GOP-controlled legislature poised to give taxpayer-spurned transit $20 million
posted at 1:32 pm on April 16, 2009 by Patrick Ishmael
Over at the American Issues Project I’ve written a post about how the tea parties present an opportunity for for right-leaning groups (like Republicans) to make inroads into urban areas. One of the ways the GOP could screw this opportunity up is, I said, by reaffirming the urban status quo.
Well, guess what.
The Republican-controlled Missouri legislature is…debating whether to send stimulus money to the St. Louis public transit system to reopen bus routes, many of which disappeared last month due to a lack of public will to fund them….
Rather than spend money on a project of some permanency — like a road or bridge, of which many in St. Louis City are in utter disrepair — it appears the legislature may instead dump tens of millions of dollars into a program that 1.) is supremely efficient at blowing through cash and 2.) will have to (re-)close the routes that it (re-)opens when the state’s stimulus cash runs out, assuming local governments don’t step in. And that’s a fair assumption.
It’s a “fair assumption” because St. Louisans voted in November against raising taxes to maintain the Metro’s previous service offering. The legislature’s proposed action should infuriate every citizen and especially proponents of good governance, not only because the legislation wouldn’t meet the “one-time expenditure” principle for stimulus funds set out by the GOP during the stimulus debate, but also because the money won’t in fact cover the funding gap; unless I mislearned my math, $20 million does not a $45 million shortfall, fix.
If Missouri Republicans intend on saving the St. Louis Metro by throwing money at it, the Party is going to do real damage to itself, both among its base and among those for whom urban alternatives based on sound economics principles would be appealing. It’s more of the same, and that’s exactly not what tea partiers want.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You know, I was listening to Rush today; and he was saying that we need to keep it a two-party system and if there is another party started that it would only split the republicans and the ‘other party’ and liberals would win (not exact words but the jist of it).
It is crap like this though when I say screw it, and I’m sick of voting in these frauds.
deidre on April 16, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Can’t believe you’re quoting yourself at length.
But yeah, locally speaking, most Republicans don’t know the meaning of the word Republican. I vote Libertarian often at local levels. Screw em.
Free Constitution on April 16, 2009 at 4:25 PM
You’re kidding, right?
Al in St. Lou on April 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Ha, well I would have cross-posted it like I do with Repurblican, but AIP has asked that I not do that for the work I do for them. Next best thing is to sample/quote a little from it, and them form a stemwinding blogpost in parallel to that.
But really. Wouldn’t you quote me at length? Really. C’mon. C’moooon.
Repurblican on April 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM