Staged Military Photo Ops Suddenly Awesome

posted at 6:54 am on April 14, 2009 by

Back in 2003, the left was astonished and dismayed that George W. Bush got such a warm Thanksgiving welcome from our troops in Iraq, even after he was evil enough to send our troops to Iraq. So what did our friends on the port side do? Oh, the usual: They concocted a controversy out of whole cloth.

“Hey, that Thanksgiving turkey Bush was carrying looked pretty fake. Wait a second, I know… It was plastic! What a perfect metaphor for this whole fake war! Plastic turkey, plastic president. Am I right, people?”

 

 

They weren’t right. They didn’t even bother to find out if they were. But that didn’t stop this weird, fact-free, too-good-to-check meme from oozing through the Internet until it finally dripped onto the desks of our finest bastion of journalistic certitude, the New York Times. Here’s what Richard L. Berke said about it on July 4, 2004, in the middle of a thumbsucker about John Kerry (remember him?) trying to find some way to grab the nation’s attention. Kerry was having a tough time because, well, he’s John Kerry. But also because the wicked and nefarious George Bush kept stealing the spotlight:

And how does Mr. Kerry top the suspense-filled plot line of this White House, which regularly negotiates hairpin turns? Just last week, the handover of Iraq happened two days earlier than expected.

There are also the manufactured surprises, like Mr. Bush’s cloak-and-dagger Thanksgiving trip to Baghdad, which drew praise even from Democrats. (The public relations bonanza fizzled after the press reported that Mr. Bush had posed with a mouth-watering – but fake – turkey.)

It took a week for the NYT to issue a correction, but at least they finally did:

An article last Sunday about surprises in politics referred incorrectly to the turkey carried by President Bush during his unannounced visit to American troops in Baghdad over Thanksgiving. It was real, not fake.

Which would seem to be no small matter, considering that this “fact” was being used far and wide to triumphantly prove the fundamental fakeness of the Bush administration. But then, this is the same newspaper that, just two months later, would run the headline “Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate, Typist Says.” Fake, real, accurate, inaccurate… whatever!

Despite the NYT’s correction, the meme of “Bush’s plastic turkey proves he sucks and stuff” survives to this day, still popping up occasionally on the Internet and in “reputable” publications all over the world. Just ask the great Tim Blair, who has served as Turkey-Tracker #1 ever since the first outbreak of this particular form of mental illness.

Which brings us to 2009, and a new president who’s on record as saying our troops in Afghanistan are “just air-raiding villages and killing civilians” indiscriminately. A president who opposed the Iraq War and, during his brief, stepping-stone tenure as a senator, voted against the surge. A president who’s even more image-conscious than most (mainly because it’s his one and only qualification for the job), and who’s obviously stung by the rather lukewarm reception he’s received from military audiences in the early days of his presidency.

So you’re the president, you’re making a surprise visit to Iraq, and you want to look good. But so far, the troops haven’t really been falling all over themselves whenever you glide into the room. What do you do? How do you shut up those pundits who dare to take note of reality? Well, according to Macsmind:

…about that “surprise visit”.

It wasn’t. The visit was communicated a full 24 hours in advance and a small contingent of soldiers – not screaming hordes – were rustled into a meeting place at Camp Victory.

Got this email from a sergeant that was there.

We were pre-screened, asked by officials “Who voted for Obama?”, and then those who raised their hands were shuffled to the front of the receiving line. They even handed out digital cameras and asked them to hold them up.

Take a look at the picture at AP and notice all the cameras are the same models. Coincidence? I think not.

 

 

How do you make sure a crowd likes you? Screen out anybody who didn’t vote for you. Even if they’re serving their country under your watch.

Flopping Aces and Redstate have followed up on this. Will they be the only ones? Will the American press try to confirm or debunk this claim? Will it make its way to the hallowed halls of the NYT?

Guess it all depends on how eager they really are to flush out a fake turkey.

Update: Whoops, sorry, I forgot… Allegedly.

Update: In the comments, somebody points to “Different Presidents, a Different Corps.” I’m not sure that video is really fair, because it’s comparing two different kinds of events. But it’s the sort of thing that would bug me enough to stage my own celebratory photo op, if I were a narcissist.

Update: “Our people are doing the vetting. Even if some of it is hitting dead ends, other ones are striking direct hits. My role is to sit back and let the citizen journalists do their job, and I amplify the stuff that shakes out.” So said noted thinker Markos Moulitsas, regarding the stories on the Daily Kos about Sarah Palin faking her pregnancy. If that newsgathering system is good enough for attacking the mother of a small infant, why isn’t it good enough for questioning the authenticity of a photo op?

Update: Hey, did you know that if anybody in the crowd had a different kind of camera, that proves the Obama team couldn’t possibly have handed out cameras? Good catch, Greg Sargent! I missed the part where the Obama team was accused of confiscating everybody’s cameras before handing out their own, but it’s good to see that pros like Sargent are on the case. (If it seems like I’m putting the burden of proof on the accused, see previous update.)

Update: Is it just me? Maybe it’s just me.

Update: The Right Knight raises a good point… “My concern, however, would be the chilling effect on the (albeit constrained) political rights of these soldiers when they’re asked by the elected Commander-in-Chief (through his staff) whether they voted for him. Someone please explain how in the hell that is his or anyone else’s business? Has military service officially become a matter of political favor from top to bottom?” And: “Little do these Obama-loving soldiers know, they’ll soon be monitored by Homeland Security upon their return from Iraq, much to the chagrin of the American Legion.” But at least they got a hug out of the deal!

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

So, if Bush was a “chickenhawk” by merely flying fighter jets in Texas, what does that make Obama?

TexasJew on April 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM

This might be OT, my apologies if so, but do you know how hard it is to fly a fighter jet? To fly an airplane period? My dad got his pilot’s license in his 60′s and he proudly told me that only 1% of the population knows how to fly an airplane. It’s an elite group. The lie that Bush is stoopid, is just that: a lie.

conservative pilgrim on April 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM

So, if Bush was a “chickenhawk” by merely flying fighter jets in Texas, what does that make Obama?

TexasJew on April 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM

Chickenpatriot

Kensington on April 14, 2009 at 11:28 AM

I thought it was obvious from the beginning that the audience for the Obama appearance was made up of mostly fans. It wouldn’t be too hard to put together a self-selected crowd – send the word around ahead of time and the folks who voted for him, or who are just excited to see the President (especially a celebrity President) will show up.

It’d be better if there were some stronger evidence than the camera story and the unverified sergeant’s email, though. Because if those get debunked, the left will just say, “See wingnuts! The troops really do love Obama and y’all are just haters!”

Missy on April 14, 2009 at 11:31 AM

Missy on April 14, 2009 at 11:31 AM

So what you’re saying is that if the story is proven wrong, it’ll be wrong. Right there, you’ve got a leg up on 95% of the left.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM

This might be OT, my apologies if so, but do you know how hard it is to fly a fighter jet? To fly an airplane period? My dad got his pilot’s license in his 60’s and he proudly told me that only 1% of the population knows how to fly an airplane. It’s an elite group. The lie that Bush is stoopid, is just that: a lie.

conservative pilgrim on April 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Oh, yeah! Bill Whittle elaborated upon this point with much eloquence a few years back.

It’s frustrating. A friend of mine last night was still gushing over Barack Obama’s intelligence. It was annoying mainly because my friend was so unquestioning about it. I don’t doubt the man is intelligent, I’m just not ready to compare him favorably to, say, Einstein. Or Mark Steyn, for that matter.

Kensington on April 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM

I get a 404 not found error when I try to forward this item. Anybody else getting it or is it just me?

liberty0 on April 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM

So, if Bush was a “chickenhawk” by merely flying fighter jets in Texas, what does that make Obama?

TexasJew on April 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM

Chicken Little.

Why did the chicken cross the road?

To get to his share of the stimulus money!

Susanboo on April 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM

It’s frustrating. A friend of mine last night was still gushing over Barack Obama’s intelligence. It was annoying mainly because my friend was so unquestioning about it. I don’t doubt the man is intelligent, I’m just not ready to compare him favorably to, say, Einstein. Or Mark Steyn, for that matter.
Kensington on April 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM

Only one of the following released his college transcripts for public view:
Albert Einstein
Barack Obama.
Why is that, I wonder?

TexasJew on April 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM

And if there were any doubt that Obama’s phony reception by the troops was staged, check out this video, “Different Presidents, A Different Corps” and tell me how President Manchild could go from the tepid response in that video to the goo-goo display at the “surprise” visit.

Oh, and Treacher, you got any new cartoons coming up we might see here? I’m dry, man, I need a comedy hit.

Crusty on April 14, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Great story Treacher. Hope to see more of your stuff here at HA.

conservativemama on April 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM

Crusty on April 14, 2009 at 12:21 PM

I’m not sure that video is really fair, because they were different kinds of events. But that’s the sort of thing that would bug me enough to stage my own celebratory photo op, if I were a narcissist.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 9:19 AM

Picked for what?

csdeven on April 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM

JT, Karl, and a few others, are good, very good, for the main parlor. It’s silly to keep them in the ‘respected commenters’ green room.

Entelechy on April 14, 2009 at 12:36 PM

RBMN on April 14, 2009 at 8:56 AM
Good point, I should have quoted that in my post.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 8:58 AM

LOL.

baldilocks on April 14, 2009 at 1:05 PM

But that’s the sort of thing that would bug me enough to stage my own celebratory photo op, if I were a narcissist.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM

Exactly. Obama wasn’t going to let that happen again. And surprise surprise, it didn’t.

Missy on April 14, 2009 at 1:10 PM

I thought it was obvious from the beginning that the audience for the Obama appearance was made up of mostly fans.

Missy on April 14, 2009 at 11:31 AM

It was obvious to me as well–almost all racial minorities and lots of women in the photo op. The military is almost male and white, even among REMFs which, of course, have a higher distaff contingent.

baldilocks on April 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM

The military is almost all male and white

baldilocks on April 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Community Based Reality! Wheeeeeeee!

TheUnrepentantGeek on April 14, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Now THAT was a great post!

nottakingsides on April 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Well, for what it’s worth, that “identical cameras” business has been pretty thoroughly debunked.

http://digg.com/political_opinion/Cam_Sham_Obama_s_Photo_Op_with_Cheering?t=24867591#c24867591

All you have to do is check out the other pics of the crowd – even the same group from different angles – to see that.

Which means the whole story boils down to an uncorroborated claim from a single anonymous source.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM

If soldiers WER$ asked whether they voted for Obama, that is a basic violation of republican principle. It is information that the military should NEVER employ. This is the same information that would be used to conduct a purge. I have put in multiple requests to CENTCOM for answers on this. If it is tru, they CAN’T take this lying down. And if Obama DIDN’T do it, that needs to come out too.

CENTCOM should be forthcoming here, and so should the soldiers who attended Obama’s surprise visit, whatever their political persuasion. This goes to the proper relation of the military to civilian government. As with all federal officials, the ultimate responsibility of every soldier is to the Constitution, and if military personnel are being asked who they voted for, that directly imperils the military’s ability to resist unconstitutional power plays by the Commander in Chief.

Alec on April 14, 2009 at 2:11 PM

Clearly this was a carefully managed moment of spontaneous affection for Obama.

However, and I say this as a guy on active duty with some familiarity how high-profile events like this tend to be run in the Army, I wonder (1) how much of the “managing” was the Obama folks, and (2) how much similar screening or staging was done for Bush, or for other presidents, for that matter.

I would doubt that Bush visits would be restricted to Bush voters, at least by Bush or his people, but you don’t think some 1SG or CSM who doesn’t want to make a bas impression on his commander would perhaps choose the people he figured would be more likely to not cause any embarrassing moments, like having some SGT make an awkward comment along the lines of, “What are we doing here and when are we going home?”? I don’t find that terribly unlikely.

Muswell Hillbilly on April 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM

pilgrim

… years in the military w/Marines, Army, National Guard, and Navy (no Air Force!),

but do you know how hard it is to fly a fighter jet? To fly an airplane period?

Que pasa? I am fully aware that all Air Force MREs come with a midget waiter and wine steward (Tech Asst: Person; Small) but you should be aware that your hubby, as a ground pounder, never washes below his neck. Are we not in Obama’s age of post-serviciality?

As to flying a fighter jet, Bill Whittle has the most insightful takedown of the slander I’ve ever read. It comes with funbook pictures so even a blue sky boy can figure it out.

I kid, because I love. I also think it is fantastic, perhaps phantasmagoric, that young Treach has another outlet.

Uncle Pinky on April 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM

DISGUSTING.

Y-not on April 14, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Anyone surprised?

deidre on April 14, 2009 at 3:16 PM

Que pasa? I am fully aware that all Air Force MREs come with a midget waiter and wine steward (Tech Asst: Person; Small) but you should be aware that your hubby, as a ground pounder, never washes below his neck.

Uncle Pinky on April 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Haha! So true–the Air Force is the crème de la crème of the military branches. All the other branches, especially the Marines, look down their noses at them.

conservative pilgrim on April 14, 2009 at 3:42 PM

The general make-up of the audience showed that as a given.

Come on, you know I’m right.

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 14, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Yeah, that was pretty much my 1st thought too. Not saying there aren’t a lot of minorities in the military, but that was a very dark crowd. Nice that they were able to find a picture with the only 4 white dudes there in it.

Russell28 on April 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM

Great post!

gwelf on April 14, 2009 at 4:01 PM

“Yeah, that was pretty much my 1st thought too. Not saying there aren’t a lot of minorities in the military, but that was a very dark crowd. Nice that they were able to find a picture with the only 4 white dudes there in it.”

Russell28 on April 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM

———————————

“The only 4 white dudes,” huh? Are you sure about that?

Obama with troops

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM

Which means the whole story boils down to an uncorroborated claim from a single anonymous source.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Which is still more than, say, “Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy.”

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Which means the whole story boils down to an uncorroborated claim from a single anonymous source.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Which is still more than, say, “Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy.”

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

THAT’S what you’re gonna hang your credibility on? Ooookaaaay…..

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

Dear heart, I’m not really concerned with whether you find me credible or not. Ooookaaaay?

Like I said, if it’s disproven, I’ll make note of it. That’s the way “citizen journalism” works, according to Kos.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM

I’m sure just mentioning this fact will earn whoever says it a spot as Olbermann’s Worst Person in the World.

Speedwagon82 on April 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM

OMG WTH

A serious post.

Knock it off.

Valiant on April 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

Dear heart, I’m not really concerned with whether you find me credible or not. Ooookaaaay?

Like I said, if it’s disproven, I’ll make note of it. That’s the way “citizen journalism” works, according to Kos.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM

You were the one insisting on the comparison.

Now that the “identical cameras” business HAS been disproven, maybe you’ll make a note of that.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM

You were the one insisting on the comparison.

Now that the “identical cameras” business HAS been disproven, maybe you’ll make a note of that.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM

You proved that they didn’t hand out cameras? How exactly did you do that?

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 4:53 PM

You were the one insisting on the comparison.

Now that the “identical cameras” business HAS been disproven, maybe you’ll make a note of that.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM

You proved that they didn’t hand out cameras? How exactly did you do that?

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 4:53 PM

The anonymous “sergeant” backed up his story by saying, “Take a look at the picture at AP and notice all the cameras are the same models.”

Well, no, they’re not. And all the other pictures of Obama meeting the troops bear that out. Links above.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:59 PM

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:59 PM

So if anybody had a different camera, that proves they couldn’t possibly have handed out cameras? Well, it’s a theory.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 5:01 PM

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 4:59 PM

So if anybody had a different camera, that proves they couldn’t possibly have handed out cameras? Well, it’s a theory.

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 5:01 PM

I showed that the anonymous “sergeant’s” claim that all the cameras used by the troops in that picture “are the same models” is demonstrably false.

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 5:09 PM

skylark on April 14, 2009 at 5:09 PM

And you were adorable doing it. But how does it prove they couldn’t possibly have handed out cameras?

Jim Treacher on April 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5