Is Obama high?

Look at Obama’s eyes.

Diane

Guess I should say I don’t want to be surrounded by even more high idiots than usual lol

Even if that weren’t the case the last thing I want is to be surounded by a bunch of high idiots everywhere I go.

beachgirlusa on October 19, 2009 at 11:43 PM

Probably are and don’t realize it. Frequent any surf shops while at the beach? Dude…

the criminalization of drugs is one of the reasons it has exploded in use.

I don’t buy that. But even if I did:

It goes against every fiber of my freedom-loving being to criminalize drugs because “they’re bad.”

uknowmorethanme

What good have drugs ever done for individuals and society as a whole? Drugs, protitution, crime rates, they all go hand-in-hand: where there’s one there’s almost always the other. Even if that weren’t the case the last thing I want is to be surounded by a bunch of high idiots everywhere I go.

my sentiment is that this is a minor drop of clean water in a bucketful of slime. If we can’t interrogate terrorists, or have to go around being labeled “right-wing extremists”, the ability to smoke pot – IF we qualify for medicinal purposes in one of those selected states – is practically no solace whatsoever.

MadisonConservative

Good point.

this is a minor drop of clean water in a bucketful of slime.

No question about it. But after drinking radiator sludge for a year (good grief, it’s only been a year), I’ll take every drop I can get!

If “free the weed” isn’t a national sentiment, then let the voters of each state say so. An honest, open conversation on the issue is impossible as long as it remains shrouded by “the law.”

Freedom, or not?

realityunwound on October 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I entirely agree, however my sentiment is that this is a minor drop of clean water in a bucketful of slime. If we can’t interrogate terrorists, or have to go around being labeled “right-wing extremists”, the ability to smoke pot – IF we qualify for medicinal purposes in one of those selected states – is practically no solace whatsoever.

Somehow this pathetic gesture doesn’t envelop me in hopeychangey goodness.

So your contention then is that we should oppose everything the administration does, regardless of whether it lines up with our philosophical/political principles or not?

We should be the 1st to applaud the federal government if they do what they’re supposed to be doing… ESPECIALLY an administration as far gone as this one.

If “free the weed” isn’t a national sentiment, then let the voters of each state say so. An honest, open conversation on the issue is impossible as long as it remains shrouded by “the law.”

Freedom, or not?

we need revenue and pot is better for you than booze.

larry harris on October 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Not in moderation. Alcohol is actually a benefit in small quantities. Pot is not, and all smoking is bad for your lungs.

But if you’re going to be either a pothead or an alcoholic, the former is preferred.

Their priorities are consistent with their maddeningly inconsistent liberal worldview. So, in that respect, this makes total sense.

Diane on October 19, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Are you saying they’re consistently inconsistent?

*HEAD POPS*

Of course then the Left went out and found a cokehead and got him elected president.

Is anyone really surprised Barack “and then I got high” Obama would go soft on the war on drugs?