<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the House GOP enabling PelosiCare?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/</link>
	<description>HotAir.com&#039;s Greenroom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 05:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia&#8217;s First Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Greenroom » Forum Archive » is the House Gop Enabling Pelosicare?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-41189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia&#8217;s First Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Greenroom » Forum Archive » is the House Gop Enabling Pelosicare?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-41189</guid>
		<description>[...] told reporters that regardless of the outcome of the vote on his amendment, which would severely restrict coverage of reproductive health issues, the House health care bill is headed for passage. He is whipping support for the amendment &#8230;Read More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] told reporters that regardless of the outcome of the vote on his amendment, which would severely restrict coverage of reproductive health issues, the House health care bill is headed for passage. He is whipping support for the amendment &#8230;Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39494</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;House Democrat:  Hey, No Worries, We&#039;ll Be Stripping the Stupak Amendment Out of the Bill Shortly Enough...&lt;/strong&gt;

Of course, of course. Which is why I find it so preposterous that Republicans couldn&#039;t manage the tactical savvy to vote &quot;present&quot; on the Stupak Amendment in the first place. Sometimes I get the feeling that savvy is looked down......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>House Democrat:  Hey, No Worries, We&#8217;ll Be Stripping the Stupak Amendment Out of the Bill Shortly Enough&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Of course, of course. Which is why I find it so preposterous that Republicans couldn&#8217;t manage the tactical savvy to vote &#8220;present&#8221; on the Stupak Amendment in the first place. Sometimes I get the feeling that savvy is looked down&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SagebrushPuppet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39328</link>
		<dc:creator>SagebrushPuppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39328</guid>
		<description>Gee, the Republicans couldn&#039;t possibly be secretly in favor of socialized medicine, could they?

Hmmm, wonder which way the wind is blowing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, the Republicans couldn&#8217;t possibly be secretly in favor of socialized medicine, could they?</p>
<p>Hmmm, wonder which way the wind is blowing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Liveblogging: The new Imperial Congress votes on Pelosicare; Update: Female Democrats turn House resolution process into circus; GOP responds; Obama rallies weakened Dems; will Stupak amendment stick?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39324</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Liveblogging: The new Imperial Congress votes on Pelosicare; Update: Female Democrats turn House resolution process into circus; GOP responds; Obama rallies weakened Dems; will Stupak amendment stick?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39324</guid>
		<description>[...] McClintock, R-CA: Healthcare mandates &#8220;brazenly unconstitutional&#8221; Green Room&#187; Is the House GOP enabling PelosiCare? Ed Driscoll&#187; &#8220;Shooting Raises Fears for Sanity of Entire Western World&#8221; Stop The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McClintock, R-CA: Healthcare mandates &#8220;brazenly unconstitutional&#8221; Green Room&raquo; Is the House GOP enabling PelosiCare? Ed Driscoll&raquo; &#8220;Shooting Raises Fears for Sanity of Entire Western World&#8221; Stop The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill30097</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39323</link>
		<dc:creator>bill30097</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39323</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The GOP needs to stick to principle and vote YES on the Pro-Life amendment.

Puts us in a good position … the majority of Americans are Pro-Life. On the final bill – we vote no. Most Americans are against PelosiCare.

Let the Democrats bury their heads in the sand. They are going to have very sore butts next November.

HondaV65 on November 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is stupidity. I called Cong Linder&#039;s office (R-GA)and told the office flunky that I considered a vote for the STupak amendment a vote for the PelosiCare bill and if he voted for either he would lose my support. Call yours now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The GOP needs to stick to principle and vote YES on the Pro-Life amendment.</p>
<p>Puts us in a good position … the majority of Americans are Pro-Life. On the final bill – we vote no. Most Americans are against PelosiCare.</p>
<p>Let the Democrats bury their heads in the sand. They are going to have very sore butts next November.</p>
<p>HondaV65 on November 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is stupidity. I called Cong Linder&#8217;s office (R-GA)and told the office flunky that I considered a vote for the STupak amendment a vote for the PelosiCare bill and if he voted for either he would lose my support. Call yours now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r keller</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39318</link>
		<dc:creator>r keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39318</guid>
		<description>I agree with &quot;stupendous train wreck&quot;...but for the country, not the Dems

I agree that some R&#039;s get it:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODhjNjAzZTZiNDdhNzFhYjZkYjE0OWM2ZGU2NmRhMGU=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

But I don&#039;t see the R&#039;s giving lots of detail.  I understand that they are hunkered down under enemy fire now.

Everyone has always known that Dems want single payer.  Everybody.

Have the R&#039;s shown any desire to get down and dirty with healthcare groups...e.g. nurses, doctors, state regulators, and yes, community groups to try to work out something PROACTIVELY?????

No, it is easier to vote for your own narrow interests.  Meanwhile the Left cobbles together a grand PLAN that is triggered at the first opportunity

The Left is cunning and works hard to do what it does.  It has huge resources with which to do it.

But I&#039;d like to think that conservatives/R&#039;s have more that that, they have the power of ideas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with &#8220;stupendous train wreck&#8221;&#8230;but for the country, not the Dems</p>
<p>I agree that some R&#8217;s get it:</p>
<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODhjNjAzZTZiNDdhNzFhYjZkYjE0OWM2ZGU2NmRhMGU=" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t see the R&#8217;s giving lots of detail.  I understand that they are hunkered down under enemy fire now.</p>
<p>Everyone has always known that Dems want single payer.  Everybody.</p>
<p>Have the R&#8217;s shown any desire to get down and dirty with healthcare groups&#8230;e.g. nurses, doctors, state regulators, and yes, community groups to try to work out something PROACTIVELY?????</p>
<p>No, it is easier to vote for your own narrow interests.  Meanwhile the Left cobbles together a grand PLAN that is triggered at the first opportunity</p>
<p>The Left is cunning and works hard to do what it does.  It has huge resources with which to do it.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;d like to think that conservatives/R&#8217;s have more that that, they have the power of ideas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39316</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39316</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;r keller on November 7, 2009 at 5:50 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They haven&#039;t failed - they seem to be playing this very well in fact.  The GOP needs to go on record continuously for supporting LIFE - and so voting &quot;yes&quot; on Stupac is a good thing if for no other reason.

But ... PelosiCare is not the final bill.  If it fails tonight - then that&#039;s it - basically the health care push is over.  The Dems would have egg on their faces for a little while - but they&#039;d possibly be able to escape the bloodbath we&#039;re preparing for them at the polls next year.

Let PelosiCare pass.  Let the BlueDogs support it.  Tomorrow - people WILL read the 2,000 page bill and we can pick apart every Democrat who voted for it.  This all makes for a stupendous train wreck for Democrats later on down the line.

Everything is progressing nicely ... don&#039;t sweat it.  The GOP for once has their finger on the pulse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>r keller on November 7, 2009 at 5:50 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>They haven&#8217;t failed &#8211; they seem to be playing this very well in fact.  The GOP needs to go on record continuously for supporting LIFE &#8211; and so voting &#8220;yes&#8221; on Stupac is a good thing if for no other reason.</p>
<p>But &#8230; PelosiCare is not the final bill.  If it fails tonight &#8211; then that&#8217;s it &#8211; basically the health care push is over.  The Dems would have egg on their faces for a little while &#8211; but they&#8217;d possibly be able to escape the bloodbath we&#8217;re preparing for them at the polls next year.</p>
<p>Let PelosiCare pass.  Let the BlueDogs support it.  Tomorrow &#8211; people WILL read the 2,000 page bill and we can pick apart every Democrat who voted for it.  This all makes for a stupendous train wreck for Democrats later on down the line.</p>
<p>Everything is progressing nicely &#8230; don&#8217;t sweat it.  The GOP for once has their finger on the pulse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r keller</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39315</link>
		<dc:creator>r keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39315</guid>
		<description>P.S., yes, I&#039;m bitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S., yes, I&#8217;m bitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39314</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39314</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like Sophie&#039;s Choice. There&#039;s no good answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like Sophie&#8217;s Choice. There&#8217;s no good answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r keller</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39313</link>
		<dc:creator>r keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39313</guid>
		<description>unfortunately I&#039;ve had the thought that R&#039;s wouldn&#039;t mind if this passed.

1. Medicare/Medicaid are unsustainable.  Eventually there will have to be a roll back in services.  Someone is going to have to do it, either now or in the future.

2. Republicans have been weak on the whole subject.  Aside from a few talking points (tort reform, insurance across state lines) they have never siezed the initiative (yes, I know they are terribly out gunned now, but what about under Bush?)

3. There are many creative ideas which fall short of nationalizing healthcare which would be extremely helpful. R&#039;s do not bring these up, and generally do not show that they have any answers.  Or, to put it another way, the person with a Plan will beat a person without a Plan.

So, the R&#039;s have failed...yes, maybe they&#039;ll be able to block in the Senate.  Maybe they&#039;ll be able to have a tactical victory.

But they do not have a strategic view of overcoming a 100 year old idea.

If you&#039;re not very bright and don&#039;t have a strategic view, then you are doomed to let someone else do the work.

But then again, R&#039;s have had a history of being in the minority...and it ain&#039;t so bad, you don&#039;t have to take responsibility for what happens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately I&#8217;ve had the thought that R&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t mind if this passed.</p>
<p>1. Medicare/Medicaid are unsustainable.  Eventually there will have to be a roll back in services.  Someone is going to have to do it, either now or in the future.</p>
<p>2. Republicans have been weak on the whole subject.  Aside from a few talking points (tort reform, insurance across state lines) they have never siezed the initiative (yes, I know they are terribly out gunned now, but what about under Bush?)</p>
<p>3. There are many creative ideas which fall short of nationalizing healthcare which would be extremely helpful. R&#8217;s do not bring these up, and generally do not show that they have any answers.  Or, to put it another way, the person with a Plan will beat a person without a Plan.</p>
<p>So, the R&#8217;s have failed&#8230;yes, maybe they&#8217;ll be able to block in the Senate.  Maybe they&#8217;ll be able to have a tactical victory.</p>
<p>But they do not have a strategic view of overcoming a 100 year old idea.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not very bright and don&#8217;t have a strategic view, then you are doomed to let someone else do the work.</p>
<p>But then again, R&#8217;s have had a history of being in the minority&#8230;and it ain&#8217;t so bad, you don&#8217;t have to take responsibility for what happens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open thread: PelosiCare vote coming tonight</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39311</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open thread: PelosiCare vote coming tonight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39311</guid>
		<description>[...] Updates will appear below as warranted. In the meantime, here&#8217;s Paul Ryan trying to rally the troops, apparently to no avail. Exit question via Karl: Should the GOP vote &#8220;present&#8221; on Stupak&#8217;s amendment instead of voting for it? Think strategically. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Updates will appear below as warranted. In the meantime, here&#8217;s Paul Ryan trying to rally the troops, apparently to no avail. Exit question via Karl: Should the GOP vote &#8220;present&#8221; on Stupak&#8217;s amendment instead of voting for it? Think strategically. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39310</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39310</guid>
		<description>The GOP needs to stick to principle and vote YES on the Pro-Life amendment.

Puts us in a good position ... the majority of Americans are Pro-Life.  On the final bill - we vote no.  Most Americans are against PelosiCare.

Let the Democrats bury their heads in the sand.  They are going to have very sore butts next November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP needs to stick to principle and vote YES on the Pro-Life amendment.</p>
<p>Puts us in a good position &#8230; the majority of Americans are Pro-Life.  On the final bill &#8211; we vote no.  Most Americans are against PelosiCare.</p>
<p>Let the Democrats bury their heads in the sand.  They are going to have very sore butts next November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitewashed Tombs:Abortion and the Health Care Bill &#124; Be John Galt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39309</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitewashed Tombs:Abortion and the Health Care Bill &#124; Be John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39309</guid>
		<description>[...]  Karl in The Green Room in Is the House GOP enabling PelosiCare? has more on the contemptible use of this amendment by &#8220;pro-life&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Karl in The Green Room in Is the House GOP enabling PelosiCare? has more on the contemptible use of this amendment by &#8220;pro-life&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squeek71</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39308</link>
		<dc:creator>squeek71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39308</guid>
		<description>The National Right to Life is pushing the GOP hard on this amendment.  Here is a link about Stupak from National Review&#039;s The Corner.  The post has a link in it to the statement from the NRTL.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDA3YTgxMTU0NzllYzI1MWY0N2E2Mzk0YzNiOWQzNjk=

Even though I am extremely pro-life, I have been hesitant to sign many of the pro-life petitions for this healthcare bill, simply because the petitions only dealt with the issue of life and none of the other monstrosities in this bill.  I don&#039;t want them to think that abortion is my only objection.  Abortion is a major objection, but I have so many other major objections as well.  I do not want my rep thinking that the bill is ok if they can fix the govt.-funded abortion problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Right to Life is pushing the GOP hard on this amendment.  Here is a link about Stupak from National Review&#8217;s The Corner.  The post has a link in it to the statement from the NRTL.</p>
<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDA3YTgxMTU0NzllYzI1MWY0N2E2Mzk0YzNiOWQzNjk=" rel="nofollow">http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDA3YTgxMTU0NzllYzI1MWY0N2E2Mzk0YzNiOWQzNjk=</a></p>
<p>Even though I am extremely pro-life, I have been hesitant to sign many of the pro-life petitions for this healthcare bill, simply because the petitions only dealt with the issue of life and none of the other monstrosities in this bill.  I don&#8217;t want them to think that abortion is my only objection.  Abortion is a major objection, but I have so many other major objections as well.  I do not want my rep thinking that the bill is ok if they can fix the govt.-funded abortion problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huckleberryfriend</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39306</link>
		<dc:creator>huckleberryfriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39306</guid>
		<description>I think a better strategy would be for ALL the Republicans to abstain from voting on Stupak&#039;s amendment. Make the darn Blue dogs stand up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a better strategy would be for ALL the Republicans to abstain from voting on Stupak&#8217;s amendment. Make the darn Blue dogs stand up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wethal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39305</link>
		<dc:creator>Wethal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39305</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;UPDATE: As of about 4:30 EST the GOP Whips Office says 31 Dems are a No on health care.

That&#039;s about 9 short of killing it, depending on how many vote. The question is, will some of them switch to yes if Stupak passes or worse, will some who would vote no if Stupak fails be yes because it passes with Republican votes?

I get many GOP reps want to vote against abortion whenever they can but the way to ensure that federal funds don&#039;t pay for abortions is to kill Obama Care not to pass the Stupak amendment. 

Bohener just got Rangel to admit he can&#039;t guarantee that if Stupak passes, he can&#039;t guarantee that it will survive conference or that Rangel himself will vote against a bill that doesn&#039;t have Stupak in it.

The GOP has to vote no on this. It&#039;s a sham. Kill the bill and kill it now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

AOSHQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>UPDATE: As of about 4:30 EST the GOP Whips Office says 31 Dems are a No on health care.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s about 9 short of killing it, depending on how many vote. The question is, will some of them switch to yes if Stupak passes or worse, will some who would vote no if Stupak fails be yes because it passes with Republican votes?</p>
<p>I get many GOP reps want to vote against abortion whenever they can but the way to ensure that federal funds don&#8217;t pay for abortions is to kill Obama Care not to pass the Stupak amendment. </p>
<p>Bohener just got Rangel to admit he can&#8217;t guarantee that if Stupak passes, he can&#8217;t guarantee that it will survive conference or that Rangel himself will vote against a bill that doesn&#8217;t have Stupak in it.</p>
<p>The GOP has to vote no on this. It&#8217;s a sham. Kill the bill and kill it now.</p></blockquote>
<p>AOSHQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free-thinker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39304</link>
		<dc:creator>free-thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39304</guid>
		<description>My thoughts exactly, Karl. Enough R&#039;s should vote &quot;present&quot; to kill the Stupak amendment. I&#039;m hoping that the House Republican leadership is secretly planning this behind the scenes to deliver an embarrassing loss to Obama and the Dems.

Ultimately, whether this version of the bill passes the House with or without the Stupak amendment doesn&#039;t matter too much. If the D&#039;s allow for federal funding for abortion in the final bill (after the House-Senate conference), the pro-life House D&#039;s could be forced to vote &quot;no&quot;. So the language will very likely be in the final bill. If we can stop this version in its tracks sans Stupak, maybe the whole healthcare government takover train will fall off the rails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly, Karl. Enough R&#8217;s should vote &#8220;present&#8221; to kill the Stupak amendment. I&#8217;m hoping that the House Republican leadership is secretly planning this behind the scenes to deliver an embarrassing loss to Obama and the Dems.</p>
<p>Ultimately, whether this version of the bill passes the House with or without the Stupak amendment doesn&#8217;t matter too much. If the D&#8217;s allow for federal funding for abortion in the final bill (after the House-Senate conference), the pro-life House D&#8217;s could be forced to vote &#8220;no&#8221;. So the language will very likely be in the final bill. If we can stop this version in its tracks sans Stupak, maybe the whole healthcare government takover train will fall off the rails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letget</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39303</link>
		<dc:creator>letget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39303</guid>
		<description>Oh my, please do not let any R vote for this either in the house or senate. 
L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, please do not let any R vote for this either in the house or senate.<br />
L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/11/07/is-the-house-gop-enabling-pelosicare/comment-page-1/#comment-39302</link>
		<dc:creator>winged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=12304#comment-39302</guid>
		<description>I cant think of a reason WHY they are doing that either.

They are helping pass the bill.  They dont control anthing - so I doubt there is a secret plan to defeat it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant think of a reason WHY they are doing that either.</p>
<p>They are helping pass the bill.  They dont control anthing &#8211; so I doubt there is a secret plan to defeat it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
