2nd-quarter GDP – +2.3%; 1st-quarter GDP – +0.6%, but lower than before
posted at 4:01 pm on July 30, 2015 by Steve Eggleston
The Bureau of Economic Analysis released their advance estimate of second-quarter GDP and said that real GDP grew by an annualized 2.3% over the first quarter. The bigger news is that release also incorporated revisions to GDP estimates from the first quarter of 2012 through the first quarter of 2015, as the BEA began to implement what Steve Liesman of CNBC calls “residual seasonality” and what many call double seasonal adjustment.
In the first quarter of 2014, the government sent shivers through global financial markets by reporting a recession-like contraction in the U.S. economy of 2.1 percent. Despite severe winter storms and record-breaking cold, economists still could not account for the deep plunge in growth. Even Federal Reserve officials worried something worse than just the effects of bad weather could be amiss in the economy.
Turns out, it was the data itself and how the government calculates gross domestic product that were actually amiss. The Bureau of Economic Analysis, the federal agency responsible for GDP, now says growth was actually 1.2 percentage points higher in the quarter for a more manageable and understandable decline of 0.9 percent.
The bureau announced Thursday its regular annual revisions of the past three years and confirmed a series of stories in CNBC that raised questions about the seasonal pattern of growth. Overall, the government revised down GDP over the three years ending in 2014 by a modest 0.3 percent but also took the first steps in changing the way it calculates GDP to account for anomalies in the quarterly pattern of growth….
In its report, the bureau revealed a new problem that CNBC had not found: Overstatement of growth in the third quarter for at least the past three years. In fact, the biggest change over the three-year period was a 2 percentage point downward revision to the third quarter of 2012 to show just a half-point of growth, and a 1.5 percentage point downward adjustment to the third quarter of 2013 to show 3 percent growth. In both quarters, the biggest subtraction came from lower federal defense spending.
A note to Liesman and his colleagues at CNBC – when one merely shifts growth around, it has to come from somewhere. Other estimates of the effects of double seasonal adjustment, that assumed a mere shift of economic activity, strongly suggested reductions in the growth in other quarters, especially the third, would happen.
Tom Blumer over at BizzyBlog put together a chart of the revisions, both quarterly and full-year (really, an average of the 4 quarterly estimates):

Courtesy BizzyBlog/Tom Blumer, reposted with permission
At the end of this round of adjustments, the nominal GDP of $17,649.3 billion as of the 1st quarter of 2015 was $44.0 billion lower than the 3rd estimate released last month, while real GDP of $16,177.3 billion (2009 dollars) was $110.4 billion (2009 dollars) lower than previously reported. The BEA’s implicit price deflator, its measure of inflation, appears to have increased by an average of roughly 0.1 percentage point over the last 3 years, putting it slightly closer in line with, but still significantly lower than, the Consumer and Producer Price Indexes.
Moving on to the current report, personal consumption expenditures contributed +1.99 percentage points to the change in real GDP. Once again, the biggest component of that was spending on health care, with a +0.31-point contribution. However, that is the first time in 5 quarters that spending on health care contributed less than +0.52 percentage points (on a revised basis).
Spending on goods also picked up, with durable goods spending contributing +0.53 percentage points (the largest contributor was auto sales/auto parts at +0.26 points) and nondurable goods spending contributing +0.52 percentage points (the largest contributor was “other nondurable goods” at +0.27 points). That spending increase is on top of a 1.4% increase in the price index for all gross domestic purchases (versus a 1.6% decrease in the first quarter), and a 1.1% increase in the price index for non-food/non-energy gross domestic purchases (versus a 0.2% increase in the first quarter).
That did not come at the expense of net exports, as that contributed a rare positive change, +0.13 percentage points this time around.
Business investment contributed far less to GDP change than in recent history, with fixed investment’s contribution of +0.14 percentage points the lowest since the 3rd quarter of 2012. The change in private inventories, after contributing +0.87 percentage points (+0.77 points nonfarm) in the first quarter, contributed -0.08 percentage points (-0.06 points nonfarm) in the 2nd quarter.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Double seasonal adjustment…is that like a Triple Dog Dare???…
PatriotRider on July 30, 2015 at 4:10 PM
Smoke and Mirrors…
PatriotRider on July 30, 2015 at 4:11 PM
Cheao illegal alien workers make for a booming economy!!!!!!
they lie on July 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM
Recovery Summer VII…
fortcoins on July 30, 2015 at 4:13 PM
#2 three years before I predicted it would be.
DarkCurrent on July 30, 2015 at 4:13 PM
Naw, still not good enough. More revisions are needed to show the economy is really humming!
otlset on July 30, 2015 at 4:14 PM
Can’t wait to see the quadruple seasonal adjust numbers…
PatriotRider on July 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM
3rd World Banana Republic Ministry of Economics and Money Printing…
Seven Percent Solution on July 30, 2015 at 4:16 PM
…and of course, they have a new way to calculate these things, so like unemployment numbers, I’m reminded of the Mark Twain’s attribution to Benjamin Disraeli: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”
– Mark Twain’s Own Autobiography: The Chapters from the North American Review
ProfShadow on July 30, 2015 at 4:20 PM
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
rogerb on July 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM
ANNUAL GROWTH 1Q12 thru 1Q15 1.98% !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where are all the trolls to talk that performance up????
parke on July 30, 2015 at 4:33 PM
Well, I’m delighted to hear that it was the numbers that were at fault, and not our booming economy.
Its clear to me that we are doing so well that 93 million people don’t have to work anymore./
Dolce Far Niente on July 30, 2015 at 4:34 PM
So hows the Chinese stock-market hanging today?
oscarwilde on July 30, 2015 at 4:35 PM
Break out the champagne!
:/
Mark Boabaca on July 30, 2015 at 4:40 PM
Report from the Obama Ministry of Plenty:
The longest, slowest, weakest, and most anemic economic recovery since the Second World War – was just revised upwards to reflect an even weaker and more anemic economic recovery than before.
Athos on July 30, 2015 at 4:40 PM
obola hates our military:
davidk on July 30, 2015 at 4:43 PM
Chocolate rations have been increased from eighty grams to fifty.
Actually what this tells us, it not only has the Government been lying to us for the last 3 years, but the real data is so bad that now they even have to lie about the false data.
Unemployment Rate for June 2015 is 23.1%
Keep in mind, that during the Great Depression of the 1930’s, the unemployment rate was only 21 percent and it only reflected the men in the workforce. In other words, the unemployment of the Great Depression was only half of what today’s unemployment rate is.
oscarwilde on July 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM
Well, that’s clearly proof that Obama should be able to run a third term.
Stupid Constitution.
LoganSix on July 30, 2015 at 4:51 PM
Excellent analysis Mr. Eggleston. Thanks.
thatsafactjack on July 30, 2015 at 4:52 PM
And those aren’t the numbers that we’ll learn of a few months from now!
How low will they go?
kregg on July 30, 2015 at 4:53 PM
We are one bad jobs report away from a cancellation of the planned rate hike.
Wigglesworth on July 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM
Nobody believes the numbers anymore.
We’ll never see another recession again, defined as 2 quarters of declining GDP. The politicians and bureaucrats will always cook the books to avoid looking bad.
MichaelGabriel on July 30, 2015 at 5:07 PM
If it’s not Obama it’s Tchaikoms…
Judge_Dredd on July 30, 2015 at 5:12 PM
If any of you believe anything out of the Obama regime, I got a bridge for you.
What is claimed good, is bad.
What is claimed bad, is far worse.
jukin3 on July 30, 2015 at 5:16 PM
I don’t think the the Great Depression we were further depressing employment by bringing in millions of democrat voters to take our jobs…
rgranger on July 30, 2015 at 5:22 PM
The Complete and Utter Fraud, King Putt says he could win a third term.
I’ll bet his transcripts are more tightly held than CNWDI, TS, Secret NOFORN or any compartmentalized classifications.
P.T. Barnum really underestimated the American Voters … Twice no less.
Gawdamned First Amendment.
Can’t trust anyone with firearms but give them the PRESS and they abuse well past FUBAR.
539 days.
What could possibly go wrong?
Missilengr on July 30, 2015 at 5:32 PM
Far better than America’s fiscal situation, not even counting unfunded mandates :D
DarkCurrent on July 30, 2015 at 5:35 PM
I must be missing something: Is there a reason to believe any information that comes from obama’s government apparatus?
GaltBlvnAtty on July 30, 2015 at 5:42 PM
SOS!
JugEarsButtHurt on July 30, 2015 at 5:44 PM
You mean the one where the government said that certain companies had to suspend trading, and that those selling stocks may be arrested?
Dr. ZhivBlago on July 30, 2015 at 5:52 PM
It’s more akin to, “We’re going to cram this square peg into this round hole no matter what it takes.”
The main point of seasonal adjustment (whether the old-school single or the new hawtness double) is to “smooth out” the peaks and valleys of economic data caused by differing factors in various months or (in this case) quarters to allow for an easier comparison between said differing months/quarters. It has always been rather subjective, which is why many economists who have the time to do their own analysis look at not-seasonally-adjusted numbers and how the change in them compares to previous years.
That’s a problem with the GDP numbers, as the BEA does not release not-seasonally-adjusted estimates. That is supposedly going to change when they implement the third portion of their “double seasonal adjustment” scheme.
Steve Eggleston on July 30, 2015 at 6:29 PM
Nice job Mr. Eggleston. Good to see you on the other side of the blog
cthemfly on July 30, 2015 at 6:57 PM
The economy sucks, period.
No amount of leftist bullshit can hide that now. barry and company not only ran the car into the ditch, they lit it on fire and pissed on the ashes.
a5minmajor on July 30, 2015 at 7:04 PM
Show us another chinese music video…..retard!!
Indiana Jim on July 30, 2015 at 8:46 PM
Thanks. Every so often the management (most of the time Ed) invites me to shake off the rust and do a post. Numbers, and by extension, economics, is something I seem to have a bit of a knack for.
Steve Eggleston on July 30, 2015 at 9:25 PM
One more thing, when did my dad start writing for HA? My name’s Steve. ;-)
Steve Eggleston on July 30, 2015 at 9:27 PM
Related, Tom Blumer rips CNN for claiming 2.3% annualized GDP growth is “solid”.
By way of comparison, the Social Security Trustees assumed an average annual GDP growth of 2.6% for their intermediate-case scenario in their latest report.
Steve Eggleston on July 30, 2015 at 9:59 PM
All these government numbers are make believe…GDP, unemployment, inflation.
thesorcerer on July 30, 2015 at 10:16 PM