Oh my: Some Hillary e-mails “too damaging” to release?

posted at 3:21 pm on January 29, 2016 by Ed Morrissey

What happens when redactions become insufficient to cover the damage to national security from Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized and unsecured home-brew e-mail system? Get ready to find out. Fox News’ Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne exclusively report that the intelligence community will prevent the State Department from releasing at least 22 e-mails in the current tranche, because not even redactions can prevent damage to national security from their release:

The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging” to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding.

The decision to withhold the documents in full, and not provide even a partial release with redactions, further undercuts claims by the State Department and the Clinton campaign that none of the intelligence in the emails was classified when it hit Clinton’s personal server.

Fox News is told the emails include intelligence from “special access programs,” or SAP, which is considered beyond “Top Secret.” A Jan. 14 letter, first reported by Fox News, from intelligence community Inspector General Charles McCullough III notified senior intelligence and foreign relations committee leaders that “several dozen emails containing classified information” were determined to be “at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, AND TOP SECRET/SAP levels.”

It’s the presence of SAP information which has the intel community seeking a halt on further releases of these specific e-mails, apparently comprising seven different threads. The problem, Herridge and Browne report, is that the lack of effective security on both the internet connection and the server itself all but guarantees that others have copies of Hillary’s entire system. Publishing the e-mails with the SAP redactions would allow those with their own Clintonemail.com backup to easily find the information and discover the value of the information they have — essentially providing a map to the needles in the haystack.

But, readers might ask, isn’t that true of all the redacted e-mails? Indeed it is, but apparently the sensitivity of those programs didn’t rise to the level of what the intel community found in this tranche. That gives us a very clear picture of just how much damage Hillary and her team did to national security with their desire to pervert legitimate Congressional oversight for the State Department.

That’s not the end of the Friday afternoon dump, either:

The AP’s Bradley Klapper reports that the Obama administration might finally be preparing to toss Hillary & Co under the bus, emphasis mine:

The Obama administration is confirming for the first time that Hillary Clinton’s unsecured home server contained some closely guarded secrets, including material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. …

Spokesman John Kirby tells the AP that no judgment on past classification was made. But the department is looking into that, too.

Hillary’s excuse all along has been that none of the information was classified when it was transmitted through the system (and then retained in its archives). The State Department had gone along with that defense, at least tacitly. This is the first time that the State Department has said they are investigating whether that claim is true — and that may be a huge, huge problem for Hillary. It might be an indication that the FBI has built the paper trail that shows that the material was classified right up to the moment it appeared on Hillary’s secret e-mail system, and now the State Department has to establish who would have had access to it.

This might be a very big sign that Democrats will need a Plan B for the presidential nomination — and sooner rather than later.

Update: Worth noting:

This raises a couple of questions, such as: How do they know? And for good measure, does that mean that they just don’t want to prosecute, as opposed to saying no crime was committed? Clearly the latter is false, so if this is the White House sending the all-clear, the former must be true.

But don’t necessarily read too much into this. They may just be wanting to signal that they aren’t pressing the DoJ to act immediately, as a way of getting their fingerprints off of whatever happens to Hillary. Later they can say, An indictment? Who saw that coming? We shall see, though, and it’s getting more and more difficult to explain inaction away.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Commenter at Power Line nails it.

This whole “none were marked classified” thing is a red herring. It’s like saying that I don’t drive a pickup truck because it doesn’t say pickup truck anywhere on my F-150.

Del Dolemonte on January 29, 2016 at 9:46 PM

Still and for all time the very best political snapshot.

turfmann on January 29, 2016 at 10:11 PM

If Hillary Clinton gets anything resembling a pass on this, much less rewarded with a nomination and winning in the general election, against the wishes of the majority of The Citizens, then it is without a doubt time once again to stand up to the King.

We will have an armed insurrection.

God save the people and the Republic for our government has forsaken us for their own pleasure and needs. We have all become serfs, some have become Barons all have come to serve our Lords and Masters and kneel before their greatness.

jpcpt03 on January 29, 2016 at 10:17 PM

It ‘s difficult to believe that Hillary didn’t wipe her server with a bit more care.
That is whatever it is. Right now, my assumption is that the only people who hadn’t hacked her e-mail are ” We, the People ”
So, now the super-secret stuff is coming out.
I guess that would be comprised of any e-mails between herself, and President Obama, that one I am sure of.
The other, and larger one is those communications with people, they don’t even want to disclose to us who they were.
Would that be Iran, Russia, other Enemies of the State?
Isis leaders?
They will not even let out redacted e-mails…

Well, I would be the first one to suggest treason and the good old-fashioned treatment for that offense.
But even I have no idea if she will have to face the music on ANYTHING she has ever done.
During this life.

Snowshooze on January 29, 2016 at 11:20 PM

Snowshooze on January 29, 2016 at 11:20 PM

Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.

-Sir John Harrington

wytshus on January 29, 2016 at 11:43 PM

Yeh Tialic…the Fbi is yawning and for how long…drip drip. Fluffer.

CWforFreedom on January 30, 2016 at 12:18 AM

I can confirm that as part of this monthly production of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, the State Department will be denying in full seven e-mail chains found in 22 documents representing 37 pages. The documents are being upgraded at the request of the intelligence community because they contain a category of top secret information. These documents were not marked classified at the time that they were sent.”

U.S. State Department Spokesman John Kirby

why are you guys such willing suckers, every single time?

everdiso on January 30, 2016 at 12:28 AM

why are you guys such willing suckers, every single time?

everdiso on January 30, 2016 at 12:28 AM

Good Lord NUMBNUTS, did you bother to read what Ed wrote or are you just spewing your DNC talking points?

It’s the presence of SAP information which has the intel community seeking a halt on further releases of these specific e-mails, apparently comprising seven different threads. The problem, Herridge and Browne report, is that the lack of effective security on both the internet connection and the server itself all but guarantees that others have copies of Hillary’s entire system. Publishing the e-mails with the SAP redactions would allow those with their own Clintonemail.com backup to easily find the information and discover the value of the information they have — essentially providing a map to the needles in the haystack.

But, readers might ask, isn’t that true of all the redacted e-mails? Indeed it is, but apparently the sensitivity of those programs didn’t rise to the level of what the intel community found in this tranche. That gives us a very clear picture of just how much damage Hillary and her team did to national security with their desire to pervert legitimate Congressional oversight for the State Department.

And as you have reading comprehension issues let me break this down for you:
No, these particular emails were not marked classified at the time but as a whole, releaseing all of these emails to the public now would constitute DAMAGING the intelligence community and the current spy network.

Let me break that down even more simply for you:

No, these particular emails weren’t classified but all of them on her servers (which as you’ll recall was NOT secured) has enough information to wreck the US intelligence network such that it can’t be released publicly now.

Still simpler:

Hillary sent enough OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION to her PRIVATE server that can compromise US Intelligence operations.

So why are you so gullible and idiotic, every… single… time?

Skywise on January 30, 2016 at 2:02 AM

I can confirm that as part of this monthly production of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, the State Department will be denying in full seven e-mail chains found in 22 documents representing 37 pages. The documents are being upgraded at the request of the intelligence community because they contain a category of top secret information. These documents were not marked classified at the time that they were sent.”

U.S. State Department Spokesman John Kirby

why are you guys such willing suckers, every single time?

lester on January 30, 2016 at 12:28 AM

You’re the Willing Sucker, Chelsea, because “Admiral” Kirby has, according to his bio, spent almost his entire military career as a Public Relations Dude for the US Military Industrial Complex. Those guys are only Bad when they’re not on your side.

Kirby was commissioned in September 1986 after completing Officer Candidate School at Naval Station Newport, Rhode Island. He qualified as a Surface Warfare Officer aboard the guided-missile frigate USS Aubrey Fitch (FFG 34) before obtaining a lateral transfer to the Restricted Line as a Public Affairs Officer (PAO). As a public affairs officer, Kirby served at sea aboard the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal (CV 59) and on the staff of the Commander, U.S. 2nd Fleet, embarked aboard the command and control ship USS Mount Whitney (LCC 20).

While ashore, Kirby completed tours as an instructor at the U.S. Naval Academy; public affairs officer with the Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron (Blue Angels); editor in chief of the Navy’s flagship monthly magazine, All Hands; the staffs of the Chief of Naval Personnel, Commander of U.S. Naval Forces Europe, Chief of Naval Operations, and the special assistant for public affairs to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. His most recent assignment was serving as the deputy assistant secretary of defense for media operations.

Kirby served as the U.S. Navy’s chief of information, serving as the principal spokesman for the Department of the Navy and providing strategic communication counsel to the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations. As the Navy’s Chief of Information (CHINFO), he led the Navy’s public affairs community consisting of more than 2,700 active and reserve officer, enlisted, and civilian communication professionals. In December 2013, he was appointed by SECDEF Chuck Hagel to be the Pentagon press secretary.

Face it, lester, this Admiral has spent his entire career as a PR Guy for the US Military; if the current Commander in Chief was a Republican you would call him “Baghdad Bob”.

We all still fondly remember how Hillario! said that she voted for War with Iraq “with conviction”, and then years later weakly claimed that she made a mistake, and it was all Bush’s fault-even though at the time, she said that she based her vote on her Meal Ticket’s intel peoples’ advice.

Using your own “logic”, not only was she Lying Thru Her Teeth then, her Meal Ticket was too!

Just curious…you brain-dead Democrats rail on and on about “Southern White Hicks” being the lifeblood of the Democrat Party, while desperately ignoring that your own Democrat Party’s Rock Stars (in your minds, at least) are exactly that. The only difference is that one of them moved from up north to the Hayseed Heaven of Arkansas, embarking on what is now something Chairman Mao would be proud of…..

Oh, and the last time the Klintons employed the services of a military star officer, Hillario’s Meal Ticket had to fire him for his total incompetence during Meal Ticket’s non-UN-sanctioned War of Choice, a War of Choice where he actually followed one of his Democrat predecessors, Lyndon Johnson, by giving the Evil Halliburton no-bid contracts to try and finish the job.

F-

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 2:05 AM

For the Democrats, who must be considering an official pardon for Hillary in exchange for withdrawing from the race, here is the relevant section of Nixon’s pardon from Ford.

Now, therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from July (January) 20, 1969, through August 9, 1974.

It appears that he gave a blanket pardon for all offenses committed while in office.

There must be many other people involved in this information breach. It would be difficult to pardon them all.

I would also wonder whether any non-federal prosecution could occur of financial irregularities with the Clinton Foundation or with tax issues.

I’m picturing the Democrats trying to spin a mass pardon of all the White House, State Department, Clinton Foundation and IRS staff.

I’m picturing the media supporting the effort.

Is it any wonder I can’t sleep.

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM

Maybe the FBI should make a generous donation to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Hubbell…er..Clinton Foundation to get access to the emails?

I wonder if Cheryl and Huma are hearing the bus revving up behind them?

wytshus on January 30, 2016 at 3:23 AM

Either –

Hillary Clinton withdraws from race.

OR

She is indicted.

If you (and I mean America as a whole, everyone one of you) don’t do either of these thing you will never be taken seriously again.

What will it be?

Crux Australis on January 30, 2016 at 5:32 AM

– If Bryan Pagliano (Hillary’s IT guy that threatened to plead the Fifth) is still alive, he might want to request that a spot on the witness protection program be held for him.

– How, and by whom, was top secret/SAP information sent to Hillary’s private server? I haven’t seen much mention of the sender(s), just the receiver (Hillary). Whoever sent that stuff must be getting a bit nervous about now.

justltl on January 30, 2016 at 7:41 AM

The Democrat-Loving, America-Hating New York Times today has buried this story on Page A15 of their print edition.

Dr. Goebbels approves!

(Raises clenched fist in Salute)

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 7:48 AM

Kirby also said 18 emails, comprised of eight email chains between Clinton and President Barack Obama, are being “withheld in full” to “protect the President’s ability to receive unvarnished advice and counsel.” But, Kirby said, they “have not been determined to be classified” and said they will “ultimately be released in accordance with the Presidential records act.”

I only saw this on CNN.

There is nothing to suggest this was classified, but unless these were yoga or wedding tips or the like, it clearly shows Obama knew Hillary was using non-government email for work purposes, which he should have known was wrong.

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 8:19 AM

I’d say start with a conspiracy indictment for Pagliano and see if he rolls, but the hard evidence seems so strong they shouldn’t need his cooperation.

50/50 on any prosecutions while the Ds are in charge of the DOJ.

Mishandling the classified information also occurred when Clinton gave this info to her lawyer who does not have the necessary clearance , so for that felony, the SOL would extend to 5 years from this past fall, to fall of 2020 for prosecution. That would only be for Clinton, not for the other people in sending the info.

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 8:23 AM

Crux Australis on January 30, 2016 at 5:32 AM

Yes, the Hillary case is definitely a canary in the coal mine. Actually, we’ve had more and more dead canaries in the mine for about the last century, and flocks of them since maybe the late 1950’s.
The toxin is, I believe, Leftism and all of the filth and corruption associated with it.
Now the Media is supposed to be keeping an eye on the canaries, but instead, when they are not actively killing them, they are sweeping them under the mixed metaphorical rug. An excellent example is provided by Del above.

justltl on January 30, 2016 at 8:28 AM

According to my search there are no posts from a certain tialo* on this thread.

Unexpectedly.

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 8:29 AM

Mishandling the classified information also occurred when Clinton gave this info to her lawyer who does not have the necessary clearance

goodtalkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 8:23 AM

Not to mention whatever droids she had searching through her e-mails supposedly sorting the business ones from the personal ones.

justltl on January 30, 2016 at 8:33 AM

Scott Johnson @ Power Line

Over-Clintonization Run Amok

This development once again puts the lie to just about everything Hillary Clinton has had to say on the subject. She continues to maintain that none of the emails were marked classified upon receipt. Whether or not this is true, however, it is irrelevant to many of the statutes under which her behavior can be deemed criminal.

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 9:20 AM

After all this time, there is still zero evidence that Clinton did anything illegal, or that any state secrets fell into enemy hands.

Yet you guys still jump up and bark like trained seals at every new fake news drop.

It is funny.

everdiso on January 30, 2016 at 9:23 AM

According to my search there are no posts from a certain tialo* on this thread.

Unexpectedly.

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 8:29 AM

And yet check some of the other Hot Gas threads from Friday 1/29 and you will see that name.

Kinda telling, isn’t it?

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM

fake news drop.

lester on January 30, 2016 at 9:23 AM

Thanks for admitting that CNN and the NY Times, which are now covering this “fake story”, are “fake news”.

What’s wrong, did Mother Clinton forget to bring you your bowl of Weetabix this morning?

F-

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM

why are you guys such willing suckers, every single time?

everdiso on January 30, 2016 at 12:28 AM

Is having a learning disability a prerequisite for becoming a troll?

It doesn’t matter if the information was marked classified at the time it was sent, if it’s classified, it’s classified.

There are only two explanations for why the information was not marked with a classification heading when it was sent:

(1) The information was generated by the intelligence community and had classification markings when generated. One of HRC’s minions extracted the information from a secure network, removed the classification markings (a felony) and transcribed the information onto an email (a felony) and sent it unsecure (a felony) to her illegal, unsecure, private email address (a felony). There it was maintained (a felony).

(2) HRC, or one of her minions, originated the information and failed to properly label it with the proper classification heading (a felony). Then HRC, or one of her minions, transmitted the unmarked classified information (a felony) over an illegal, unsecure, private email server (a felony), where it was maintained (a felony).

In either case, these classified emails were saved onto a thumb drive (a felony), the thumb drive containing classified information was given to HRC’s attorney, who did not have the appropriate security clearance, (a felony) and he stored the thumb drive outside of an approved, secure facility (a felony).

So for each and every email that contained classified information, nine or ten felonies were committed.

Do you understand now? If not, go back to the beginning of this post and re-read until you do understand.

GAlpha10 on January 30, 2016 at 9:31 AM

After all this time, there is still zero evidence that Clinton did anything illegal, or that any state secrets fell into enemy hands.

Yet you guys still jump up and bark like trained seals at every new fake news drop.

It is funny.

everdiso on January 30, 2016 at 9:23 AM

If you go to the State Department FOIA site you can see the evidence for yourself. There are currently 25,125 emails that have been released by the State Department as of yesterday morning. 1,340 of those emails have had portions redacted because they contained classified information, regardless is they were so marked.

Since each of these emails were either sent to HRC, or HRC sent them to someone from an illegal, unsecure, private email service, a felony was committed. Since they were not properly marked with their classification heading, 1,340 additional felonies were committed. Since they were maintain on an illegal, unsecure, private email server, 1,340 additional felonies were committed.

And all these felonies do not include whatever the FBI has been able to retrieve from the server(s) that were “wiped clean” to cover her criminal activities. Each and everyone of the 1,340 classified emails have been released by the State Department. Each email that the FBI has retrieved that are not included in the 1,340 constitutes several additional felonies. (1) Failure to properly mark classified information, (2) transmitting classified information over an unauthorized network, (3) maintaining classified information on an unsecure, unauthorized device, (4) improper destruction of classified materials, (5) obstruction of justice, and (6) conspiracy.

Again, NOTHING that the FBI has recovered from the hard drives has been released. Everything that has been released is due to a court order stemming from a FOIA lawsuit(s).

The evidence gathered by the FBI will be released during the Grand Jury, if the DOJ prosecutes, or will be leaked if they do not. Either way, this evidence, combined with the 1,340 emails released by the State Department (plus those they cannot release because, in their entirety, they are too sensitive), will sink the HMS Hillary.

GAlpha10 on January 30, 2016 at 9:48 AM

Halperin explained that even some in the White House have begun to discuss the investigation. “It’s not clear whether they know what’s happening or it’s just their intuition, but the body language among some Obama administration officials is this is more serious and something is going to happen. Again, the timing of it could be if not cataclysmic, pretty bad for Secretary Clinton if Sen. Sanders is still alive.”

I hadn’t seen this quote that was in the Daily Caller before. I thought the end was pretty funny.

Is Sanders asking for extra security?

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 10:11 AM

If you want to see the emails, just call Russia or China and ask them to send you a copy.

Wino on January 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM

Is Sanders asking for extra security?

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 10:11 AM

Yes he has, and they are setting up a special meeting to discuss this with Hillary in Fort Marcy Park.

Wino on January 30, 2016 at 10:44 AM

Guess its time for Obama to decide if covering/protecting Hillary is worth his presidency. Consider some of those “too top secret to be released emails” were to/from obama/hillary so technically obama may be guilty too. How is it obama or his staff or the state dept was ok with obama emailing to/receiving top secret/sap emails knowing it was going through an unsecured server??? Sounds like obama also jeopardized America and our allies!

soapyjeans on January 30, 2016 at 10:54 AM

“State Department is also withholding 18 emails between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton.”

– Catherine Herridge
1:30 into her report.

So the president was aware of her private email?
And if they’re withholding those 18 emails – did they contain classified info too? If so, I don’t see anything but stonewalling and a pardon coming.

Hill60 on January 30, 2016 at 11:06 AM

So the president was aware of her private email?
And if they’re withholding those 18 emails – did they contain classified info too? If so, I don’t see anything but stonewalling and a pardon coming.

Hill60 on January 30, 2016 at 11:06 AM

Yup. Right off the bat they claim Executive Privilege and blocked release of any emails between BHO and HRC. So, yes, he did know about her using her illegal, unsecure, private email system and did nothing to stop her.

However, if the FBI is able to retrieve emails from BHO and HRC from the “wiped server(s)”, there’s no way BHO can prevent them from being entered as evidence in a criminal trial.

GAlpha10 on January 30, 2016 at 11:14 AM

fake news drop.

lester on January 30, 2016 at 9:23 AM

PS, I wasn’t aware that a US Government agency (the Department of State, which has been totally run by Democrats since 2009, and was run by your Heroin for 4 of those years) was a “fake news drop” source.

But then again, I’m not as Stupid as you are, and unlike yourself I am not desperately trying to excuse criminal behavior that would probably land anybody else in the pokey.

Using your “logic”, everything the State Department has told us since 2009 has been based on fake news drops. Thanks so much for admitting it!

F+

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 11:23 AM

If the Russians, Chinese and Iranian have copies why can’t the American citizens see them,
Do we really have to wait until Russia release copies?

IXXINY on January 30, 2016 at 11:27 AM

After all this time, there is still zero evidence that Clinton did anything illegal, or that any state secrets fell into enemy hands.

everdiso on January 30, 2016 at 9:23 AM

Then why is the FBI investigating her?

darwin on January 30, 2016 at 12:04 PM

After all this time, there is still zero evidence that Clinton did anything illegal

lester on January 30, 2016 at 9:23 AM

This whole Hillario! email thing began less than 1 year ago.

I know it happened before your parents were even born, but using your “logic” in this sad excuse for a post, you would have also cleared Richard Nixon of doing anything illegal a year after the Watergate break-in in 1972-which was a full year before he actually resigned!

F-#409.

Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2016 at 12:16 PM

Watching the Clinton defenders on TV say the emails were not classified when they were sent is a real joke, and they know it. Information/intelligence is always more valuable as it is developed/discovered than it is years later. They are grasping for a lifeline but SS Hillary is already foundering and about to go under…

Irish Stout on January 30, 2016 at 4:40 PM

If this slime ball ever gets into the white house, she’ll be too busy enriching herself and family, and broadening her network, to give a flying fark about America, the economy, or national security.

Oxymoron on January 30, 2016 at 5:34 PM

Work got busy. I saw this headline just before it did but frankly there’s nothing new here. Same deal where they claim some emails are classified but can’t say that they were sent or received by clinton and don’t say they were classified at the time or if it happened later.

*yawn*

Tlaloc on January 29, 2016 at 8:53 PM

According to my search there are no posts from a certain tialo* on this thread.

Unexpectedly.

talkingpoints on January 30, 2016 at 8:29 AM

So tell me again how you guys know the truth when you see it and are never mistaken…

Tlaloc on January 30, 2016 at 8:27 PM

Tialic , you’re a water carrier. Should be embarrassed.

CWforFreedom on January 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM

During an interview with MSNBC reporter Monica Alba, Clinton claimed she didn’t know which emails were being withheld by the Obama administration but then claimed that she did not generate any of the email chains that have been deemed too sensitive for release.

How does Clinton know whether or not she generated email chains if she does not know which emails she’s referring to?

CWforFreedom on January 30, 2016 at 10:24 PM

How many are emails from Obama to Hillary that came from Obama’s private Hot Mail or gmail account? LOL.
What if Obama is using an off-the-books private server similar to Hillary?

The missing Nixon tapes thing returns!

albill on January 31, 2016 at 8:44 AM

Is it time to add some vertical black bars to this photo?

talkingpoints on January 31, 2016 at 10:25 AM

Too damaging to national security or too damaging to Obama? At this point I’m willing to bet Obama is somehow linked to these emails and before it’s all said and done something will be done to try to excuse Hillary from responsibility. Think Fast & Furious with Eric Holder. Before he got executive privilege I’m willing to bet the conversation between him and Obama went something like, “You need to get me out of this or I’m taking you down with me.”

Yakko77 on January 31, 2016 at 2:34 PM

This is yet another branch of the problem. 18 of the 22 e-mails were pulled by Obama. Were believed to be about the panning of the Ben-gaze problem. I think some one should be going after Obama on this one.

jpcpt03 on January 31, 2016 at 8:21 PM

So tell me again how you guys know the truth when you see it and are never mistaken…

Tlaloc on January 30, 2016 at 8:27 PM

I’ve posted links supporting arguments and claims that I make.

You declare something to be so, and declare someone to be unsavory in some manner when they challenge you on the matter.

Methinks you suffer from a significant case of projection…

The Schaef on February 1, 2016 at 11:44 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3