Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Sunday Morning: Life vs. Death

posted at 12:01 am on July 19, 2009 by The Other McCain
printer-friendly

If you like what I’m doing, one way to get me to do more of it is to tell me how much you like the way I do it. This may partially explain why Mrs. Other McCain is a mother of six wonderful children, but check this out:

“RS McCain has written a must-read on the origins of John Holdren’s anti-people philosophy.”
Pundette

“Sometimes Robert Stacy McCain is so funny that I forget how smart he is.”
Matthew Archbold

Those are two reactions to a long post I did Thursday morning. It was also linked at the Rhetorican (“Follow the Money”) and drew comments from Jennifer, Rhymes With Right, and the Rev. David R. Graham. The same post was also cross-posted at The Green Room, where it elicited this comment:

In some other previous post, on a topic similar, I asked who paid for the commercials for planned parenthood and zpg that I was inundated with as a child in the 60’s. You’ve provided some answers – thank you for that. I’m more than 50 years now and I still clearly recall receiving the message on the TV and taking it as a fact. Talk about organized propaganda – I still clearly remember it!
ericdijon on July 16, 2009 at 8:33 PM

To which I replied:

Oh, absolutely. I distinctly remember being at a swimming pool in LaGrange, Georgia (where my grandmother lived) and hearing a commercial for Zero Population Growth on somebody’s portable radio. And I was like, “Huh?”
Thirty-five or 40 years ago, that message was everywhere. Paul Ehrlich was a frequent guest with Johnny Carson on “The Tonight Show.” So, why don’t you hear that message so frequently and explicitly anymore?
1. IT WORKED — By 1976, the U.S. total fertility rate had fallen to about 1.7 and not all the pro-life activism in the past three decades has made a dent in the Culture of Death. The recent rise in the U.S. TFR to 2.05 is entirely due to the influx of tens of millions of higher-fertility by immigrants. Among U.S.-born non-Hispanics, any recent statistical upward trend in TFR is (a) minor and (b) mostly a function of marginal factors like deperate pre-menopausal IVF efforts by Baby Boom women.
2. CULTURAL MOMENTUM — The elite Malthusians spent tens of millions on their anti-baby propaganda campaign over the course of several decades. They especially targeted influential “opinion leaders” like journalists, politicians and academics, so as to create a ripple effect. Once babyphobia entrenched itself in conventional wisdom — “Well, everybody knows [insert anti-natalist talking point] . . .” — there was no need for continuing the propaganda campaign, at least with the saturation intensity that the ZPG/PP campaign manifested in the 1960s and ’70s.
Generally speaking, the more elite someone’s education level nowadays — the higher their ranking in their high-school class, the higher the average SAT score at their college, the more years they spent pursuing postgraduate education — the less likely they are either (a) to have a child before age 30, or (b) to have more than two children in their lifetimes.
I talk to smart young people all the time in D.C., folks whose incomes at age 25 are greater than my own. They will swear up and down that they can’t afford to get married or have children, and look at me like I’m crazy for thinking otherwise. And whatever you do, don’t try to tell them they’ve been indoctrinated with this counterfactual belief.
The weird thing is, there’s no difference in this regard between secular liberals and most young people who claim to be “conservative” Christians. Sigh.
The Other McCain on July 18, 2009 at 2:58 PM

Given such evidence of interest in this subject, obviously it deserved a separate follow-up post. During my decade at The Washington Times — the last four years as editor of the “Culture, Etc.” page — I reported on many of the biggest stories of the Culture Wars. Certainly, my knowledge of the history of these issues, and the skills (or dumb luck) that will push my personal blog past the 2-million-hit mark today, would be useful in this regard. And yet I don’t do it.

REASONS OR EXCUSES?

The reason I haven’t blogged more about these issues since leaving the Times is that, when you’re “just a blogger,” there is very limited readership for such stuff. Everybody’s got opinions on these subjects, and when “just a blogger” tries to discuss them in an authoritative fashion . . .

Well, if a blogger posts something, but nobody links it, so nobody reads it and nobody comments, et cetera, those 400 or 600 or 800 words might as well never have been written. I’m not Catholic, and most pro-life bloggers are Catholics who only link other Catholic bloggers. They don’t know me from Adam’s housecat, so for a Protestant to do pro-life blogging feels like a waste of time and energy.

Plus there is the matter of pride. I’m a professional. I write for money, and have done so for more than two decades. To feel compelled to write for free . . . you have no idea how I burn with shame to be “just a blogger,” especially when I see what’s produced (and what’s not produced) by some journalists. But even if I could overcome my sinful stiff-necked pride, even if every word I wrote for free didn’t feel as if someone was purposefully humliating me, the point of writing is communication, and writing stuff that nobody reads is not very useful. 

Perhaps because I work so hard on stuff that I get paid for, or that might get linked — and therefore read — elsewhere, I’ve lately tended to neglect some opportunities for which I should be grateful. Which means that, contrary to my repeated admonition to other bloggers about the importance of persistence, I’ve allowed discouragement to get the best of me, for which I apologize.

See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil . . .
Deuteronomy 30:15

That anyone would choose the way of death and evil is something that we profess to find astonishing, yet it happens every day, and we all do it. Just ask yourself, “Have I forgotten to pray for those who despitefully use me? Have I passed by the waylaid traveler on the Jericho road, when it was in my power to be a Good Samaritan?”

DEATH BY NEGLECT

By not doing good, we choose evil, just as by not pursuing the ways of life, we choose death. And sadly, we often don’t even realize we are making a choice, until it is too late. Someone dies, and I think, “Why didn’t I talk to them more when I had the chance?” Or I learn of some horrible pain in someone’s life — they get sick, lose their job or get a divorce, before I even knew they were having any kind of problem — and I think, “Why didn’t they tell me? Maybe I could have helped.” But I didn’t reach out to them, and they didn’t know I cared, and so they never imagined it would do any good to talk to me about their problems.

Mea culpa, as the old-school Catholics say, mea maxima culpa.

My sinful heart wants to judge others for their failures — when they don’t return my phone calls — and yet who has been a greater failure than me? Mea culpa.

People get angry at me for no good reason and I resent it. Yet I often become frustrated and unleash my fury at someone whose only error is to have crossed my path at the wrong time. Mea culpa.

Sometimes I feel neglected, but who have I neglected? Sometimes I get my feelings hurt, but how many times have I hurt other people’s feelings? What sin could anyone ever committ against me that I haven’t committed against others? What a wretched, evil, heartless person I am, to think that I should ever deserve any favor, courtesy or blessing, and yet what bounties of unsolicited blessings have been showered upon me? Mea maxima culpa.

‘FLYING MONKEYS’ IN THE CULTURE WAR

During a smoke break while I was writing this, I did what I habitually do when I’m not online: Go through the speed-dial on my cell phone, looking for someone I need to call. Dialed a source on the IG-Gate story, but no answer. Dialed a buddy, but no answer. Conservative lesbian Cynthia Yockey? Well, OK, let’s call her.

“Hi, Stacy!” she said, and next thing I knew she was telling me about her online war with the left-wing blog pests she calls “flying monkeys” (a reference to the minions of the Evil Witch in The Wizard of Oz.) Somehow, Cynthia had crossed the radar of certain Palin-hating leftoids, who had decided to attack her in the most vicious personal ways possible. (Michelle Malkin, are you paying attention?) Rather than throw traffic back at them — she’s a lesbian ex-Democrat who never heard of a “fair fight” — Cynthia had put up a post with this provocative title:

Sadly, yes! ‘Obama’s mama was trash and only 17-years-old when she got knocked up’

Beautiful. She had done that on Tuesday, but nobody in the conservative blogosphere paid attention. Mea culpa. And Cynthia told me about how the Obamabots had shut down a good libertarian woman blogger by their usual dishonest fascist methods. Mea maxima culpa.

I blame myself for this, because I have failed to act when it was within my power to help. And there are many other instances I could relate. My laziness, my selfishness, my neglectful habits – these are sins, you see. And who is not similarly guilty? I just shake my head when people tell me they can’t attend such-and-so event because . . . oh, well, never mind the excuses. The point is, people waste their lives in the most frivolous and trivial ways you could possibly imagine. As do we all.

OK, so I’m 49 and will be 50 in a few months. I’ve already outlived better men than me. Who knows how much more time I have left? So if I’m wasting time . . . mea culpa.

Life is too short, and death too long, for anyone to choose death by wasting their life and think that they are innocent. Time is money, you know, so when you pay money to waste your time, as a friend of mine said recently, you grieve the heart of God.

Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Amen.

onthego on July 19, 2009 at 2:12 AM

If you want to find some pro-natalist protestants, look up the acts 29 church planting network.

blakea83 on July 19, 2009 at 8:58 AM

It apears you have a very healthy conscience. No matter what conclusions you may come to about your personal sins, I think God is smiling knowing he still resides inside.
That is proof of life.

katy on July 19, 2009 at 9:47 AM

I rarely engage in religious discussions. For me it tends to lend itself toward the dissent within groups of people who share political goals but those people would rather concentrate on the minor differences of their respective religiosities than their commonalities. Now that I have prefaced you with that premise with no panacea on the horizon, lets discuss this a bit.

Are we to be edified by Protestant confessionalism here? This might be one of the reasons why you don’t get as much of the linky love from Allahpundit the Atheist and Captain Ed Morrissey the Catholic. How do you define your Protestantism? Does it lean toward Calvinism, Lutheranism or is it the Americanization of both for the Christianity sake your prepositional argument here. I was going to say propositional argument but decided that fallicies are in the eye of the beholder or is that the emboldened?

Now for the reference to… “Mea culpa, as the old-school Catholics say, mea maxima culpa” or in english “my fault”, or “my own fault.” Well I am one of those old Catholics and as my memory serves, mea culpa was just one of the many latin expressions thrust upon us in Catholic parochial school by those Episcopalian or Franciscan nuns along with the swats from yard sticks across our backsides & pieces of chalk pelted at the back of our heads for being disruptive in class. Oh, how I miss those days of corporal punishment by the nuns. Ah, but I digress from the mea culpa original point yet that is “my own fault” (pun intended). The “mea culpa” was not a dominant Catholic saying for me to live my life by but I’ll tell you what was. I thought being raised Catholic was to learn how to professionally apply the “guilt trip” on others if they were not receptive to your point of view (bending them to your will). It wasn’t until I turned 18 and ventured out into this big bad world and found out that the “guilt trip” phychology on others ended up being an universal human condition. Case in point, how else could an unqualified and inexperienced white man ascend to the presidency of the United States. Did I say white man? Well perhaps I was wrong, mea culpa, hmmmmm.

Robert, you are who you are and I respect you very much but please keep the religiosity out of these follow on post if you can. Do the best you can or at least keep it as far afield when trying to make a point. Thanks.

[ps] When was Deuteronomy written? Some say it was written during the 7th century which has become the linch-pin of Old Testement criticism. Funny that was when Muhammad was just coming into his own.

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM

[ps] When was Deuteronomy written? Some say it was written during the 7th century which has become the linch-pin of Old Testement criticism. Funny that was when Muhammad was just coming into his own.

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Are you serious about when Deuteronomy was written?
You can’t be.
Every prophet from beyond the time of the author Moses (including Jesus) quoted from it.
Do some research on…. Torah.

katy on July 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM

you’re “just a blogger,”

Sad to say, if it wasn’t for Hot Air®, I may have never known about The Washington Times existence. The funny thing about that is I lived in Columbia and Frederick County MD (at different times) for more than 3 years in the late 80’s. Honestly, blogs and paper print news media bore me to tears.

The “Life vs. Death” topic interests me. I can’t understand why we humans think it important to limit our numbers while no other species on the planet has ever felt it to be a good idea.

I simply do not enjoy reading blog websites. Many of the topics in The Greenroom are of interest to me. I find The Greenroom and Hot Air to be excellent sites for news, editorial, and commentary. I have to laugh when I read comments on Hot Air sopped with anger and frustration in reaction to Allah Pundit’s genius; in disapproval, they call him a click-whore. I wince when I read comments in The Greenroom sopped with praise, in reaction to a Greenroom poster’s genius; in admiration, they suggest the poster should have their own blog site. The eloquent Greenroom poster and the master of comment-producing squibs (and our beloved Ed,) have exposure to wide-scale loyal readership for posters, and provide readers and commenters a well-rounded waypoint on the Internet for a digest of current events, discoveries, observations, essays, and fun.

I was also reared in a man-made religious faith. I married a woman of Catholic faith. We both learned and continue to learn the value of life versus death. We learn through recognition of our own sins and from insightful writers conversant in the topics. The Church helps us keep perspective on where we’ve been and where we may venture from this point. I reflect about my past on why I was where I was, and your “Big Money and the Culture of Death” post did as I inferred in my comment, it provided me with another “why” why my past has some details that I prefer it did not.

Hot Air is my main source of news and information. I’m way too busy and lazy for any other type of media and Hot Air is easy for me to either access or dismiss with the click of a button. I can read it at work, at home, or on my cracker. The Greenroom provides me with depth on a topic written by an author who is interested and passionate about the topic. I find that I need a little more time more time to explore The Greenroom but it is always time well spent. It’s like spending the day in the library, but instead, its everywhere I go.

Your “Sunday Morning: Life vs. Death” post is uniquely seasoned. I’d love to see more of this from you as you find the time to share with us. My favorite thing about both The Greenroom and Hot Air sites is the community. Or is it because it provides a familiarity of diversity? I like all the directions that the comments take and the diverse opinions that comprise each thread. What could be better than reading (or posting) an item and at the same time discover that your take on the content of the item is shared by many or possibly by no one else but you? I’ll be looking for more from The Other McCain.

ericdijon on July 19, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Are you serious about when Deuteronomy was written?
You can’t be.
Every prophet from beyond the time of the author Moses (including Jesus) quoted from it.
Do some research on…. Torah.

katy on July 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM

I did research it. Hence, my post scripture to RSM.
BTW, In the book of Deuteronomy, the author (according to you is MOSES) writes of the death of Moses. How can someone who is dead write about their own death? That is the linch-pin of my argument and why there is the criticism of the Old Testement out there. When it was written or shall I say transcribed into the book of Deuteronomy must have occurred after the death of Moses. I did say that some say that it was written in the 7th century. I did not include myself in that statement. My guess is that it was probably transcribed between the time of Josiah and King Solomon.

Here comes some Trinity speak for you Katy:

In addition, of course Jesus can quote Deuteronomy. The Holy Bible’s words themselves was inspired through and from God, correct?. What makes you think God (or Jesus in this case) can’t repeat or speak his own words? I would have thought you figured that one out. God is everywhere and everlasting is he not? This is the argument that baffles most atheists. Ask Allahpundit yourself Katy if you think he can wrap his arms around Trinity speak. My guess is that Allahpundit has no thoughts on matters that never existed.

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 2:47 PM

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 2:47 PM

The last chapter of Deut was an account of his death. It made the Law complete.
In no way does that fact give speculation to its author or the time frame in which it was written down. It was the Word of God passed from Moses to the people. The stone Torah exisits. All of it in stone. In the Hebrew language one letter can represent thousands of words. The “ten commandments” was the entire 5 books of Moses.

Yes it was written down on skins later but it was not a new revelation to come about in the 7th century if that is what you suggest.

As far as trinity speak. Not sure what you mean by trinity speak….except perhaps an assumption of my faith walk on your part. I have studied Torah for years and do not subscribe to the “trinity” understanding of God.
Yes, Jesus did speak his own words. My point was they were not new to the people He spoke them to. The Jews of His time only had the Torah and the Prophets to study and learn from so it would be natural that he would use them to teach from. What He did was open those words up to a greater understanding and that proved a challenge to the religious leaders of His time hence the conflicts.
He read from the Torah in the temple. He used the words and instruction of the Torah in His sermons. That’s what I’m saying.

katy on July 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM

katy on July 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM

I rarely engage in religious discussions. For me it tends to lend itself toward the dissent within groups of people who share political goals but those people would rather concentrate on the minor differences of their respective religiosities than their commonalities. Now that I have prefaced you with that premise with no panacea on the horizon, lets discuss this a bit.

I cut and pasted the first paragraph from my first comment on this thread for you Katy. I stand by it because of the dissent that takes place when different religions are discussed. I’m done with you Katy. Bless & peace be with you in all your endeavors.

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 4:04 PM

I’m done with you Katy. Bless & peace be with you in all your endeavors.

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 4:04 PM

One final thought;
-Apparently you do not stand by your first paragraph or you would not have responded.
I asked you a question based on your post and you chose to respond. Your response back to me was spiced with the very thing claim you wanted to avoid.
For me it tends to lend itself toward the dissent within groups of people who share political goals but those people would rather concentrate on the minor differences of their respective religiosities than their commonalities.

Here comes some Trinity speak for you Katy:

In addition, of course Jesus can quote Deuteronomy. The Holy Bible’s words themselves was inspired through and from God, correct?. What makes you think God (or Jesus in this case) can’t repeat or speak his own words? I would have thought you figured that one out. God is everywhere and everlasting is he not? This is the argument that baffles most atheists. Ask Allahpundit yourself Katy if you think he can wrap his arms around Trinity speak. My guess is that Allahpundit has no thoughts on matters that never existed.

A little snark, a little hypocrisy a little attitude and a quick exit.

“I’m done with you Katy”?

hummmm…. That’s all you’ve got?

and an obvious and flagrantly disingenuous blessing…. but I’ll take it anyway ;o)

katy on July 19, 2009 at 5:05 PM

[ps] When was Deuteronomy written? Some say it was written during the 7th century which has become the linch-pin of Old Testement criticism. Funny that was when Muhammad was just coming into his own.

Americannodash on July 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Er, Muhammad was around 600 AD.

Pretty sure Dueteronomy had been around a few centuries by then.

cs89 on July 19, 2009 at 10:53 PM


You must be logged in to post a comment.