A Piece of Advice for the World’s Most Intractable Man
posted at 4:23 pm on December 9, 2009 by Howard Portnoy
[ Elections ]
James Taranto leads today at BOTWT with an item that includes a piece of well-intentioned advice for Barack Obama. The item opens with a summary of Obama’s most recent speech — his millionth by rough count — arguing the need for a “Proposal to Accelerate Job Growth and Lay the Foundation for Robust Economic Growth.” This is a circumlocution for stimulus, a word Obama dare not utter lest people be reminded of his oh-so-successful $787 billion stimulus, thanks to which — you will recall — the unemployment rate never rose above 8%.
But what was truly striking about Obama’s speech was not his chutzpah in asking the American people to allow this government to spend more of their money on another fool’s errand, but his reference to the “bitterness of partisanship” and “endless campaigns focused on scoring points instead of meeting our common challenges.”
By this you might assume that Obama was finally owning up to his own severe limitations as a man and a leader. But, no, it was — if you can believe it — his usual dig at this predecessor. Talk about the pot calling the kettle. . . ah, never mind.
It is in the spirit of attempting to help Obama devise a plan that will really help the economy that Taranto offers his advice and that is to
call a moratorium on so-called health-care reform. Just tell Congress to put the effort on the shelf until after next year’s election.
The threat of a government takeover of the health industry, which would impose enormous new costs on businesses, has got to be a drag on the economy. In part this reflects a fear of the unknown, a tendency to hold off on major economic decisions as long as it is unclear what if any legislation will pass.
In essence, Taranto is asking Obama to allow the American people to vote their conscience about health-care reform as it is currently defined: something that they will do in the votes they cast in the upcoming midterm elections. If they are on board with Obama’s ideas, they will reelect their Democratic Congress members. If they are not they won’t.
Will Obama heed advice that could ultimately prevent his holding the bag in the event his partisan approach fails? It’s doubtful. But it’s fun to think about — if you’re not Barack Obama.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I’m afraid that good advice alone will not be sufficient to change the behavior of a man like Obama. He “knows” that his way is the right way and he is not endowed with the luxury of self criticism as are the rest of us mortals. So, it will be “damn the torpedos, full steam ahead”, unless he is forced to change.
VBMax on December 9, 2009 at 6:08 PM
“Intractable”? But he was supposed to be the phenom politician of all time: supple, wise, visionary, post-partisan. You mean, we were lied to? Our sweet prince is really an insecure, petty, intractable Chicago hack? Goodness.
rrpjr on December 9, 2009 at 7:26 PM
Why exactly would it be a bad idea to allow American’s to have a direct vote on changes to the government such as this? The legislature could put a package together and on the first Tuesday of each November Americans could vote it up or down. The legislation could have a specified minimum time before vote, such as 4 months so Americans could get well acquainted with what the bill would mean.
astonerii on December 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM
This is a reference to only one thing: HIM. There is HIM and his acolytes, the partisans, and then everyone else. If you are not an acolyte, you are bitter. OUR common challenges are a reference to the commonality of HIM and the acolytic partisans, not THEM and everyone else. It must be challenging to figure out how to accomodate every union chief with pork in each piece of legislation written. To say nothing of each lib politico. It must be challenging to try to move an entire free market economy into socialism in such a few short months. And challenging to read all that script from TOTUS all day, every day. And to face all these challenges without a tinge of bitterness. How godlike.
Of course the rest of us, the non-acolytic partisans, don’t face any challenges, but remain bitter nevertheless. We’re just so non-appreciative. Shame on us.
Robert17 on December 9, 2009 at 9:32 PM
Obama holding the bag? Not likely, as he learned at the feet of the Daley machine, which invented the bagman (or at least perfected it).
GnuBreed on December 10, 2009 at 6:07 PM