Green Room

The New Contract With America

posted at 4:26 pm on September 1, 2009 by

Observers of the political scene are increasingly willing to entertain the possibility that the Republicans could retake the House in 2010. As Ed pointed out yesterday, they have an opportunity even greater than 1994, but thus far they haven’t demonstrated anything like the organization Newt Gingrich and his team brought to the party. The last thing I heard from a prominent Republican politician in either house of Congress was Orrin Hatch suggesting we present Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat to his widow as a gift.

The time is unquestionably ripe for a new Contract With America. It only makes sense to nationalize the election, in response to the growing discontent voters feel with the President’s agenda. It’s also wise for the Republican Party to come together around a clear statement of policy and principle, as a way of re-introducing themselves to an electorate that couldn’t find many reasons to love them in 2006 and 2008.

The new Contract With America should set out a bold vision for undoing the damage Obama has done to the country. This will be a more delicate project than it might seem at first glance. Obama was a radical who ran as a moderate, and a certain degree of radical change will be necessary to undo the damage. It will take some heavy lifting to get America back to where it was just one year ago, a journey that will double back across a barren wasteland of wasted tax dollars, past bottomless deficit pits and pools of poisonous regulation, where a murder of czars picks at the bones of long-dead liberty. The media will assure the public this journey is a suicide mission, and their only choice is to plod along the irreversible course the Democrats have plotted, no matter how dreary it might be.

The task for the Republicans is to both excite and reassure the public. Average folks always say they want “change,” but they’re understandably nervous about massive upheavals. They won’t be eager to hop off the Democrat log flume and jump right onto a Republican roller coaster. A well-reasoned agenda, backed up with resolute common sense, will go a long way toward convincing them that the fate Obama had in mind for them is neither desirable, nor inevitable.

I hope the new Contract With America features massive reductions in government spending as a centerpiece. The government must release its death grip on the private sector. Private industries grow, produce new products, generate wealth, and create jobs. Government-controlled industries are corpses that decompose at varying speeds. Why would the economy grow, and spur new job creation, if the private sector keeps contracting? Let the new Contract With America explain the staggering size of Obama’s deficits, and the radical explosions in government spending… then show how the two are related, and why they can only be reduced in tandem. Pledge that no new agencies will be created, and the process of trimming the fat from the bloated federal government will begin in earnest under Republican leadership.

The new Contract should shatter the ridiculous myths Democrats have been concocting about their failed policies. Purge America of the economic ignorance necessary to believe something like Cash for Clunkers was a success. Promise a full accounting for the billions that disappeared from Cash for Clunkers and the “stimulus” bill. Pledge the full and timely release of vital economic data, which Obama has gone to great lengths to conceal. Explain why the Post Office is not a model which the health-care industry should emulate.

Republicans should vow to bring transparency and accountability to the shady maze of back alleys and smoke-filled rooms Obama spilled on the already mean streets of Washington. Michelle Malkin’s new book is a detailed indictment of the new Culture of Corruption. She already did the heavy lifting for you, Republicans. Present her table of contents to the American people as a target list, and promise none of those targets will be left standing by the end of 2010. An awful lot of Americans already own that book. Maybe they can use red pens to draw little bulls-eyes next to the names, as they are taken down. Election day should see a massive run on red pens. Don’t make Michelle publish a second edition of the book in 2011.

The new Contract With America must, inevitably, address health care. The Republicans should take this opportunity to explain how government intervention has caused many of the problems that exist in the health care system. More intervention is not the solution. The answer lies with treating health care like other commodities, and allowing competition, and the creative energy of the free market, to make it less expensive, and therefore more available. Socialism can only increase supply at the expense of quality, and it can never increase supply enough to meet skyrocketing demand. Prices are not reduced by grinding them into dust and hiding them in everyone’s tax bills.

Competition requires more companies to enter the insurance industry, while a government-funded insurance option will inevitably have the opposite effect. Competition also requires greater consumer participation, which means more awareness of exactly what they’re buying, and how much they are paying for it. Too much of health care is hidden behind the bureaucratic complexity of health insurance, which isn’t really “insurance” at all, but rather the medium of exchange for the purchase of medicine – a baffling foreign currency minted from a blend of payroll deductions, employer contributions, and government subsidies. Let people have “insurance” for catastrophes, and purchase rational health plans for routine care with their own money, bringing patients and doctors together. Reduce the legal costs to the medical profession, through tort reform… and explain, in clear and fearless language, why that will never happen under Democrats. Free markets can only exist in bright daylight – choice requires knowledge.

The new Contract With America should include a firm commitment to America’s defense. Pledge to end all political prosecution of American intelligence agents and military personnel, and make a strong declaration that our soldiers are not chips to be tossed on the political poker table. Make a promise to America’s defenders that they will always go into battle with clear rules of engagement, and never need to worry about being second-guessed by politicians after the shooting stops. Include a heartfelt, long overdue thanks to all of the men and women who have kept America safe since September 11, 2001.

The Republicans should pledge to hold regular, well-attended meetings with their constituents, and promise that both supporters and dissenters will be kept safe, and respected. This is a long, slow pitch over home plate, and it would be foolish not to knock it out of the park.

These ideas, and many other worthwhile proposals, must be expressed in both practical and moral language. When the Left is confronted by the failure of its ideas, it always tries to foreclose alternatives by declaring them unthinkable. No liberal has ever been more likely to mount this defense than Barack Obama, who has nothing except the assumed mantle of moral superiority to offer in defense of his party. Few have looked more ridiculous trying to don that mantle. There has been too much corruption in this Administration, too many Obama cronies getting rich while unemployment and the deficit explode, too many knives in America’s back with Nancy Pelosi’s fingerprints all over them. The case for freedom and capitalism should begin with the simple understanding they are inseparable.

I’m sure I left some things out. There is no shortage of things the Republicans can do for their country. If they can’t rise to the occasion, in this of all election seasons, it will be time for them to step aside – or more to the point, it will be time for us to push them aside. They need to do more than convince us they’re a bit less awful than the Democrats. They need to make us believe in them again. It’s a tall order. That’s why I want some time to study the menu.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


We need a candidate who can highlight the reasons that the Jug-eared One’s proposals are bad for our future and why adhering to the constitution is not only necessary but crucial to our well-being as a nation.

In the interim, we must elect representatives who will actually represent us. The majority of our Senators and Congressmen are beholden to a select group of interests and lobbies that are so far removed from the public well-being as to be absurd.

What is needed more than a candidate who is different, who has an attitude that is different. An approach that says, “I will be your servant in DC; I will respect your authority as my boss. I will represent you.” would be the thing that would guarantee my vote and ensure my support.

I suppose Aerosmith had it right: Dream On.

hillbillyjim on September 2, 2009 at 9:50 AM

is more,

Preview is your friend, hillbillyjim.

hillbillyjim on September 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM

Great article and great comments! If we ever get rid of this administration and there’s a country left when we do, I hope we will never let our defenses down and become complacent again. This situation should stay in our minds forever and never allow us to take our freedom for granted again.

silvernana on September 2, 2009 at 9:58 AM

Great work as always – and I forgive you for letting my pancakes get cold as I read your brilliance……..

Cinday Blackburn on September 2, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Hear, hear!

While we’re at it, let’s see if there are some useful ideas in the Bill of Federalism. I don’t know if we could actually get any passed, but numbers 4, 8, and 10 may resonate with enough people to convince them to dump some of the Dems in the state legislatures.

As to Sarah Palin: If she decides to run outside of Alaska, she’s going to have to work on her delivery. She’ll have to align her cadences with her syntax (a serious problem for her audiences in most of the country, and why her speeches read better than they sound), learn how to build to a climax and relax to go on to the next point, and soften her accent a little.

njcommuter on September 2, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Once again Doc a brilliant post. But then we expect nothing less. However, you hit the main problem in your first paragragh. The Republican party at this point has no leadership, and truthfully, no vision. Until they come up with someone capable of either or both, then the nation will be cursed with the biggest bunch of “me too” Republicans that we have seen since Ike was in the oval office. Looking across the wasteland that is American politics, I unfortuantely don’t see one. The lack of leadership in the Republican Party has doomed us all to galloping socialism.

georgeofthedesert on September 2, 2009 at 10:25 AM

Picking up on Reliapundit, these are not necessarily in my priority order–and there may be too many bullets, but you get the idea:

1. ENERGY independence and rational conservation
2. Commitment to DEFENSE, with strong commitment to improving the pay of our people under arms and to rationalizing our force and basing structures
3. NO MORE EARMARKS100% transparency in government. Simply-written laws, posted well in advance of votes. No earmarks. Budget growth based on population growth only
4. NO NEW GUN CONTROLSA return to Constitutional, limited government. The federal government will immediately divest itself of any ownership of private entities and will never again enter into such arrangements.
5. NO MORE LIBERAL JUDGESCommitment to an originalist judiciary
6. NO FEDERAL TAKEOVER OF HEALTH CARE reform based on free market principles
7. Regulatory Reform: zero-based reform of federal regulations
8. Immigration Reform: Increase legal immigration to meet our specific internal needs. 100% commitment to internal enforcement and border security
9. Tax Reform: a flat tax without itemized deductions. Broaden the tax base, lower the rate, eliminate compliance costs
10. Overturn McCain-Feingold, but require all contributions to be posted on-line within 24 hours with true traceability to the source of funds (i.e., “George Soros-funded Entity”)
11. Eliminate the Federal Reserve. Congress can create new money only at the percentage of population growth (no inflation!). Make it illegal for the U.S. government to purchase–or fund the purchase of–instruments in the financial markets
12. Dramatically reduce the size of federal public sector employment through attrtion and elimination of agencies and departments not specified by Article 1, Section 8 Enumerated Powers

PD Quig on September 2, 2009 at 10:55 AM

It should be simple and short. I agreed with Gingrich’s ten points, but it was too long. It is better to start with a shorter list and add to it as you suceed with some of them. I can’t remember most of the 1994 list. The one that I do remember is close the department of education. The world would be a better place without the department, but it was a political loser and dragged down others which also didn’t get enacted. The list did a lot of good, but it ended with a loser mentality with the public.

burt on September 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM


You people honestly want a spokesperson to sell a plan.

Because watching the left (not just the pols, also the mass media and the bussed-in rage-boys-for-pay and their union thug bretheren) go after Gingrich, Palin, Joe-the-plumber, Judge Bork, Trent Lott, etc. etc. is such an effin’ thrill…

Having a “spokesperson” behind the contract plays right into the Alinskyite plan, people! Why play their game for ’em? Read a little Sun Tzu and force *them* to meet on *our* ground for a change!


acat on September 2, 2009 at 1:26 PM


You people honestly want a spokesperson to sell a plan.

Because watching the left (not just the pols, also the mass media and the bussed-in rage-boys-for-pay and their union thug bretheren) go after Gingrich, Palin, Joe-the-plumber, Judge Bork, Trent Lott, etc. etc. is such an effin’ thrill…

Having a “spokesperson” behind the contract plays right into the Alinskyite plan, people! Why play their game for ‘em? Read a little Sun Tzu and force *them* to meet on *our* ground for a change!


No, I want a LEADER to LEAD and INSPIRE the country to follow his/her (not Palin!) plan. You’re going to elect an empty chair?

voxpopuli on September 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM

massrighty on September 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM

Ever think about running for office?

LEBA on September 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM

Off and on, but I travel for work too much to be effective. Plus, my state rep is fairly conservative (for a MA democrat;) and does first-rate constituent service work, so un-seating him would be a bear.

Thanks for the kind thought, though.

massrighty on September 2, 2009 at 9:13 PM

LonelyMassRepublican on September 2, 2009 at 5:34 AM

What part of MA?

massrighty on September 2, 2009 at 9:21 PM

Dr Zero you are by far, IMHO, the best analyst here at Hot Air…No offence to Ed and Allah.

My hope and prayer would be that somehow you would come to advize a true conservative who we had managed to draft to run for Potus. A conservative with intelligence, courage, a servant’s heart who has the strenght of her convictions…who is proud to be an American and who is willing to fight for this country…

CCRWM on September 2, 2009 at 10:30 PM

Dear Dr Zero (Hero)!!

I have recently found this, I am sure you have also read this, just wanted your opinion on it!!

Could this help? Or hinder? Is this an Amendment worthy of pursuing?

Onward Forward and Upward!!

RoxanneH on September 4, 2009 at 10:01 AM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM


Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?