<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamunism Infects the Washington Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/09/27/obamunism-infects-the-washington-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/09/27/obamunism-infects-the-washington-times/</link>
	<description>HotAir.com&#039;s Greenroom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/09/27/obamunism-infects-the-washington-times/comment-page-1/#comment-33179</link>
		<dc:creator>CK MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=9714#comment-33179</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And one more question: Is Obama considering rejecting McChrystal’s request because he’s afraid that when next-door Iran gets its nukes, which likelihood he seems strangely complacent about, they can then hold our entire Afghanistan force hostage?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In a word, no.  That&#039;s the least of our worries.  Even if you can think of a scenario under which it would make sense for Iran to threaten our troops with nukes - which I don&#039;t think you can - just having nuclear material is not the same as having an explosive.  Just having an explosive is not the same as having a munition.  Just having a munition is not the same as having a delivery system.  Just having a delivery system and munition is not the same as having a reliable delivery system.  Just having a reliable delivery system is not the same as having a reliable and accurate delivery system.  And just having a reliable and accurate delivery system and weapon is not the same as having a usable reliable and accurate delivery system and weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And one more question: Is Obama considering rejecting McChrystal’s request because he’s afraid that when next-door Iran gets its nukes, which likelihood he seems strangely complacent about, they can then hold our entire Afghanistan force hostage?</p></blockquote>
<p>In a word, no.  That&#8217;s the least of our worries.  Even if you can think of a scenario under which it would make sense for Iran to threaten our troops with nukes &#8211; which I don&#8217;t think you can &#8211; just having nuclear material is not the same as having an explosive.  Just having an explosive is not the same as having a munition.  Just having a munition is not the same as having a delivery system.  Just having a delivery system and munition is not the same as having a reliable delivery system.  Just having a reliable delivery system is not the same as having a reliable and accurate delivery system.  And just having a reliable and accurate delivery system and weapon is not the same as having a usable reliable and accurate delivery system and weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/09/27/obamunism-infects-the-washington-times/comment-page-1/#comment-33176</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=9714#comment-33176</guid>
		<description>An ace up his sleeve? Cunning? Time will tell. 
All it says to me so far is what I already knew.  He and his cannot be trusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ace up his sleeve? Cunning? Time will tell.<br />
All it says to me so far is what I already knew.  He and his cannot be trusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
