Green Room

“Obama’s Big Sellout”… and what the Right can learn from it

posted at 12:46 pm on December 13, 2009 by

Matt Tabbi has a piece in the new Rolling Stone, titled “Obama’s Big Sellout,” about the number of people with ties to Bob Rubin (of the Clinton administration, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup) or other Wall Street insiders who assumed positions of responsibility in the Obama transition and White House. Taibbi is a progressive not prone to mince words:

What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history. Elected in the midst of a crushing economic crisis brought on by a decade of orgiastic deregulation and unchecked greed, Obama had a clear mandate to rein in Wall Street and remake the entire structure of the American economy. What he did instead was ship even his most marginally progressive campaign advisers off to various bureaucratic Siberias, while packing the key economic positions in his White House with the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside.

As a result, Taibbi has taken friendly fire from people like Tim Fernholz at the American Prospect:

The piece is a factual mess, a conspiracy theorist’s dream, doesn’t even indict Obama for his real failures (which I’ll discuss in a post later today) and of course invokes the cold hands of Bob Rubin like a bogeyman at every turn. This is pernicious for a lot of journalistic reasons, but politically it’s bad for progressives beacuse conspiracy theories stand in the way of good policy analysis and good activism, replacing them with apathy and fear.

Fernholz goes on to list what he sees as problems with Taibbi’s piece. Taibbi has admitted to one factual error, but argues that the “factual” issues Fernholz raises are mostly disagreements over how the facts should be interpreted. At Reuters, Felix Salmon basically agrees with Taibbi.

However, it is the areas of agreement that should interest the Right. Fernholz, for all of his criticism, writes:

Is the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street problematic? Yes. Does the Administration take it too easy on the banks? Absolutely. Are White House advisers too centrist for progressive tastes? Sure.

Taibbi, in response, writes:

[Fernholz] argues that “the problems Taibbi tries to describe aren’t some ridiculous cabal” but instead “come from group-think and structural influences.” Correct me if I’m wrong, but this was exactly the point of the article. The issue with the modern Democratic party is that its leaders all share a world view that’s extremely narrow. They genuinely believe in Rubinite ideas, have grown accustomed to an incestuous relationship with Wall Street, and they probably think that the right people were put in charge.

The notable point of this Lefty consensus is that you heard nothing like this from the Left or its establishment media outlets when the Wall Street meltdown struck during the peak of the 2008 campaign. They were not remotely interested in the financial ties between Wall Street and the Democrats, or the role of Clinton HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo in plunging Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the subprime markets, or the Fed’s role in dumbing down lending standards, to name just a few topics.

Moving forward, the Left — from Pres. Obama on down — should not be allowed to whine about having inherited a bad economy from the Bush administration. By their own admissions, Clinton-era Democrats were among the “very people who caused the crisis in the first place” — and they now hold high offices in the Obama administration.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Moving forward, the Left — from Pres. Obama on down — should not be allowed to whine about having inherited a bad economy from the Bush administration. By their own admissions, Clinton-era Democrats were among the “very people who caused the crisis in the first place” — and they now hold high offices in the Obama administration.

+Millions of Gorenheit degrees!

You buried the lede.

alexwest on December 13, 2009 at 1:04 PM

“a crushing economic crisis brought on by a decade of orgiastic deregulation and unchecked greed, Obama had a clear mandate to rein in Wall Street and remake the entire structure of the American economy.”

These people are insane.

rrpjr on December 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM

I’ve tried reading Tabbi’s articles. Incoherent doesn’t even begin to describe his style.

thebrokenrattle on December 13, 2009 at 1:57 PM

You buried the lede.

alexwest on December 13, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Arguably, though I saw it as building to a big finish. I should rethink that for the future; blog posts probably should have the big grabber right up front.

Karl on December 13, 2009 at 1:59 PM

You buried the lede.

alexwest on December 13, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Arguably, though I saw it as building to a big finish. I should rethink that for the future; blog posts probably should have the big grabber right up front.

Karl on December 13, 2009 at 1:59 PM
—–
But.. but.. Clinton was *decades* ago! Anything he did Bush already ruined!

(/lib)

The thing about liberals is, they judge the Dem past presidents on their intentions, and “everyone knows” life was better under Bubba.

Mew

acat on December 13, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Coordinated chaos and economic destruction. They get rich from it, so they go along with Obama’s sinister plan.

marklmail on December 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Obama is a socialist and he proves it more and more everyday

http://www.2012-today.blogspot.com

walker_ro on December 14, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Moving forward, the Left — from Pres. Obama on down — should not be allowed to whine about having inherited a bad economy from the Bush administration. By their own admissions, Clinton-era Democrats were among the “very people who caused the crisis in the first place” — and they now hold high offices in the Obama administration.

Mr Karl,

You should know better. They are incapable of thinking these types of things through. Sure they know Obama and his administration are (and always have been) in bed with the banks. But what you fail to recognize is that “Bush lied, people died.” and that proves that this is ENTIRELY Bush’s fault.

xax on December 14, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Great post, Karl. But the media is so in love with Obama that they will never scrutinize his actions the same way Tabbi did…except for the blame Bush part.

jediwebdude on December 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Karl, please correct the name, in the very beginning…s/b Taibbi.

Schadenfreude on December 14, 2009 at 1:31 PM

I love the way liberals assume that anything less than 100% govt control of everything, is some form of laisez faire.

MarkTheGreat on December 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Where are these people coming from? Just when you think things are going as far left as it’s possible to go without falling off the sanity charts, someone comes up with this.

jeanie on December 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Is it possible that the Left and the Right are both realizing that things need to change, at the same time?

If I was an incumbent, I’d be very worried by this development.

hawksruleva on December 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM

Is it possible that the Left and the Right are both realizing that things need to change, at the same time?
If I was an incumbent, I’d be very worried by this development.
hawksruleva on December 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM

If I was a “real” leftie like Hugo Chavez, I would be looking to backdate my newspaper birth announcement to show I was born in Hawaii. Sounds like the perfect opportunity for him to make a run for POTUS!

Mr_Magoo on December 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Top Pick

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?

“If we do nothing, more companies will back out and more people will lose coverage.”

You know, I may have cracked the case for you, guys