A Blast of Pure Intolerance

posted at 11:10 am on June 10, 2009 by

Our culture praises tolerance as the supreme virtue, but intolerance has its uses, too. For example, decent people should not tolerate a tired, bitter old late-night comedian making jokes about raping the 14-year-old daughter of a politician on national TV. The equivalent joke about raping Barack Obama’s daughters would not be tolerated. To let something like this slide is to concede that Sarah Palin and her daughter are less worthy of respect – less human – than Obama and his daughters. People do not forfeit their humanity because they hold political views that elite liberal culture disapproves of. There are only two things decent Americans need to hear from David Letterman now: his heartfelt apology to Willow Palin and her parents, followed by his resignation. Any guest on Letterman’s show who wishes to be respected as a gentleman or a lady should make this demand to his face, until he finally gets the message.

I’m also intolerant of celebrities casually tossing off ugly religious bigotry during fluff interviews. Asked how she would deal with the villain of her Transformers movies, Megan Fox said, “I’d barter with him, and say instead of the entire planet, can you just take out all of the white trash, hillbilly, anti-gay, super bible-beating people in Middle America?” A comparable remark about the black or Hispanic “anti-gay, super bible-beating people in Middle America” would not have been tolerated. A similar insult directed at the even more anti-gay Koran-beating Muslims in the Middle East, who are known to actually murder gays on a fairly regular basis, would have ended her career. To tolerate this kind of idiocy against certain racial groups and religions, but not others, is to concede that certain racial groups and religions are inherently inferior and worthy of contempt. Megan Fox owes her success to a much bigger star, whose coat-tails she rode to fame and fortune: Optimus Prime, who would never allow her thoughtless insults to pass unchallenged. For one thing, Optimus knows the futility of trying to appease Megatron by offering him a few human sacrifices. Also, when he’s not a giant robot warrior for justice, he’s a truck… which means those white rural Christians insulted by Megan Fox are his people. A sentient eighteen-wheeler would receive a very warm welcome if he rolled up to any truck stop or stock-car rally in the South.

I can’t see any reason to tolerate a nominee for the highest court in the land making repeated statements that her racial heritage and sex make her wiser and better qualified to be a jurist. Not very long ago, our culture demanded the summary termination of veteran sportscaster Jimmy “the Greek” Snyder, because he made public comments that black athletes are naturally superior because they were bred for strength and stamina during the era of slavery. We are, correctly, repulsed by theories of racial superiority or inferiority being pumped into our public discourse. Jimmy the Greek said something crass and stupid. So did Sonia Sotomayor, and she did it more than once. You can easily list a number of racial heritages that Sotomayor would not have been allowed to cite as reasons for her superior judicial temperament. I’ve written before that if she was a German woman named Sonia Sotomacher, and she had a history of claiming her Teutonic heritage made her a superior jurist, we’d be going into the second week of Barack Obama’s impeachment hearings by now. Claiming one race is superior to another is logically as offensive as claiming one race is inferior to the others. We should not demand higher standards of our sportscasters than we do of our Supreme Court justices.

We have learned to despise racism and bigotry because we revere the dignity and humanity of all people, regardless of their skin color or religious beliefs. We even extend this reverence to religions that are hostile to our common culture, or wish to segregate themselves from it, provided they respect our laws and the rights of fellow citizens. We have also learned that language plays an important role in shaping ideas and behavior. We insist on using terms like “African-American” because we understand the importance of addressing people with dignity and respect. I doubt many of us are under the illusion that such polite language completely erases bigoted thoughts from people’s minds – how many of us could honestly say we go through our adult lives, or even a single day, without having thoughts which are unworthy of expression through public speech? Everyone occasionally has feelings as unpleasant as the garbage floating around in Megan Fox’s head… but most of us would know better than to pour them into microphones.

We are a culture that swims in an all-encompassing ocean of media. Every waking hour is filled with light and noise from televisions, computers, and radios. Our commitment to the freedom of speech should be matched with a commitment to the quality of speech, to keep that ocean of media as clean as possible. Because we rightly recoil from the idea of using government censorship against anything except the most vile profanity, it’s up to private citizens to raise their voices against those who assert the power to strip political opponents of their dignity and humanity, or those who believe the poisonous doctrines of racial superiority are less toxic for certain races. A cretin like Dave Letterman is free to tell all the rape jokes he wants, but no one should be pointing a camera at him, or handing him a paycheck for doing it. In a nation committed to keeping the government from policing our speech, while embracing technology that can make anyone’s voice heard in millions of homes, intolerance is our only effective weapon against bigotry. We should use it more often.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Letterman is a filthy pervert.

I wouldn’t be surprised if he had kiddie porn on his home PC.

atheling on June 10, 2009 at 11:43 PM

Do I need Doctor Zero’s permission to make a video of this for youtube?
(Yes, I’m a noob.)

JakeRightThought on June 10, 2009 at 11:12 PM

If so, you have it!

Doctor Zero on June 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM

“I’d barter with him, and say instead of the entire planet, can you just take out all of the white trash, hillbilly, anti-gay, super bible-beating people in Middle America?”

Notice she picked the group least likely to give a damn about what she said. Unlike other groups, who would already be in the streets, burning somebody’s car or chopping off somebody’s head.

Well played, Megan.

Yeah, she sure is courageous, isn’t she?!

Sterling Holobyte on June 10, 2009 at 11:48 PM

Tell CBS what you think of Dave…

http://www.cbs.com/info/user_services/fb_global_form.php

katy on June 10, 2009 at 8:04 PM

Submitted less then five minutes ago…

Apparently it is just fine with CBS to slam white Christian conservative women and their children, but if “Mr” Letterman had said something like this about “Mr” Obama’s children or even worse, (God Forbid!) Ms. Sotomayor he’d be slapped soundly around buy both cbs and ge officials, right? This is why the Late Show’s ratngs have slipped so badly against Tonight show both old and new and I firmly expect that our good friend Dave will lose even more viewers now. I for one will never watch his show again. So sorry CBS but your liberal Christian hating slip is showing AGAIN!

Vntnrse on June 10, 2009 at 11:52 PM

In his book he laid out the premise that the more outrageous or deviant an act is, once it’s witnessed by the population a sort of numbness sets in within us.

Exactly. Which is why the left constantly pushes the envelope(with the help of the mass media), just a little further each time, until what is abnormal and obscene is the new normal in people’s eyes.

Sterling Holobyte on June 10, 2009 at 11:52 PM

I think our society started falling apart back when President Clinton had the audacity to soil the Oval Office by having oral sex with Monica in the peoples office. The outrage that most Americans felt at that time was offset by excuses of the offense by those on the left. Once that happened and his behavior was excused, the crassness of our society started to sharpen. Now no one would be the least bit bothered if O’bama did the very same thing in the future. It fails to shock us anymore and we’ve become a society now that has become so crass that Letterman felt comfortable making those kind of statements. If he were still alive, can you imagine someone like Johnny Carson delivering this kind of back alley humor? Even Jay Leno has more class than Letterman. 30 years ago our society wouldn’t have allowed this to stand. They would have run Letterman out of town on a rail.

FreedomLover on June 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM

I always thought the battle to keep Clinton in office did serious damage to the culture, and it’s only gotten worse over the years. Our politics was hardly a landscape of jolly good fellowship before that, but The Year of Lewinsky seemed to change something for the worse. Comparisons to Watergate often point out that Nixon was no slouch in the obstinacy or lust for power departments, but in the end, he and his party had the simple decency to arrange his resignation. Twenty-five years later, we got a taste of what might have happened if they had decided to fight until the bitter end.

I’ve never forgotten the nauseating spectacle of Clinton’s hit team going after Ken Starr – can you imagine if George W. Bush had assigned a team of character assassins to fan out across the airwaves and savagely destroy, say, Patrick Fitzgerald? In the casual ugliness of Letterman, or Megan Fox’s robot holocaust fantasies, you can see echoes of Alec Baldwin going on national television to encourage the violent murder of Henry Hyde and his family. A generation before Clinton, his desperate commitment to hold power at any cost, and destroy anyone from government officials to private citizens who threatened him, would have been considered monstrous. A generation later, the young daughters of an inconvenient politician are fodder for thoughtless atrocity on a show carried by one of the major networks, beamed into millions of homes.

The Clinton impeachment saga cost the Democrat Party a chunk of its soul. Feminists who howled with outrage over the merest whiff of sexual harassment were suddenly happy to give the world’s most powerful sexual harasser a coupon book of free passes. Civil-rights figures who questioned the black authenticity of Clarence Thomas spun on a dime and declared Clinton to be “the first black president,” cheapening the mighty, centuries-long saga of black civil rights into a cheap trinket that could be pinned onto the lapels of a white politician they especially liked. The party that created the Office of the Independent Counsel, in an ostentatious display of dedication to the cause of “good government,” threw away even the pretense of principle to burn a bothersome Independent Counsel at the stake. The Democrats, and their constituencies, have never been the same since.

Doctor Zero on June 11, 2009 at 12:07 AM

Great article Dr Z, the Palins deserve a very sincere apology. To bad Dave doesnt have a sincere bone in his body

General America on June 11, 2009 at 12:09 AM

It’s only ok to say these things if you’re a liberal, obviously.

Spiritk9 on June 11, 2009 at 1:01 AM

It’s just the way things are now.

Everyone’s a protected special class….except white Christians, white Republicans, and anyone who is white who won’t admit that he or she is part of the inferior race. All other races, creeds, and political beliefs are special and deserving of “tolerance.” We’re not.

We insist on using terms like “African-American” because we understand the importance of addressing people with dignity and respect.

Funny how we never insist on the term Caucasian-American.

….The fact that nobody amongst the cultural elite bats an eye at Letterman’s joke, or Megan Fox’s bigoted remarks, or Sotomayor’s racial supremacist mindset, is proof that I am right.

Hawkins1701 on June 11, 2009 at 4:24 AM

I quit watching Letterman when he stopped being funny. That was 1994.

TexasBella on June 11, 2009 at 4:34 AM

Oh, and another stellar post, DZ. Your work really deserves its own collected print edition.

I’d buy it. :-)

Hawkins1701 on June 11, 2009 at 4:37 AM

Congratulations on a great post DZ.
This incident is interesting in that it points out the leftist game of “If you insult our side in any way it’s criminal, but if we insult you we’re just joking – lighten up.”
Sure, you have freedom of speech to call your boss any vile name you choose. And he or she has the right to fire you for that offensive behaviour.
I say fire the creep.

PaddyJ on June 11, 2009 at 4:42 AM

Everyone’s a protected special class….except white Christians, white Republicans, and anyone who is white who won’t admit that he or she is part of the inferior race. All other races, creeds, and political beliefs are special and deserving of “tolerance.”

Oh, and I should add that anyone who is NOT white who holds these beliefs are race traitors. I was remiss in not mentioning them.

Hawkins1701 on June 11, 2009 at 4:43 AM

Tell CBS what you think of Dave…
http://www.cbs.com/info/user_services/fb_global_form.php
katy on June 10, 2009 at 8:04 PM

Thanks for the link. I sent a note expressing my disgust at how low DL has decided to stoop for a cheap laugh.

Like so many social / fiscal conservatives nowadays, I find myself thinking “what’s the use” but I persist in the hopes that it’ll make a difference…no matter how small.

jthibod on June 11, 2009 at 4:59 AM

One of the best essays I’ve ever read on this site, and perhaps the best-reasoned.

Owen Glendower on June 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM

Hope I don’t get my account banned for saying this, but Jimmy the Greek was pointing out a fact: Black slaves were bred selectively for their strength. There is no denying that. Maybe he took it a little too far, that’s not for me to judge.
It’s amazing how Blacks don’t want anyone to believe (rightfully so) disgusting stereotypes like intelligence of Blacks, personal hygiene habits of Blakcs, work habits of Blacks etc., but they do want you to believe the stereotype of their sexual prowess and endowments.
I’m just sayin’.
You hit the nail on the head on the hypocrisy against Conservatives.

SuperManGreenLantern on June 11, 2009 at 7:02 AM

Liberals preach tolerance, but offer none.

MarkTheGreat on June 11, 2009 at 7:31 AM

Here’s a politically incorrect question. If all of the white people in positions of power are removed from those positions, and white people in general become the minority in this country, does that mean that the U.S. will start to be more like Africa, South America, and the Middle East?
I can’t wait!

ExcessivelyDiverted on June 10, 2009 at 8:20 PM

Yes in does. The world is full of examples: countries in Africa and Latin America.

History has also given us examples of what is in store for the U.S.: the ancient Egyptian, Roman and Greek civilization come to mind.

TheSitRep on June 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM

Tell CBS what you think of Dave…

http://www.cbs.com/info/user_services/fb_global_form.php

katy on June 10, 2009 at 8:04 PM

Thanks, katy.. DONE !!
Now, can someone direct me to the list of his advertisers ?

pambi on June 11, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Hope this isn’t a duplicate post:

Thanks, katy.. DONE !!
Now, can someone direct me to the list of his advertisers ?

pambi on June 11, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Ancestry.com
Best Western
Bowflex
Capitol One
CBSports.com
DiTech
EBay
Earn My Degree
Embassy Suites
JohnFreida.com
Intel
LasikPlus
Lexus
Lifelock
Mars Candy
On The Border Restaurants
True Credit by TransUnion
TV.com

SuperManGreenLantern on June 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM

THANKS !!

pambi on June 11, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Thanks, katy.. DONE !!
Now, can someone direct me to the list of his advertisers ?

pambi on June 11, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Go to HillBuzz. They have everything with links. Lots of them. Then come back here.

Geochelone on June 11, 2009 at 11:35 AM

To let something like this slide is to concede that Sarah Palin and her daughter are less worthy of respect – less human – than Obama and his daughters.

Not to be the “vocabulary police” but don’t you mean something like “argue” or “believe or “promote“?

MB4 on June 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM

or maybe “in effect concede to those who believe”?

MB4 on June 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM

Leo Strauss pegged the issue with a society embracing tolerance as its cardinal virtue in his book Natural Right and History — back in the early 1970′s. Simply put: What does such a society do when confronted with an intolerant population, particularly an internal one? Such a society either invalidates its raison d’etre or allows itself to be rent apart — either way, it cannot last. To survive, a civilization or culture must make — wait for the dreaded word — judgements concerning civil behavior, and resolve to be intolerant of behavior that deviates to an egregious degree from those judgements. To prosper, those judgements must be consonant with the common sense, morals, ethics, and values of the preponderance of the community. Isaiah Berlin spoke of the ethos of pluralism as opposed to that of multiculturalism — in a pluralist society, the dominant culture respects and elevates everything about minority or foreign cultures that is not flatly contradictory to the core tenets of the dominant culture, while in the multicultural episteme the goal becomes the denial that a dominant culture exists, which in practical if not explicit terms means the eventual eradication of the dominant culture. In the latter case, both the basis and the cohesive force of a society is willfully destroyed.

All of which, I suppose, is a circuitous route toward expressing strong agreement with the thrust of DrZ’s piece. As a culture, among our central tenets have historically been the defense of innocence and meritocracy. To tolerate an innocent child being sexually assaulted, if only verbally, before an audience of tens of millions, should be socially intolerable, and thus not tolerated. For a presumptive Justice of the United States Supreme Court to express the opinion that one’s biography rather than one’s skills and the caliber of one’s mind qualifies one for such high office should be politically intolerable, and thus not tolerated. Legal penalty is not required here, for that violates another of our highest tenets. Ostracism, scorn, and ultimately dismissal from our collective consciousness are the keys to such a sacred intolerance. Interestingly, in ancient Athens, ostracism was held to be a harsher penalty than death — maybe we’ll arrive there again . . .

loneloc on June 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM

Comment pages: 1 2