The New California Gals

posted at 11:35 am on September 26, 2009 by
[ Politicians ]   

carly_siteThe get-a-life ridiculous criticism of not-yet-a-candidate for senator Carly Fiorina’s “web-site” (actually more an on-line sign-up sheet), led me to take a look at the site of ex-eBay CEO and recently declared gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman – and to start thinking some more about the upcoming year in California politics.

Considering Whitman’s background, not to mention her personal wealth, I would have expected a rather high level of sophistication from her on-line effort – state of the art, whatever the art happens to be right now – but there’s nothing knock-yer-socks off about it aesthetically or technically. It’s just – nicely done, on first glance friendly and completely un-frightening, yet obviously quite serious, kind of like Whitman herself. Anyway, I don’t think a politician’s web site should typically aim for flash or web-graphical genius. whitman_2010

While we’re stuck on style, both Whitman and Fiorina invite us to use their first names, but Meg’s comfy greens and organic typeface contrast strongly with Carly’s hot reds and shopaholic sans-serifs. But here’s where aesthetics steer you wrong – unless you’re one of those very old-fashioned Americans whose first association with green is greenbacks: How many political greens would feature right there on the front page an op-ed by the candidate – dateline 9-16-09, San Jose Mercury News – entitled “To create jobs, curb environmental regulation”?

Such a sentiment, stated front and center, would have been almost unimaginable coming from a truly ambitious, would-be mainstream California politician of the last couple of decades. It’s the kind of thing flinty cons like Tom McClintock or Bruce Hershenson might have grumbled to smallish audiences in valiant losing efforts. Meg, who has the relative newcomer’s freedom to position herself tactically, has chosen their message, separating herself explicitly from Governor Arnold’s Green Republicanism:

Within months, Sacramento will be handing down new rules to implement AB32, the far-reaching law to restrict greenhouse gas emissions. Signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006, AB32 may have been well intentioned. But it is wrong for these challenging times.

With this ongoing economic crisis, the governor has the ability to issue an executive order putting a moratorium on most AB32-related rules. I urge him to do so. And if he does not, I will issue that order on my first day as governor.

This could get interesting. Maintaining the not-so-green theme, and contrary to what I’ve heard elsewhere, Meg’s “on the record” page describes her as open on offshore drilling:

With advances in drilling technology that reduce environmental risks, we need to re-look at offshore drilling. We have to utilize our resources here at home to reduce dependence. I want to look at new technologies such as slant drilling.

Don’t want to give you the wrong idea: Those three sentences are the very last ones on the page, and her overall message is first and foremost a jobs message, secondly a fiscal one. I think those are the right emphases, at least for now. We’d probably have to see another $1.00/gallon for the drilling message to start moving up again.

As for Carly, another CEO turned Republican politician but with a mixed reputation, I suspect she’ll be Megger than Meg on jobs, business, and the fisc, but she hasn’t enunciated a program yet. We’re left with personal impressions and question marks: By demeanor and background she comes across as “cosmopolitan” rather than “conservative” or “populist,” and supporters of the already declared Republican for Senate Chuck Devore question her apparently late conversion to a pro-life stance, but it’s hard to see an urbane or modern, less than 100% rock-ribbed image as a major electoral liability – against Barbara Boxer, in California. In any event it won’t be an aesthetic critique of Carly’s pre-candidacy web-site that decides things for me – or, I suspect, for very many others.

I’ll give the guys to Carly’s and Meg’s respective rights every chance to win my vote, and their supporters every chance to raise their game. (I’ll even take a hard look at Chuck Devore’s web site!) But, even with the table tipped more in a conservative and populist direction than in a long time, Republican competitors may have their work cut out for them. The concurrent campaigns of the zillionaire and ga-zillionaire hi-tech power-blondes, political outsiders in what’s shaping up to be an outsider’s year, could make for an appealing synergy, while seeming to offer an instant image makeover for the state of Boxer, Pelosi, and Feinstein. It may seem a little fanciful, dreamy, showy – some will say superficial – but it would be no less typically Californian, and intrinsically no less important to national politics, for being so.

cross-posted at Zombie Contentions

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Can’t say I judge a politician by her website, but the Gals are certainly interesting.

Very honestly, I expect the choice to boil down to “Anyone but Newsom/Brown.” Feinstein’s revealing tantrum on the floor of the Senate, when Jim DeMint tried to insert some water delivery to the Central Valley farmers in a bill, has got to be frying her with a lot of voters. If it hasn’t yet, it will — should she try to run for governor. I’ve never seen her as agitated as she was in that floor speech: furious and shaking at the very thought that someone wanted to get some water to the farmers. Nothing she says about that issue will ever be believable again.

A lot of independents — aptly called low-information voters — will probably think the state can survive another round of Jerry Brown, and that that would be better than voting (ick) Republican. I think people pretty much recognize Gavin Newsom for what he is — but if he gets the state Democratic machine behind him, he could stand a chance. He photographs well. Watch for LAT to step in at a key point in the primaries and depict Brown as the rumpled and tested elder statesman. If you’re the LAT leadership, you probably think Brown is the one who can beat a Republican in a down economy.

I don’t see any potential GOP contender that I simply couldn’t vote for. On the other hand, I have as few illusions about any of them as I had about Da Schwarz. The real problem in California is the entrenched Democrat-controlled legislature, and that won’t change in 2010.

J.E. Dyer on September 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM

JED, as someone who was full of illusions about Gov Arnold once upon a time – and who thinks that he was ready to follow if only the people had been a little more willing to lead – maybe I should mistrust my own optimism about the gals. Fiorina and Whitman offer something fresh to a state desperate for it, yet at the same time recall a different California, the one that amazes people in the process of getting big things done. I wouldn’t underestimate either of them, though I of course agree with you that the legislature will remain a huge problem.

I wouldn’t say that the governorship is Whitman’s to lose, but if Newsom were any more San Franciscan he’d be rated X or illegal in most states. For most voters, I think he’s the Proposition 8 guy – and his program is barely-to-the-right of Bill Ayers. Jerry Brown is yesterday’s change, today’s old clothes, but, if the LAT is thinking like you’re thinking they’re thinking, the LAT is probably thinking right that he’d be the tougher opponent.

Feinstein’s performance on the CV farmers was jaw-dropping. Shows you what being vastly overrated for decades can do for a politician’s human touch – comparing the senators trying to get water to the masses to the Japanese at Pearl Harbor! Clearly, the Dems are running short of blood enemies from history to associate with conservatives – with additional candidates, the Indians or Mexicans, say – excluded by political correctness.

CK MacLeod on September 26, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Meg Whitman is on record praising Van Jones green jobs work! If you haven’t seen it you should. Chuck DeVore has a spine and has been fighting the fight for a long time. Do your homework thoroughly please, I still am. The people of CA are done with the status quot as it’s been said over and over again, we are done. So the war is on and it will be won.

jeaneeinabottle on September 26, 2009 at 3:39 PM

Whitman clearly was snowed by Jones – typical weenie crap: I’m more put off by the lifestyles of the rich and infamous schmoozing than I am by the fact that she overpraised him on the basis of meeting him. I’ve got a feeling she can overcome having blown some overly effusive smoke on his behalf once upon a time, before she knew much about him.

For the record, here’s what she said after the Truther and Communist stuff came out:

My husband and I met him and many others on a cruise sponsored by National Geographic and The Aspen Institute. He talked about supporting job growth in California, but of course I did not do a background check of his past over dinner. As these reports have surfaced, it’s clear that he holds views that I entirely reject; any suggestion otherwise is ridiculous.

YMMV.

As for DeVore, I’ll give him every chance.

CK MacLeod on September 26, 2009 at 3:55 PM

Becoming California governor right now requires pretty much the same sort of attitude as Rudy Giulani had when he became mayor of New York in 1993, and was dealing with Democrats in control of both the City Council and the state government. You’ve got to be able to both make your case to the public over their heads, use any and every option available within the law to go around the Democrats in Sacremento and you have to have no fear about being branded an a-hole in the media, which wants to see the Democrats retain power.

Arnold’s attempt at reform collapsed because after his 2005 effort failed he pretty much just gave up. Outside of the time immediately after 9/11, when they were afraid they might die, none of the New York media ever loved Rudy, but the majority of the public did because of what he had accomplished (same thing with Reagan at the national level). Whomever the GOP picks next year to run for governor, if they care more about having good media PR than changing the culture in Sacremento, they’ll end up with neither.

jon1979 on September 27, 2009 at 10:35 AM

jon1979: After the failure of the Arnold initiatives, his re-elect numbers were in the 20s. We’ll never know whether there isn’t something else he could have done, but in retrospect it looks like the recall election was a populist high point, more the end of something than the beginning. Within a year or two, he had run all the way to the center or further, and was almost as popular again as when, pre-initiatives, his endorsement was golden. By then, the tenor of politics in California had changed again, somewhat in line with national rejection of Republican rule.

If an R takes the governorship, he or she is going to need a lot of luck and a lot of skill, but the terrain is likely going to be a lot different than it was for Arnold in the mid-’00s or Giuliani in New York in the ’90s.

CK MacLeod on September 27, 2009 at 1:11 PM

California mnight want to look at this news article from Japan:

http://www.japantoday.com/category/business/view/izumi-city-in-kagoshima-to-cut-corporate-tax-in-bid-to-safeguard-jobs

It looks like the cluebat is starting to take effect.

mandalis on September 27, 2009 at 1:19 PM