Comments on: If Palin Were President Now

By: jerrytbg

jerrytbg — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:28:33 +0000

Superb analyses…with equally so links…
This will be a permanent link for me…
Can’t wait use it… With your permission of course…;)

By: acat

acat — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:23:27 +0000

Eh.

Elections have consequences.

Putting a batch of RINOs like Arlen “idiot” Specter in office just to hold the seats cost the Repubs in 2006, and McCain’s failure to understand this cost him (and Palin) in 2008.

We don’t need “Republicans”. We need Conservatives. Men and women who will say “No” (or better, Hell No!) to pork-barrel politics and attempts to buy voters and instead working to shrink the government.

Mew

By: shmendrick

shmendrick — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:29:55 +0000

For some years now there has been an accelerating shift in moral authority from the left to the right. In the past, the left championed the individuals rights over bureaucratic entities especially if it was corporate but even if it was government. They railed against right wing dictatorships abroad and supported the pursuit of democratic human freedoms. This all began to change in the sixties and the left is now supporting left wing dictatorships abroad and big bureaucracy at home, be it big government, big union, or even big corporations(ie. GM, etc.).

The conservatives as led by Sarah Palin, are supporting minimal bureaucracy and government, pro individual rights, lower taxes and the sanctity of life. The left hasn’t conscioulsy realized their lost moral authority and it is why they so viciously attack Palin as she is now the populist spokesperson for this new moral authority for the people. She is at the head of a movement that is only now just starting to grow and take shape. And nothing the left can do will stop this trend. That is why they are so desperate to tear her down. The moral authority they once had is now lost and it has been transferred to the person who most represents the common “man” and who has become the de facto champion of individual rights and freedom and responsible but minimal government.

By: OlympicLeprechaun

OlympicLeprechaun — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:17:29 +0000

And I’m sure that the sight of Todd in his swimwear would be a welcome sight for the female electorate.

By: OlympicLeprechaun

OlympicLeprechaun — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:16:32 +0000

If Palin were President now…

Soon after the election we could have been treated to the sight of Sarah and family on vacation, celebrating on the beach in her bathing suit.

Exit, stage left, to a cold shower.

By: Daggett

Daggett — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:45:57 +0000

1,000 times Amen. I can’t believe people are still bent on criticizing Palin in view of all the crap we get from Obama.

By: The Dean

The Dean — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:00:33 +0000

It would depend on who are the top advisors to Palin. If it is Ron Paul and Thomas Woods, then we would be in much better shape.

But if you think for a second that there wouldn’t be a deficit if John McCain and Bill Kristol were giving marching orders, you’re fooling yourselves.

By: ericdijon

ericdijon — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:32:06 +0000

Sad to say that I don’t have the same kind of faith in our team as your point requires. Palin may have fought all that you’ve listed, but we have U&L houses that have several inches of lib fat around their waistlines. With the color and fervor of these houses, the drooling blood-thirsty rhetoric, and the smell of pork in the morning, I think we citizens would have had a good lesson in exactly how overriding a veto happens.

By: RightOFLeft

RightOFLeft — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:07:01 +0000

If Palin were President, we would not have: …

Ditto for McCain, for all the good it did him.

By: letget

letget — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:30:51 +0000

I am SO sorry Sarah isn’t President of the United States, but bho is. This bho is beyond a horrible President and he does not care one flit for anything that doesn’t help him or mo!
L