Hillary sends an army to New Hampshire

posted at 5:11 pm on February 3, 2016 by Jazz Shaw

This will likely go down in the history of the 2016 Democrat primary as the key distinction between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. Sanders has never run a national campaign and has spent most of his time dashing back and forth between Iowa and New Hampshire. He’s raised an impressive amount of money to run ads but he doesn’t have the ingrained machinery of a long standing political dynasty. What he’s lacked in long term staffing he’s made up for with mostly younger volunteers, knocking on doors and organizing events while they line up new supporters and get them to the polls. I have to give the man credit… it’s been an impressive operation thus far.

Facing off with him is Hillary Clinton, who is pretty much the exact opposite of Sanders in terms of campaign infrastructure, resources and experienced staff. The money she can summon up on a moment’s notice doesn’t hurt either. Now she’s in New Hampshire and lagging badly in the polls. If this were Bernie we were talking about he’d likely be in serious trouble. But for Hillary Clinton it was just a matter of picking up the phone. (Washington Post)

Hillary Clinton’s campaign has dispatched an army of over 150 staffers from its campaign headquarters in Brooklyn to boost the ground game in early states, primarily in New Hampshire.

The staffers have been driving up from New York to the relatively close Granite State in the final week of campaigning before the Feb. 9 primary.

Clinton faces an uphill struggle to compete with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) here, where polls show he has held a lead…

Some of the dozens of staffers who have left Brooklyn for field work have also been dispatched to Nevada and South Carolina, though the bulk will work in New Hampshire.

That’s a pretty sweet deal, being able to just place a call and have 150 experienced, paid campaign staffers hop in their vehicles and head out to New Hampshire. And once they arrive there are just ten counties in the Granite State. Having fifteen people in each one of them getting their ground game mobilized with the help of local staff and volunteers can make up for a lot of ills.

How badly do you think Sanders wishes he could summon that sort of a force to charge into battle on a moment’s notice? But he still may not have much to worry about. Hillary is way back in the polls for a reason. All of the staff in the world can’t change people’s minds if the message just isn’t resonating. New Hampshire seems to be feeling the Bern and he may just cruise through to a comfortable win. And if so, what’s the point of this entire tale?

This isn’t just a story about New Hampshire. Hillary Clinton can afford to soak up a loss there, pack up and head south. Then she’ll be in fresh territory where she can send out an army of worker bees to begin making calls and knocking on doors. Bernie will be much closer to starting from scratch by comparison. And in the end, this one news item about Clinton dispatching her army to Nashua is why I still don’t see much of a long term hope for Bernie taking the nomination away. (Absent Clinton being indicted, that is.) She’s just got too many guns in the arsenal.

HillaryClintonClaps


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Will they carry two headed coins with them?

31giddyup on February 3, 2016 at 5:20 PM

New Hampshire, their economy just doubled with this primary…that little state can hardly handle any more visitors.

Hillary’s army…never so many angry women in one state…state of confusion.

right2bright on February 3, 2016 at 5:20 PM

Why aren’t the Democrat stories aren’t getting the Comments today, does anyone have a theory? – Lol

steveracer on February 3, 2016 at 5:22 PM

My first thought was she was sending in her army from Brooklyn to vote in NH.

tej on February 3, 2016 at 5:24 PM

Army of lawyers threatening to sue anyone/anything over nothing.

Marcola on February 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM

The best strategy for Hillary is to send staff but stay away herself.

Cindy Munford on February 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM

If only she had sent an army of 150 the Benghazi!

Deadeye on February 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM

Which Army??? So many of them have contributed to the Clintons over the years.

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:30 PM

It couldnt be an army of NFL refs. They can fcuk up a coin toss quicker than you can say Schenectady……

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:33 PM

With Killary she’s more likely sending a mob to NH than an army…

viking01 on February 3, 2016 at 5:33 PM

If only she had sent an army of 150 to Benghazi!

Deadeye on February 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM

Deadeye on February 3, 2016 at 5:33 PM

Why aren’t the Democrat stories aren’t getting the Comments today, does anyone have a theory? – Lol

steveracer on February 3, 2016 at 5:22 PM

Got one so far:

If only she had sent an army of 150 to Benghazi!

Deadeye on February 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM

31giddyup on February 3, 2016 at 5:35 PM

If they are fat lesbians they might run of air before getting NH. Didn’t support the fat lesbians study a few years ago.

Oil Can on February 3, 2016 at 5:44 PM

Why aren’t the Democrat stories aren’t getting the Comments today, does anyone have a theory? – Lol

steveracer on February 3, 2016 at 5:22 PM

Not a lot of democrats here maybe?

DarkCurrent on February 3, 2016 at 5:46 PM

Bernie should go to SC.

forest on February 3, 2016 at 5:48 PM

Memo from Killary the Felon HQ:

Any delegate not flipping a coin on immediate demand gets a ride to Fort Marcy Park…

End of message. Cankles, out.

viking01 on February 3, 2016 at 5:49 PM

And focus on the black vote. If Bernie puts a dent in the blakc vote in SC, Team Hillary will really be sweating.

forest on February 3, 2016 at 5:49 PM

Now she’s in New Hampshire and lagging badly in the polls. If this were Bernie we were talking about he’d likely be in serious trouble. But for Hillary Clinton it was just a matter of picking up the phone.

It’s very likely that Bernie wins NH. I think Hillary is just trying to keep the margin as small as possible.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM

And in the end, this one news item about Clinton dispatching her army to Nashua is why I still don’t see much of a long term hope for Bernie taking the nomination away. (Absent Clinton being indicted, that is.) She’s just got too many guns in the arsenal.

Correct conclusion but a better supporting argument has to do with Bernie’s supporter demographics. If the electorate looked like it did 30 years ago he’d have a pretty good shot at the nomination but now the dem party skews heavily towards minorities who just don;t seem to feel the ‘bern.’

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 5:53 PM

Steve racer. Prolly the same reason we dont get a lot of articles about China. Only one commy red china supporter around that i can think of…..

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:54 PM

Hillary’s army… a bunch of cranky women in their fifties.

Neitherleftorright on February 3, 2016 at 5:54 PM

If only she had sent an army of 150 the Benghazi!

Deadeye on February 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM

you misspelled BENGHAZI!!1!

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM

Does anyone know if the six coin flips had video footage of them? And what are the odds of six out of six coin flips going one way????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM

I especially like the brown shirts that army is wearing, quite fetching.

Bishop on February 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 5:53 PM

Oh yeah… I hear black people clamoring for Hillary… like those BLM guys that accosted her backstage. And the stumping from Sharpton, Jackson, et. al. has been incessant.

Neitherleftorright on February 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM

Tlaloc. ?????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 6:02 PM

Does anyone know if the six coin flips had video footage of them? And what are the odds of six out of six coin flips going one way????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM

There was a link yesterday from a thread which showed the math and the odds involved with winning 6 coin flips in a row, I believe the final tally was 1.7% chance of this result.

Bishop on February 3, 2016 at 6:03 PM

She gonna lose. I guess she just doesn’t want it to be a 20 point blow out. It might be anyway.

I would root for Sanders in this but I’m sure any more that he can’t win the general. If it’s Sanders vs Rubio it’s going to be close. Let’s hope that doesn’t happen.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:04 PM

Winning isn’t the point.

Say she’s down 35 and closes the gap to 20.

She then advertises herself . . as. . .I don’t know. . .as “The comeback Kid” even though she finishes second.

Where have I heard that before? Hmmmmm.

Steve_in_SoCal on February 3, 2016 at 6:06 PM

Does anyone know if the six coin flips had video footage of them? And what are the odds of six out of six coin flips going one way????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM

odds 1/2^6 = 1/64

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:06 PM

Oh yeah… I hear black people clamoring for Hillary… like those BLM guys that accosted her backstage. And the stumping from Sharpton, Jackson, et. al. has been incessant.

Neitherleftorright on February 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM

Well you can pay attention to your anecdotes or you can pay attention to the data.

Up to you.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:07 PM

Tlaloc. ?????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 6:02 PM

yes?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:07 PM

Does anyone know if the six coin flips had video footage of them? And what are the odds of six out of six coin flips going one way????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM

See cattle futures.

Oxymoron on February 3, 2016 at 6:08 PM

There was a link yesterday from a thread which showed the math and the odds involved with winning 6 coin flips in a row, I believe the final tally was 1.7% chance of this result.

Bishop on February 3, 2016 at 6:03 PM

1/64 is 1.5625%

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:08 PM

Odds relating to winning 6 coin flips?

1 in 64 or about 1.56%

Steve_in_SoCal on February 3, 2016 at 6:09 PM

Is it just me or does it seem like Hillary’s had a permanent Joker grin surgically etched into her visage?

Herod on February 3, 2016 at 6:10 PM

Correct conclusion but a better supporting argument has to do with Bernie’s supporter demographics. If the electorate looked like it did 30 years ago he’d have a pretty good shot at the nomination but now the dem party skews heavily towards minorities who just don;t seem to feel the ‘bern.’

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 5:53 PM

You have a point. Hillary will buy minority votes. She’s got crews of Pastors in every state at the ready. I bet Sharpton and Jackson endorses here before this is over.

But blacks won’t turn out this year like 2008/12 so that advantage is not so large. It’s true , very few like Hillary. White older women is her best demo.

Anyway, She probably won’t make it to general. If she does they’ll be hiding the walker and every shot of her will be arm in arm with someone(holding her up).

If she does make it she can only beat Rubio. Anyone else she’ll lose to.

And don’t site me polls about an event next year. Those are worthless. Seriously, those are like weather forecasts a year away. Using those from the summer, Bernie shouldn’t even be in this. Bernie is beating Hill because the more people see of her the less they like her.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:11 PM

A new, reasonable, poster signing on as Tialoc today, I see. Welcome!

Who is John Galt on February 3, 2016 at 6:12 PM

Massachusetts labor unions have already been directing resources to NH for the beast.

wraithby on February 3, 2016 at 6:14 PM

1/(2^6)

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM

Seriously, those are like weather forecasts a year away. Using those from the summer, Bernie shouldn’t even be in this. Bernie is beating Hill because the more people see of her the less they like her.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:11 PM

Global warming 25 years ahead! Er, Climate change next century! lol

Who is John Galt on February 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM

Tlaloc. I prefer bishops figures. Hes a helluva lot more congenial than you. BTW- isnt benghazi SPELLED benghazi?????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 6:16 PM

Massachusetts labor unions have already been directing resources to NH for the beast.

wraithby on February 3, 2016 at 6:14 PM

This tactic works better for her than minority outreach. Though Bern has a better message for unions.

If hillary buys the service worker locals SEIU’s that could help. Obama got them in 2008 and they are really gov subsidized(through fair pay laws) GOTV fronts for whichever dem candidate buys them. They have armies of people that can go state to state. They are the people in purple shirts you see at rallies on TV.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:20 PM

Hillary has never been a good politician and she sure seems like a pretty miserable human being. In the end, people need to connect with you. Which is Rubio’s primary strength. Probably why he matches up the best against her.

I still cannot imagine her losing the nomination – but I’m no longer in surprise territory if she does.

Zomcon JEM on February 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM

“a willing suspension of disbelief.”

http://nypost.com/2016/02/03/hillary-i-was-never-friends-with-donald-trump/

IDontCair on February 3, 2016 at 6:22 PM

She’s just got too many guns in the arsenal.

Vince Foster unavailable for comment.

ghostwalker1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:22 PM

Global warming 25 years ahead! Er, Climate change next century! lol

Who is John Galt on February 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM

Leftists are the dumbest dupes in the history of mankind. They haven’t even designed one test yet for their stupid hypothesis but they call it a fact. They are more primitive than pagans praying to a totem.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:26 PM

Hillary? Send an army?? Ohhhhh…. I see… It’s to save herself. Not our ambassador or the heroes who tried to save him.

KMC1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:39 PM

And don’t site me polls about an event next year.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:11 PM

should I tell him or does somebody else want to?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:41 PM

Tlaloc. I prefer bishops figures. Hes a helluva lot more congenial than you. BTW- isnt benghazi SPELLED benghazi?????

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 6:16 PM

You should probably stop focusing on how much you like the speaker and start focusing on how accurate the math actually is.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:43 PM

FYI an interesting breakdown of which groups voted for which candidates based on entrance polls. Given the nature of caucuses this may not be precisely accurate but is most likely in the ballpark.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/primaries/iowa-entrance-poll/

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:51 PM

When you compare Hillary’s cash and personnel to Sanders, it’s like a football game between between Notre Dame and St Mary’s School For Girls winding up in a 21-21 tie despite fixed referees-Hillary eventually “winning” by a series of “loaded dice” coin tosses.

If, in NH, she just reduces Sander’s margin of victory–whe will declare “victory by momentum”.

MaiDee on February 3, 2016 at 6:56 PM

And don’t site me polls about an event next year.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:11 PM

should I tell him or does somebody else want to?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:41 PM

In 10 months – did you need an exact date – “next year” and 10 months is close enough for not clueless people.

Anyway, I see you can’t keep making the case for Hillary as the “now ways Taard” Hariet Tubman candidate so you diddle over 2 months.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:57 PM

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:07 PM

You have no current data or you would paste it up here. And if your using polls, well we all see the gross inerrancies of those lately.

What you have is wishcasting and a flailing candidate that people don’t like. I think Bernie’s people said it this way the other night…

She’s a liar

She’s a liar

She’s a liar

Neitherleftorright on February 3, 2016 at 6:58 PM

Why isn’t this vile, venal witch in prison already??

locomotivebreath1901 on February 3, 2016 at 6:58 PM

How fitting that these days she always seems to be wearing the classic Mao Tse Tung style dress.

She could send half the country to New Hampshire and it wouldn’t help her any.

Andy__B on February 3, 2016 at 7:01 PM

FYI an interesting breakdown of which groups voted for which candidates based on entrance polls. Given the nature of caucuses this may not be precisely accurate but is most likely in the ballpark.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/primaries/iowa-entrance-poll/

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 6:51 PM

Looks like bernie wins the working poor and less educated.
Hillary wins big on terrorism .

So much for your useless theories.

Don’t post a link if it undercuts your arguments.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:02 PM

In 10 months – did you need an exact date – “next year” and 10 months is close enough for not clueless people.

Anyway, I see you can’t keep making the case for Hillary as the “now ways Taard” Hariet Tubman candidate so you diddle over 2 months.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 6:57 PM

Touchy, touchy.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:05 PM

You have no current data or you would paste it up here. And if your using polls, well we all see the gross inerrancies of those lately.

What you have is wishcasting and a flailing candidate that people don’t like. I think Bernie’s people said it this way the other night…

She’s a liar

She’s a liar

She’s a liar

Neitherleftorright on February 3, 2016 at 6:58 PM

http://cookpolitical.com/story/9179

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:07 PM

Why isn’t this vile, venal witch in prison already??

locomotivebreath1901 on February 3, 2016 at 6:58 PM

Good question, the right has sworn they have absolute proof of her violating several laws!

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:07 PM

Everybody likes to talk about the odds on coin flips. You do realize ‘the odds’ of every toss coming up h or t is 50/50? Every time, right? The results under discussion don’t ‘defy the odds’. Unusual, yes. Better to discuss the possibility of anyone but a Clintoon running for national office while likely a federal criminal. How do we calculate that?!?

DemetriusPhalerum on February 3, 2016 at 7:07 PM

Looks like bernie wins the working poor and less educated.
Hillary wins big on terrorism .

So much for your useless theories.

Don’t post a link if it undercuts your arguments.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:02 PM

What argument of mine did that undercut exactly?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:08 PM

Touchy, touchy.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:05 PM

Yuk. gross.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:10 PM

What argument of mine did that undercut exactly?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:08 PM

A little touchy I see.
IA has too few minorities but
the demo for Sanders ,in your link, intersects much of the minority demo.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:13 PM

in other states with a high minority %.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:13 PM

A little touchy I see.
IA has too few minorities but
the demo for Sanders ,in your link, intersects much of the minority demo.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:13 PM

How exactly do you reach that conclusion given that they didn’t break out the ethnicity of respondents?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:15 PM

income under 50000 +9 Sanders
unmarried women +10 Sanders
First time voters +22
education some college/associates +10

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:16 PM

Ah I see you’re making the highly dubious assumption that if Sanders wins a given socioeconomic or education cohort of whites that he’ll win the same cohort of minority voters.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:16 PM

Bill is in charge of the under-24 female campaign staffers…

albill on February 3, 2016 at 7:17 PM

How exactly do you reach that conclusion given that they didn’t break out the ethnicity of respondents?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:15 PM

In IA that wouldn’t matter. It’s a very white state.

The demo attribute intersections is what I’m looking at. It’s an educated guess.
I’m using it to undercut your projection. But in truth I don’t even believe it.
I think hill will win blacks because she has the Pastors bought. I just don’t think they’ll come out for her in high numbers.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:19 PM

Pastors and service unions bought.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:21 PM

It’s an educated guess.
I’m using it to undercut your projection. But in truth I don’t even believe it.
I think hill will win blacks because she has the Pastors bought. I just don’t think they’ll come out for her in high numbers.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:19 PM

A) It’s not really an educated guess since it runs contrary to the actual knowledge of how groups behave electorally

B) You don’t even believe it, but you think it undercuts my argument?

C) This notion of pastors being bought and that somehow translating into votes has at least the virtue of being unique

D) The right also assumed that blacks wouldn’t vote in significant numbers in 2012. Turns out they voted at a higher rate than whites for the first time ever

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:22 PM

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:22 PM

A) You don’t supply any proof of A) And those groups did vote Sanders in YOUR link.
B)I’m just showing hoe your own link undercuts your arguments.
C) You must be dumb not to think the Churches and unions don’t bring people to the polls.
D)2012 was Barak Obama. Do you SEE(use your eyes) any difference between Obama and Hillary?

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:27 PM

Tialoc can’t see that Barak Obama might … just might… have an advantage with blacks that Hillary doesn’t have … lol.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:29 PM

Dang. Dreadloc got fired from Killary’s Army?
Pathetic!

22044 on February 3, 2016 at 7:29 PM

I thought they liked pigeons.

22044 on February 3, 2016 at 7:31 PM

A) You don’t supply any proof of A) And those groups did vote Sanders in YOUR link.
B)I’m just showing hoe your own link undercuts your arguments.
C) You must be dumb not to think the Churches and unions don’t bring people to the polls.
D)2012 was Barak Obama. Do you SEE(use your eyes) any difference between Obama and Hillary?

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:27 PM

A) no they didn’t because it’s just you assuming that under $50k income = minority, which isn’t remotely true. And I think you know where that conversation ends for you (skip to D below if you are in doubt)

B) which you failed to do and undercut yourself by saying even you know your argument was garbage.

C) I just find your argument to be unique.

D) Ah, so you assume that because you’re racist everyone must be. < got it.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:32 PM

D) Ah, so you assume that because you’re racist everyone must be. < got it.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:32 PM

You are crazy. I live in a black area. I can assure you that no one is pumped for Hillary like they were Obama. My opinion is just common sense. If you think people don’t vote for their own then you should stop with the political commentary.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:34 PM

D) Ah, so you assume that because you’re racist everyone must be. < got it.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:32 PM

Dumb liberals who are locked up in their little white worlds make statements like this.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:35 PM

You are crazy. I live in a black area. I can assure you that no one is pumped for Hillary like they were Obama. My opinion is just common sense. If you think people don’t vote for their own then you should stop with the political commentary.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:34 PM

Again a retreat to anecdote.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:37 PM

How exactly do you reach that conclusion given that they didn’t break out the ethnicity of respondents?

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:15 PM

Oh, look who suddenly think it’s important that people be able to articulate the reasoning behind their conclusions.

The Schaef on February 3, 2016 at 7:38 PM

Tlaloc. That was my round about way of saying id rather share a foxhole with people like bishop than people like you. Ok tlaloc, insert snark comeback here _________________________.

Indiana Jim on February 3, 2016 at 7:38 PM

Again a retreat to anecdote.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:37 PM

Yes, a Flash application about a fictitious animated lady named Julia is a much stronger argument.

The Schaef on February 3, 2016 at 7:39 PM

Again a retreat to anecdote.

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:37 PM

“The first black president inspired high minority turnout” is a racist statement according to this one.

Donna Brazil wouldn’t argue with me. You are a nut.

BoxHead1 on February 3, 2016 at 7:41 PM

Students in the Granite State can choose to vote there rather than in the state from which they came.
http://www.unh.edu/main/unh-votes

Of course Hillary would never exploit this voting “feature”.

diogenes on February 3, 2016 at 8:20 PM

“She’s just got too many guns in the arsenal.”

I saw what you did there, Jazz.

Meremortal on February 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM

ted cruz just tweeted that hillary abandoned her run for the presidency and is going to florida

renalin on February 3, 2016 at 8:59 PM

She needs an army – to hold guns to people’s heads so they vote for her.

grumpyank on February 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM

Tlaloc on February 3, 2016 at 7:07 PM

Read the exit Iowa exit polls. Bernie took 80% of the youth. 63% of Shrillary’s votes were from women 55+.

Former head of the NAACP announces Bernie support. The drip, drip, drip is starting to coalesce into a stream. Watch out for the coming wave.

She is the worst candidate.

Her own fellow Democrats chanted.

She’s a liar!

She’s a liar!

She’s a liar!

You can hide behind polls and data, but a leftist like you who is guided by feelings that Shrillary gives no one the warm fuzzies… not even Bill…. heck especially not Bill.

Neitherleftorright on February 4, 2016 at 11:11 AM