What About The Right Not To Wear Head Covering

posted at 10:42 am on June 7, 2009 by
printer-friendly

In his “historic” speech to the Muslim world, Barack Obama spoke up for the rights of women. The first example Obama used was the right of Muslim women in the West to wear hair covering (italics mine):

The sixth issue that I want to address is women’s rights.

I know there is debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Another odd choice by Obama, just like his claim that “rules” in the U.S. make if “harder” for Muslims to donate to charity. Obama may have thought he was being brave by speaking up for Muslim women in the West, but he was being cowardly because in many Muslim countries women are forced to wear veils, burqas, and other types of clothing which are part-and-parcel of the subjugation of women. By focusing on the right to wear hair covering, not the oppressive practices in which hair covering and more restrictive clothing is forced upon women, Obama threw women’s liberation under the bus.

Obama really would have been brave if he told the Muslim world that just as we will fight for the right of Muslim women in the West to wear hair covering, we will stand up for the right of all women not to wear hair covering or other restrictive clothing. That would have been a truly historic statement, rather than politically correct nonsense:

And what’s all this about head scarves? “I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal,” Obama said. Talk about a straw man. Isn’t the real wardrobe issue for many Muslim women that they must cover, smother and nearly blind themselves in burqas, whether that’s their choice or not?

And Obama could break with the tradition, not unique to Obama or to any one political party, of refusing to have American women representing this country forced to wear head covering when visiting Muslim countries. Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush, Nancy Pelosi, and many other women who are successful and supportive of women’s rights have engaged in this practice when traveling to Muslim countries.

Respect is a two-way street, and if we are to respect the practices of Muslim women, Muslims should respect the practices of non-Muslim women.

Cross-posted with updates at Legal Insurrection Blog

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Sometimes there’s a thin line between appeasement and diplomacy. Obama crossed it by far.

the_nile on June 7, 2009 at 12:06 PM

The Saudi schoolchildren forced back into the burning dormitory for not being properly veiled were unavailable for comment at press time.

Techie on June 7, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Obama really would have been brave if he told the Muslim world that just as we will fight for the right of Muslim women in the West to wear hair covering, we will stand up for the right of all women not to wear hair covering or other restrictive clothing.

You know, when I point out to liberals that, while they talk about tolerance, they act intolerant when they do things like rush the stage at a Tancredo speech, I’m usually told that “I’m tolerant of everyone except the intolerant.” But it that’s really so, indeed, why don’t we hear liberals speaking out against forced Shariah law?

kc8ukw on June 7, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Hillary looked stupid wearing the headpiece-pantsuit combo. Free women to look that way.

clorensen on June 7, 2009 at 12:18 PM

The Saudi schoolchildren forced back into the burning dormitory for not being properly veiled were unavailable for comment at press time.

Techie on June 7, 2009 at 12:11 PM

excellent comment.

katy on June 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM

When I see Michelle Obama wear a hijab then maybe Obama may have some credibility. Liberals who always tout the rights of women always take a total pass on the misogyny of the middle east.

NeoKong on June 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM

“Some people” also say that women of Islam also have the right to honor killings, arranged marriages, no education and genital mutilation.

The denegration and restraint of the free will of women begins with forcing a woman to hide away her identity.

pjean on June 7, 2009 at 12:32 PM

There is a difference between a choice made under coercion and free choice. Many in the Muslim world use brutality and terrorism to coerce the “choice” of submission to their oppressive rules. It is not surprising that President Obama supports such “freedoms,” as coercive tactics are being endorsed and used by liberal Democrats in our Country.

If you don’t believe coercion is being increasingly proposed and practiced in the United States, consider what “free union elections” would be under Card Check, or the outings and attacks against opponents of Gay Marriage by advocates of Gay Marriage, and the vicious treatment of conservatives by the MSM, Hollywood and liberal academia. The freedom to coerce Muslim women that Obama supported is what all American freedoms will be like unless the Leftist Anti-Americans are stopped.

Loxodonta on June 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Obviously taking about misogyny in a misogynous country ruled by Muslim dictators is going to be tricky, and pretzel like.

tarpon on June 7, 2009 at 12:41 PM

A little later:
Head coverings are manditory.

Don’t be caught without yours!

The Religious Poice are watching!

Friendly21 on June 7, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I know there is debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal,

Straw man: the issue is Muslimas who want to do their bankning covered up, or have ID photos taken covered up.

Why didn’t Hussein mention that if it’s fair to ban non-Muslims from Mecca, it’s fair to ban them from, I dunno, the Holy City of New York, because there’s a cathedral there?

Akzed on June 7, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Obama really would have been brave if he told the Muslim world that just as we will fight for the right of Muslim women in the West to wear hair covering, we will stand up for the right of all women not to wear hair covering or other restrictive clothing.

No kidding he would have been brave. They probably would have stoned him on the spot.

Daggett on June 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Head coverings are manditory.

Don’t be caught without yours!

The Religious Poice are watching!

Friendly21 on June 7, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Yes! Some neighborhoods in London and in the Netherlands are no-gos for Christian women who don’t cover up. Comment, Hussein?

And all of this is ridiculous anyway, having the POTUS address a religion, as if he represents everyone not of that religion, and has any authority to speak to a religion as if it is a unified monolith or something.

But after all, I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God.

Akzed on June 7, 2009 at 1:22 PM

could not possibly agree more.

sammypants on June 7, 2009 at 1:30 PM

Hillary looked stupid wearing the headpiece-pantsuit combo. Free women to look that way.

clorensen on June 7, 2009 at 12:18 PM

It’s not so much the combination of the pantsuit and the hijab/scarf in this case, but the fact that the Sec. wore one at all. What were they to do if she dind’t? They wouldn’t stop the world from spinning or throw her out?

‘Civilization’ is regressing rather rapidly and this administration is giving the setback carte blanche. Condi and Hillary should never fall for such nonsense. When your cipher in chief bows to the king, then Hillary is just a tiny shaddow. Eunuchs all.

Schadenfreude on June 7, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Sure, you have the right to cover your hair and even your face. So we have driver’s licenses with no photos on them. Does this make sense? Does this extend to passports too? Fact is, countries who hold back women are the poorest, least stable countries.
He is avoiding the issue deliberately because to insist on human rights in the middle east would be pointless and dangerous. Going there and saying that women should be treated equally would be like another nation’s leader coming here and saying abortion should be illegal. The masses would be in an uproar.

mph on June 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM

It’s ironic how the left will call the “religious right” old fashioned, non progressive and backward, but look the other way when it comes to Islam.

Also I did a tour in Afghanistan in 2004. I can assure you that wearing a Burka was not welcome by all women. There were a few times that I encountered Afghani women who would show me their face if they knew no men were watching.Not because I asked them to, but because they wanted to. In fact one time while on patrol a door opened in a house I was walking by and two young Afghani women,uncovered, blew me kisses and then quickly closed the door. These were not actions from women who currently enjoyed the lifestyle imposed on them by Islamic law. What I frequently have encountered in Aghanistan and Iraq are women who wish they could be free to act as other women do around the world.

gator70 on June 7, 2009 at 2:37 PM