The Third Party Moment
posted at 1:06 am on November 23, 2009 by Doctor Zero
Two spectacular book-signing tours by prominent conservative figures are currently in progress: Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. They share many of the same ideas about the decay of the American system, and how to reverse it, but one striking difference is their approach to the Republican Party. Palin wants to revive the party, while Beck has already taken a seat on its death panel. In Florida on Sunday, he gave a speech calling for an end to the two-party system, and has often spoken of the futility of counting on the Republican Party for any meaningful assistance in rescuing America from socialism.
The confusion and weariness of the Republicans doesn’t automatically mean the third-party moment has arrived. It’s possible to be fed up with the GOP, but still opposed to investing serious energy in the formation of an alternative party. I don’t disagree with most of Beck’s criticisms of the Republicans, but I favor Palin’s approach to reforming them, instead of abandoning them. For me, the third-party moment will be one of absolute despair, aimed more at salvaging the remains of a broken country than averting disaster. It will be more about resurrection than reformation.
The current environment is one of peril, not despair. The Republicans have improved their game considerably since the dark days of 2006, partially due to the dead wood cleaned out in a couple of bad election cycles. They’ve maintained a respectable amount of discipline in the House and Senate votes against the Democratic health-care takeover. People like John Boehner and Jim DeMint have displayed intelligence, leadership, and parliamentary skill. When even Lindsay Graham can tap into the ring and put Obama’s Attorney General on the mat with the Soft On Terrorism Suplex, it’s tough to declare the party completely devoid of energy and courage.
The most ardent critics of the GOP say that its worst elements outweigh its best – the RINOs and disguised Democrats in the lower decks will always sink the ship, no matter who takes the helm. When the Republicans give in to their worst instincts, a little tough love is called for, as we saw in the recent New York District 23 race. Conservative insurgent Doug Hoffman didn’t lose because he leaned too far to the right. He lost largely because of backstabbing from masked Democrat Deedee Scozzafava, a lack of campaign funding and organization, and some perceived weakness on local issues… all things a faithful Republican Party could have helped him with, if they weren’t busy weaving a million dollars of Scozzafava campaign money into a noose for themselves.
Hoffman wasn’t trying to destroy the GOP. He wanted to run as its candidate, and he lose because the party failed him. If Hoffman runs again, with the money and political assistance of the Republican Party behind him in 2010, he’ll win. If the party cruises ACORN ballot-stuffing parties, looking for another union organizer’s wife to put on the ticket, they’ll lose. We’ll soon find out if they learned their lesson.
Talk of building a new party to escape the RINOs is akin to talk about secession to escape from disastrous liberal policies: how do you keep the same people from migrating into your new party or nation-state, and starting the whole miserable process again? How does a third party of conservative purity defeat both the Democrats, and the enraged rump of an embittered Republican Party bent on revenge? If you think the media gives disproportionate attention to liberal Republicans now, just wait until it can use them as clubs to beat the Third Party… a mission those liberal Republicans will gladly volunteer for. As the NY-23 race showed, it’s better to defeat the Republican left from within the party, rather than give the Democrats ringside seats at a Conservatives vs. Republicans smackdown.
I’ve always wondered how a conservative movement that essentially concedes defeat against liberal Republicans, and withdraws from the party, could expect to defeat the much larger and more powerful Democrat Party. If we can’t handle Olympia Snowe swooning before “the call of history,” I don’t like our chances against the guy on the other end of the line.
Glenn Beck’s call for dissolving the two-party system is unlikely to make any headway, because one of those two parties has no intention of dissolving. The Democrat coalition has its fault lines and bitter rivalries, but they are united in defending the growth of the State. The members of that coalition are willing to set aside their differences to support increasing the size of government as an inherently desirable goal, then fight among themselves for influence within the immense government they have created. The challenge for conservatives is to reach the independents and moderates who orbit the fringe of the Democrat coalition, and show them why their faith in Big Government is misplaced. At the same time, they must provide a coherent philosophy that can unite those who already mistrust Big Government. A Third Party wrapped up in a messy divorce from the GOP would not be in a stronger position to do either of those things.
A political party is a mixture of money, tradition, and political machinery. The two major American parties have been brewing for a long time, accumulating assets that would not be easily replaced or duplicated. The Republican Party, for all its flaws, is a valuable instrument for conservatism. Changing the attitude of the people who control the party will be a less formidable task than persuading the rest of the nation without it. Glenn Beck says that his goal is to reform government by changing the hearts and minds of the people who vote it into existence. If he can accomplish even a fraction of that goal, he won’t have to worry about creating an alternative to the Republican Party.
Meanwhile, middle-class voters are tired of being dismissed as mindlessly angry white people by sneering journalists. They want someone who understands their concerns to express them with eloquence and passion, giving them a voice that would never be willingly provided by a partisan media culture. That’s why they like Sarah Palin so much. Her remarkable journey took her completely outside a party apparatus that was already polishing its alibis and planning how to dispose of her remains, even as it demanded the impossible from her last year. More of the GOP establishment should try “going rogue,” and finding the party’s future in the vast crowds waiting to get Palin and Beck to sign their books. The Republican Party is America’s home team, in the contest to re-define its essence. By the time we could replace them with another team, we’d be playing an entirely different game.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I’m on the reform from within bandwagon too. We don’t want to sell out, but there’s far too much at stake right now for playing games. I understand the libertarian principles Beck is embracing, but I just don’t think they’re realistic, not right now. We need new blood and new energy to take back our party and strengthen America.
killtruck on November 23, 2009 at 1:25 AM
I have a question for all those on the “let’s start a third party” route.
My understanding is that, according to these folks, the GOP is just too tainted to stand up against statism…that it has been infiltrated by the self-serving, the leftists and the principle-less wimps and morons to the point that it’s “just as bad as the other party”.
Okay. So let’s say we go all in and create this perfect third party…which will, if history is our guide, serve more as a spoiler than a real contender. But let’s set that aside and pretend that there’s SUCH a momentum that a third party wipes the floor clean and the GOP gets the kind of votes the third party normally would.
Here’s my question.
What do we do when that third party becomes corrupted by the same leftist, wimpy, self-serving, principle-less morons? Because it would only be a matter of time. Whenever there’s an effective fight against statism, it will inevitably become a target to be infiltrated and corrupted by the worthless, self-serving cancerous elements as the GOP is.
Do we then create a new third party and go through it all over again?
OR DO WE TAKE OUR STAND AND TAKE OUR PARTY BACK IN THE NAME OF CONSERVATISM AND IN THE PRINCIPLES WE BELIEVE IN?
powerpro on November 23, 2009 at 3:57 AM
The concept of a start-up third party is eerily similar to Obama/Nancy/HarryCare. There are problems that need to be addressed in both healthcare in America as well as within the political establishment of both parties. A complete do-over isn’t the answer for either.
One of the best hopes for the conservatives that feel disenfranchised by their elected or electable representatives may seem to be the implosion of the Democratic party, similar to that of the Republicans. Only the implosion will not come from zombie-like pre-socialists as in the Republican Party. It will continue to come in the form of ridiculous leadership. “Obamateurism of the Day” ain’t just a blog entry. It could easily be matched with a Rangelism, Pelosism, and Riedism. It is difficult for the Democrats to continue down this path without completely ceding the Independent voters and most likely having a few conservative of the party faithful just stay home on V-day. The Republicans have managed not to look as ridiculous on a daily basis, regardless of the media portrayals. Should there ever be a “Ridiculous Poll” the Dems should win hands down.
As has been said many times the Republicans can’t just be Socialist Lite. Conservatives conserve. Webster can help with the definition here:
1 : to keep in a safe or sound state ; especially : to avoid wasteful or destructive use of
2 : to preserve with sugar
3 : to maintain (a quantity) constant during a process of chemical, physical, or evolutionary change
There is no room for the Republicans to try to utilize definition #2; to be sugary sweet in dolling out smiles and pork. Otherwise, the average working American pretty much is living by definitions 1 and 3. There is no other choice. With the Socialists seemed bent on the complete opposite of the definitions above, excepting #2, there will be a desire ala Glen Beck’s proposal for a mulligan on political parties. And a similar net effect as in 1992. It feels creepy longing for the Clinton days again but Obamaramadama has many conservatives doing just that. Perspective is like that.
No, a complete do-over isn’t necessary. With all the wailing about the Cash for Clunkers program perhaps a lesson or two could be learned from it by the Republicans, Conservatives, Independents, and Glen Beck. For a few bucks and a little TLC the Clunkers could still be on the road. The billions poured into getting rid of them and starting fresh will have the downside of a 20% repossession rate (predicted). And the program only drew a small fraction of all drivers. A new political party would be just as expensive, the default rate would be great if the ride doesn’t get them to the point B they signed on for, and that new car smell doesn’t last forever.
Robert17 on November 23, 2009 at 7:52 AM
Excellent as always. Much of the chatter about Palin starting an independent run makes me laugh.
But then, I’ve read her book. Not just the cover or the Frank Rich review.
cs89 on November 23, 2009 at 8:54 AM
Sarah is a smart politician, Glenn not so much. A lot of the gop is still watching to see which way the winds blowing instead of standing up for conservative principles. When will they ever learn. Sarah will almost have to run in 2012 because she’s putting herself out there and dangling that prospect in front of everyone. Sometime you just have to go all in with your chips.
Kissmygrits on November 23, 2009 at 9:25 AM
Third parties don’t seem to work. Conservatives need to take the leash and yank on the choker and a finger on the shock collar button and let the pieces fall where they may. Its called standing up for principles.
Itchee Dryback on November 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM
The libertarian party is just as corrupt and incompetent as the major parties, more so even.
The plan should be for conservatives to bum-rush the republican party and shift it to the right, not a useless 3rd party that will guarantee democrat party domination.
Rebar on November 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM
If I squint a little, I can see Palin and Beck doing a good-cop/bad-cop routine here.
Palin (and Rush, for that matter) saying “Work within the party, call out the RINOS, keep the pressure on”, with Beck providing the “Or else”.
I don’t see a third party succeeding, but we are due for some reshuffling – moreso in the Dem alliance than on the Repub side – and it’ll be interesting to see how the political deck gets re-shuffled.
Mew
acat on November 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Sarah is a smart politician, Glenn not so much. A lot of the gop is still watching to see which way the winds blowing instead of standing up for conservative principles. When will they ever learn. Sarah will almost have to run in 2012 because she’s putting herself out there and dangling that prospect in front of everyone. Sometime you just have to go all in with your chips.
Kissmygrits on November 23, 2009 at 9:25 AM
——
I would hesitate to say Beck isn’t a smart pol – I think he’s a different *kind* of smart pol, proceeding from a different set of underlying assumptions, perhaps, or maybe it’s just a difference of what tools they have handy. Sarah has a hammer, Beck has a megaphone. They’re doing different jobs, but headed in the same general strong-USA, conservative-USA direction.
Beck is soaking up sheep who would otherwise gravitate toward Luap Nor and other fringe-right groups, Sarah is soaking up GOP conservatives who may otherwise sit home and watch as the RINOs give it all away.
Mew
acat on November 23, 2009 at 1:08 PM
I could easily start my response with: “Well ……. I’ll tell ya what we should do.” But I can’t. I’m so torn right now that all I seem to be able to manage is an adjunct or critique of other’s ideas.
Your question is nothing but valid …… why go through the birthing process agony only to find that we’ve spawned a twin. But I could justifiably ask as well – why go through the intervention process agony only to experience the reoccurring backslide.
I think, for the moment anyway, that the problem lies not with the elected – but with the electorate.
At the point that GW nearly realized his amnesty agenda (was it in 06), my wife and I decided that the GOP had sold its soul to the very monster that it now sanctimoniously ridicules the statists for serving. Even back then, I could have foretold a stiffening of the GOP spine in reaction to the liberal successes that were inevitable given the abject failure of the McCain selection and campaign.
Waiting for the GOP to figure out which way the wind blows before it moves defines the very heart of the problem. We aren’t talking principles here but rather, expediencies.
As a “movement”, grassroots conservatives are galvanizing. This must continue and it must remain. The present failure is on us ……. not those whom we sent unsupervised to Washington as they only did (do) what we allow them.
oldfiveanddimer on November 23, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Great post, as always, Doc. But… you seemed a little hesitant to teabag Beck to the level in which he deserves.
As wacky as Beck is, he has done America a great service by beating certain issues into the gorund until the rest of the media was forced to acknowledge their existence.
By encouraging the “end of the two-party system” he is doing Conservatives a great deal of harm. No doubt, he will succeed in getting many of his loyal fans to vote 4 the fourth party candidate (Ron Paul has a deathgrip on the third). But he will not sway one leftist to do the same.
The McCain loss was not as wide-margined as it could have been. But, we can gurantee double-digit deafeats in the future future if Conservatives are off voting for 1 of 3 candidates as the left loyally elects the darling of the DNC.
If anything, Beck should be encouraging the right to make sure the GOP is sending the proper candidates to the race, while stressing that a principled vote for a third part candidate is the one-stone-throw that guarantees pragmatism and Conservatism die together.
JCred on November 23, 2009 at 2:56 PM
I agree with you Doc. I like Glenn Beck and I was hoping he would be more of a glue that would rally us conservatives together, but separating the base further will bring more harm in the long run than good. Cohesiveness is what we need, together we can do it, singularly we can’t vote out anyone. I hate to see Glenn take that direction.
SWChance on November 23, 2009 at 5:29 PM
This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.
Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.
Allahpundit on November 23, 2009 at 8:09 PM