On The Social Nature of Conservatism
posted at 7:40 am on October 5, 2009 by Michael van der Galien

Whenever conservatives debate economics and social equality with progressives, the latter succeed in portraying the former as cold, greedy and careless. ‘Conservatives just don’t care about the poor,’ leftists say, they only care about protecting corporate interests and making a couple of million themselves while they’re at it.
Britain’s conservatives, the Tories, have now decided to counteract this myth (see below) actively by making “a crusade on poverty” an integral part of their campaign.
Mr Gove, the shadow schools secretary, said the Tories are focused on improving social mobility and helping those born in poor families advance up the economic scale.
As the Conservatives open their annual conference in Manchester today, they are unveiling plans for more than two million Britons claiming incapacity benefit face tough “back to work” medical tests that could see their benefits cut.
In a BBC Radio Four interview, Mr Gove insisted that planning to cut benefits for claimants did not mean the party was not committed to helping the poor.
He insisted that the Tories’ “back to work” policies are focussed on narrowing the gap between rich and poor and helping the children of poorer households improve their own circumstances.
Mr Gove said: “The Conservative Party this week is a party that is on a mission, a crusade to deal with the long-standing issues which have kept 20 to 30 per cent of our people in poverty.”
They want to explain to voters that conservative policies aim at emancipating the poor whereas progressive policies shackle them. Welfare doesn’t truly help the poor. Rather, it removes any incentive to improve their lot in life themselves.
Welfare keeps the poor in poverty.
Conservatives in both Europe and the US have to be courageous enough to turn the tables on leftists. Giving handouts to the poor is not a sign of compassion, let alone of righteousness.
Quite the opposite even. It aren’t leftists but conservatives who act in the best interest of the poor. And it is in their interest to become independent, self-reliant and confident human beings. The left’s well-intentioned policies have reduced the lower class to little more than children. There isn’t anything even remotely compassionate about that.
It’s time for conservatives in the West to do what the Tories are doing now; declare a crusade on poverty by explaining that fiscal conservative policies do not merely sound nice in theory but are actually good for the people at large, and especially for the poor.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Former Texas Senator Phil Gramm had a set speech where he’d tell his audience, “The greatest Welfare Program in the world is a Job. You get a job and you buy groceries for your family; you buy a home to put a roof over your family’s head…”
Pope John Paul II in his Encyclical “Centissiumus Anni” amplified Pope Leo XIII’s remarks from a century before recognizing the dignity of the working man and noting how, in the modern world, what you do defines who you are and helps develop a sense of self-worth.
Even Bill Clinton recognized the value of self-sufficiency when he signed the Welfare to Work legislation , “Ending Welfare as we know it.”
So it never ceases to amaze me that that there still exists a political class that not only denies that self-sufficiency is a virtue, but sees that denial as evidence of them being some type of morally superior beings.
potkas7 on October 5, 2009 at 8:43 AM
Entirely right, Michael.
Once stuck in the welfare trap, it is often prohibitively difficult to escape it. The Tories have been saying this for some time now, but the party has had to undergo a major image overhaul in order to get this message across.
This would be a wonderful way to not only help the poor but also to put the Left in a nasty quandary. Do they wish to keep the poor as one of their captured bloc of votes or will they help them to achieve their aspirations?
Choices, choices…
Track-A-'Crat on October 5, 2009 at 10:00 AM
It’s doubly stupid that liberals have convinced themselves that their arguments and tactics are feasible. They need only look dispassionately at most of those states that have Democratic controlled for decades. They are in sad condition.
jeanie on October 5, 2009 at 12:10 PM
“So it never ceases to amaze me that that there still exists a political class that not only denies that self-sufficiency is a virtue, but sees that denial as evidence of them being some type of morally superior beings.”
I think you’re problem there is that you quote the pope.
It may come as a surprise, but our leftist friends do not exactly respect religion, and especially not the Catholic Church.
Exactly. The right could actually put leftists on the defense on this one. It’s not that difficult to do. “Do you want to keep the poor in shackles?”
The wonderful thing about being a lefty is that you can just ignore past experiences. It’ll be better this time, you know.
Michael van der Galien on October 6, 2009 at 5:24 AM