Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


What If A Million Taxpayers Went Galt?

posted at 1:49 pm on May 30, 2009 by Laura
[ Going Galt ]    printer-friendly

Glenn Beck wonders what would happen if a million taxpayers stopped paying taxes.  He suggests that they can’t put us all in jail.  I’d like to remind him that they can take our property and garnish our wages.  Sure, a taxpayer under those circumstances might not be caged.  But he certainly would not be free.

There’s certainly no reason we cannot, as Ghandi suggested, withhold payment of taxes, yet still stay within the law.  Just make the decision to earn less. That’s a difficult decision for people to make as it involves a bit of personal sacrifice, but it’s far less sacrifice than the penalties for tax evasion, and it’s more effective.

For conservatives who want to take the fight to the left using the left’s methods, it’s a tailor-made solution.  (Which is why leftists scream like banshees and mock those who promote it.  They know it will work.)  It means taking advantage of the Cloward-Piven tactic of overloading the system until it collapses.  The work slowdowns by slaves were a similar form of protest – when the system relies on your productivity, then the failure to be productive will eventually collapse the system.  A final example may be found in the Montgomery bus boycott; people made personal sacrifices and worked around every obstacle but they did not give in.

The left’s idea that the nanny state will take care of us all is, to use the word of which they are so fond, unsustainable.  It’s unsustainable in any event – it’s never worked before, and it’s not going to work now.   This is one area where we can take Vladimir Putin’s word at face value.  The Chinese, too, are worried because they know the American left is doing great harm not just to the United States but to the world’s economy.  The outcome is not in doubt.  The only variable is the speed at which it happens. I hope to hasten the inevitable collapse.

As a practical matter, what can we do?

You don’t need to break the law to give less to government.  But if you are willing to consider breaking the law, then you should have no problem considering making a few personal sacrifices which will not put you in jail.  As an added benefit, these “sacrifices” often come with great benefits for families that do them.

If you’re sending your children to private school, consider one parent quitting their job and homeschooling the children.  You don’t need to be a teacher.  There are many great programs available so you do not have to plan a curriculum and schedule.  Your children will be freed from busywork and the tyranny of the slowest or least behaved student in the class.  When they can learn at their own pace, they learn more.

Look for ways to cut your budget, and then cut your income accordingly.  The average family spent approximately one of every three food dollars on meals eaten away from the home in 1997.  Imagine the effect on the system if a million families stopped doing that.  How much does your family spend on entertainment?  Wait until that movie comes out on DVD, or better yet, hits your public library’s shelf.  When you rent a movie, watch it with friends so they don’t have to rent it too.  Don’t buy a new car.  Buy a used car.  Whenever possible, barter.

There are a million creative ways you can save money and find ways to survive (and thrive) on less income.  And because you are trading money for time, you will have more leisure time available to take advantage of money saving tricks like making your own laundry detergent for a fraction of the cost.

The bottom line is if we are serious about protesting what is happening in our government, then we should be equally serious about making day to day changes in our lives.  It lacks the “glamor” of tax evasion but it will be far more effective.  We have an opportunity, right now, while the Democrats have control of the White House and Congress, to show how empty and lacking in reality that their big-government promises are.  The house of cards is going to fall anyway, but if it falls hard enough, it will be many generations before they are able to muster up the support to try this again.

If you think it’s a good idea to stop paying taxes, then do it by going Galt.

.
Cross posted @ PH

Updated: changed title for readability, fixed a grammar error.

Note: Yes, I’m aware that Atlas Shrugged is poorly written.  Yes, I’m aware that Rand was a raging athiest who thought people like me are idiots for believing in God.  I espouse objectivism from my perspective as a Christian Hedonist.  Yes, I’m aware that John Galt created an amazing machine and that the loss to society of me and people like me is nothing compared to how that fictional genius inventor deprived his society of his talents.  Yes, I’m aware that we don’t have a large, hidden, gulch to which to relocate and that we will continue to economically interact with society at some level.  “Going Galt” is nothing more than verbal shorthand for suggesting that the productive people on whom society depends deprive government of tax revenue in order to starve it.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Hm… I already do all those things! Now what? :D

Christina D on May 30, 2009 at 4:38 PM

I’ll tell you exactly what would happen.

Democrats will use the lawlessness as a pretext to fling open the prison doors, empty the prisons of the millions doing time for drug offenses (how could libertarian repubolicans criticize that?) and they will prosecute every one of those million taxpayers.

And so we’ll have a bunch of wealth producers in jail and a bunch of slackers on the streets.

Bad move.

jeff_from_mpls on May 30, 2009 at 6:08 PM

Christina – now convince others to do it too. :-)

Jeff – you’re referring to what would happen if people start evading taxes, right? Not what would happen if they go Galt?

Laura on May 30, 2009 at 7:31 PM

“I aim to misbehave.”

-Captain Malcolm Reynolds, Serenity

Hawkins1701 on May 31, 2009 at 6:40 AM

Jeff – you’re referring to what would happen if people start evading taxes, right? Not what would happen if they go Galt?

Laura on May 30, 2009 at 7:31 PM

Yes.

I can’t imagine prosecuting someone for voluntarily dropping out.

But having said that, if someone had told me one year ago that within a year, government will have seized control over the financial services and auto industries, I’d have laughed.

jeff_from_mpls on May 31, 2009 at 8:34 AM

Hello! Awesome article. I disagree with one thing:

Yes, I’m aware that Atlas Shrugged is poorly written.

Have you ever read the communist manifesto? Have you ever read anything by Gore Vidal? That junk is poorly written. Ayn’s mission was to use allegory to make her philosophy accessable to the average, educated reader, not just students of philosophy, and she succeeds brilliantly.

“Going Galt” is nothing more than verbal shorthand for suggesting that the productive people on whom society depends deprive government of tax revenue in order to starve it.

Yes, definitely! I would add that the whole point of Atlas, is not that we should interprit it literally and go disappear into a gulch. Rather, capitalism is the only moral economic system and socialism can and should be resisted with peaceful protest. To borrow a term the left has been so fond of for the last 8 years, “Going Galt” is a call for direct action against an oppressive government and economic system.

bitsy on May 31, 2009 at 9:06 AM

While technically illegal, this method is also almost impossible to detect or prosecute.

Trade services with your neighbors. Cut the grass of a plumber in exchange for him fixing that leaky toilet. Tune up carpenters car, in exchange for some roof work.

Since neither of you earn cash, there are no taxes to pay.

MarkTheGreat on May 31, 2009 at 2:32 PM

Bitsy, the fact that other books are poorly written doesn’t make Atlas better. :-) The plot was great, but she wrote like she was being paid by the word.

That note at the bottom of the post was a pre-emptive shush – last time I posted something like this on my personal blog, I got a lot of comments and link-backs from people who made those arguments.

Laura on May 31, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Obama has written in his books, and agreed with Ayers regarding the issue of WHO should be in prison, and WHO should not. During the campaign, and currently, we are seeing racial and class divides being created by Obama and his Administration. I am with Jeff on this one. When I saw Beck discussing this my first thoughts were the criminals will be let out to house the IRS offenders. PRONTO! If you are a white middle class person there is a target on you and if you choose not to pay your taxes; you will go to jail, directly to jail, you will not pass go and there is not get out of jail free card.

As to Rand’s style of writing and so forth; for me it was all about pondering what could be possible if the government became what it has become. Who better to see the psychological and physical ramifications than a former Russian, and someone who observed moves made in Europe both during Hitler and post Hitler? To me most of her books were about alerting the reader to what will happen if they no longer have freedoms. Plus, “Atlas” to me was the ultimate key to how she saw man/Self, and the men/Self most like the character, Howard Roark. And as to being wordy, Steinbeck’s, “Grapes of Wrath” was not exactly short, very wordy, and much more of a torture for me to read versus “Atlas”. If I remember correctly it took Steinbeck four pages to describe a turtle crossing the road. UGH!

freeus on June 1, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Hey Laura…

What happens when unemployment hits, say, 12%?

Do all the folks getting by on unemployment insurance count as some sort of “Galt-by-proxy” ?

Mew

* for the record, this cat is employed and aims to remain so – but I’m a contractor, so I can nudge my income down by reducing my hours worked… which equates to more time sleeping.

acat on June 1, 2009 at 9:10 PM


You must be logged in to post a comment.