The Aristocracy of Intent
posted at 3:18 pm on July 23, 2009 by Doctor Zero
President Obama’s bizarre prime-time press conference last night illustrated one of the worst aspects of socialism: the insularity of its elites. This was clearly the performance of someone who expects to be shielded from criticism, opposition, practical considerations, and the results of his actions.
People often wonder how liberals can regard themselves as such an enlightened elite, while running down every other aspect of the society they nominally belong to. If every successful person in America is greedy, cruel, and selfish, how can financially successful liberals claim to be morally superior? The answer is nothing so simple as hypocrisy, although liberals are very sensitive to that accusation, and constantly project it onto others. The truth was visible in Obama’s press conference last night. What you saw was not a humble servant of the people, carrying out his duties as the executive of a constitutional republic. It wasn’t even a man discussing an idea he thinks is brilliant, and trying to convince others to support it. It was a monarch who could barely conceal his anger and frustration at those who dare to question his wisdom. Liberals regard themselves as an aristocracy of intent, a privileged class made superior by their dedication to “selfless” principles.
Naturally, such an insular elite sees itself surrounded by enemies. These enemies cannot, by definition, have anything but the most vile and selfish motives – otherwise, they would be supporting the liberal program, not opposing it. That’s why Obama was willing to make an utter fool of himself last night, by characterizing doctors as bloodthirsty ghouls who can’t wait to dismantle our children and sell them for scrap, starting with their tonsils. It’s interesting that Obama didn’t have anything better prepared for his press conference, since he went in knowing the public was turning decisively against him. He really didn’t think he would need to do anything other than dazzle his audience with his limitless compassion and charisma, while pointing out what soulless monsters his opponents are.
Liberal voters are always eager to excuse the failures of their leadership by emphasizing how much they “care.” You can find this sort of thinking deployed on Obama’s behalf today. At least he’s trying to “do something” about the health-care “crisis,” which we can no longer ignore! Of course, this “broken” health-care system has higher approval ratings than any politician in the country. We should be spending more time worrying about how to fix our broken government. It’s especially rich to hear the architect of the “stimulus” swindle criticize anyone else for trying to rob customers by billing for unnecessary procedures. Is the total value of all extraneous medical procedures for the past six months more than $787 billion?
As it stands, government is far more responsible than any business interest for the systemic problems that do exist in the medical industry., but this idea simply does not appear on the liberal radar screen. The intent of benevolent big-government programs places their results beyond criticism. To the Left, it simply is not possible that “reforms” intended to increase access to health care, and make it more affordable, could result in rationing and higher prices… any more than increases in tax rates could lead to reduced revenue for the government. Since nothing could ever be improved by reducing government involvement, that option is presumptively swept off the table, leaving the Left to devise increasingly wasteful and counter-productive schemes to address the problems with its previous schemes. A sinking ship is extremely difficult to repair, if you begin by declaring the big hole in the side of the hull cannot possibly by the reason you’re taking on water.
The radiant aura of their good intentions insulates liberals from even the most basic criticisms they level at others. Lots of those “greedy” health care professionals are female, but I doubt many of them are rocking $6000.00 handbags like Michele Obama. You’d have to steal a lot of tonsils to afford the kind of million-dollar night on Broadway the Obamas are known to enjoy. The moral superiority of leftist politics transcends any personal transgressions he might have committed. When Ted Kennedy finally passes away, you can expect the media to float the idea that Mary Jo Kopechne’s life was a small price to pay for decades of having this magnificent liberal lion stalk the halls of the Senate.
The Left is also very selective in who it chooses to criticize for greed and selfishness. We obviously aren’t meant to hate hard-working schoolteachers or auto workers for striving to provide the best for their families, but we’re supposed to hate hard-working dentists so much that we’ll turn their entire industry into a penitentiary. By the way, the median income for those evil tonsil-grabbing pediatricians is about $150k per year. How much is Henry Gates pulling down per year? The President seemed a lot more concerned about inconveniencing Gates than he did about disrupting the lives of the millions who are happy with their current health insurance.
The power of the free-market capitalism despised by the Democrats is that it shows far more interest in results than intentions. The free market has very little time to spare for well-meaning failures. It certainly doesn’t appropriate a couple million dollars worth of prime-time television to ram them down people’s throats. The profit motive, so casually impugned by desperate liberals, is the best thing going for the consumers of any product – from health care, to computers, to cat food – because it is the best way to ensure the highest level of sustained effort from the greatest number of producers. If health care is completely nationalized, there are some doctors who will continue to practice their trade with undiminished dedication, entirely out of concern for their patients… but neither health care, nor any other industry, can rely entirely on the efforts of such people.
The angry and confused man on television last night did not think he would ever find himself playing defense – and losing. He thought he only needed to announce he was giving away “free” health care, then bask in the adulation of the grateful multitudes, like any beloved king. Aristocrats rarely take criticism well, and they lack a capitalist’s creative energy for dealing with setbacks. If you ever do need your tonsils out, you’re better off hiring a greedy doctor than a caring bureaucrat. It looks like you might just be allowed to continue making that decision.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Barbara Boxer’s recent disrespect to the black man testifying at the Congressional hearing was another example. Stay on the “plantation,” and we’ll take care of you, but don’t go reading anything not on the approved list.
Same thing with the Dem and GOP elites’ response to our Sarah. How dare this Bible-thumping, state-U educated snowbilly with five kids (one she didn’t have the “sense” to abort) presume to talk back to her betters. (So much for the “Speak truth to power” saying the lefties love.)
Last night was just another example of the Court Party vs. the Country Party.
Wethal on July 23, 2009 at 3:31 PM
Wonderful piece, Doc Zero. By coincidence I was discussing these very same issues with friends today.
Daggett on July 23, 2009 at 3:37 PM
The misinformation dam that is Obama’s socialistic agenda is about to break. Is it time to drain Lake Obama now before the valleys of American capitalistic economic recovery are under water for decades?
Americannodash on July 23, 2009 at 4:36 PM
I think you’ve stretched that metaphor to the breaking point.
TheUnrepentantGeek on July 23, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Let’s start with something simple like the US postal service. Maybe we could hold up into view the monotonous pace and stoic concern that this business has for each American. This would surely be the hallmark of service available in healthcare – no? Running the business at a deficit would be de rigueur – no? Having a legion of unionized employees with perpetual benefits makes a business more competitive – right?
ericdijon on July 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM
Let’s just go with “The little metaphor that could.”
Americannodash on July 23, 2009 at 7:58 PM
Step One: Congressional Term Limits
Step Two: Not needed.
BobMbx on July 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM
Obama’s probably wishing he tried his “fundamentally transforming” hand on Indonesia or Kenya.
America is not going down without a horrendous fight!
katy on July 23, 2009 at 8:07 PM
I dunno. That metaphor almost made me wet myself.
trigon on July 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Dude, you freaking rock, whoever you are. I must now return to para. 4.
GTR640 on July 23, 2009 at 8:13 PM
SPOT ON. I think this is your best post by far. Great read.
LiquidH2O on July 23, 2009 at 8:17 PM
Liberals are a sanctimonious bunch. Like, my parents were recycling 20 years ago, and me and my brothers and sisters had to haul that sh-t to public works, like half a mile away. And they (my parents) did it simply because it made sense, and they could, and they weren’t assh*les. They were thrifty, you know? Like the Bible says, trying to be good stewards of the earth…
But now, oh Lord, here comes Al Gore and Jill Pelosi or whatever her first name is, as if they discovered this thing all on their own yesterday!!! Ahh, it makes me sick!
GTR640 on July 23, 2009 at 8:22 PM
Beautiful.
The thought here reminds me of this excerpt from a speech by Teddy Roosevelt:
atheling on July 23, 2009 at 8:22 PM
He’s throwing tempter tantrums like a spoiled child.
The last two years, he has risen (AKA been funded) through the ranks to the Presidency, all along the way having his praises endlessly sung.
And now the fainters at rallies are gone, and the tears have finally finished being shed over his historic victory.
This man thrives off of delusions of grandeur and the high brow language of obscurities and emotion. That is his life blood, and he dries and shrives in the clarity of detail, like a slug on pavement on a 90 degree day.
I personally don’t think he will get his way on Universal Hell-Care.
Well, I hope he doesn’t. I don’t think he has the support in Congress, or the support of Americans.
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM
Oh
And insulting the very people you need to help get your healthcare “reform” done is not a good strategy.
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:24 PM
Oh, and speaking of aristocrats, here’s this little gem:
atheling on July 23, 2009 at 8:25 PM
Oy! As it turned out today, it’s not our doctors, but our Rabbis.
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on July 23, 2009 at 8:25 PM
Applause and raucous cheering.
Skandia Recluse on July 23, 2009 at 8:27 PM
Yes, everyone has his turn. But for the liberal politician, it’s never himself.
atheling on July 23, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Surely you’re not talking about circumcisions going too far!
ericdijon on July 23, 2009 at 8:30 PM
The misinformation dam that is Obama’s socialistic agenda is about to break. Is it time to drain Lake Obama now
It was a metafjord.
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on July 23, 2009 at 8:30 PM
I have the teeniest of hopes that the Obama Presidency will usher the demise of the Democrat Party – at least its hard left socialist wing.
Like Britain’s self destructed Labour Party, the Obama-Pelosi-Reid Triumvirate may self destruct the Donks. We can only pray.
2010 cannot come soon enough.
atheling on July 23, 2009 at 8:33 PM
For amplification of these fine ideas, read Jonah Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism.” It’s out in paperback now, so no excuses. Best money I’ve spent on a book since I can’t remember when. The book explains the fascist roots behind contemporary liberalism, by way of it’s antecedent American Progressivism (Wilson, et al). A major tenent of fascism is the allegiance to the community, usually the nation, and the leader. This allegiance is the lifeblood of the fascist state. Those who with-hold that allegiance are anathema. While contemporary liberals are too into their own hyphens to really be good fascists, they do insist on conformance to “right thinking” as they understand it. Btw, when they say, “It takes a village to raise a child,” they mean the state.
smellthecoffee on July 23, 2009 at 8:33 PM
This has to be one of the best essays ever about the evils of liberalism. Good intentions truly are the paving stones of the road to hell. I mean, when you look at this president and his minions, the only difference between him and a totalitarian dictator is a legion of SS or Brown-shirts, the latter perhaps already taking shape in the form of ACORN.
Like I always say, LIBERALISM = HYPOCRISY
J.J. Sefton on July 23, 2009 at 8:33 PM
I’m tempted to go get my tonsils removed by the evil doctors in my family just to spite Obarky.
And mine are perfectly okay
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:35 PM
You are a prize, Doctor Zero. Michelle needs to find a place for you. Someone needs to find a place for you.
LibTired on July 23, 2009 at 8:35 PM
…and your quotes, atheling, reminded me of this:
Knott Buyinit on July 23, 2009 at 8:36 PM
Leftists insist on being judged on their intentions, on their stated goals, and never on their actual actions, or the effects of those actions.
My late father taught me that the Road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
The Monster on July 23, 2009 at 8:36 PM
Liberalism is like a zombie
Or like Death Wish movies.
Just when you think you’ve seen the last of em..
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:36 PM
This “aristocracy of intent” finds itself into another aspect of liberalism, which, as someone who earns his living almost exclusively through brainpower, I find particularly abhorrent: that belief in liberal dogmas is itself a mark of intelligence, which no amount of objective evidence to the contrary can shake. If liberals are so intelligent, why don’t they have all the money they need to fund their schemes? Clearly they could fool us non-liberal rubes into parting with our hard-earned cash voluntarily, which would take away the entire basis for conservatives’ complaints about how these things get funded, i.e. high tax rates, no? If liberals sold me a bunch of stuff and then used those revenues to fund their schemes, what basis would I have to complain?
It’s a simple variant of the old question, “If you’re so smart, how come you’re not rich?”
venividivici on July 23, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Fine job, Dr. Z. Top drawer.
smellthecoffee on July 23, 2009 at 8:40 PM
I dunno. That metaphor almost made me wet myself.
trigon on July 23, 2009 at 8:10 PM
+++++++++++++++++++
hahahahahaha
fabrexe on July 23, 2009 at 8:41 PM
And filthy
I always see all these smart, enlightened lefties with disgusting hair that can be converted easily into rats’ nests.
They aren’t intelligent, though. They are just masters of the three D’s:
1) Deception
2) Deflection
..and I forget 3)
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM
You truly have a way with words, Doc…………..
…….. Once again, excellent, and spot on!
Seven Percent Solution on July 23, 2009 at 8:46 PM
Dung?
LibTired on July 23, 2009 at 8:47 PM
Dereliction?
I had a good third one but I forgot it
Hmph!
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:50 PM
shrives should read “shrivels.”
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM
Kennedy is a Manatee among men.
Dr. Charles G. Waugh on July 23, 2009 at 8:59 PM
I eagerly await each Dr. Zero post. Incredible. You sir, are a treasure.
Texas74 on July 23, 2009 at 9:10 PM
They really do represent a regression of the human race to an earlier type of consciousness. It’s that whole “noble savage” thing, which has almost no basis in empirical fact, as shown by archeological evidence that the leading cause of death for primitive males was violent death in battle.
venividivici on July 23, 2009 at 9:12 PM
I tend to think that they are above their humanity. That they believe they transcend it, in a sense.
However, what they don’t get is that such blatant hubris is what precisely makes them human.
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 9:14 PM
should read
I tend to think that THEY THINK THEY are above their humanity
sorry
blatantblue on July 23, 2009 at 9:15 PM
Tea Party Patriots Stand Up For Liberty and against Cap-And-Tax and ObamaCare at the Dallas office of Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison on July 17, 2009.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swwMAdjt_lM
Watch the ending – our Senator Kay “Bailout” Hutchison did not want to meet with the protesters or accept the petition against Government Run HealthCare.
And Kay Bailout wants to run for Governor of Texas — Ha, Ha, Ha – Good Luck Kay Bailout….
izoneguy on July 23, 2009 at 9:54 PM
Excellent essay, sir.
justltl on July 23, 2009 at 11:13 PM
King Obama is definitely no King Canute.
“Very well. Sea,” cried Canute, “I command you to come no further! Waves, stop your rolling!. Surf, stop your pounding! Do not dare touch my feet!”
He waited a moment, quietly, and a tiny wave rushed up the sand and lapped at his feet.
“How dare you!” Canute shouted. “Ocean, turn back now! I have ordered you to retreat before me, and now you must obey! Go back!”
And in answer another wave swept forward and curled around the king’s feet. The tide came in, just as it always did. The water rose higher and higher. It came up around the king’s chair, and wet not only his feet, but also his robe. His officers stood before him, alarmed, and wondering whether he was not mad.
“Well, my friends,” Canute said, “it seems I do not have quite so much power as you would have me believe. Perhaps you have learned something today. Perhaps now you will remember there is only one King who is all-powerful, and it is he who rules the sea, and holds the ocean in the hollow of his hand. I suggest you reserve your praises for him.”
The royal officers and courtiers hung their heads and looked foolish. And some say Canute took off his crown soon afterward, and never wore it again.
Joe Bloggs on July 23, 2009 at 11:14 PM
our Senator Kay “Bailout” Hutchison did not want to meet with the protesters or accept the petition against Government Run HealthCare.
And Kay Bailout wants to run for Governor of Texas — Ha, Ha, Ha – Good Luck Kay Bailout….
izoneguy on July 23, 2009 at 9:54 PM
redridinghood on July 23, 2009 at 11:32 PM
Look forward to reading everything you post Dr. Zero … you never disappoint.
redridinghood on July 23, 2009 at 11:38 PM
Yo, Joe Bloggs,
Well said – thanks. And thanks doc.
Bhagwani on July 23, 2009 at 11:43 PM
Pure Genius
darktood on July 24, 2009 at 12:48 AM
This reminds me of C.S. Lewis’ awesome quote:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
wooga on July 24, 2009 at 12:58 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »