The Unvetting of Van Jones

posted at 12:19 pm on September 8, 2009 by

The Obama administration has been pushing the line that the (forced) resignation of its “green jobs czar” Van Jones is a story about botched vetting. However, Fox News confirmed what members of past administrations already knew — that Jones was investigated by the FBI (and perhaps others), regardless of whether Jones filled out the standard questionnaire for presidential appointees.

The Obama administration didn’t need no stinkin’ questionnaire to know who Van Jones — communist-cum-eco-socialist Truther — was:

Mr. Jones was a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, which was established, funded and celebrated as the new intellectual vanguard of the Democratic Party. The center’s president is John Podesta, who was co-chair of Mr. Obama’s transition team and thus played a major role in recommending appointees throughout the Administration.

As lefty blogger-activist Jane Hamsher noted, Jones was exceedingly well-known within the Sorosphere:

I first met Van Jones when he was honored last year by the Campaign for America’s Future at their gala dinner. He was being swarmed by all of the liberal institutional elite, who just could not be more full of praise for the impressive environmental leader and prison reform organizer. Everybody wanted Van Jones on their board. Everyone wanted him at their fundraisers. Everyone wanted a piece of his formidable limelight.

Now he’s been thrown under the bus by the White House for signing his name to a petition expressing something that 35% of all Democrats believed as of 2007 — that George Bush knew in advance about the attacks of 9/11. Well, that and calling Republicans “assholes.” I’m pretty sure that if you search through the histories of every single liberal leader at the CAF dinner that night, they have publicly said that and worse.

Although folks on the right may like to focus on that poll showing that over one-third of Democrats are Truthers, a note of caution is in order. As with polls on “birthers,” such numbers are more a function of heuristics than deeply-held opinion. Hamsher’s suggestion that the intellectual vanguard of the Democratic Party — which is certainly better informed about Trutherism than the average person — is sympatico with Jones is a far more damning indictment than the poll.

That there are more Van Joneses lurking in the bowels of the Obama administration is a near-certainty. Consider the case of Chas Freeman, Israel-hating, Saudi-shilling apologist for the Butchers of Beijing. Like Jones, Freeman blamed the US for 9/11 — and he probably would be in charge of drawing up National Intelligence Estimates today, if not for those meddling bloggers.

These sorts of views are not disqualifying to the Obama administration because — as Andy McCarthy points out — Pres. Obama “is not Mr. Magoo — haplessly gravitating to Truther Van and Ayers and Dohrn and Klonsky and Davis and Wright and the Chicago New Party and ACORN, etc.”

It is the nature of Pres. Obama and his fellow travelers that the administration needs to have swept under the proverbial rug. Making the story about vetting serves the Obama administration on several levels. It deflects blame to a relatively anonymous bureaucracy, but more important, suggests that the Jones appointment is an aberration.

However, the tactic of shifting the story from substance to process carries its own measure of risk. First, over time, people may yet come to learn that the Van Jones hire was not an isolated incident, resulting in a loss of credibility. Second, people are already figuring out that Pres. Obama is pursuing a raft of left-wing policies; this cannot be covered up with a midnight resignation. Third, a narrative of incompetence is corrosive. Incompetence of this sort has little political traction — until the administration is seen as doing a big thing badly, like Hurricane Katrina or the Iranian hostage crisis. Should that sort of event occur, Obama’s weakened political infrastructure may collapse under its own weight.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

It deflects blame to a relatively anonymous bureaucracy, but more important, suggests that the Jones appointment is an aberration.

That shouldn’t work for very long. “Oh, my, what a remarkable coincidence it must be that so many Czars happen to be communist radicals. However did we miss that in our vetting process?”

Daggett on September 8, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Throw this guy on the “not the -fill in the blank- I thought I knew” pile of radical associations. Keep throwing them on the pile…

bigjack on September 8, 2009 at 3:41 PM

I find this disturbing! Don’t these folks pose a clear and present danger to the United States? What is treason? If they are Communists who are plotting the collapse of this country Obama should be impeached, then hung!

Marco on September 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM

Today on Rush’s show he said that GWB told him that Obama would go the czar route to deliberately avoid vetting and congressional approval. If GWB knew all this why wasn’t it all over the campaign? Someone didn’t want Obama’s associations talked about.

fourdeucer on September 8, 2009 at 3:50 PM

Third, a narrative of incompetence is corrosive.

Fourth, Obama really needs to get better contestants for Dancing with the Czars.

Jones was no Holyfield.

Arbalest on September 8, 2009 at 3:50 PM

Naah, don’t you read HuffPo?

He’s allowed to be a truther, and throw out slander, and support whatever bizarre cause he wants, and have supported Communism in the past.

Because, you see… he’s black.

Nope, that’s it. The entire defense. Black people are allowed to be crazy without any sort of discouragement or penalty applied. Any attac on him is due solely to his race, meaning his statements, positions, etc. are all forgiven for a black man.

I’m not sure why, I’m afraid any answer I can come up with for that is clearly bigoted and racist, but that is the current defense being played in the media.

gekkobear on September 8, 2009 at 3:54 PM

I wanted to be a czar but I pay my taxes, never been to jail, and have common sense. They told me government wasn’t for me. Oh yea and I am not a minority so I could never call anyone a racist. I was trying to be the czar of czars. Its a Dang Shame

Tremmy on September 8, 2009 at 4:01 PM

Obama , change

Van Jones , Loose change..

the_nile on September 8, 2009 at 4:07 PM

Obama is easily more radical than Van Jones. There’s a reason the One has surrounded himself with crazy czars.

Do we now live in Czarist America?

theCork on September 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM

The hunt is on. Now that Beck and Gateway Pundit, the leaders in exposing and spotlighting Van Jones, were successful at getting him out of the admin. there will be more dogs after the foxes. Release the hounds!

Mallard T. Drake on September 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM

It deflects blame to a relatively anonymous bureaucracy, but more important, suggests that the Jones appointment is an aberration.

The point is that Jones must–and can–be tied directly to Jarrett and, therefore, to Obama. These three are all rowing in the same boat.

BuckeyeSam on September 8, 2009 at 4:13 PM

It wasn’t about him being a “truther” although that shows an amazing level of stupidity.

The man is a racist, striving and planning for a racial conflict where he and zero think blacks will become slave masters or some crap, and he’s a full blown communist as was his father and mentor of OBAMA.

What more does one need to know? I don’t care if he was a truther or not, the fact that he signed that petition only increased the public knowledge of his absolute stupidity and impulsiveness. Same as zero the anti-hero.

Look for more of the same, only with more cover ups now.

Spiritk9 on September 8, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Don’t know if you all have seen this yet, but apparently they’re working on the vetting issue with a new office- or, maybe I just made this up…

BKeyser on September 8, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Let’s be clear. Van Jones may be gone, but his views are still well-represented in the White House. For that matter, you think Jones can’t just call Obama or Emanuel?

hawksruleva on September 8, 2009 at 4:25 PM

It’s really simple to spot them.

Just look for anyone that named their kids after Marxists.

faraway on September 8, 2009 at 5:00 PM

It is not a crime for Democrats to hold such views, the only crime is that Jones openly admitted to holding such views.

Angry Dumbo on September 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Of course Obama knew and knows about all the czars. They were chosen for that very reason. Does anyone really believe that in a country of 300 million there were no other people to perform these jobs? This is precisely why Obama has denied access to all his previous documents. They would show the direct link to these people.

texabama on September 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM

BKeyser on September 8, 2009 at 4:18 PM

That was a great link! Why does it create visions of “Animal Farm”?

ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.

lovingmyUSA on September 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM

CAREFUL, PEOPLE– Obama told our school kids that our Facebook/internet comments WILL BE DREDGED UP someday. He is now threatening us.

leftnomore on September 8, 2009 at 5:55 PM

Consider the case of Chas Freeman, Israel-hating, Saudi-shilling apologist for the Butchers of Beijing. Like Jones, Freeman blamed the US for 9/11 — and he probably would be in charge of drawing up National Intelligence Estimates today, if not for those meddling bloggers.

Good Lord what have we done to ourselves?

whbates on September 8, 2009 at 6:33 PM

he probably would be in charge of drawing up National Intelligence Estimates today, if not for those meddling bloggers

That phrase has been going through my head for the last week. They sound exactly like bad guys from Scooby Doo, claiming the kids were meddling. How dare you get in our way!

MamaAJ on September 8, 2009 at 6:50 PM

We need a deck of cards with these bozos resumes on them much like President Bush used on the other Huessin during the Iraq war! Some clever graphics artist could use Michelle’s “Culture of Corruption” as a blueprint! Hey, maybe she will do it and make a few bucks while performing some more civic service!! They would make good targets for the firing range!!

Marco on September 8, 2009 at 9:15 PM