<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamanomics 101: The Bad News Is,the Good News Isn&#8217;t Really That Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/</link>
	<description>HotAir.com&#039;s Greenroom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seesalrun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/comment-page-1/#comment-20326</link>
		<dc:creator>seesalrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=6318#comment-20326</guid>
		<description>A “perfect storm” &lt;blockquote&gt;

was electing a media blessed incompetent with a questionable agenda with questionable backing and Anti-American leanings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A “perfect storm”<br />
<blockquote>
<p>was electing a media blessed incompetent with a questionable agenda with questionable backing and Anti-American leanings.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obamanomics 101: The Bad News Is, the Good News Isn&#8217;t Really That Good</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19785</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obamanomics 101: The Bad News Is, the Good News Isn&#8217;t Really That Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=6318#comment-19785</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com. To see the comments on the original post, look here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com. To see the comments on the original post, look here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Morrissey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19753</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=6318#comment-19753</guid>
		<description>This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues &lt;a href=&#039;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/28/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good&#039;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.</p>
<p>Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues <a href='http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/28/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good'>here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cs89</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19684</link>
		<dc:creator>cs89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=6318#comment-19684</guid>
		<description>You mean just saying &quot;The Economy is Improving!  The Economy is Improving!&quot;  and highlighting the positive, while ignoring the negative in economic reporting... &lt;em&gt;doesn&#039;t make the economy better?&lt;/em&gt;

/sarc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean just saying &#8220;The Economy is Improving!  The Economy is Improving!&#8221;  and highlighting the positive, while ignoring the negative in economic reporting&#8230; <em>doesn&#8217;t make the economy better?</em></p>
<p>/sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoosterOh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19669</link>
		<dc:creator>WoosterOh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=6318#comment-19669</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;President Obama’s economic advisers is that, even adjusting for the recession, the contraction in employment seems way too high&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Many of you said it, and there is our first clue, time to change the way we figure unemployment. Just as Obama cut spending, you know, the fuzzy math one by putting something into the budget, then taking it out, he will cut unemployment, after he adds 2 more million to the unemployed lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>President Obama’s economic advisers is that, even adjusting for the recession, the contraction in employment seems way too high</p></blockquote>
<p>Many of you said it, and there is our first clue, time to change the way we figure unemployment. Just as Obama cut spending, you know, the fuzzy math one by putting something into the budget, then taking it out, he will cut unemployment, after he adds 2 more million to the unemployed lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turfmann</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/27/obamanomics-101-the-bad-news-isthe-good-news-isnt-really-that-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19668</link>
		<dc:creator>turfmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/greenroom/?p=6318#comment-19668</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Me? I boldly say, “Bring your umbrella.” As I first explained in December at The American Spectator, the most important thing to understand about Obamanomics is It Won’t Work. The neo-Keynesian deficit-spending “stimulus” approach, which began with Henry Paulson and the Bush administration, is the exact opposite of what the economy needs, because The Fundamentals Still Suck.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Au contraire, mon ami&lt;/em&gt;.  It is working &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; as Mr. Obama intended.  I ascribe malicious intent to that which he and his minion are attempting to foist upon us.

Overwhelm the system, make the adversary live up to his own rules.

Welcome to the United Socialist States of America.

Anyone else want to follow Sarah Palin around the US like the Grateful Dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Me? I boldly say, “Bring your umbrella.” As I first explained in December at The American Spectator, the most important thing to understand about Obamanomics is It Won’t Work. The neo-Keynesian deficit-spending “stimulus” approach, which began with Henry Paulson and the Bush administration, is the exact opposite of what the economy needs, because The Fundamentals Still Suck.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Au contraire, mon ami</em>.  It is working <em>exactly</em> as Mr. Obama intended.  I ascribe malicious intent to that which he and his minion are attempting to foist upon us.</p>
<p>Overwhelm the system, make the adversary live up to his own rules.</p>
<p>Welcome to the United Socialist States of America.</p>
<p>Anyone else want to follow Sarah Palin around the US like the Grateful Dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
