ObamaCare: Is the GOP finally turning on the mandate?

posted at 8:36 am on September 23, 2009 by

Sen. Chuck Grassley had already shifted his position to oppose forcing Americans to buy health insurance. Now it seems that Sen. GOP Whip Jon Kyl is calling the individual mandate a “stunning assault on liberty,” which suggests it may become a party position:

The attacks have confounded Democrats in and out of government, who noted quickly that mandating coverage was, until recently, a relative given when it came to health care reform.

“It’s f–ing ludicrous,” said one health care reform activist, who noted that when Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) asked committee members to air their disagreements with an individual mandate during a meeting on May 5, no one chimed in.

May was months ago. Talk Left’s Big Tent Democrat and AMERICAblog’s John Avarosis are much less surprised, though mostly out of cynicism. The fact is that the GOP followed the same pattern in 1993-94 — initially backing mandates, then backing off as big government healthcare schemes proved unpopular with voters.

A new Zogby poll has more bad news for mandates:

Less popular with 2010 voters is a key provision in Sen. Max Baucus’, D-Mont., recently unveiled health care bill that would require all Americans to purchase health insurance or face a hefty fine. A clear majority of voters in competitive Senate races (68 percent) oppose such a provision, as do 70 percent of voters in competitive House races.

Also unpopular is the so-called “employer mandate,” which would require large and small businesses to provide health insurance to their employees or face a fine. Fifty-nine percent of voters in competitive Senate races oppose the “employer mandate,” as do 60 percent of voters in competitive House races.

I generally take a Zogby poll with a grain of salt. However, the new NBC/WSJ poll has 59% of adults against the individual mandate, and there are currently more McCainocrat districts than Obamacan districts, so the Zogby numbers have a certain logic.

And while the mandate is an assault on liberty, the GOP would be well advised to start telling the public that a mandate-based system will likely result in soaring premiums and soaring healthcare costs, and from there to rationing. Sometimes, voters in the middle need to be reminded what the blessings of liberty are in practical terms.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Re: RegularJoe’s mythical three choices

How bad is “the status quo”?

According to a 2008 report from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, both of those estimates are way off. The foundation’s analysis indicates that the true annual cost per family is more like $200, with uncompensated care accounting for “less than one percent of private health insurance costs.”

These numbers are important because the president’s main justification for requiring every American to buy health insurance, a central element of his reform plan, is that uninsured people unfairly impose costs on their fellow citizens. That rationale not only has a weak empirical basis; it conceals the real motivation for the individual insurance mandate while dodging moral and constitutional questions about it…

Karl on September 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM

SubVet735 on September 23, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Amen, brother. He’s the EXACT guy I’m talking about. When his wife and kids gets sick from eating a bad fish, I’ll wind up paying the bill.

RegularJoe on September 23, 2009 at 4:16 PM

Re: RegularJoe’s mythical three choices

How bad is “the status quo”?

According to a 2008 report from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, both of those estimates are way off. The foundation’s analysis indicates that the true annual cost per family is more like $200, with uncompensated care accounting for “less than one percent of private health insurance costs.”

These numbers are important because the president’s main justification for requiring every American to buy health insurance, a central element of his reform plan, is that uninsured people unfairly impose costs on their fellow citizens. That rationale not only has a weak empirical basis; it conceals the real motivation for the individual insurance mandate while dodging moral and constitutional questions about it…

Karl on September 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM

So, Karl, are you going to pay my $200? Not just this year, but every year? If the total is so flippin’ small, the insurance can’t be that much; why don’t the deadbeats just pay it? No, your solution is to stick me with the tab. Great. Are you sure you’re not a democrat Congressman?

Besides, I thought we were deciding this on principle. I shouldn’t be FORCED to pay for someone else’s medical bill, whether it’s $200 or $200,000 or 2 cents. I sure as heck wouldn’t expect someone else pay MINE.

RegularJoe on September 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Gee, politicians BACKING AWAY from unpopular legislation. Can you imagine that! Almost as if those people who elect their representatives MIGHT DO SOMETHING if the unpopular legislation is made into law.

Who would ever believe that could happen!

GarandFan on September 23, 2009 at 4:29 PM

no freaking mandates

robo on September 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Such mandates will kill Obamcare. The whole idea of paying for it is anathema to those who most ardently support it. The Obama (read ACORN) crowd want FREE healthcare. Mentioning payment just ‘harshes the buzz, man.’

ROCnPhilly on September 23, 2009 at 5:02 PM

Now it seems that Sen. GOP Whip Jon Kyl is calling the individual mandate a “stunning assault on liberty,”

Gosh, you think so Sherlock???
What tipped you off? The Furious crowds stretching around the block at Town Hall events all over the country? The million some-odd marchers which descended on Washington? The endless tirades on every single Conservative Radio, Television, Cable and Internet outlet there is??
WOW.
Go ahead and vote FOR it GOP. I DARE you. Want to see a viable third party finally get legs?? DO IT.

KMC1 on September 23, 2009 at 5:18 PM

Why is no one in Congress demanding we adhere to our founding fathers’ constitution????? wouldn’t mandates make this unconstitutional???

huskerdiva on September 23, 2009 at 5:24 PM

Comment pages: 1 2