Green Room

Rogue Warriors

posted at 2:15 am on October 4, 2009 by

The unprecedented pre-order sales of Sarah Palin’s memoir, Going Rogue, have prompted numerous attempts to either explain, or dismiss, her popularity. Steve Schmidt, the chief strategist for the McCain campaign, pins his hopes for the future on Mrs. Palin… squarely between her shoulder blades, with a knife. Says Schmidt:

I think that she has talents, but my honest view is that she would not be a winning candidate for the Republican candidate in 2012, and in fact, were she to be the nominee, we would have a catastrophic election result. 

In the year since the election has ended, she has done nothing to expand her appeal beyond the base. … Th[e] independent vote is going to be up for grabs in 2012. That middle of the electorate is going to be determinative of the outcome of the elections. I just don’t see that if you look at the things she has done over the year … that she is going to expand that base in the middle.

Schmidt adds, “The leadership of the party cannot be outsourced to the conservative-entertainment complex.” Oh, so that’s why zillions of people are pre-ordering her book – they’re hungry for entertainment. With any luck, Palin will throw in some recipes, and maybe a few sudoku puzzles. The sour grapes about Palin’s supposed inability to “expand her appeal beyond the base” are ludicrous. If the hardcore Republican base has become large enough to push an unwritten book to the top of the best-seller lists, 2010 is going to be even more unpleasant for the Democrats than I suspected. The last remaining Democrat senators will be able to carpool in the last remaining Saturn.

Schmidt’s position is unpleasant, but understandable. As the architect of a disastrous campaign, he needs someone to blame for his failures, or else his career is over. A much less hostile analysis from Raphael Alexander of the National Post offers this explanation for the Palin phenomenon:

Sarah Palin is a classic populist politician. What makes her so popular is her very nature. She is the definition of “grassroots”, a working mother who successfully entered politics at the municipal level and worked her way up to the governorship. She didn’t manage this by impressing people with her five different institutions of education, or how many books she had written on Russian foreign policy. No, she managed it because she inspired Americans who felt that Sarah was “one of them.”

For every housewife who dreamed of being more, but had to contend with the responsibilities of raising a family, Palin inspires a strange kind of anti-feminism. There is a perceptible sense of pride that one can be “just average”, with all of the same human failings and shortcomings as everybody else.

So people are scrambling to order Palin’s book because she’s “one of them?” She’s the new Erma Bombeck? Certainly her approachability and friendly, common touch are part of her appeal, but they’re not the most important part. She’s not sitting on top of the Amazon and Barnes & Noble best-seller lists because she’s average.

What fascinates people about Sarah Palin is that she’s provocative.

Every movement needs its scholars, the engineers of its philosophy. It also requires representatives, people who can get elected to office and implement its ideas. To get those representatives elected, there must be people who can master the scholarship, make it understandable to people who aren’t political junkies… and add a little extra zing, a jolt of electricity to capture the imagination of those non-political people.

There are many ways to be provocative. Some of those methods are rude, or confrontational. The only memorable moment in President Obama’s address to Congress on health care reform came when a previously obscure Republican representative couldn’t stomach any more mendacity, and called him a liar. It was an ill-mannered outburst, for which the Congressman apologized… but it was also devastatingly effective. It got people buzzing, and because the Congressman was correct, his outburst prompted furious last-minute adjustments to the President’s legislative proposals, along with weakening the already soft public opinion of those proposals.

The most aggressive provocateurs walk a tightrope across a canyon of bad taste and controversy. Glenn Beck says some wild, hilarious, and outrageous things, in his desperate struggle to awaken rubber-frog voters before the waters of mega-state socialism boil them alive. He’s also been spectacularly right about some very important things, like the Van Jones scandal. Even as Beck reaches new heights of popularity, and drags sleazy characters like Jones out of an administration that major media outlets worship as flawless, a couple of soft-spoken young people with a video camera shock America into action against ACORN, an organization they should have become enraged about long ago. Sometimes you don’t have to say anything to be provocative – you just have to show Americans something their media gatekeepers didn’t want them to see.

Sarah Palin is provocative by her very existence, having followed none of the scripts prepared by the media, or the bitter vampires of McCain’s campaign staff. She electrifies people by speaking with confidence and cheer, to convey ideas that strike the average listener as simple common sense… and which make them realize how radical and deranged the world outside their window has become. Palin’s recent speech in Hong Kong was upbeat and plain-spoken, describing an America of liberty and opportunity, and frankly addressing the murderous evil of our terrorist enemies. The speech becomes electrifying when you realize these ideas would be as incomprehensible to the current Administration as Quaddafi’s lunatic rant before the United Nations.

Palin’s famous “death panel” commentary was powerful because it brought the midnight whispers of an unpleasant truth into the public consciousness. The provocations of someone who used to carry the ancient banner of a great political party must be delivered with elegance and wit… especially if they contemplate taking up that banner again.

The conservative movement requires champions who can make both moral and practical arguments, and show how they are woven together. America has swung so far to the left that simply standing athwart history and yelling “Stop!”, as William F. Buckley put it, makes one into something of a radical. I don’t think we conservatives appreciate our provocateurs enough. The editorial power of the mainstream media has been greatly diminished by the rise of alternative news and commentary sources, but the media still has the power to keep silent, and bury important stories. More importantly, they control the culture, which administers endless injections of their ideology to the apolitical “swing” voters who are so critical to elections. The parade of businessmen and religious zealots who serve as Hollywood’s corps of villains, plot lines designed to make liberalism seem irresistible, a thousand little jokes and asides that paint the Right as psychotic… It takes a lot of wattage to blast a conservative idea through all that white noise.

Look at the way our major media culture has treated Obama’s radical ideas to take control of the medical insurance industry: a blatantly unconstitutional scheme that becomes sheer insanity in the face of towering government debt, and self-destructing Medicare and Social Security entitlements. The media regards this as a perfectly reasonable, almost uncontroversial idea. What would be an equally dramatic conservative idea? Instead of nationalizing a massive industry, what if a conservative politician proposed privatizing one, like the embarrassing public school system? The proposal would be immediately treated as unthinkably radical, an unacceptable heresy, and the media would portray its advocates as borderline lunatics.

You can’t fight your way across a slanted battlefield like that with quietly respectable speeches and erudite policy papers, submitted as genteel points of order. You can’t have leaders whose monocles drop from their widened eyes, as they reel in astonishment from savage and unfair attacks. You get around the media by saying things they have to repeat, expressed in language the public will find unforgettable. You provoke so much interest that people shove biased journalists aside, as they rush to pick up a copy of your book.

The Obama presidency has given many people who dislike politics no choice but to become political. Political control has infiltrated every aspect of their lives. As they awaken to this reality, they’re looking around for someone besides Obama, someone who can show them an alternative to the total State, which they can no longer pretend not to see. They will not turn to someone quietly waiting to be noticed. The announcement of Going Rogue marks the moment when Palin’s future became more important than her past. What she “used to be” is no longer as important as what she is, and may become.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


She needs to operate like an AC130 on Obama’s agenda. Making slow left turns and raining fire on it.

ted c on October 5, 2009 at 5:52 AM

Are you suggesting we drop Sarah the Barracuda and go with Spectre or Ghost Rider? I like that in more ways than one.

A cuda may be ferocious, but it also attacks indiscriminately – the shinier the better. The AC on the other hand see thru the darkness clearly and deliberately picks its targets. To whit a short measured mention of death panel and the dems scatter like vermin for shelter, only to see the shelter ripped asunder.

Oh yeah, I’m loving that imagery

AH_C on October 5, 2009 at 8:01 PM

SilentWatcher, ditto to all that you said

AH_C on October 5, 2009 at 8:01 PM

If the hardcore Republican base has become large enough to push an unwritten book to the top of the best-seller lists, 2010 is going to be even more unpleasant for the Democrats than I suspected. The last remaining Democrat senators will be able to carpool in the last remaining Saturn.

Oh come on Doc. That’s lazy reasoning.

A) Assumes only Republicans bought the book because they like her.

B) Further assumes book sales are tantamount to voter action.

Those are demonstrably false premises. If you’re going to make blanket assertions about the woman’s appeal, cite some actual data.

TheUnrepentantGeek on October 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM

Here is another silly mantra: “I worry about …”

In other words, on the subject of Sarah Palin, any concern expressed about her candidacy is immediately termed a “silly mantra”. No idolatry, or elitist, and entrenched viewpoints there. No not at all. Good to see such open mindedness among The Common Folk™

if you don’t think she beat Obama and the Democrats (the MSM is included) in their vicious game to grind her down and destroy her utterly, then you need your head examined.

Oh. I see.
Well you can be reassured, this will one of a very small number of my “Palin posts”. I can do without the FU attitude coming from within my own party.

tartan on October 5, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Oh come on Doc. That’s lazy reasoning.

A) Assumes only Republicans bought the book because they like her.

B) Further assumes book sales are tantamount to voter action.

Those are demonstrably false premises. If you’re going to make blanket assertions about the woman’s appeal, cite some actual data.

TheUnrepentantGeek on October 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM

I’m surprised you let me slide on (C) there will almost certainly be more than one Saturn left in 2010.

I don’t see anything lazy about the idea that you can’t explain the titanic pre-order sales of Palin’s book by saying the only people buying it are hardcore Republicans, and people planning to write scathing reviews on the Huffington Post.

Hard data will be hard to come by, unless Mrs. Palin includes a comment card inside every copy of the book. (“On a scale of 1 to 5, how likely were you to vote for me before you read this book? How about now? Please return this card to receive a free 13-month calendar of me posing with my favorite firearms, including a minigun in the bonus month!”)

In the absence of such data, or an even more exacting survey conducted with ballots, interpreting the success of “Going Rogue” is a matter of opinion. Schmidt’s is both silly and mendacious.

Doctor Zero on October 5, 2009 at 10:23 PM

Noocyte on October 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Hold off on the eye bleach, I don’t think it’ll be necessary. As for your friends, think about this one, no election is the same as the last one. There are similarities, but what I am seeing is a sea change. This country was not this riled up about Carter. That’s the current history sameness that President Pantywaist is living. It’s also his nightmare. Reagan’s first order of business was undoing all the crap that 30 years of dhimmis had put on us. Reagan didn’t act alone.
Look back at the mid term 1978. It was a massive Conservative swing. 2010 is shaping up to be a tsunami that will make all other swings look like ripples by comparison.

Blacksmith8 on October 6, 2009 at 7:25 AM

I can do without the FU attitude coming from within my own party.

tartan on October 5, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Right back at ya.

Blacksmith8 on October 6, 2009 at 7:28 AM

Right back at ya.

Blacksmith8 on October 6, 2009 at 7:28 AM


No idea what you mean. But you’re free to explain. I simply offered an opinion and was told I needed to have my head examined. You’re idea of a FU attitude may differ.

tartan on October 6, 2009 at 10:26 AM

so many great comments on this latest fine, FINE piece from dr. Z.

i don’t have much to add, except:

Palin/J.C. Watts

The Republican Party should stop seeding 95% of the black vote to the Democratic Party. President Obama’s approval among blacks is now at 73%.

SheetAnchor on October 4, 2009 at 8:44 PM

that’s a great idea!

homesickamerican on October 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Doctor Zero – On. The. Mark!

Dandapani on October 6, 2009 at 7:09 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Slow your roll, boss

Top Pick

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?

“If we do nothing, more companies will back out and more people will lose coverage.”

You know, I may have cracked the case for you, guys

“They’re still running against her and still winning races.”

“…the suspect is from Quebec and has a Canadian passport.”

When the Left lost their way on immigration

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 2:41 PM

It wasn’t all that long ago, really

“I personally watched some of these students go up to Chief Brown, right up to her face, and call her all kinds of names, cursing at her.”

Did the Queen “nix” a Trump visit to London?

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 12:41 PM

More like wishful thinking on the American left

Sometimes it’s hard. This was the hardest part

Did the polls get the Handel/Ossoff race wrong?

Allahpundit Jun 21, 2017 11:21 AM


Physician, heal thyself

Maybe we’ll stay home and watch.

Good lack of work if you can get it

GOP takes 2 more special House races, meaning what?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 21, 2017 8:41 AM

Two more demoralizing moral victories for Dems.

Not a murder, but nearly as awful

GA Election results thread Update: Handel wins!

John Sexton Jun 20, 2017 7:10 PM

Late night?

7 p.m. ET: The election to end all elections

Allahpundit Jun 20, 2017 7:01 PM


Dashcam footage: The shooting of Philando Castile

Allahpundit Jun 20, 2017 6:31 PM

“Sir, I have to tell you that I do have a firearm on me.”

“Military personnel had to neutralize an individual.”

Because that’s pretty much the same thing, you see

“Now is the time to be more visible.”

“If you’re frustrated by the lack of transparency in this process, I share your frustration.”

Uh oh.

“No matter how radical, offensive, biased, prejudiced, fascist the program is?”

No regrets

And it’s not just your imagination

“The hopeless fear Warmbier is now experiencing is my daily reality…”

Kicking him when he’s down.

Of pigeons and terrorists

Jazz Shaw Jun 20, 2017 12:01 PM

A terrorist by any other name…

Some things require a sledgehammer, not a scalpel

Closing the gap.