Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Antonia Zerbisias and the ‘Water-Cooler Consensus’

posted at 10:19 pm on April 29, 2009 by The Other McCain
printer-friendly

Michelle Malkin has a post about Antonia Zerbisias of the Toronto Star, who Twittered a Malkin death wish last night.

To me, the most interesting part of the story is this: Zerbisias isn’t a political reporter or an op-ed commentator. She’s not someone whose job involves politics at all. She’s a “Living” section columnist.

When I’m asked about liberal bias in the news media, one of the things I sometimes talk about is the “water-cooler consensus.” Bias is not the result of a conspiracy. It’s just that most journalists are liberals, and they hang around the office, talk amongst themselves, and a sort of consensus opinion prevails. Fitting in, being part of the crowd, requires that you echo that consensus — or at least, not directly contradict it.

You see, then, how you end up with a lifestyle columnist who thinks she’s Keith Olbermann. And you understand why there are so few conservatives in media. In America’s newsrooms, opinions like Antonia Zerbisias are so commonplace that the person who doesn’t share them is an oddball. A conservative in the news business learns to bite his tongue, because to vocally disagree with liberalism is to expose oneself as an enemy.

The liberal “water-cooler consensus” thus goes uncontradicted, and next thing you know, even the photographers, sports writers and lamebrain “Living” section columnists are echoing the consensus. Journalists work in an environment where almost everyone is a liberal, where the assumptions of liberalism are pervasive, and so it never even occurs to most reporters to ask the kinds of questions a conservative would ask. Journalists don’t notice liberal bias for the same reason fish don’t notice water.

This is why a mush-mouthed, apologetic, watered-down kind of conservative message won’t work. People in the media expect conservatives to be defensive and fearful, because most journalists consider conservatism something wrong and shameful. So when a David Frum or a Meghan McCain tries to cut corners and blunt the message, it only reinforces liberal assumptions.

Standing up to the likes of Antonia Zerbisias is necessary, if only to give courage to those few newsroom conservatives — and I know they’re still out there — who would otherwise be intimidated into silence.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Journalists don’t notice liberal bias for the same reason fish don’t notice water.

And they’re able to function almost as well without it.

Antonia Whoever was then complaining that she was being bullied by Malkin. Do they all use the same playbook, or is it just instinct in lieu of actual thought?

Jim Treacher on April 30, 2009 at 2:27 AM

It is more than mere conformity. It is competition. One’s merit and brilliance is proved by upping the ante; this is how one becomes distinguished among one’s peers. We now have a mutated marketplace, in which dogma and hate have replaced individual thought and the journalistic drive for truth.

rrpjr on April 30, 2009 at 5:52 AM

It’s even worse than that–AZ started out at the Red Star writing for their TV listings. And yes, she’s always been like that.

andycanuck on April 30, 2009 at 10:07 AM

This is why a mush-mouthed, apologetic, watered-down kind of conservative message won’t work. People in the media expect conservatives to be defensive and fearful, because most journalists consider conservatism something wrong and shameful. So when a David Frum or a Meghan McCain tries to cut corners and blunt the message, it only reinforces liberal assumptions.

Great phrasing there. Conservatism is wrong and shameful. I have a good college friend who is a liberal who does not consider himself a liberal. We had a lengthly discussion on affirmative action and I said I had no problem with government aid based on need, but I viewed race and gender preferences to be counterproductive.

He knew I was not racist or sexist, but he simply couldn’t believe that I had a problem with affirmative action. Conservatives have great positions on the issues, but we don’t often have the discussions on the merits for fear of being misunderstood. Conservatives are by nature non-conformist and we have to use our non-conformity to address the issues presented on the merits without adopting the liberal narrative that our positions are shameful.

Angry Dumbo on April 30, 2009 at 10:24 AM

or is it just instinct in lieu of actual thought?

Jim Treacher on April 30, 2009 at 2:27 AM

Most people appear to operate that way. No reason reporters would be terribly different.

TheUnrepentantGeek on April 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM


You must be logged in to post a comment.