Good News: Russia Looking at China for Inspiration
posted at 7:46 am on October 20, 2009 by Michael van der Galien
Nearly two decades after the collapse of the Communist Party, Russia’s rulers have hit upon a model for future success: the Communist Party.
Or at least, the one that reigns next door.
Like an envious underachiever,Vladimir V. Putin’s party, United Russia, is increasingly examining how it can emulate the Chinese Communist Party, especially its skill in shepherding China through the financial crisis relatively unbowed.
United Russia’s leaders even convened a special meeting this month with senior Chinese Communist Party officials to hear firsthand how they wield power.
Now, we all knew that Putin and Medvedev weren’t exactly the enlightened chaps the MSM pretend they are, but this goes far. Even for them. The Russian people were nearly destroyed by communism; so what do their new, capitalist rulers do? Right, abolish freedom and repeat the same mistakes their fathers and grandfathers made before them.
Don’t get me wrong. Putin et al. are not communists as such. They’re authoritarians. They don’t want China to tell them how to start a communist revolution. No, they only want to know how they can, and I quote, develop “the Chinese ability to use a one-party system to keep tight control over the country while still driving significant economic growth.”
But that’s not much better, now is it. The Chinese system is extremely authoritarian. If Russia copies China’s one-party rule, the Russian people will once again be doomed to slavery.
And so Putin continues his transformation from strong yet democratic leader, into a dictator who crushes all dissent – violently.
It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so darn sad.
Recently in the Green Room:
- Sunday reflection: Matthew 4:1-11
- Rand Paul wins CPAC straw poll
- Real question: Does Obama’s budget fund overseas abortions to protect endangered animals?
- Photo of the day: Crimea now belongs to Russia, at least on Russian propaganda TV
- Vatican: Pope Francis wasn’t talking about same-sex relationships; Update: “Civil unions” explained