If Palin Were President Now
posted at 11:52 am on July 11, 2009 by Legal Insurrection
printer-friendly
Sarah Palin’s announcement that she will resign as Governor of Alaska has kicked off a new round of attacks on Palin’s intelligence and integrity from pundits on both sides of the political spectrum. For most of the commentators, the resignation signals an end to Palin’s chances at becoming President.
Few of the critics supported Palin before the resignation, so the resignation is not so much a revelation to them, as an opportunity to say “I told you so” and to take more cheap shots at Palin and her family. Among the non-political classes who form the base of Palin’s support, I’m not sure the resignation makes much difference.
Despite the criticism of Palin and assertions that she is unfit for the presidency, it is hard to imagine that Palin could do any worse as President than Barack Obama is doing right now. For all Obama’s smarts and syntax, he is driving this country off a cliff, with the pedal down to the floor while he reads the drivers’ manual on how the brakes work.
If Palin were President, we would not have:
- A debt and deficit rising so far out of proportion to historical norms as to threaten the near-and-long term viability of the country’s ability to service the debt without destroying the value of the dollar, and passing on to our children and grandchildren unsustainable burdens.
- A stimulus package filled with pork and giveaways to political constituencies, pushed through under false and fraudulent claims of job creation, and exaggerated claims of immediate economic disaster which themselves hurt the markets, in a process so disgusting that not a single Representative or Senator read the bill before voting.
- Health care proposals which are wolves in sheep’s clothing, using a seemingly benign “public option” to drive out private insurers, to increase the percentage of people dependent on the government, and eventually to obtain the “one nation, one plan” nationalization of health care which is the holy grail of Obama and his left-wing supporters.
- A “cap-and-trade” proposal which seeks to regulate and tax the most fundamental aspects of the economy based upon the pure hubris that bureaucrats in Washington are capable of knowing what is best for individual businesses, and arising from disputed science as to the existence and causes of global warming, while proponents like Al Gore stand ready to make fortunes from “trading” carbon credits.
- A foreign policy which strong-arms allies such as Israel and Honduras, while paying deference to enemies such as Hugo Chavez and Mahmood Ahmadinejad, and which denigrates the U.S. by showing subservience to foreign rulers and by distorting the historical role of the U.S.
- An energy policy which increases our current dependence of foreign oil by locking up domestic resources, in the speculative hope that someday, somehow, alternative energy sources will make up the difference.
- The use of federal government power to bully the private sector into giving up property rights in favor of unions and other political supporters of the administration, rather than letting the rule of law work in the normal fashion in auto industry bankruptcy proceedings, as happened with other industries that restructured.
An administration spinning out of control because of the same disease which characterizes all central planners; the false sense that central government is best suited to make decisions for individuals. And add to it the hubris of the political classes, the people who cannot fathom that anyone without the proper degrees or who isn’t articulate lacks intelligence or common sense. By the time Obama figures out how to use the brakes, it will not matter.
Say what you want about Sarah Palin, she does not suffer from the Master of the Universe complex which drives this administration to push hard on the gas pedal as we approach the cliff. So who is the fool?
Cross-posted with updates at Legal Insurrection Blog
You must be logged in to post a comment.


Greenroom Feed
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I am SO sorry Sarah isn’t President of the United States, but bho is. This bho is beyond a horrible President and he does not care one flit for anything that doesn’t help him or mo!
L
letget on July 11, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Ditto for McCain, for all the good it did him.
RightOFLeft on July 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM
Sad to say that I don’t have the same kind of faith in our team as your point requires. Palin may have fought all that you’ve listed, but we have U&L houses that have several inches of lib fat around their waistlines. With the color and fervor of these houses, the drooling blood-thirsty rhetoric, and the smell of pork in the morning, I think we citizens would have had a good lesson in exactly how overriding a veto happens.
ericdijon on July 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM
It would depend on who are the top advisors to Palin. If it is Ron Paul and Thomas Woods, then we would be in much better shape.
But if you think for a second that there wouldn’t be a deficit if John McCain and Bill Kristol were giving marching orders, you’re fooling yourselves.
The Dean on July 11, 2009 at 3:00 PM
1,000 times Amen. I can’t believe people are still bent on criticizing Palin in view of all the crap we get from Obama.
Daggett on July 11, 2009 at 6:45 PM
If Palin were President now…
Soon after the election we could have been treated to the sight of Sarah and family on vacation, celebrating on the beach in her bathing suit.
Exit, stage left, to a cold shower.
OlympicLeprechaun on July 11, 2009 at 10:16 PM
And I’m sure that the sight of Todd in his swimwear would be a welcome sight for the female electorate.
OlympicLeprechaun on July 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM
For some years now there has been an accelerating shift in moral authority from the left to the right. In the past, the left championed the individuals rights over bureaucratic entities especially if it was corporate but even if it was government. They railed against right wing dictatorships abroad and supported the pursuit of democratic human freedoms. This all began to change in the sixties and the left is now supporting left wing dictatorships abroad and big bureaucracy at home, be it big government, big union, or even big corporations(ie. GM, etc.).
The conservatives as led by Sarah Palin, are supporting minimal bureaucracy and government, pro individual rights, lower taxes and the sanctity of life. The left hasn’t conscioulsy realized their lost moral authority and it is why they so viciously attack Palin as she is now the populist spokesperson for this new moral authority for the people. She is at the head of a movement that is only now just starting to grow and take shape. And nothing the left can do will stop this trend. That is why they are so desperate to tear her down. The moral authority they once had is now lost and it has been transferred to the person who most represents the common “man” and who has become the de facto champion of individual rights and freedom and responsible but minimal government.
shmendrick on July 11, 2009 at 10:29 PM
Eh.
Elections have consequences.
Putting a batch of RINOs like Arlen “idiot” Specter in office just to hold the seats cost the Repubs in 2006, and McCain’s failure to understand this cost him (and Palin) in 2008.
We don’t need “Republicans”. We need Conservatives. Men and women who will say “No” (or better, Hell No!) to pork-barrel politics and attempts to buy voters and instead working to shrink the government.
Mew
acat on July 12, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Superb analyses…with equally so links…
This will be a permanent link for me…
Can’t wait use it… With your permission of course…;)
jerrytbg on July 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM