Calculating the Cost of Asylum Seekers

(AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

The University of Amsterdam has published a study on the costs and benefits of immigration policies in The Netherlands, and it makes for some pretty shocking reading.

Advertisement

Not exactly surprising reading, but shocking because the costs of importing asylum seekers from third-world countries are even higher than you might have expected.

The Netherlands, like most Western European countries, has been on a tear accepting a large number of “asylum seekers” from the third world, particularly from Africa and the Middle East. Some of this is because of Dutch policies, and some because the EU has had a nearly “open-door” policy when it comes to immigration.

The last time a serious look at the cost was taken was decades ago, so the University of Amsterdam decided to take a look. It found that, unsurprisingly, people who come to the Netherlands to work have a net positive effect on the economy, and just about everybody else who immigrates there is quite expensive, as are their children.

Immigrants from first-world countries contribute the most, often contributing more to the economic well-being of the country than native Dutch people. On net they contribute 625,000 Euros to the economy.

Advertisement

Asylum seekers from Africa, on the other hand, contribute -625,000 Euros to the economy, and if you include the second generation, the cost is over 1 million.

That’s a pretty hefty cost.

Aside from the obvious, the Dutch have another reason to be very concerned about the various costs and benefits of immigration policy: the native-born population is declining, and the continued viability of the economy depends on immigration. If the immigration presents a net cost to the economy, economic decline and even societal collapse is one possibility; if the immigrants provide a net benefit, as some do, the opposite is true.

As of now Dutch immigration policy is imperiling the country.

The Dutch government used to collect and provide this sort of information–one of the researchers on this report used to help compile the figures–but the government didn’t like the results. So they quit providing the numbers.

Proponents of open borders often make claims about how immigrants revitalize society and bring economic benefits, but as this study shows, it depends entirely on just who those immigrants are, what their level of education is, and their motives for immigrating.

Advertisement

Many, it seems, want the benefits of a welfare state but are not equipped to contribute meaningfully to its sustainment.

That asylum seekers from the third world are costly makes intuitive sense–of course they are. That they are so costly is alarming.

Modern Western economies are built on norms and educational standards to which the immigrants have not been exposed, and modern “multicultural” ideologies ensure that the second generation and perhaps beyond never become well integrated into European cultures. We see that in the “no go” zones, the high dependence on welfare, the increased criminality in immigrant communities, and the anti-Western rhetoric commonly found in immigrant communities.

Western elites are killing off their cultures and their countries, and anybody who stands up and objects is labeled a xenophobe, “far right,” or even fascist.

It is suicidal.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement