Ritalin. Buy ritalin….

Lortab online pharmacy. Buy lortab….

Strip poker. Poker stars….

Stand tall, my friend. You might just be the finest human being who has ever lived.
Jim Treacher on June 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM

How do you explain your stupid name?
I hope you never have a daughter.
Jim Treacher on June 13, 2009 at 1:08 AM

That was quite a tantrum.
Jim Treacher on June 13, 2009 at 7:53 PM

Here are a couple of other crazy wacky book-burners for you to seethe about, Bill:
http://www.sheckymagazine.com/2009/06/lettermans-non-apology.html
Jim Treacher on June 13, 2009 at 7:54 PM

And I hope you start acting more like your last name and keeping it cool.
Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM

Now you do.

Who did Spitzer rape? I hope you aren’t self projecting.

How do you explain this line that used to be in the banner of your blog?
“Mother, may I sleep with Treacher”

I know it’s not there now. But when I checked in awhile back and seen that I chuckled. But some, like you now, would think it’s a reference to statutory rape.

That answer is pathetic.

There is something sick and twisted in your logic that you want to keep insisting Letterman was referring to raping Willow. Why? Because the apology has to be your way or the highway? I think I’ll take back the doubt. Thou doth protest too much, methinks. Your attitude makes me think you would like to burn or ban some of William Shakespeare’s works. Or muzzle Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor, George Carlin, etc.

I stand corrected.

And I hope you start acting more like your last name and keeping it cool.
Jim Treacher on June 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM

VBG

You were not, to a certain extent, “Mr. Freeze” yourself. About 5 to 10 degrees lower then me. Fahrenheit not Celsius.

Bill Blizzard on June 14, 2009 at 12:03 PM

And I hope you start acting more like your last name and keeping it cool.

Thanks for the link. I hope you read all the comments to that post.

http://www.sheckymagazine.com/2009/06/lettermans-non-apology.html

Bill Blizzard on June 13, 2009 at 7:24 PM

That was quite a tantrum. Well, you asked.

RE: eforhan on June 13, 2009 at 12:19 AM

You are right. I stand corrected. Sorry!

Jim Treacher on June 13, 2009 at 1:08 AM

RE: Mother, May I Sleep with Danger?
That answer is pathetic. That and a dollar will get you a McChicken sandwich at McDonald’s. Do you think yourself to be “Mr. Danger“ because of your musings on the blog? It was dangerous to write your PC babble here, ( would you like some cheese with that whine? ), not thinking about the implications of your old banner.

The only letter separating your name from “teacher” is the letter “r”. So they both sound almost exactly the same when pronounced phonetically. So, “Mother may I sleep with Treacher” is a statutory rape joke made worse because a teacher is an authority figure. But I’ll give you the benefit of doubt and chalk it up to not thinking it through.

A mistake. Just like Letterman’s writers. They scan through a news story about Palin visiting NYC and find an itinerary but missed the part of who was accompanying her, if it was in the article they read at all. I and everyone I asked, about 40 people, had no idea who was accompanying Palin in NYC. The people that seen it live thought he was referring to Bristle. I told the joke to those that didn’t see it and they thought the same. And so did his audience which I would assume are a majority of New Yorkers.

You started this topic after Letterman made it clear in his half assed apology that he wasn’t referring to Willow. There is something sick and twisted in your logic that you want to keep insisting Letterman was referring to raping Willow. Why? Because the apology has to be your way or the highway? I think I’ll take back the doubt. Thou doth protest too much, methinks. Your attitude makes me think you would like to burn or ban some of William Shakespeare’s works. Or muzzle Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor, George Carlin, etc.

From Palin’s response:

“Plus, it would be wise to keep Willow away from David Letterman.”

Letterman invited only Sarah and Todd on the show. Not the whole family. That statement isn’t a joke and it implies Willow being raped for sure according to your logic.

How do you explain this line that used to be in the banner of your blog?
“Mother, may I sleep with Treacher”

With this. How do you explain your stupid name?

I know it’s not there now. But when I checked in awhile back and seen that I chuckled. But some, like you now, would think it’s a reference to statutory rape. But nannies like you seem to know the magical dividing line on what humor steps over that line.

Bill Blizzard on June 12, 2009 at 11:34 PM

Yes, genius, joking about raping a 14-year-old girl does cross my line. If it doesn’t cross yours, I hope you never have a daughter.

Good thread, Treach. They’ve set the PC rules and we either have to make them use them or ignore them completely. The former former will hopefully show the libs for the hypocrites they are.

eforhan on June 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM

LOL! I accused Treacher of being PC, not Palin.

Jim Treacher on June 12, 2009 at 10:52 PM

How do you explain this line that used to be in the banner of your blog?
“Mother, may I sleep with Treacher”

I know it’s not there now. But when I checked in awhile back and seen that I chuckled. But some, like you now, would think it’s a reference to statutory rape. But nannies like you seem to know the magical dividing line on what humor steps over that line.

Bill Blizzard on June 12, 2009 at 6:45 PM

Not liking jokes about a child being sexually assaulted, or the blundering attempts to excuse it — sorry, but if you’re following Sarah Palin’s activities closely enough to make a joke about her daughter getting knocked up at a baseball game, you can at least make sure you’re slandering the correct one — is politically correct. How about that.

Stand tall, my friend. You might just be the finest human being who has ever lived.

seesalrun on June 12, 2009 at 1:12 AM

That’s exactly what they’re doing. Their goal is to run Sarah Palin out of public life by attacking her family. I don’t care for it, and letting it happen without opposition seems like an odd way of moving forward.

Jim Treacher on June 12, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Their goal is to destroy this Country and anyone who supports it with it.

Our goal is to save it. WE have to concentrate on the goal and not lower ourselves to their level. THAT would give them exactly what they want.

That being said, I’m glad Palin is on the offense as she should be. If anyone public or private had said something like that about my daughter, well…

Jim Treacher on June 12, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Sorry Jim. I didn’t see the video from the first night that started the controversy. But after watching it and considering Letterman made clear he was referring to Palin’s 18yo, I still think you are being way too PC. Palin shouldn’t have put her children in the spotlight during the RNC convention. Especially with the 18yo being pregnant at the time while being a spokesperson for abstinence education, funded by an apparel manufacturer which makes slutty clothing for tweens. As far as my friends and I are concerned, nothing is taboo when it comes to jokes. If you wince we consider you to be PC. My Jewish friends even make jokes about the Holocaust. Libs were outraged at Rush’s shot at Chelsea Clinton and my friends and I considered them to be PC. After reading Hot Air for the past 3 years I thought being PC was a taboo here.

RE: “Their goal is to run Sarah Palin out of public life by attacking her family.”

From the comments section it appears Palin supporters and conservatives don’t watch Letterman. Therefore the goal you attribute here wouldn’t work. The only motive was to get a cheap laugh.

You have a hell of an imagination. How does that translate into rape? It was Spitzer who was on the receiving end of that line not Palin’s daughter.

Bill Blizzard on June 12, 2009 at 2:15 AM

Why are you pretending not to know I’m talking about the A-Rod joke?

I’d be more ambivalent about the Spitzer joke if it hadn’t come a full 24 hours after the first one. It seems very unlikely that somebody on Letterman’s staff hadn’t been told by then that Willow went on that trip, not Bristol.

Move forward. Concentrate on the goal, not the Enemy.

seesalrun on June 12, 2009 at 1:12 AM

That’s exactly what they’re doing. Their goal is to run Sarah Palin out of public life by attacking her family. I don’t care for it, and letting it happen without opposition seems like an odd way of moving forward.

More Leftist Numb-nuts taking a Dump on Air…

mr1216 on June 11, 2009 at 2:46 PM

THAT was the most disgusting part of this to me also. Any “man” that sat in the audience and laughed at that buck toothed, bastard daddy, pedophile (lighten up, Dave, it was a joke) should submit to an orchidectomy. They don’t need them anymore.

That’s right, not liking jokes about little girls being raped is political correctness.
Jim Treacher on June 11, 2009 at 6:44 PM

Letterman>>
“Can’t keep Eliot Spitzer away from her (Palin’s) daughter.”

You have a hell of an imagination. How does that translate into rape? It was Spitzer who was on the receiving end of that line not Palin’s daughter. Who did Spitzer rape? I hope you aren’t self projecting.

Have faith Jim,. Let Letterman have Palin. She can take it, look at what she has already endured for Gods Sake. And Palin, know that America not only respects you but knows EXACTLY what is going on.

Move forward. Concentrate on the goal, not the Enemy.

Have faith Jim,. Let Letterman have Palin. She can take it, look at what she has already endured for Gods Sake. And Palin, know that America not only respects you but knows EXACTLY what is going on.

Move forward. Concentrate on the goal, not the Enemy.

I second you replacing Allah. Allah has been insuffereable for a long time. And thanks to the recent open registration I can finally say it!
Joy on June 11, 2009 at 6:44 PM

So you’ve waited all this time to sign up, and the first thing you do for your debut is to ask that Allah be replaced? Classy.