Game Over, Huck…Game Over…
posted at 9:18 am on December 3, 2009 by Slublog

One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” But the other rebuked him, saying, “Do you not fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we indeed justly, for we are receiving the due reward of our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”
– Luke 23:39-43
These verses are often cited to show the depth of Jesus’ mercy. What’s interesting is that they also show His respect for justice. Jesus did not offer to remove this man from his punishment – He only said He would see the criminal in Paradise, after the man had paid the ultimate price for his crime.
When I consider that Mike Huckabee’s tendency as governor was to show mercy to certain criminals in Arkansas, I think of the two criminals crucified with Jesus. Although one of them came to repentance, he was not given a reprieve from his secular punishment. He died at the hands of the state for his crime, and both he and Jesus accepted that as fitting judgment at the hands of men.
While governor of Arkansas, Huckabee granted 1,023 commutations and pardons in 10 years, twice as many as his three predecessors combined. Arkansas prosecutors have said that if a pastor was involved, Huckabee was likely to grant clemency. What bothers me about Huckabee’s record is that there is a difference between spiritual redemption and secular justice. People may be forgiven by God for their sins, but that doesn’t mean society should overlook their crimes. Huckabee’s seeming inability to differentiate between the two is troubling.
Huckabee’s overuse of his clemency power displayed a fundamental disrespect for those who worked to bring criminals to justice and to the families affected by the criminals he pardoned with such frequency. Prosecutors in that state asked Huckabee time and time again to take more care in his use of the pardon/commutation power and he did not, and even threatened to make it harder for them to make plea agreements with defendants. His actions and his response to criticism suggest that he put his own value system above his responsibilities as governor to use his executive power with discretion and take the opinions of those in the judicial system under appropriate consideration
Unfortunately, when he was questioned, Huckabee did not show respect for those tasked with judging criminals. The mocking tone he allowed his staff to communicate to a fellow public servant displays contempt for those who questioned his judgment, which is rather unbecoming of a man who fashioned himself a ‘Christian Leader’ during last year’s presidential campaign. Huckabee’s actions as governor, and especially the ‘LOL letter,’ display more hubris than humility. Ultimately, a leader is responsible for the actions of his or her subordinates. That Huckabee allowed such a letter to be sent doesn’t speak well of his political character.
Huckabee’s clemency record on its own would have been enough to grievously wound his political career. His reaction to those who have criticized it, both now and in the past, display a temperament and lack of judgment that have not mixed well with political power in the past, and for that reason Huckabee should be denied access to it in the future.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Coming off as a cross between Jim Bakker and Richard Nixon is not the path to political success in 2012.
And Huck’s die-hard supporters need to ask themselves — suppose this was not Mike Huckabee, but an Ed Rendell in Pennsylvania, a Bill Richardson in New Mexico or a Jon Corzine in New Jersey who had issued this many pardons and then had an aide reply to prosecutors the way Huckabee’s assistant did in the letter revealed on Tuesday. What would the reaction of Republicans in general and conservatives in particular be? To say Clemmons had been sentenced to an excessive term in the first place and besides, he didn’t kill the cops on that release, but on the one by the Washington State judge after the rape charge? Not likely.
jon1979 on December 3, 2009 at 9:37 AM
I think I disagree with the Jesus/clemency for Dismas thing. Jesus didn’t enact the punishment, so Jesus didn’t have the “power” to grant him clemency (obviously, he had the power to, but for it to really be mercy, wouldn’t he have to have been the one to sentence him?). Otherwise, isn’t it more “putting him out of his misery”? If I enter a room and someone is being tortured, if I shoot that person, am I “showing mercy”? I would probably argue that I wasn’t. However, if the torturer stopped, and freed the man, that’s closer.
Huckabee (representing the State of Arkansas) was the one who sentenced these criminals and carried out their sentence. Therefore, he would have the ability to show mercy and grant clemency.
It’s still awful if the LOL Letter is true and correct. And yes, game over. I can’t say that I’m particularly upset though.
Abby Adams on December 3, 2009 at 9:48 AM
After rereading my comment I’m not positive I make sense.
Abby Adams on December 3, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Abby, I can see what you were driving at, although I disagree with your conclusion and happen to like Slublog’s analogy. Huck, although representing the state which convicted the criminals, was commuting them and showing mercy, not as the state, but as a minister and a man of God. They had found redemption through Religion, and so he made their secular punishment void. Jesus forgave the repentant criminal in they eyes of God but still expected him to serve his secular punishment.
drocity on December 3, 2009 at 10:17 AM
They will never go there. Huckabee is their idol to worship and is infallible, all knowing, and without sin.
hanzblinx on December 3, 2009 at 10:48 AM
What do a Baptist Minister, Morman, Indian, RINO, and Moose-muncher have in common?
They all can never be President. Unless they can learn to speak Spanish el-pronto.
Punditpawn on December 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM
Good analysis, Slu.
jon1979 – insightful comment, as always.
Track-A-'Crat on December 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM
That was really, really dumb.
Brian1972 on December 3, 2009 at 2:52 PM
Facts don’t matter. Truth doesn’t matter. Never saw anything like it — except from leftists.
Feedie on December 4, 2009 at 12:26 AM
The only good to come from this is that many Huckabee fans who were forcing him on the rest of us in the party have started to think a little about how good a presidential candidate he would truly be.
I was getting scared for a while there, because every other word out of some moderates was “Huckabee is the only guy who can win in 2012.” which sounds WAY too much to me like the much lauded “McCain is the only guy who can win against Obama” mantra which led us straight off the cliff in 2008.
This man is a RINO. He may have his good points, but he has a whole lot of bad ones as well. The man is NOT a hard-core conservative.
We’ve got to stop being afraid of being labeled conservative. And we certainly have to make sure our candidates are no longer afraid to be conservative either. Huckabee is NOT the man we need to lead us in 2012. Period. And this horrific bungling of the clemency process is another example of why not.
Mad Mad Monica on December 4, 2009 at 2:53 PM