Why Sarah Palin should appear on Letterman’s show

posted at 2:17 pm on June 16, 2009 by

A lot has been said already about David Letterman’s comments on Governor Sarah Palin’s daughters. And some aren’t going to like what the title of this post suggests, but I do think it’s worth exploring the possibility that the Governor would appear on the Late Show, now that he has apologized and Governor Palin has accepted.

When Letterman first offered to have Palin on, I think everyone recognized it for the “joke” that it was: a not-so-subtle challenge to Palin that if she wanted to engage him, it would be on his terms and without a mea culpa for her daughters. No doubt, his drubbing over the last week from the full spectrum of political observers, most notably NOW, compelled some reflection on Letterman’s part about the apology, which brought us to last night’s soliloquy of sorry. As far as Letterman is concerned, his apology (and it was, I think, a full and sincere one) ends the issue.

But this episode, for a variety of reasons, shouldn’t just end there, and it’s a mistake to interpret a Palin appearance to be a reward to Letterman for bad behavior. Letterman’s invitation is an opportunity to remind Americans of, or alternately introduce them to, the subtext of the Letterman-Palin feud — that Palin and her family are a special target for the lib media. That her appearance resulted from a symptom of the media’s double-standard disease is all the more important.

And Palin and Letterman don’t even have to say a word about the subtext at all. Through Letterman, Palin would get to engage her detractors openly, comprehensively, confidently, and on a highly visible public stage, simply by being present. It’s an opportunity that to this point hasn’t really been possible.

As a rhetorical strategy, Palin’s timing actually makes a great deal of sense, said Richard Vatz, a professor of political communication at Towson University and a self-described conservative. Noting that the pregnant-daughter jokes had been dying down, Letterman’s crack stood out, making him easier to isolate for criticism, he said.

“If a large number of people are doing something against you, it’s hard to take on the whole group,” Vatz said.

Palin can’t do much to curb the anti-Palin misogyny that’s out there, but she can make its most visible and egregious instances a cautionary tale that she and her family are not just going to be stepped on, and one of the best ways to do that is to draw those critics closer to her when they’re weakest. And not all critics should be, or have to be, addressed on-set; Bill Maher is more amoeba than big fish. The Governor can’t be running around, putting out embers in the middle of a forest fire.

And make no mistake, Letterman won’t become some Palin partisan if she comes to his studio, but an appearance on his show, under these circumstances, will do much to undermine and undercut future shots at her and her family, a clear demonstration that rather than avoiding controversy, the Palins and Sarah Palin specifically are not afraid to fight their detractors, defeat them, and bring them if not into an orbit of congeniality, then some semblence of neutrality. Crazier things have happened.

MARCIE KLEIN, SENIOR PRODUCER “SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE”:  Well, the first, I actually was the first person to meet her. She, one of the NBC pages, or someone in my office brought her up to the eighth floor, and I was standing there, and I, I, I thought, “Oh my God, she looks just like Tina.” I mean, I couldn’t believe how much she looked liked Tina. And, Tina was happened to be in my office, and I ran into my office, I shook her hand, and she had incredibly strong, you know, handshake, but I was overwhelmed by how much she physically looked like Tina, and how — Tina Fey — and how a lot of people come to our show, actors, musicians, and they’re nervous. I mean, you know, “Saturday Night Live, I watched this my whole life.” She was not nervous. I thought, “This is the most confident person I’ve ever met.” I walked into my office and said to Tina, “You’re gonna freak out, she looks exactly like you, or you like exactly like her.” She said, “She’s prettier than I am.”

MENIN: Do you think that maybe she wasn’t nervous because she hadn’t watched the show before? Did she say if she’d watched the show before?

KLEIN: I’m sure she watched the show before, I don’t know, but I think she’s just a person with a lot of confidence. And I think when you see people with confidence, you like that. You know, you trust, you know, you, there’s something, there’s something to confidence that, that people respond to.

Indeed, there is.

Letterman won’t be the last on-air personality, blogger, or media entity that takes a shot at Palin, and I think everyone appreciates the fact that Palin’s unique place in the American psyche will compel other scumbags to besmirch the Governor in ways unimaginable for other politicians, particularly Democrats. But the fact that she won’t be afforded such common courtesies of decent dialogue and criticism isn’t a sufficient reason to spurn those who come, hat in hand, to atone for their over-reaches. In fact, it’s a reason to do the opposite.

It’s not about Letterman. It’s about Sarah Palin effectively defending her family and herself, now and for the long haul. And one of the best ways to do that is to appear on Letterman’s show.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

My thoughts exactly. He’s invited her to the track, so why not take a victory lap?

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Maybe a couple of months down the line, but not now. Do it now, and Letterman will be under huge pressure from the left to “avenge” the recent humiliation by at the very least going full Katie Couric on her during the interview. No jokes about the kids, but a treatment that would make Dave’s recent visits with Bill O’Reilly look like love-fests by comparison (and if he feels like he’s getting in trouble, it would simply be time for the old Jon Stewart “Clown Nose Off/Clown Nose On” routine). Plus no matter what the segment goes like, the media spin the next day work be that Dave “pulled victory from the jaws of defeat” by doing something or getting Palin to say something on the show.

Better to delay the visit until sometime down the line, when most people have put the Willowdonneybrook out of their minds, and where if Letterman starts bringing this battle up again in a hostile tone, it would just show he can’t let go of his Palin hatred.

jon1979 on June 16, 2009 at 4:00 PM

There is no way he’s going to do the “full Katie Couric.” If he even hints that he’s going after her, this all starts up all over again. He already knows he can lose business by attacking this lady. I really think it could be the perfect opportunity for her to show she’s got what it takes to play this game.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Couldn’t disagree more. as jon1979 states, she’ll be set up for something which will end up in the media as “Letterman exposes Palin’s stupidity/hypocrisy/bad mothering…”. What conservatives should be doing is ramping up the pressure to get Letterman fired. He’s a sack of shit who needs to be put in the trash. Anyone who thinks his apology sincere, or his attitude changed is delusional. Palin is correct to forgive, in keeping with her Christian beliefs, and to get out of the way so that the base can take this guy out while the getting is good. Palin should never go on his show, in his home court and sit in the hot seat while he presides over her behind the big desk. If he wants her on his show, then he goes to Alaska, he sits in the baby seat while she presides, and he kisses the ring.

fitzsweetpea on June 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM

There is no way he’s going to do the “full Katie Couric.” If he even hints that he’s going after her, this all starts up all over again. He already knows he can lose business by attacking this lady. I really think it could be the perfect opportunity for her to show she’s got what it takes to play this game.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Since it’s still a hot issue, he’d have people from CBS, NBC and other liberal magazines giving him questions to grill Palin with. And like I said, he would keep the kids out of it, to the point it would be more like a “60 Minutes” piece than a segment on a late-night show, unless there was trouble. Then it would be “Clown Nose On” time.

Sure, a lot of conservatives would be outraged and say this proves he learned nothing and the apology was insincere, but the left would counter that Dave asked Sarah hard news questions, and the right is just whining that their girl was treated unfairly (never mind that the last time Letterman grilled a liberal hard was when he went after James Carville in 1999 because he was pissed over how Clinton had screwed up the Democrats’ agenda with his Lewinsky diddiling). And of course, in scoring the rematch, the media would be about as fair as one of Vince McMahon’s WWE referees.

Give it a few months, and Letterman will still be hot over being forced to apologize, and the people he talks to and reads will still be hot over losing this skirmish, while most normal-thinking humans will have gone on to other issues. If we’re 4-5 months down the line and Palin’s said nothing about Dave between now and then, and then he comes out and treats her like Mike Wallace confronting some neerdowell in a hidden camera ambush interview, you’ll have a lot more of the public understanding that Letterman both holds a grudge and is carrying water for Palin’s potential opponents.

jon1979 on June 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM

If he wants her on his show, then he goes to Alaska, he sits in the baby seat while she presides, and he kisses the ring.

fitzsweetpea on June 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM

I’m fine with either one, but that would indeed be sweet.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

You’re full of sh!t, Patrick.
Your claptrap is nothing but a mouthful of mealy-mouthed double-talk from a moderate trying too hard to be nice.

She said what she said, and she won’t be going on his show.

It saddens me that we have lowered ourselves to congenially accepting and rewarding such unacceptable behavior!

You have made no valid point, worth repeating!

Period.

Because it would be rewarding bad behavior to go on his show and only someone taught in a liberal school system – where bad behavior is rewarded all the time – would say something like you just did.

You are sickening, really.

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

He is not going to grill her. He just got done apologizing to her in front of the whole country. It’s in his best interest, professionally speaking, to appear as evenhanded as possible with her.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

Not everything is best solved with a full frontal assault, General.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 5:12 PM

If he wants her on his show, then he goes to Alaska, he sits in the baby seat while she presides, and he kisses the ring.

fitzsweetpea on June 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM

I’m fine with either one, but that would indeed be sweet.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

that would be sa-weeeeeeeeeeet!

however, i am inclined to think that he is not worth her trouble.

i mean, what did sarah get out of her appearance on SNL? and what about mccain’s back-and-forth with letterman during the campaigh? did it really help john at all? doesn’t seem like it did…

it’s a tough call.

homesickamerican on June 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM

You might have a point.

But at times I wonder if the only way to win is not to play. A little … Outlaw, as it were.

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM

You are sickening, really.

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

Tell me how you really feel.

Patrick on June 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM

She said she would not go on his show and boost his ratings and she should stick to that plan, for a long time. If his show is still on the air when she’s running for office, then re-evaluate. At this point it wouldl definitely be rewarding bad behavior and setting an example for the likes of Maher and other idiots.

liv2race on June 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM

It’s in his best interest, professionally speaking, to appear as evenhanded as possible with her.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

Again, little socialist educated children…. rewarding bad behavior at any point afterward, is NOT WHAT WE USED TO DO.

But, I see this is a mute point, since I see that I am talking to damaged brains. And so of course it’s all Greek clap-trap to you.

I give up.

Enjoy your country.

You deserve it.

Good bye.

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:49 PM

It’s in his best interest, professionally speaking, to appear as evenhanded as possible with her.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

if he were a “journalist” trying to appear objective, i would agree.

but he’s not. he’s a bitter old leftist comedian with a hard-on for sarah, and i seriously doubt that he would be able to control himself.

homesickamerican on June 16, 2009 at 5:52 PM

But, I see this is a mute point, since I see that I am talking to damaged brains.

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:49 PM

I assume you mean “moot point.”

Patrick on June 16, 2009 at 5:57 PM

btw, nice blog, patrick!

homesickamerican on June 16, 2009 at 6:00 PM

btw, nice blog, patrick!

homesickamerican on June 16, 2009 at 6:00 PM

Thanks!

Patrick on June 16, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:49 PM

For some reason I can’t read this guy’s stuff without hearing “Macho Man” by Village People in the background.

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 16, 2009 at 6:14 PM

She said she would not go on his show and boost his ratings and she should stick to that plan, for a long time.

liv2race on June 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM

That was before he apologized. It’s an entirely different environment now. If she waits, say, six months, everybody will have forgotten the whole thing and he’ll be free to play his little games again. Right now he isn’t.

But, I see this is a mute point, since I see that I am talking to damaged brains.

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:49 PM

There no humor like unintentional humor.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 6:17 PM

And there’s nothing like making a spelling error while laughing at somebody else’s spelling error!

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Karma ran over your dogma.

What can I say, I like antiques.

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 16, 2009 at 6:21 PM

Huh. I might have to get a television for that one.

fronclynne on June 16, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Because it would be rewarding bad behavior to go on his show and only someone taught in a liberal school system – where bad behavior is rewarded all the time – would say something like you just did.

Actually, it would be rewarding good behavior – the apology. It would establish the symbolic reality that A LIBERAL CAN APOLOGIZE to Sarah Palin and re-join the human race. That’s something that we should want lots of people who’ve gone idiotically strange over Sarah Palin to feel like doing. Purely as a political matter – and regardless of whether or not you believe She’s the One.

The easiest way to teach a dog to do something is to show it another dog that already knows how to do it – eating from a bowl, using a doggie-door, taking “a walk” outside.

The more dogs we get to walk through the door and take their walks outside, the better.

I concur with Mr Treacher and Patrick.

For the puppies.

CK MacLeod on June 16, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Summarizing: “It’s OK to change your mind and be nice to conservatives.”

Isn’t that a big part of the political message we need to send to a few million voters sooner or later?

CK MacLeod on June 16, 2009 at 6:54 PM

Most likely it would be, not just OK, but GREAT for Letterman. As bitter and squinched a repellent loser as he may be, he couldn’t help but treat her gently. He might even find himself liking her. He’s certainly like the ratings boost. Political message: It’s GREAT to be nice to Sarah Palin. As for forgiving bad behavior, she’s a believing Christian and bigger than any insults. She wants to be a leader of all the people, even the bitter and squinched repellent losers.

Idunno, sorry for over-posting, but I’m liking this idea a lot. Another rule of American culture: Feed the beast!

CK MacLeod on June 16, 2009 at 6:58 PM

CK MacLeod on June 16, 2009 at 6:58 PM

What the guy who’s way smarter than me said.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 7:06 PM

The easiest way to teach a dog to do something is to show it another dog that already knows how to do it – eating from a bowl, using a doggie-door, taking “a walk” outside.

The more dogs we get to walk through the door and take their walks outside, the better.

I concur with Mr Treacher and Patrick.

For the puppies.

CK MacLeod on June 16, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Oh IF ONLY. Please inform my puppy of this.

TheUnrepentantGeek on June 16, 2009 at 7:15 PM

I think it would be a good idea, actually. But Sarah Palin is only human, and a lot of the insane moonbat search-and-destroy tactics have no doubt hurt her personally. So I don’t see it happening.

ddrintn on June 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM

“This is the most confident person I’ve ever met.” I walked into my office and said to Tina, “You’re gonna freak out, she looks exactly like you, or you like exactly like her.” She said, “She’s prettier than I am.”

I look about as much like Sarah Palin as Tina Fey does.

ddrintn on June 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM

No. If you’re Sarah Palin, you pick Sweeps Week (in November, I believe), then you ask NBC (quietly) if you can go on Conan during their hottest viewing night (isn’t that Thursday?).

You go on Conan during Sweeps Week and never breathe a word about Dave during the interview with Conan.

victor82 on June 16, 2009 at 7:38 PM

Gov. Palin does not need to appear on Letterman’s show. He’s dying in the ratings and needs every boost he can get. She could go on Conan’s and get her point across.

Kissmygrits on June 16, 2009 at 8:37 PM

First of all, she needs to run a state that’s a whole night’s journey away from NYC. Did you recognize that? Or do you want her to fly down just for this pervert’s sake?

promachus on June 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM

Letterman is now joking/mocking about Palin accepting his apology.

“The good news is Sarah Palin has accepted my apology. She also accepted a $500 gift certificate from Lens Crafters”

As if she can be bought.

I don’t buy the sincerity of his apology. He is trying to milk it. If Sarah went on his show he would mock her still, while benefiting from huge ratings.

Can’t imagine why anyone would think it is a good idea for her to go on his show. Letterman’s audience would boo her every word.

Geochelone on June 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Actually, you ignore the late night losers and you do your job in Alaska. If serious journalists want to talk to you, you either do it via satellite or they come to you.

Sarah Palin is bigger than these fools, and far more important.

Shotgun Messiah on June 16, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Be careful what you wish for. Anyone that gets snippy with Letterman to his face gets their ass handed to them.

Letterman would obliterate Palin. I thought the classy (and politically smart) thing to do would have been for her to go to his show and receive an apology in person. Too late for that.

Anyone that actually believes Palin can stand toe to toe with Letterman is way wrong.

Letterman won’t forget how he has been treated by Palin and her fans, anyway. If Palin runs in 2012, Letterman will be waiting. It’s supposed to be his last year on the air, and he will unload everything on her with no filters whatsoever.

Moesart on June 16, 2009 at 8:46 PM

I don’t think she needs to go on Letterman. First of all it is exactly rewarding him for bad behavior. He’ll tell his sponsors, “Look she even came on the show, we’re not so bad…” and then like others have said he’ll try to do a 60 minutes type interview with her. What exactly does Palin gain by going on Letterman???? I only see a lose-lose situation. Remember it didn’t help her by going on SNL to confront Tina Fey other than Fey saying she was nice, etc. Palin’s problem right now is the late-night shows and people just not taking her as serious as they should. Going on Letterman’s show isn’t going to help that. Doing more Matt Lauer segments where she sounds confident and articulate are what will help.

LtBarnwell02 on June 16, 2009 at 8:47 PM

Quite frankly the people who watch Letterman are the rabid Left and will never like or vote for her. She should not grace him with her presence and she should not give him the ratings boost.

CCRWM on June 16, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Well, now that Mobysart has spoken, we all know the truth.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Moesart on June 16, 2009 at 8:46 PM

You didn’t see Letterman groveling his a$$ off?

CCRWM on June 16, 2009 at 8:50 PM

I think the general strategy for Palin is to use her talents to drown her enemies.

Letterman attacks her – she appears on Conan – have fun with that Letterman.

The NRSC attacks her – she campaigns for Mario Rubio (a conservative republican the NRSC declared war on).

You want to win a firefight – you have to outflank the enemy.

HondaV65 on June 16, 2009 at 8:52 PM

I’m pretty sick of the ‘as long as he/she apologizes, all’s well’ garbage.
Something to be rewarded ? Get real.
Don’t ever bother with this idiot, Sarah.

Now that’s a decent idea, victor82 on June 16, 2009 at 7:38 PM
LOL

pambi on June 16, 2009 at 8:53 PM

“Now when I call your name, please come forward and pick up your apology. [Laughter, applause] I wanna get through this as quickly as possibly so you folks can get to the ‘Fire Dave Rally.’ [Cheering] It’s nice that people hate me who are no longer just part of my immediate family. My son, he’s telling everybody at school that his father is Conan!”

“The good news is Sarah Palin has accepted my apology. She also accepted a $500 gift certificate from Lens Crafters. I thought that was a nice touch,” he said. “I tell you, I was quite nervous about this whole thing, and I was really nervous about an apology to Sarah Palin, so when I did get my confidence up and my nerves to settle down, I rehearsed by apologizing to Tina Fey. That helped. That was a big help. [Applause]”

“The big news here today in New York City is the ‘Fire Dave Protest Rally’ and it’s going on right now. You folks are missing the real show, I’m sorry. Do we have a camera out there? Let’s check in on the Fire Dave Rally, it’s at 54th and Broadway!” he said. Directors then cut to footage of various looting rallies from around the world, with a graphic reading “Midtown Paralyzed By Anti-Letterman Protest” underneath.

Letterman’s famous “Top Ten” list was also written to poke fun at the protest, appropriately titled “Top Ten Things Overheard at the Fire David Letterman Rally.” It included such quips as “David who?” and “When does Cheney get here with the waterboarding gear?”

————————————-

That’s what happens when you go up against a pro. You end up being the joke. You can’t say you weren’t warned.

Moesart on June 16, 2009 at 8:53 PM

victor82 on June 16, 2009 at 7:38 PM

Absolutely, that is just what I was thinking, go on Conan. What a great ‘screw you Dave’ and he deserves it. If anyone thinks that sorry-a$$ apology was from the heart, you are just kidding yourself. Ugly old dave will be nipping at her again before you can count to 10…….

clinker46 on June 16, 2009 at 8:56 PM

And…how creepy for Sarah to sit there with the guy who announced on his show that he gets aroused by her …ewwww yuck!

CCRWM on June 16, 2009 at 8:57 PM

Moesart on June 16, 2009 at 8:53 PM

All he is saying is you don’t bother me neener neener neener

CCRWM on June 16, 2009 at 9:00 PM

That’s what happens when you go up against a pro.

Moesart on June 16, 2009 at 8:53 PM

You have to grovel at her feet for forgiveness.

Jim Treacher on June 16, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Wrong wrong wrong to even suggest Sara Palin go on Letterman. Letterman wouldn’t attack her, but you can bet your ass that his bookers would have someone like Garafolo or some drooler like that to attack her for him. It’d be a setup. Forget Letterman.
Go on Conan.

44Magnum on June 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM

You are sickening, really.

Mcguyver on June 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

Classic projection.

What’s sickening is your display of breathless, overwrought, hyperbolic ad hominem spewage. You didn’t even try to substantively address any of the author’s points; in fact, I’m reasonably sure you didn’t even read what he wrote. You just spewed bile.

Sickening. And pathetic. And ironically a pretty good illustration of exactly what the author was explaining: when you confront infantile vulgarity with rational maturity, you generally come out looking awfully good by comparison.

Palin is to Letterman, as Patrick is to you. And Patrick owes you a thanks for so clearly illustrating his point.

Professor Blather on June 16, 2009 at 9:06 PM

I agree with Patrick. There’s very little downside, and I think Letterman would be on his best behavior considering.

changer1701 on June 16, 2009 at 9:07 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3