Yet another UN peacekeeping force child sex ring uncovered

posted at 12:41 pm on January 12, 2016 by Jazz Shaw

Let’s just get one thing out of the way right up front here: when, if ever, are these stories going to stop? I feel like something of a monster for even putting these words into writing, but I don’t think I really even experienced any shock or sense of betrayal when I saw yet another headline at the Washington Post today recounting the story of more United Nations peacekeeping forces in Africa turning out to have been exploiting children for sex. It’s just become so commonplace now that it’s akin to reading about another meth lab being discovered on the other side of town. You want to be outraged. You should be outraged. But at some point it simply becomes the new normal and the shock is replaced with sadness and what approaches resignation to the fact that the world is an awful place.

The details, horrible as they are, could have come from any number of previous stories we’ve seen.

The United Nations has been grappling with so many sexual abuse allegations involving its peacekeepers that Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon recently called them “a cancer in our system.”

Now, officials have learned about what appears to be a fresh scandal. Investigators discovered this month that at least four U.N. peacekeepers in the Central African Republic allegedly paid young girls as little as 50 cents in exchange for sex…

The most recent allegations involve at least four peacekeepers who are accused of paying girls as young as 13 for sex at a camp for the internally displaced next to the international airport in Bangui, the capital. The site, known as M’Poko camp, is home to 20,000 people, mostly Christians. It is a vast agglomeration of white tents surrounding old, decaying airplanes, just yards from the airport runway.

Yes, the Central African Republic is, for all intents and purposes, a failed state and no fit place to live unless you are heavily armed and well positioned to survive constant conflict. It’s a country which is rich in uranium, oil, gold and timber but which has been essentially a battleground of violence and corruption for years. Ever since François Bozizé took power more than a decade ago and suspended the constitution he’s been at war with rebel forces who continue to challenge his likely fraudulent elections. The real losers, unfortunately, have been the rank and file citizens. Then along comes the United Nations, bringing food, medicine and troops to “stabilize” the region. It probably seemed like a great deal to the starving citizens until the troops turned around and began raping their children themselves.

Is it just something in the nature of “peacekeeping” and charitable forces being sent into third world nations with few eyes watching them? I’d honestly like somebody to help me figure this out. If you’re motivated to help people to the point where you sign up for such duty one might imagine that you’d be among the least likely to go around exploiting and raping the most helpless souls in the world. We saw something very similar in the Peace Corps this past year in case you missed it. They too had cases of volunteers being found raping young girls or tolerating the rape and abuse of their own volunteers and were forced to put in Kellie Greene as Director of Office of Victims Advocacy. Green quickly got to work pointing out all the flaws in the system and was rewarded for her work by being fired. (Washington Post)

Two hundred current and returned Peace Corps volunteers around the world have signed a petition to Congress to reinstate an outspoken advocate for victims of sexual assault who was pushed out four years after lawmakers demanded that the agency show it was serious about volunteers’ security.

“Survivors and their allies are asking for the immediate reinstatement of Kellie Greene as Director of Office of Victims Advocacy,” says the petition started on Change.org in December.

“Kellie Greene has proven herself to be a fierce advocate for Peace Corps Volunteers who become victims of crimes during their Peace Corps Service,” the petition says. “She holds Peace Corps to a incredibly high but necessary standard. She has ushered in great change within Peace Corps. Returned Peace Corps Volunteers are calling for her immediate reinstatement.”

Pardon my French, but what the hell is going on around here? Are supposed forces of salvation like the UN peacekeepers and the Peace Corps just magnets for pedophiles and monsters? I understand that evil can crop up anywhere, but as long as the majority of the members are honest, caring individuals, they should be reporting and ejecting such offenders as soon as they are noticed, not covering up the crimes and going after their own watchdogs.

I don’t have a solution for this. Simply calling to dissolve the UN’s peacekeeping forces entirely or to scrap the Peace Corps seems extreme and would cut off whatever other positive work they are doing. But do they both require outside monitoring since they can’t seem to look after their own flock? And if so, who takes on that job when it takes place in nations all over the world and falls under so many different jurisdictions? Normally the answer to that question would be the United Nations, but… oh. Never mind.

UnitedNations


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

African muslims – go figure……

dentarthurdent on January 12, 2016 at 12:44 PM

Isn’t there a rumor that Obama wants to be the head of the UN?

katiejane on January 12, 2016 at 12:45 PM

I think some countries just pawn their criminals off on the UN as “troops” just to get rid of them.

Flange on January 12, 2016 at 12:46 PM

Simply calling to dissolve the UN’s peacekeeping forces entirely or to scrap the Peace Corps seems extreme and would cut off whatever other positive work they are doing.

Excellent point…could you please list anything positive the UN or Hippy Corpse has ever done?

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:47 PM

Normally the answer to that question would be the United Nations, but… oh. Never mind.


Pick one:

a) This is the SAME organization vetting Syrian refugees for the State Department. Think about the MANY fun things that WILL come from that policy.

b) “I say we take off and nuke the site from space. It’s the only way to be sure.”

PolAgnostic on January 12, 2016 at 12:47 PM

M’Poko camp

Heh.

otlset on January 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM

Investigators discovered this month that at least four U.N. peacekeepers in the Central African Republic allegedly paid young girls as little as 50 cents in exchange for sex…

“Hey, we paid them this time. What’s the problem?”

-UN Scumbags.

portlandon on January 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM

The UN is a sick joke of what leftism produces.

From “peace keeping” forces involved in a child sex ring to a “human rights council” that gives seats to the worlds worst despots.

gwelf on January 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM

Whenever there’s a scandal like this, you notice that the news accounts never say which country the particular UN peacekeeping unit is from.

My guess is Bangladesh, whose army does a lot of this kind of thing for the UN. It’s a major source of foreign currency for the Bangladesh government.

And I bet it was troops from Bangladesh who caused the plague in Haiti.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM

Isn’t there a rumor that Obama wants to be the head of the UN?

katiejane on January 12, 2016 at 12:45 PM

Surrounded by all those “peacekeepers”, he’d be in heaven.

Flange on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

Isn’t there a rumor that Obama wants to be the head of the UN?

katiejane on January 12, 2016 at 12:45 PM

Something involving head, anyways.

portlandon on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

KatieJane: UN rules are that the Secretary General can’t be from a veto power.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

KatieJane: UN rules are that the Secretary General can’t be from a veto power.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

Obama will become a birther ;)

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM

Well this is the same institution where Saudi Arabia is heading the Human Rights Council.

Jeffreyvdb on January 12, 2016 at 12:51 PM

OTOH – they’ve passed the first test to qualify for the Secret Service……

dentarthurdent on January 12, 2016 at 12:52 PM

KatieJane: UN rules are that the Secretary General can’t be from a veto power.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

Obama will become a birther ;)

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM

OK, that would be pretty funny if he did come out as a Kenyan after he leaves office.

Flange on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

Leftie trolls, where are you?

Schadenfreude on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

KatieJane: UN rules are that the Secretary General can’t be from a veto power.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

Soooo, no problem for someone from Kenya or Indonesia…..

dentarthurdent on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

Yet another UN peacekeeping force child sex ring uncovered

Meanwhile, U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies

Deafdog on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

OK, that would be pretty funny if he did come out as a Kenyan after he leaves office.

Flange on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

why do you think he’s saving those college admission papers?

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:55 PM

I won’t have any Prose on this until tlaloc opines…

ToddPA on January 12, 2016 at 12:56 PM

Community organizing on a global scale.

antipc on January 12, 2016 at 12:59 PM

Meanwhile, U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies

Deafdog on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

^^^ This ^^^

antipc on January 12, 2016 at 1:00 PM

I understand that evil can crop up anywhere, but as long as the majority of the members are honest, caring individuals, they should be reporting and ejecting such offenders as soon as they are noticed, not covering up the crimes and going after their own watchdogs.

Oh you mean people like Green Beret Charles Martland should call them out?

That train already left the station. Precedent set.

Reuben Hick on January 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM

This is the real WAR ON WOMEN

Someone should ask Shillary about it, she seems to be an expert on the subject.

Danger on January 12, 2016 at 1:01 PM

I understand that evil can crop up anywhere, but as long as the majority of the members are honest, caring individuals, they should be reporting and ejecting such offenders as soon as they are noticed, not covering up the crimes and going after their own watchdogs.

Steven Den Beste raises a great point towards one of the core issues – the covering up of crimes and the preference to attack the watchdogs as opposed to the reprobates who embrace this evil…

…why is the UN / Press not referencing the nation(s) whose troops are embracing this vile act? Why isn’t there any serious / criminal repercussions for the officer’s in charge of the peacekeeping forces? Or the fecklessness of their civilian oversight? Or the nation’s involved themselves?

The mindset of the UN, like that of the left, is that they are adverse to judge – unless it’s rendering judgment on the US, Israel, or the West. It institutionally tolerates crime, criminal acts, and wanton flouting of it’s rules and international law – because unless it’s the US, Israel, or the West doing it, it’s the ‘unfairness’ of ‘past wrongs’ that cause it. Criminals and criminal states always get the benefit of the doubt.

Nothing will change until that mindset changes. That mindset change starts by holding those criminals, their officers, their civilian oversight, and their nation fully accountable for those crimes – with real punishments and no tolerance for coverups or blaming the victims or watchdogs.

Athos on January 12, 2016 at 1:02 PM

Excellent point…could you please list anything positive the UN or Hippy Corpse has ever done?

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:47 PM

Well, if you count HIV positive…

Rix on January 12, 2016 at 1:04 PM

I’m sure the UN will get right on this……..

GarandFan on January 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM

Hey Jeffrey time to fire up the jet, Bill.

RickB on January 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM

Excellent point…could you please list anything positive the UN or Hippy Corpse has ever done?

Sure. They are frequently involved in work with… the .. Well, not that so much, but they often …

Okay. I got nothing. But hypothetically they might

Jazz Shaw on January 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM

Unexpectedly!

Galtian on January 12, 2016 at 1:08 PM

KatieJane: UN rules are that the Secretary General can’t be from a veto power.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

Obama will become a birther ;)

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM

He doesn’t speak French.

kcewa on January 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM

Pardon my French, but what the hell is going on around here? Are supposed forces of salvation like the UN peacekeepers and the Peace Corps just magnets for pedophiles and monsters?

It’s the problem with many modern “virtuous” movements. Because UN peacekeepers and the Peace Corps are viewed as virtuous organizations, whose members are beyond reproach, the corrupt naturally gravitate to these movements to use them for their own ends and to provide them with some protection from legal authority. We see this in the modern “social justice warrior” movement as well.

I trust almost no “virtue” movements or charities anymore. Inevitably they seem to be scams to bilk people out of their money or havens for pedophiles, criminals, and other assorted lunatics.

Doomberg on January 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM

Do they get little blue pills to go with the big blue helmets?

Marcola on January 12, 2016 at 1:14 PM

Let’s just get one thing out of the way right up front here: when, if ever, are these stories going to stop?

When we disband that corrupt and evil organization, tear down the building on the East River, and use the rubble to help build a wall along our southern border.

Nomennovum on January 12, 2016 at 1:16 PM

Meanwhile, U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies

Deafdog on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

Aren’t the 2 soldiers that stopped an Afghan ally from raping a young boy chained in his room being court marshalled?

What happened to common sense and decency???

Hank_Scorpio on January 12, 2016 at 1:22 PM

That’s what happens when the monsters take control.

It is well past the point where the monsters need to be exterminated.

Turtle317 on January 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM

Jazz Shaw on January 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM

Truth is always good. Too bad the left doesn’t think it exists.

Neitherleftorright on January 12, 2016 at 1:37 PM

at least four U.N. peacekeepers in the Central African Republic allegedly paid young girls as little as 50 cents in exchange for sex

That almost makes it sound like they’re more upset about the failure to pay a $15 minimum wage than it does that these were 13yo girls.

GWB on January 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM

Obama wants to run the UN when he gets done being in the oval office. LOL. He isn’t even aware how that leader is chosen. Nobody in their right mind would make him an ambassador to the UN in the first place, and nobody in the world would vote him in as the chair when it does revolve around to the USA again.

He also thinks that by being the UN leader he’d be able to dictate to the USA what laws we have and what is contained in our constitution. LOL again. President Trump will tell the UN to bag it, pack up and get out, AND defund them. No more UN to be leader OF.

LOL LOL LOL @ the p3nis in chief and his band of merry rapists.

Andy__B on January 12, 2016 at 1:51 PM

…at least four U.N. peacekeepers in the Central African Republic allegedly paid young girls as little as 50 cents in exchange for sex

That almost makes it sound like they’re more upset about the failure to pay a $15 minimum wage than it does that these were 13yo girls.

GWB on January 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM

Knowing the manhood of those “peacekeepers”, it probably amounted to more $15/hr rate.

Rix on January 12, 2016 at 1:52 PM

Sure. They are frequently involved in work with… the .. Well, not that so much, but they often …

Okay. I got nothing. But hypothetically they might

Jazz Shaw on January 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM

you’ve convinced me

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 2:03 PM

The UN force is very much like any military force in a foreign land. And it has young soldiers.
Like so many other military encamped forces thru modern and ancient history

Don’t know about today’s gay, and feminized US forces
But back in the day, just out the gate of near any military post, sex could be had cheaply in several countries throughout the world. And these gals were NOT old hags…

Heck, you could even barter for it wth cigarettes, candy bars, and such as jars of mayonnaise.
BTW, most young soldiers didn’t require an ID check of girls before getting busy

Shocking huh Jazz??

BigSven on January 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM

The UN force is very much like any military force in a foreign land.
BigSven on January 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM

Hey – don’t forget about our chivalrous Secret Service agents…..

dentarthurdent on January 12, 2016 at 2:28 PM

Simply calling to dissolve the UN’s peacekeeping forces entirely or to scrap the Peace Corps seems extreme and would cut off whatever other positive work they are doing.

i’ve got something else in mind for them to be cutting off

(IYKWIMAITYD)

WaldoTJ on January 12, 2016 at 2:55 PM

the problem is that the UN is made up of mostly muslim and or black nations. Those cultures do this stuff. If UN troops meant guys from Denmark only, no, you would have no rape. But if it includes guys from, say, Mali or Bangladesh, well, yes, you are inviting the fox into the hen house.

The UN has become a joke. A corrupt cesspool of third world nations. They know nothing about fighting, and everything about graft and rape.

And what is the GOPe view on the UN? Do we even have to ask?

HugoDrax on January 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM

OTOH – they’ve passed the first test to qualify for the Secret Service……

dentarthurdent on January 12, 2016 at 12:52 PM

Or a teachers union.

malclave on January 12, 2016 at 3:23 PM

It must be exhausting having to cover up so many scandals.

Pegcity on January 12, 2016 at 3:30 PM

When asked if he thought having sex with a 13-year old girl was wrong, one UN soldier replied, “But my wife at home just turned 12”.
;-)

albill on January 12, 2016 at 4:11 PM

Isn’t there a rumor that Obama wants to be the head of the UN?

katiejane on January 12, 2016 at 12:45 PM

Yes, he would like to be the President Secretary General.

I started the rumor.

LoganSix on January 12, 2016 at 4:29 PM

And yet liberals as well as some Republicans love the UN.

RoddREpub on January 12, 2016 at 4:58 PM

Pardon my French, but what the hell is going on around here? Are supposed forces of salvation like the UN peacekeepers and the Peace Corps just magnets for pedophiles and monsters?

That sort of hyperbole is why it is difficult for anybody to have a sensible conversation about the issues and how to manage them.

First, thirteen-year old girls are quite able to have sexual desires of their own, and to pursue them. It is quite likely they were willing participants and they might even have been the initiators.

Second, all around the world and in every culture, a significant percentage of post-pubescent young girls are very eager to present themselves naked, and the most trivial excuse will suffice. Pretending that this is not so means that you cannot put men on guard against it, and teach them how to recognise, diffuse and avoid situations that would lead to unwise sex.

Third, most 13-year old girls (and, indeed, most of them under about 26 I’d say) are ignorant and inexperienced.

The result of these matters is a dangerous coupling of intense desire and foolishness. One of the most important reasons why societies attempt to restrict sexual access to young girls is to protect them from themselves. Those restrictions define the legality of the situation.

The morality is more complex. The age and circumstance for which sexual activity is deemed socially acceptable varies across Africa, from “only within marriage”, to “not below age 21”, to “not before puberty”; which could be as low as 9 or 10. Even in some parts of Europe the age at which sex becomes ‘officially’ acceptable is as low as 14.

What really is the difference between a jail-bait of 13 years and 364 days, and blossoming womanhood 24-hours later? One is ‘monster’ food and the other a protégé in need of nurture? Besides, the notion that sex with such a young person is ‘immoral’ and/or repugnant is a relatively recent notion and far from universal even in civilised societies. For many societies, the issues of moral concern for these girls would be the prostitution and the absence of marriage, not their age.

Meanwhile if you really want to protect a young girl then the first monster that she needs to be protected from is the one called lust that her pubescent hormones awakened inside her; but to protect her effectively from that particular monster you will need to recognise her own sexual appetite and agency.

In this matter it is western societies that have gone furthest astray because they provoke that appetite and encourage its sating whilst simultaneously avoiding any public acknowledgement of its existence; they compound these errors by putting only cursory protection around their young girls and then uselessly huff and puff when pregnancy rates increase, STDs spread more widely, and foreign barbarians grope, invade and impregnate their daughters. When the western societies have worked out how to keep their own daughters safe they might have something sensible to say about the daughters of other regions, and about the misdeeds of UN peacekeepers.

YiZhangZhe on January 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM

I understand that evil can crop up anywhere, but as long as the majority of the members are honest, caring individuals, they should be reporting and ejecting such offenders as soon as they are noticed, not covering up the crimes and going after their own watchdogs.

Jazz, save this graf. There are a couple of other stories you can use it on.
And not just rape cases, although there are plenty of them.

Meanwhile, U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies

Deafdog on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

AesopFan on January 12, 2016 at 6:51 PM

Excellent point…could you please list anything positive the UN or Hippy Corpse has ever done?

Sure. They are frequently involved in work with… the .. Well, not that so much, but they often …

Okay. I got nothing. But hypothetically they might

Jazz Shaw on January 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM

And this one — reminds me of the SCOTUS interrogation on education unions yesterday on PowerLine.

Vernuccio characterized the morning this way: “The questions from the justices show that the premise of the case may be upheld: that collective bargaining in the public sector is inherently political.”

Vernuccio also told me that when the justices asked for examples of collective bargaining issues that are not political, the opposition came up with just one. One lawyer suggested mileage reimbursements, but even that was shot down.

AesopFan on January 12, 2016 at 6:52 PM

KatieJane: UN rules are that the Secretary General can’t be from a veto power.

Steven Den Beste on January 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM

Obama will become a birther ;)

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM

OK, that would be pretty funny if he did come out as a Kenyan after he leaves office.

Flange on January 12, 2016 at 12:53 PM

why do you think he’s saving those college admission papers?

Rogue on January 12, 2016 at 12:55 PM

AesopFan on January 12, 2016 at 6:53 PM

Steven Den Beste raises a great point towards one of the core issues – the covering up of crimes and the preference to attack the watchdogs as opposed to the reprobates who embrace this evil…

…why is the UN / Press not referencing the nation(s) whose troops are embracing this vile act? Why isn’t there any serious / criminal repercussions for the officer’s in charge of the peacekeeping forces? Or the fecklessness of their civilian oversight? Or the nation’s involved themselves?

The mindset of the UN, like that of the left, is that they are adverse to judge – unless it’s rendering judgment on the US, Israel, or the West. It institutionally tolerates crime, criminal acts, and wanton flouting of it’s rules and international law – because unless it’s the US, Israel, or the West doing it, it’s the ‘unfairness’ of ‘past wrongs’ that cause it. Criminals and criminal states always get the benefit of the doubt.

Nothing will change until that mindset changes. That mindset change starts by holding those criminals, their officers, their civilian oversight, and their nation fully accountable for those crimes – with real punishments and no tolerance for coverups or blaming the victims or watchdogs.

Athos on January 12, 2016 at 1:02 PM

It’s the problem with many modern “virtuous” movements. Because UN peacekeepers and the Peace Corps are viewed as virtuous organizations, whose members are beyond reproach, the corrupt naturally gravitate to these movements to use them for their own ends and to provide them with some protection from legal authority. We see this in the modern “social justice warrior” movement as well.

I trust almost no “virtue” movements or charities anymore. Inevitably they seem to be scams to bilk people out of their money or havens for pedophiles, criminals, and other assorted lunatics.

Doomberg on January 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM

The UN force is very much like any military force in a foreign land. And it has young soldiers.
Like so many other military encamped forces thru modern and ancient history

Don’t know about today’s gay, and feminized US forces
But back in the day, just out the gate of near any military post, sex could be had cheaply in several countries throughout the world. And these gals were NOT old hags…

Heck, you could even barter for it wth cigarettes, candy bars, and such as jars of mayonnaise.
BTW, most young soldiers didn’t require an ID check of girls before getting busy

Shocking huh Jazz??

BigSven on January 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM

The point about the UN is that they are sent specifically to protect the people they are exploiting, and who in other cases are forced to have sex to receive the aid the UN sent to their camp.

That’s not the same situation as for the “camp followers” around the bases whose offers are (more or less) voluntary (and probably less, but there is not the element of “friendly fire” coercion as in the UN camps).

…In this matter it is western societies that have gone furthest astray because they provoke that appetite and encourage its sating whilst simultaneously avoiding any public acknowledgement of its existence; they compound these errors by putting only cursory protection around their young girls and then uselessly huff and puff when pregnancy rates increase, STDs spread more widely, and foreign barbarians grope, invade and impregnate their daughters. When the western societies have worked out how to keep their own daughters safe they might have something sensible to say about the daughters of other regions, and about the misdeeds of UN peacekeepers.

YiZhangZhe on January 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM

I agree with you on the double-standards and inconsistencies in play, but I think we can say something sensible about both problems simultaneously.

AesopFan on January 12, 2016 at 7:00 PM

I think there has been a lot of profound thinking done here. AesopFan just above quoted most of the best of it. But with all that said,

Let’s just get one thing out of the way right up front here: when, if ever, are these stories going to stop?

In a practical sense, they aren’t. Ever.

More to the point, the only way you can even get moderately close to stopping it is to make charity and “help” organizations of any and all kinds solely the province of the private sector.

Why? Because as long as it’s run by a government or governments, it’s nearly impossible to fire anyone, jail anyone, or even cut off their funding. And whether you can or not depends on who has the most political pull, not who committed what crimes.

I’m sure you can think of any number of events that illustrate the truth of that.

So what are ya gonna do? Declare war on the Peace Corps and the UN Peacekeeping Forces? Short of that, there is nothing you can do to hold them accountable, for precisely the same reasons we can’t with the IRS, the EPA, the Dept. of Interior, the State Department, the VA, the Justice Department, the….

…sheesh, how long a list do ya want?

GrumpyOldFart on January 13, 2016 at 5:06 PM