Green Room

You’re missing the point

posted at 6:14 pm on November 12, 2009 by

I know counterfactuals and math are hard to fit on a bumper sticker. But one would hope that in an 800-plus word essay on economics (even if in Politico), some economic content could be included.

Thus Menzie Chinn concludes a defense of the “jobs saved or created” story complete with regression analysis (and not just ANY regression, mind you, but one with “error correcting mechanisms”. Prof. Chinn is right that the proper measure is some ceteris paribus calculation. He quotes Greg Mankiw’s analysis during the Bush Administration as some kind of shield. But Mankiw says “The job market is not what we would like it to be right now, but it would have been worse without the Administration’s actions.” Were those the words to come from Christina Romer’s or Jared Bernstein’s mouth, I’d have no debate. But I think it is more than semantics to go from “Simulations of a conventional macroeconomic model show that, without the tax cuts, the level of real GDP” would be x% lower and unemployment y% higher, than to say you’ve created or saved 640,329 jobs.

Official data here, where it helpfully adds “as reported by recipients”, perhaps to shift the guilt.

The problem is the administration has oversold its control of the economy, and used statements of certainty with numbers — six significant digits on that page, why? what is the basis of that level of precision if not hubris? — where one reasonably should have reached for uncertainty. Bernstein, who originated the report that said with stimulus the unemployment rate would not be 8% with the stimulus bill, now says that without the stimulus the unemployment rate would be “at least 11 percent and going higher”. Hey, we all miss a forecast now and then, but if you miss one by 3% by your own admission, don’t you have to be a little more modest about your predictions going forward?

Prof. Chinn’s estimate includes a guess that Q4 output rises at the same rate as Q3. That’s without cash-for-clunkers, and with data showing federal tax receipts 18% below year-ago levels. GDP growth of 3.5% for Q4 is not what the WSJ panel expects — they forecast 2.1% growth for Q4 and nearer 3% for 2010.

Their average for payroll employment is a gain of about 565,000 jobs between now and November 2010. The low-end estimate of the original package estimated by the CBO and the Obama economic team was for a gain of 2.1 million jobs from 2009 to 2010. You can say all you wish that you’ve “created or saved” 1.2 million jobs next year, but you’re missing the point.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Everything good that happens is thanks to Obama, so any time someone is hired to mow someone’s yard or fix their leaky faucet, those are jobs saved by Obama.

Everything bad that happens is Bush’s fault– even the things that didn’t spring up until well after he left office or that are a direct result of the current administration’s policies.

Sounds like typical liberalogic to me.

RachDubya on November 12, 2009 at 7:11 PM

How’s that hope ‘n change working out for the good ole USA about now?

Cinday Blackburn on November 12, 2009 at 7:42 PM

Lets go right to the source. . . .

Fewer people drawing a paycheck, more people unemployed, more people giving up, and more people no longer eligible for unemployment compensation.

Skandia Recluse on November 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM

Yeah, former economics grad student here, calling some major BS on this one.

1) Regression analysis can be a powerful tool, but it can be awfully prone to abuse. You can fit a line through just about any data.

2) Most economic analysis is of the “comparative static” variety. I.e., run the analysis with assumption A, then substitute assumption B, and see what the difference is. Dynamic models take into account how the change from A to B would alter the model itself. Dynamic analyses are much harder to do, and depend on a lot of assumptions which make them ripe for criticism.

3) Any analysis is only as good as the data that’s being analyzed. If people are lying about where the stimulus funds are going, then the analysis is going to be worthless.

Farmer_Joe on November 13, 2009 at 9:18 AM

I bought lunch and gas today, spent about $100 … who knows, I probably saved or created 3,500 jobs.

Dukehoopsfan on November 13, 2009 at 4:47 PM

It’s much simpler than anyone dares discuss. Nobody asked me.

Any ECON-101er can explain the efficiency of a business closing in redistributing the workforce and, in turn, redistributing wealth in a very capitalistic manner. The volume of a commodity is relatively constant at a given price, the workforce required for that commodity at that price/volume will respond in kind. For example, AIG disappearing would not change the volume of the commodity, but would redistribute the workforce involved with the commodity accordingly. Some AIG people will rehire at the hiring entity and some at the hiring entity will lose their jobs and many will suffer from changes in their income while others will benefit. Bailing out floundering business in the spirit of saving jobs is a true waste of money and a perfect model to provoke acceptance of socialism. The floundering business can now only pay substandard wages resulting in increasing numbers of lower working class individuals that cannot afford the commodity causing the GNP to shrink. Recursive destruction.

ericdijon on November 14, 2009 at 9:01 AM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM


Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?