OAD: Obama Adulation Disorder

posted at 10:15 am on November 24, 2009 by
[ Media ]   

Whenever writers on the left express their disenchantment with the president, they do it gently. First they don their kid gloves, the same ones they used to caress BO with words of praise and admiration during the campaign. Then they write. (“Mr. President, Sir, Your Most Eminent of Holinesses, if I might be so bold as to say. . .”) It’s an interesting psychological disorder — one that ought to be as rich a source of dissertation topics for future PhD candidates as the temperament of Obama himself.

Take Richard Cohen’s lastest round of soul-searching in a column interestingly titled “Missing Barack Obama.” Cohen’s main argument is that Obama’s decisions so far in his young presidency lack the moral clarity Cohen claims to have seen in Obama during the campaign. (There is something obscene about mentioning Obama and morality in the same sentence; you expect mirrors around you to start cracking.)

But Cohen is unable to register even the most reserved, the most qualified of grievances without effusively celebrating Obama, the man and the president. In the very first sentence of the article, for example, Cohen tells us that in his circle he is “known as the guy who always had some reservations about Barack Obama.” Ouch, Richard, that’s pretty brutal. You sure you’re allowed to write that in a family publication? Not to worry, though, because by sentence 2, he has begun his atonement for lashing out so grievously at his beloved president by reminding anyone who will listen that he voted for Obama “with both glee and enthusiasm.”

He moves on to Obama’s so-called “race speech” in Philadelphia. (Remeber that?) Cohen apparently had a moment of moral clarity himself when Obama unburdened himself on the American public, essentially blaming the country for his own decision to sit in the pews of a black nationalist church for 20 years, listening to some lunatic spew anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-you-name-it venom week after week. Cohen didn’t like the speech at first — even though, he hastens to tell us, he saw both style and dignity in Obama’s sniveling. (In fact, he has since reread the speech and now understands that it belongs in the National Archives, next to the Declaration of Independence.)

In fairness to Cohen, he does go on to critique several of Obama’s recent actions and decisions, such as his bowing to the Japanese emperor, his snubbing the Dalai Lama, and —worst of all — his agreeing to let his attorney general try the mastermind of 9/11 in a criminal court. But this is today’s column. Wait a day. Cohen is sure to see the error of his ways and prostrate himself in front of the White House, hoping to receive Obama’s forgiveness.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Yeah, I prefer to be a little more blunt. Like, for example, why is Obama like Barney Frank’s sex life? They’re both f’in a-holes.

Daggett on November 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM

Obama is a perfectly intelligent man in the wrong job. His ego will never permit him to acknowledge that even to himself. It looks as if his supporters are permanently unable to do so either.

jeanie on November 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM

…and yet if you read the comments on the WaPo website, Cohen still gets slammed by Obama’s supporters, who are mad about Richard’s support of the WOT after 9/11. They already think he’s a closet neocon, and nothing obsequious he writes about Obama now is going to get them back on his side.

The funny thing here is in order to try and maintain his viablity among other liberals, as well as remaining on the New York-D.C. cocktail party invitation lists, Cohen tries to do some amazing mental gymnastics here. He slammed the Wright speech in March of 2008, but in order to knock Obama for his recent actions, he now tries to go back and say the Wright speech was both good and the real Obama, espousing the attitudes Barack needs to return to today.

What he either doesn’t grasp — or doesn’t want to say lest those party invites stop coming — is that all the Wright speech showed was that Obama was good at reading a teleprompter and had a speechwriter deft in pushing the right buttons for people inclined to want to believe Barack didn’t harbor the same thoughts as his minister, and that the recent actions and not the speech are a truer indication of what the president actually thinks.

jon1979 on November 24, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Daggett on November 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM

Dude.

Abby Adams on November 24, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Yeah, I prefer to be a little more blunt. Like, for example, why is Obama like Barney Frank’s sex life? They’re both f’in a-holes.

Daggett on November 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM

+ 10

patriette on November 24, 2009 at 5:49 PM

That Richard Cohen! He’s such a brave, independent thinker!

tsj017 on November 24, 2009 at 9:31 PM

Awww… are da widdle Bawack lovas disenchanted wif dere tin God? Awwwww.. I feel so sowwy for dem! Bah.

Unruly children. That’s all they are. With no business being in the powerful positions they’ve been given by the ignorant of this country. Blegh. More nausea inducing words right before Turkey Day. How dare they.

Mad Mad Monica on November 25, 2009 at 12:45 PM