Video: DNC chair caught in lie about Dem debate negotiations

posted at 12:41 pm on October 14, 2015 by Jazz Shaw

There was a big fight going on among the Democrats yesterday, but it wasn’t the one on the debate stage in Las Vegas. It’s been well known for quite some time that pretty much everyone in the party wanted more debates than the four scheduled for this year and they wanted them to begin sooner. Everyone, that is, except for Hillary Clinton and DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. That argument came to a head when one of her vice-chairs, Tulsi Gabbard (D – Hawaii 2) found herself uninvited to the debate last night after being a bit too vocal about how the party needed to schedule more such events. It was apparently bad enough that Bernie Sanders’ campaign had to offer her one of their tickets. (CNN)

Tulsi Gabbard said she was disinvited from Tuesday night’s first Democratic debate after voicing a call for more of them.

“If she needs a ticket, have her give me a call,” Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign manager, said on CNN’s “New Day” on Monday. “I think we have a couple; we can give her one.”

Gabbard said she “politely declined” Weaver’s offer, not wanting to turn the brouhaha into a “political conversation.”

That led to a rare moment yesterday afternoon on CNN when Wolf Blitzer had DWS on his show and asked her about how ugly things had gotten. The chairwoman flatly denied that it had happened, even when Blitzer pressed her on the subject, saying they had multiple sources confirming that Gabbard had been told “she should probably make other plans.” She tried to deflect the question, saying that it was a shame that they were talking about the “process” rather than the issues, going on to insist that she had consulted with all of her vice-chairs before arriving at the number of debates to be held.

Oh really? Check out the video below. John Heilemann was on Morning Joe to report that he’d spoken to more than a dozen people (vice-chairs and their spokespeople) and he couldn’t find one who didn’t find out about the decision on the number of debates “through a press release.”

What’s happening here is clear. The media, in a rare moment of doing their jobs when it comes to reporting on the DNC, has conducted numerous interviews and found out that DWS single-handedly rigged the number of debates against the wishes of most of the their candidates and the majority of the party and she did it to shield Hillary Clinton from damage. Then when she was called out on it on national TV, she lied through her teeth about it. This should be far more than an embarrassment for the Democrats… it should be a firing offense.

It’s not just Republicans taking notice. DWS is now being heckled by her own base. (ABC News)

The call for more Democratic debates is growing louder.

The chair of the Democrats National Committee got heckled today during her remarks at the New Hampshire Democratic Party convention by protesters calling for more than six debates in the primary.

The chants began as Debbie Wasserman Schultz told the crowd she was looking forward to the December debate in Manchester, New Hampshire.

“We want debates! More debates!” party members yelled out, drowning out her remarks.

Many protesters — many of whom were Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley supporters — simultaneously held up bright orange signs that read, “More debates = More votes for DEMOCRATS.”

I don’t think we’ve heard the last of this. Nobody can actually overrule DWS on the schedule as far as I know, so we may never see those extra debates. But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Hair’s getting a little dry looking there. Somebody order her a mayonnaise and hold the burger!

otlset on October 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM

Debs wouldn’t lie.

forest on October 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM

Hilarious. Here’s Ted Cruz’s take on the debate:

Ted Cruz calls Democrats debate an audition to wear jackboots of despot

Ward Cleaver on October 14, 2015 at 12:46 PM

Hair’s getting a little dry looking there. Somebody order her a mayonnaise and hold the burger!

otlset on October 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM

Maybe she should switch to Miracle Whip.

/heresy!

Ward Cleaver on October 14, 2015 at 12:47 PM

DWS, proving once again the accuracy of the ‘Peter Principle’…

Athos on October 14, 2015 at 12:48 PM

Play this and disseminate it.

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 12:49 PM

Let DebWaSchultz continue to speak.
Early, often, and on every possible outlet.

She is the most effective member of the Republican race.
She’s just too d*mned dumb, or brainwashed to recognize it.

orangemtl on October 14, 2015 at 12:50 PM

Catch and Release..

I fully support it..

Throw her back in…

Electrongod on October 14, 2015 at 12:54 PM

when she was called out on it on national TV, she lied through her teeth about it.

Wow. DWS is a liar. Who knew?

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

And she’ll roll right into a good one in the Hillary administration.

BacaDog on October 14, 2015 at 12:55 PM

Fire her now

cmsinaz on October 14, 2015 at 12:55 PM

Hey, somebody tried putting lipstick on a sow.

antipc on October 14, 2015 at 12:56 PM

The mayo scumhag doesn’t know the diff. btw. a marxist, socialist, D, and always blames the “Republicans” when asked to differentiate.

She is dumber than lard.

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM

She’s a Democrat. She LIES.

It’s what Democrats do.

See also, Sun rising in the East….Bears Sh*t in the Woods..
…Fire burns…Water is wet…..

ToddPA on October 14, 2015 at 1:01 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Garsh, that would be a darn shame.

rbj on October 14, 2015 at 1:02 PM

White liberals really do ruin everything……

libfreeordie on September 7, 2013 at 11:50 AM

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM

She is dumber than lard.

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM

I was thinking of a sack of dirt……

itsspideyman on October 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM

DNC chair caught in lie

Wouldn’t news be made when she’s caught in a truth?

bernzright777 on October 14, 2015 at 1:04 PM

. But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

So? Debbie’s more than willing to lose this job, for a job in the Clinton Administration that they promised her.

Why do you think she is shielding Hillary?

portlandon on October 14, 2015 at 1:04 PM

It would be great to have Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz get the boot. Yes, please!

Mother of Pearl on October 14, 2015 at 1:05 PM

She is dumber than lard.

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM

I was thinking of a sack of dirt……

itsspideyman on October 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM

I’ve always been a big fan of a bag of hammers.

bernzright777 on October 14, 2015 at 1:05 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Silly Jazz Shaw.

If Hillary wins the presidency, DWS will become Secretary of State because of this.

TheJamesMadison on October 14, 2015 at 1:06 PM

The most dangerous lie/liars are those in the U S A who self deceive aka lie to themselves that these low cur dog commie/marxist Democrat party thugs do not lie 24-7/365 about every last thing.

THEY LIE, THE MSM/msm/blog media enables as do all the others with heads in the lie made sand.

Now the worlds largest most dangerous lie “Climate Change” and every last person of any reason, honesty, or moral code should be calling it out.

But you see the lie seeds have been sown and the evil reaping now comes.

Go and sin no more, call out this huge lie and all the others.

APACHEWHOKNOWS on October 14, 2015 at 1:07 PM

OT: DOJ creates a new position to address what he the growing risk from homegrown terrorism and specifically white supremacy.

So now, apparently Obama has declared war on white people.

Happy Nomad on October 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM

This should be far more than an embarrassment for the Democrats… it should be a firing offense.

This is a joke right?

We are joking here? Am I missing it?

Gatsu on October 14, 2015 at 1:09 PM

It’s irrelevant whether there are more Dem debates, since everyone will go out of their way again to not attack Hillary. They won’t hit her on the email issue it seems.

Braveheart on October 14, 2015 at 1:11 PM

OMG. She looks WORSE when she’s all dolled up! (Still sounds like a foghorn either way.) How is that possible?

Serious Drivel on October 14, 2015 at 1:11 PM

Lose her job? That’s a joke. You can’t be a good Demarxist if you believe lying is wrong.

yhxqqsn on October 14, 2015 at 1:13 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Silly Jazz Shaw.
If Hillary wins the presidency, DWS will become Secretary of State because of this.
TheJamesMadison on October 14, 2015 at 1:06 PM

I diagree… DWS will be Hillary’s press secretary.

You’d see her EVERY DAY.

Marcola on October 14, 2015 at 1:16 PM

So? /any dem

NoFanofLibs on October 14, 2015 at 1:24 PM

The DNC can’t take the chance that the real message of the candidates might be revealed by an unscripted moment that could appear in multiple debates. Too many opportunities for statements they can’t take back or revise.

Is it just me, or does DWS always look like she is one shower short from optimal personal hygiene?

DimsdalePiranha on October 14, 2015 at 1:25 PM

She is dumber than lard.

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 12:57 PM

I was thinking of a sack of dirt……

itsspideyman on October 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM

I’ve always been a big fan of a bag of hammers.

bernzright777 on October 14, 2015 at 1:05 PM

And she’s ugly as a mud fence.

cornbred on October 14, 2015 at 1:26 PM

many of whom were Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley supporters

I wondered where he was.

mankai on October 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM

Whatshername-Schmutz has SUCH a beautiful lisp….

Shirotayama on October 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM

I don’t think we’ve heard the last of this. Nobody can actually overrule DWS on the schedule as far as I know, so we may never see those extra debates. But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Looking at Tuesday’s debate, you have to wonder what good adding any additional debates would do? Sanders was the only one on the stage last night with even a hope of catching Hillary, and he basically disarmed himself by taking her scandals off the table, at the risk of being branded a hypocrite now if he brings them up again.

The only way added debates could make a difference is if Uncle Joe finally gets into the race, and given his mighty brain, there’s also no way to know if adding debates then might not help Hillary, though Joe would at least force Hillary to tighten her embrace of Obama’s actions, and allow him to possibly trip her up on any new revelations (and if Biden didn’t bring it up, odds are the future moderators aren’t going to do it, or will frame the questions more on Hillary’s unfair treatment by Republicans than Hillary’s violations of federal law).

jon1979 on October 14, 2015 at 1:44 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Promises, promises

Newtie and the Beauty on October 14, 2015 at 1:59 PM

So now, apparently Obama has declared war on white people.

Happy Nomad on October 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM

That “now” is yer fake premise, friend.

Schadenfreude on October 14, 2015 at 1:59 PM

Is it any surprise that the DNC Chair corrupted the process or lied about it? Really? She was on The Kelly File last night after the debate, and she lied publicly again. She will only Lise her job, if Hillary is not elected.

Techster64 on October 14, 2015 at 1:59 PM

OT: DOJ creates a new position to address what he the growing risk from homegrown terrorism and specifically white supremacy.

So now, apparently Obama has declared war on white people.

Happy Nomad on October 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM

What white supremacy? Where the hell are all these white supremacists I keep being told are under every rock?

I live in friggin Alabama and I have yet to meet a single white supremacist. Though I did hear a thousand news stories about one in the Carolinas recently (the only one the media could actually find, apparently).

runawayyyy on October 14, 2015 at 2:02 PM

And Debbie “Blabbermouse” strikes again!

Mike from NC on October 14, 2015 at 2:10 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

The only way to truly, effectively fire DWS would be to strap her to an Orion heavy lifter, put an apple in her mouth, and launch her toward the sun.

AubieJon on October 14, 2015 at 2:34 PM

Who are you kidding. This lie will have a short life but I do wonder how they have decided to use it in the press. I would only assume they have figured out that it cant hurt Hillary and the press doesn’t care much for some one as replaceable as DWS. But DWS has been telling these lies for years about Republicans and the press never said anything. I can only assume that they are using it to help fight the fact that the press goes with every lie that the left tells by using this exception to prove they are not just a propaganda machine for the left.

pwb on October 14, 2015 at 2:35 PM

Look, I’m not offering a defense for DWS here, but I watched that debate last night and A) I’m not sure the country could stomach more than six debates, B) I’m not sure she could convince a network other than MSNBC to carry more than six debates, and C) after the performances from Webb and Chafee, the field will be so winnowed down that it’ll be Hillary versus her cheeerleader Sanders by debate number three.

At this point… well, you know the rest.

BKeyser on October 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM

She tried to deflect the question, saying that it was a shame that they were talking about the “process” rather than the issues…

‘The Process’ of course, being the manner of deciding issues.

So, should the “Democratic Party” use a “democratic process”, or a dictatorial process?

What’s in a name? Seriously.

DWS thinks it is a shame that they are talking about the “process”. Perhaps it’s more of a shame that like the Democrat Party, much of the USA these days is ignoring the democratic elements of the “process”, and our democratic republic is edging more toward a dictatorial form.

s1im on October 14, 2015 at 2:45 PM

She’s a moron.

RonRon on October 14, 2015 at 3:02 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Not as long as the “Progressive” wing of the party is in the majority. It would require that the ‘centrists’ and ‘conservative’ Democrats ban together. So far, they’re not that smart.

GarandFan on October 14, 2015 at 3:05 PM

But when the dust settles it may wind up costing Debbie Wasserman-Schultz her job.

Oh, I hope not.
Better to go with the enemy you know …

AesopFan on October 14, 2015 at 3:08 PM

This article was written as if we are surprised that a Demorat would openly lie. Where the hell have you been the last seven years? They all lie and do so daily about anything. They do it from obama on down with no since of wrong doing.

inspectorudy on October 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM

The DNC can’t take the chance that the real message of the candidates might be revealed by an unscripted moment that could appear in multiple debates. Too many opportunities for statements they can’t take back or revise.
DimsdalePiranha on October 14, 2015 at 1:25 PM

Sums it up – and DWS knew that from the beginning about Hillary, so the rest of the field was an even less reassuring opportunity.

And Dems are always allowed to take back, revise, or deny any statements that damage the agenda.
It’s DeMedia for a reason.

AesopFan on October 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM

The more noteworthy event would be catching DWS telling the truth.

Another Drew on October 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM

not wanting to turn the brouhaha into a “political conversation.

When you’re in politics, everything you do is ‘political’ – this is a strange time to start having “sensitivities”.
Just another (redundancy alert) big-mouthed politician who was feeling “neglected and ignored” and needed to focus the attention of the moment on herself.

Another Drew on October 14, 2015 at 3:18 PM

OMG. She looks WORSE when she’s all dolled up! (Still sounds like a foghorn either way.) How is that possible?

Serious Drivel on October 14, 2015 at 1:11 PM

She looked totally ready for what we in Las Vegas refer to as the “walk of shame”. Seriously, the hookers here were probably asking her for some hair & makeup tips.

FNH57 on October 14, 2015 at 3:47 PM

Debbie is a democrat.

Lying is what they do.

widget on October 14, 2015 at 3:50 PM

BKeyser on October 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM

I concur.

Unless Bernie just wants an extra few nights to publicly stick his nose up Hillary’s crack or to drag her just that little bit more leftward (there are still 10 million or so non-democrats she has not officially called her personal enemy), I don’t think there is a point in having a 2nd debate let alone a 7th.

deepdiver on October 14, 2015 at 4:58 PM

Debbie the DemocRat

justltl on October 14, 2015 at 6:02 PM

Are DEMOCRATS allowed to tell the truth?

Obamatrix on October 14, 2015 at 7:42 PM

… and hold the burger!

otlset on October 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM

Eewwww! Just, EEWWWW!

UnstChem on October 14, 2015 at 10:31 PM

 
Debbie Lied
Debates Died.
 

ignatzk on October 15, 2015 at 1:13 AM

Fire her? She is the face of the Democrat party – dumb as a football bat and attractive as a mud fence. Keep her.

ghostwalker1 on October 15, 2015 at 2:43 AM