Green Room

An Attorney General for All Seasons

posted at 9:54 am on August 31, 2009 by

Okay, class, can you guess which of the following two statements was made by Attorney General Eric Holder?

(1) One of the things we clearly want to do with these prisoners is to have an ability to interrogate them and find out what their future plans might be, where other cells are located; under the Geneva Convention that you are really limited in the amount of information that you can elicit from people. […] It seems to me that given the way in which they have conducted themselves, however, that they are not, in fact, people entitled to the protection of the Geneva Convention.

(2) I never thought I would see the day when … the Supreme Court would have to order the president of the United States to treat detainees in accordance with the Geneva Convention … This disrespect for the rule of law is not only wrong, it is destructive in our struggle against terrorism.

If you guessed the second, you would be right. If you guessed the first, you’d also be right.

To be fair, the statements were made six years apart — the first soon after Sept. 11, 2001, the second last December. During that interval, with no additional attacks on U.S. soil to help keep the raw memories of 9/11 fresh, is it not understandable that even a legal scholar might change his mind?

Not if that “scholar” is a tool like Eric Holder. This is the man who brokered Bill Clinton’s 11th-hour pardon of criminal Marc Rich, then on the FBI’s list of Ten Most Wanted Fugitives. Since being named U.S. Attorney General by Barack Obama, Holder has dropped charges of voter intimidation against a member of the New Black Panthers and Democrat operative named Jerry Jackson whose hobbies, according to his own MySpace page, include “killin crakkkas.”

Almost in the instant that AG Holder came to the bizarre conclusion that he had no case against Jackson, he was readying himself to reopen the case against CIA employees and contractors who had carried out enhanced interrogation methods during the presidency of George W. Bush. Never mind that each of these cases was already exhaustively reviewed, starting in 2005, by career prosecutors under the supervision of the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Never mind that no new evidence has arisen suggesting that any of the cases should be reopened. Never mind that after the Justice Department declined to prosecute five years ago, all cases were sent back to the CIA, which has since take internal disciplinary actiono in cases of misconduct. And never mind that the U.S. Attorney General serves at the pleasure of the President, who is the nation’s chief justice officer and who can direct the AG to pursue or not pursue any case.

Holder has made it clear he intends to go forward with the investigation with all deliberate speed, and Obama claims he is powerless to stop him.

Several legal scholars who do not happen to be named Eric Holder have observed that the AG’s actions in this instance violate the legal principle of estoppel. This is a bar on making an allegation or that contradicts what one has previously stated as the truth. This fact, along with the others noted earlier, has not deterred Holder or Obama — himself a legal scholar — from ordering Holder to desist.

Clearly the motivation for Holder’s action are purely political. The consequences of them could be quite grave.

Cross-posted at Zombie Contentions

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Gosh, I miss the good ole days when ‘Don’t Taz Me bro.’ was the topic de jour.

Fuquay Steve on August 31, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Crapweasels, all of them.

rockmom on August 31, 2009 at 11:24 AM

If Obama actually can’t stop him, who can? The Legislative branch? The Judicial? Doesn’t seem as if he should have that much power, he’s not elected–WE didn’t put him in office and WE are the folks who should have the say. This is our country and they are our employees like it or not.

jeanie on August 31, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Not really Kubuki is it? More like pro wrestling;

“And Eric ‘The AGEE’ in on top of the turn buckle, I think he has something in his hand. Referee Obama just warned him minutes ago but now is distracted, someone in the crowd seeks moral clarity and… Oh no Eric landed on top of “The Scape Goatman” striking him with that object just under the chin AND THE G_MAN IS DOWN!

Look, leave him alone Howard. Clearly you have problems with people of color… that are also totally unethical… so stop it.

onomo on August 31, 2009 at 12:40 PM

The Jug-eared One needs a spine transplant; Holder needs to be a private citizen.

These shitbuckets are supposed to be upholding the law, not making a mockery of it.

hillbillyjim on August 31, 2009 at 1:35 PM

hillbillyjim: I understand your concerns and how emotional rational people can get over the frustration of dealing with an out-of-control administration, but please refrain in the future from using profanity. HotAir has a strict policy when it comes to this matter, as you can see for yourself by consulting the terms of use, the link to which appears in the yellow box just preceding the comments section.

Thanks again for writing.

Howard

HowardPortnoy on August 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM

This is a parody, but at the bottom it includes a clip of Attorney General Holder at a Congressional hearing in which he has difficulty describing who he considers terrorists: http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/05/attorney-general-assures-congress-only.html

Mervis Winter on August 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM

You will not be troubled by my profanity henceforth, Howard.

Geez.

hillbillyjim on August 31, 2009 at 2:10 PM

hillbillyjim: Not my rules, but I’m obliged to enforce them.

HowardPortnoy on August 31, 2009 at 2:13 PM

It is your prerogitive to define profanity as you see fit.

No worries.

hillbillyjim on August 31, 2009 at 2:20 PM

OK. About the imagery. I’d like to point out I saw both Groove Tube AND Kentucky Fried Movie several times decades ago.

ericdijon on August 31, 2009 at 9:00 PM

In the future, please re-read and edit your comments in order to ensure that the sensibilities of every prude and every prim prick* person will not be offended in any way.

*sanitized for your protection

hillbillyjim on September 1, 2009 at 8:00 AM