Two IGs to DoJ: We need a criminal probe into Hillary e-mail

posted at 8:41 am on July 24, 2015 by Ed Morrissey

So much for “asked and not answered” as a campaign strategy. Two Inspectors General at the State Department have requested that the Department of Justice open a criminal probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server after finding reason to believe it was used for transmitting “hundreds of potentially classified e-mails.” The New York Times broke the story last night — but they weren’t quite done with it, to which we’ll return in a moment.

The two IGs flagged this issue with the State Department a month ago in a memo to a familiar person in the Libya mess:

Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.

The request follows an assessment in a June 29 memo by the inspectors general for the State Department and the intelligence agencies that Mrs. Clinton’s private account contained “hundreds of potentially classified emails.” The memo was written to Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary of state for management. …

In the course of the email review, State Department officials determined that some information in the messages should be retroactively classified. In the 3,000 pages that were released, for example, portions of two dozen emails were redacted because they were upgraded to “classified status.” But none of those were marked as classified at the time Mrs. Clinton handled them.

In a second memo to Mr. Kennedy, sent on July 17, the inspectors general said that at least one email made public by the State Department contained classified information. The inspectors general did not identify the email or reveal its substance.

Patrick Kennedy, one should recall, was the man responsible for security decisions in Benghazi, but whom the so-called Accountability Review Board never bothered to question in its investigation into the sacking of the consulate. He’s a long-time Clintonista, so it’s not exactly a surprise that this request never made it outside of State. Four weeks later, the IGs have decided that they have to go around Kennedy and State to get eyes on the question of whether Clinton transmitted classified information through her private system — which would indeed be a crime — and just how much went through.

Nor is that the only evidence of State Department stonewalling to come to light, as the NYT’s Michael Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo report:

On Monday, a federal judge sharply questioned State Department lawyers at a hearing in Washington about why they had not responded to Freedom of Information Act requests from The Associated Press, some of which were four years old.

“I want to find out what’s been going on over there — I should say, what’s not been going on over there,” said Judge Richard J. Leon of United States District Court, according to a transcript obtained by Politico. The judge said that “for reasons known only to itself,” the State Department “has been, to say the least, recalcitrant in responding.”

In other words, there has been a systematic attempt to stonewall all of the investigations into State Department activities. Patrick Kennedy seems to be one of the choke points, but Trey Gowdy plans to take this to the top. They have announced that they will summon John Kerry’s chief of staff to explain why documents demanded by the select committee on Benghazi have not been forthcoming. Perhaps they can share the answer with Judge Leon.

It’s a pretty bad story for Team Hillary, but it could have been worse. In fact, it was a little worse on initial publication, Politico’s Dylan Byers reports, and then the Paper of Record watered it down a bit later in the night — even to change the article’s URL:

The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation “into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state.”

That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry “into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state.”

The Times also changed the headline of the story, from “Criminal Inquiry Sought in Hillary Clinton’s Use of Email” to “Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account,” reflecting a similar recasting of Clinton’s possible role. The article’s URL was also changed to reflect the new headline.

As of early Friday morning, the Times article contained no update, notification, clarification or correction regarding the changes made to the article.

Will the Department of Justice actually open an investigation into these IG concerns? On one hand, it will be difficult for the Obama administration to shrug off security violations after allowing the worst cyberwar defeat in American history for more than a year. On the other hand, it’s Obama, and it’s the Clintons. Even if the DoJ takes up the case, don’t expect it to be anything more than a stall tactic.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife asks:

What difference, at this point, does it make?

Galtian on July 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM

This is all about keeping her under control. And Menendez’s prosecution is also a warning to her. In the latter story there is something new today, Menendez is accusing the DOJ prosecutor of presenting false testimony to the grand jury.

What Menendez is going through is what Hillary! has to look forward to if she starts campaigning against anything Obama has done, particularly his Iran disaster.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM

Amazing.

And this criminal is allowed to run for the Presidency of the United States?!

Cleombrotus on July 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM

Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife asks:

What difference, at this point, does it make?

Galtian on July 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM

20 years to life.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM

Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife asks:

What difference, at this point, does it make?

Galtian on July 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM

I thought it was Anthony Wiener’s wife’s girlfriend?

Chris of Rights on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

meh

weedisgood on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

Ya but Trump said something mean, didn’t he?

artist on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

The surest sign yet that Iosif Biden is running.

Steve Eggleston on July 24, 2015 at 8:49 AM

How about an investigation of Planned Parenthood?

Hillary is a huge Moloch supporter and it would be rich to see both (her and PP) under a microscope at the same time.

BTW…..
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/23/planned-parenthood-yanks-corporate-sponsor-page-after-coca-cola-drops-support/

Until this Thursday, Planned Parenthood kept a list of corporate allies and sponsors on its website. Once Coca-Cola became the third corporation to ask to be taken off the list, Planned Parenthood took it down altogether.

A snapshot of Planned Parenthood’s donation page archived one day ago touts support from very large corporations:

Matching Gifts
Double the size of your gift. Does your employer match charitable contributions? If so, please contact your Human Resources Department for more information about how your gift may be matched.

A partial list of companies with Corporate Matching Gift Programs includes: AT&T, Alcoa, American Express, Avon Products, Black & Decker, Circuit City, Citibank, Clorox, Coca-Cola, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Fidelity Investments, Ford Motor Company, Gannett, James River Corporation, Merck & Company, Microsoft Corporation, Motorola, Phillip Morris, T. Rowe Price, Prudential Insurance, Safeco Corporation, Sun Microsystems, Sunoco, Vanguard Group, Verizon, Washington Post Company, White & Case

How about we call these companies and let them know how we feel?

Maybe influencing THEM to avoid controversy would temper their enthusiasm for supporting candidates like Clinton, and others that support grinding up all those “black lives that matter”?

PappyD61 on July 24, 2015 at 8:49 AM

Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife asks:

What difference, at this point, does it make?

Galtian on July 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM

I thought it was Anthony Wiener’s wife’s girlfriend?

Chris of Rights on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

Same thing.

Steve Eggleston on July 24, 2015 at 8:50 AM

Amazing.

And this criminal is allowed to run for the Presidency of the United States?!

Cleombrotus on July 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM

Should this surprise any of us? How many in government aren’t criminals at this point? Damn near all of them from Bureaucrat Paper Shuffler #6 to the President to at least 90 members of the Senate to most of the House of Representatives, to most of the Supreme Court violate our Constitutionally enumerated liberties on a daily basis.

That is a crime.

And at least 80 members of the Senate, if not more could be prosecuted for exactly what Bob Menendez is accused of.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 8:50 AM

The surest sign yet that Iosif Biden is running.

Steve Eggleston on July 24, 2015 at 8:49 AM

That would be a big F—ing deal!

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM

For example……how many of you have accounts with Fidelity?

https://www.fidelity.com/customer-service/phone-numbers/overview

Maybe some could take the opportunity to voice their free speech and let them know how you stand in their support for an organization that grinds up babies and sells their body parts?

…..Politicians (like Sanders / Clinton, etc.) support of these organizations MIGHT be tied to the money they bring their campaigns and if THAT were to be impacted……mmmmmmm.

PappyD61 on July 24, 2015 at 8:53 AM

Fisherman on trawler begins dumping cod from the net. Reaches into the pile and pulls out a server, tosses it back over the side.

Limerick on July 24, 2015 at 8:53 AM

Come on folks? Who here doesn’t understand that this Kabuki Theater is all about clearing Hillary and immunizing her against future accusations? “We investigated Hillary, and found no evidence of criminal wrong doing”.

This would get her off the hook for Benghazi as well as multiple other criminal actions she has taken, such as illegal campaign fund raising, bribe taking and corruption.

oscarwilde on July 24, 2015 at 8:56 AM

Will the Department of Justice actually open an investigation into these IG concerns?

No.

Next!

BacaDog on July 24, 2015 at 8:56 AM

PappyD61 on July 24, 2015 at 8:53 AM

Don’t worry, the GOPe is on it.

http://www.redstate.com/2015/07/24/vote-republican-we-wont-defund-planned-parenthood-but-well-support-crony-capitalists/

artist on July 24, 2015 at 8:56 AM

Meanwhile, the New York Times is editing this story, (at the request of the Clinton Campaign), without any “notification”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/new-york-times-alters-clinton-email-story-211176.html

Rovin on July 24, 2015 at 8:57 AM

Hillary will never be prosecuted she knows where all of the skeletons are hiding.

woodhull on July 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM

Fisherman on trawler begins dumping cod from the net. Reaches into the pile and pulls out a server, tosses it back over the side.

Limerick on July 24, 2015 at 8:53 AM

a) Most of the worlds fishermen are Chinese
b) No Chinese fisherman would be that dumb
c) The Chinese “Fishermen” already have the full contents of Hillary’s server.

oscarwilde on July 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM

In other news, National Park Service personnel recently installed motion sensor cameras at Fort Marcy Park, just across the Potomac river from Washington, DC.

Galtian on July 24, 2015 at 9:03 AM

Steve E nailed it. This is coming from Biden. Good news all around.

matthew8787 on July 24, 2015 at 9:05 AM

Hillary and Trump and Bernie and Huckabee and Biden…was it always this bad?

kcewa on July 24, 2015 at 9:07 AM

Hillary will never be prosecuted she knows where all of the skeletons are hiding.

woodhull on July 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM

Indeed, woodhull, the fix is in; there will be no serious investigation of the Hildebeast’s, or Slick Willie’s illegalities. The best we can hope for is enough truth to come out to effectively and permanently derail any possible presidential aspirations. That applies to Chelsea, too, as she’s a “future menace in training” and she’s learning from the best.

rpjkw11 on July 24, 2015 at 9:07 AM

Hillary will never be prosecuted she knows where all of the skeletons are hiding.

woodhull on July 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM

This.

davidk on July 24, 2015 at 9:08 AM

Sanders, O’Malley, Webb, Biden and maybe even Gore could all be in play before this is over.

Saverio on July 24, 2015 at 9:10 AM

I predict that DOJ will investigate, but come up with nothing… so that Hillary can say that the DOJ cleared her name on the Email issue.

dforston on July 24, 2015 at 9:12 AM

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 8:50 AM

Wheeler’s List just keeps getting longer and longer.

Cleombrotus on July 24, 2015 at 9:15 AM

Almost O/T: If this is true, stick a fork in Hillary, she is done. Gives the term “Clinton’s insiders” a whole new meaning.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM

She should show up in a hoodie. It’s been said they are menacing looking.

Bmore on July 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM

Oh yeah..like this is going to be a real investigation…

Ricard on July 24, 2015 at 9:17 AM

Even if the DoJ takes up the case, don’t expect it to be anything more than a stall tactic.

“We can’t comment on an ongoing investigation”

“Dude, that was like 4 years ago”

“Phony scandal”

forest on July 24, 2015 at 9:17 AM

Wheeler’s List just keeps getting longer and longer.

Cleombrotus on July 24, 2015 at 9:15 AM

We’re going to need something the size of the Great Wall of China to be able to line them all up against when the Revolution comes.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 9:19 AM

Of course DoJ will take this opportunity. They can say that they had no choice (when they eventually absolve her of any wrongdoing); no one will be able to answer a single question on the issue since an investigation is ongoing; they can drag it out until this time next, releasing their findings of complete exhonoration right as early voting gets started; and they can hammer the Great Right Wing Conspiracy for having to undertake this ghastly violation of the former female SoS’s questionable integrity.

It’s everything an Alinskyite could dream of for an unpopular candidate sure to preserve the Obama legacy.

BKeyser on July 24, 2015 at 9:19 AM

They can work on the case during their break…

right2bright on July 24, 2015 at 9:19 AM

Almost O/T: If this is true, stick a fork in Hillary, she is done. Gives the term “Clinton’s insiders” a whole new meaning.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM

Doubtful. The only other man she may have dabbled with was Vince Foster and Hillary Junior is definitely not his daughter. Rumors about Hillary are more along the lines like “she’s munched more carpet than the WNBA”.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 9:21 AM

It’s everything an Alinskyite could dream of for an unpopular candidate sure to preserve the Obama legacy.

BKeyser on July 24, 2015 at 9:19 AM

The only wrench in that, and I agree, is if a judge gets involved and he gets a little testy…judges can do what congress cannot.

“I want to find out what’s been going on over there — I should say, what’s not been going on over there,” said Judge Richard J. Leon of United States District Court, according to a transcript obtained by Politico. The judge said that “for reasons known only to itself,” the State Department “has been, to say the least, recalcitrant in responding.”

Some judges do not like to be stonewalled, others are so liberal it doesn’t matter…it looks like this judge wants some actions.

right2bright on July 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM

Doubtful. The only other man she may have dabbled with was Vince Foster and Hillary Junior is definitely not his daughter. Rumors about Hillary are more along the lines like “she’s munched more carpet than the WNBA”.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 9:21 AM

The facial similarity in the article is impossible to deny.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM

Steve Eggleston on July 24, 2015 at 8:49 AM

I agree. This signals that the Obama Regime is REALLY out to clobber Clinton. Just the headline is hurting her and even CNN has commented on it.

dogsoldier on July 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM

So nothing will come of this – unless a vast left-wing conspiracy has decided Hillary is blowing the presidential race and needs to be replaced.

forest on July 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM

The corruption and cover-up is thick. She’s a criminal but Obama wants to protect her.

AprilApple on July 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM

They have announced that they will summon John Kerry’s chief of staff to explain why documents demanded by the select committee on Benghazi have not been forthcoming. Perhaps they can share the answer with Judge Leon.

So is this how they ‘out’ Team Hillary in favor of full-blown Bernie or some other leftist?

Mark Boabaca on July 24, 2015 at 9:24 AM

On Monday, a federal judge sharply questioned State Department lawyers at a hearing in Washington about why they had not responded to Freedom of Information Act requests from The Associated Press, some of which were four years old.

Yes….stonewalling.

CWforFreedom on July 24, 2015 at 9:26 AM

How many remember Barofsky and Walpin?

They ran afoul of Obama back in 2009…IG’s, too.

Now, I know, this is about Hillary. But, Hillary serving as Obama’s SecState. I suspect that nothing will come of this…pretty much the normal MO these days.

DoJ simply has to say “it is under investigation” and it all stops right there.

And more ammunition supporting the “Vast right-wing conspiracy” gets added to the Hillary plus column…and the LI voters will suck it all in and smirk at anyone who would deign to knock Hills down a notch or two…because, you know, she’s Hillary.

coldwarrior on July 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM

But I’m thinking that the State Department (and probably the White House) know what’s in the next traunch of Hillary’s emails that are getting released, and they are starting to distance themselves from it. I think they want to be seen as going on the attack rather than continue to try to cover for her.

blink on July 24, 2015 at 9:07 AM

I think you are correct. State knows what is being released and when, and they don’t like the optics of what is coming down the road.

Plus Obama doesn’t care about Hillary in any way so he won’t try and stop anything and her tanking in the polls so early doesn’t bother him one bit.

Johnnyreb on July 24, 2015 at 9:31 AM

So there are alot of theories about how this will play out and why it’s happening.

Not one of them is that government/law enforcement officials will do their jobs honestly and with integrity. Not one single person is saying this. Nobody even entertains the possibility that the process will not be thoroughly corrupted.

forest on July 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM

forest on July 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM

Sad…no, disgusting, isn’t it?

“Fundamentally Change The Way We Are Governed.”

coldwarrior on July 24, 2015 at 9:36 AM

With the DOJ as corrupt as many of the other agencies under this administration and used as a political arm of Obama, does anyone actually believe DOJ will open a criminal investigation on Clinton’s criminal activities? It ain’t going to happen.

iamsaved on July 24, 2015 at 9:37 AM

The only other man she may have dabbled with was Vince Foster and Hillary Junior is definitely not his daughter. Rumors about Hillary are more along the lines like “she’s munched more carpet than the WNBA”.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 9:21 AM

Many think Chelsea has an uncanny resemblance to Web Hubbel. He just might have been the lucky guy. Bill was overheard once saying he “only shoots blanks”.

/s

bobthm3 on July 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM

IF there were integrity in this Administration, a President with backbone, a President who (having taken his first oath of office twice) actually took that oath seriously….this stuff would have ended before the embers in Benghazi had turned cold.

I worked for a man of integrity (in a previous administration) who told a couple of my contemporaries that they would be 100% cooperative with the IG, totally forthcoming, and if they withheld anything, they were on their own….literally…out the front door, find your own damn lawyers, figure out how to pay your mortgage and tell your wife and kids you got canned because you lied on your own.

One complied…fully. The other hedged,weaved and dodged.

It was brutal.

Wish this man of integrity had stuck around as a boss.

Integrity.

But, this administration?

One simple directive from the President of the United States: “Come clean now! All documents released today!””

Simple directive.

It’ll never happen. Not with this president.

Not in these political times.

Integrity? Pfffftttt.

coldwarrior on July 24, 2015 at 9:46 AM

meh

weedisgood on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

…you got off?…on that ‘hummer’ picture?

JugEarsButtHurt on July 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM

I guess 2008 still is not over. Must mean that Hillary was about to rollover on obama, and they found out about it. Get XXL bag of popcorn ready, because something is about to come out

ConservativePartyNow on July 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM

PappyD61 on July 24, 2015 at 8:49 AM

Moloch indeed. The companies buying the baby parts are supposedly engaged in fetal stem cell research, which I thought was illegal except for strains that were in existence prior to 2001.

Even if they are actually doing research on fetal stem cells, it has so far been a dead end unlike adult stem cells. So one has to wonder why the fetal research hasn’t been abandoned for adult stem cells.

My suspicion is that there is indeed a Moloch aspect to the final disposition of these body parts.

Akzed on July 24, 2015 at 9:53 AM

Weedisgood doesn’t care about corruption. Smoke some more weed and make it all go away.

AprilApple on July 24, 2015 at 9:58 AM

The facial similarity in the article is impossible to deny.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM

The Webb Hubbell rumors have been around for decades. Supposedly supported by BillyJeff never being accused of paternity in spite of the numerous liasons he’s had over the years (many of them with Trailer Park Trudys), and the story that he told one of his long time mistresses (she reported this- I forget which one) that he was infertile.

No one cares.

Dolce Far Niente on July 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM

ConservativePartyNow on July 24, 2015 at 9:53 AM

New narrative in the works.

As for the Grey Lady…the newspaper, not the harpy…they long ago lost their standing as a newspaper of record. Their slogan long ago changed from “All the news that is fit to print” to “All the news that is print to fit.”

coldwarrior on July 24, 2015 at 10:01 AM

Many think Chelsea has an uncanny resemblance to Web Hubbel. He just might have been the lucky guy. Bill was overheard once saying he “only shoots blanks”.

/s

bobthm3 on July 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM

The proper word for a guy who end up under the sheets in Hillary is not “lucky” but either “drunk as an Irishman with a prepaid tab” or “legally blind”.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM

The Webb Hubbell rumors have been around for decades. Supposedly supported by BillyJeff never being accused of paternity in spite of the numerous liasons he’s had over the years (many of them with Trailer Park Trudys), and the story that he told one of his long time mistresses (she reported this- I forget which one) that he was infertile.

No one cares.

Dolce Far Niente on July 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM

Interesting. It is interesting that after all the liaisons Billy Jeff has had no “royal” bastards have showed up.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 10:05 AM

No one cares.

Dolce Far Niente on July 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM

No one cares until Hillary is the nominee. It’s hard to position oneself as “nation’s happiest grandmother” when the kid is sired by your boss rather than your husband.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 10:06 AM

Almost O/T: If this is true, stick a fork in Hillary, she is done. Gives the term “Clinton’s insiders” a whole new meaning.
Rix on July 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM

Akzed on July 24, 2015 at 10:08 AM

Interesting. It is interesting that after all the liaisons Billy Jeff has had no “royal” bastards have showed up.

ConstantineXI on July 24, 2015 at 10:05 AM

Access to every Democrat chick, cooperative wife, near-unlimited money, and not a chance to conceive a bastard. That’s what I call lucky.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 10:16 AM

The responsibility for all this corruption and malfeasance goes to the top: Obama allows and abets it and IMO can do it remorselessly and with an emotionless poker face because he’s a polished psychopath.

Chessplayer on July 24, 2015 at 10:16 AM

Chessplayer on July 24, 2015 at 10:16 AM

At times sorta has the same facial expression as Mohammed Atta.

coldwarrior on July 24, 2015 at 10:21 AM

I think she still has a cracked head….

d1carter on July 24, 2015 at 10:33 AM

Obama and Biden control the DOJ, not Clinton. If Biden decides to run, he can make Hilary’s life a living Hell.

Every obama promise comes with an expiration date. At a point real soon, he’s not going to care what hillary has on him.

matthew8787 on July 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM

meh

weedisgood on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

Could you explain why this is no big deal to you?

Throat Wobbler Mangrove on July 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM

Will the Department of Obama-struction of Justice actually open an investigation into these IG concerns? On one hand, it will be difficult for the Obama administration to shrug off security violations after allowing the worst cyberwar defeat in American history for more than a year. On the other hand, it’s Obama, and it’s the Clintons. Even if the DoJ takes up the case, don’t expect it to be anything more than a stall tactic.

The Department of Obama-struction of Justice only gets involved when white policemen shoot black men. But it will never prosecute anyone in the Obama Administration, past or present. The inmates have taken over the jail, and the country.

The only way to truly investigate this is for Congress to appoint a special prosecutor with full subpoena authority.

Steve Z on July 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM

Almost O/T: If this is true, stick a fork in Hillary, she is done. Gives the term “Clinton’s insiders” a whole new meaning.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM

No way. Here she is with a pic of her real father:

Who is the only one could get wood over Hillary.

justltl on July 24, 2015 at 11:19 AM

The Department of Obama-struction of Justice only gets involved when white policemen shoot black men. But it will never prosecute anyone in the Obama Administration, past or present. The inmates have taken over the jail, and the country.

The only way to truly investigate this is for Congress to appoint a special prosecutor with full subpoena authority.

Steve Z on July 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM

And yet the republicans voted to confirm sistah Lynch. Heaven forbid challenging a nominee on qualifications instead of being gun shy about the darkness.

arnold ziffel on July 24, 2015 at 11:20 AM

Investgate?
These are mearly ‘suggestions’ mind you.

And it will take ACTION on the part of the DOJJ (Department of JizzahJihad)for ANYTHING to actually affect The HildaBeast and her multi-billion dollar procurment of the presidency.

Go away little people. We’re working here.

Stupid Americans

Missilengr on July 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM

“I can’t talk about emails because of the DOJ investigation.”

Followed by:

“I have been cleared of all wrong-doing. See, I told you so. Next question.”

Carnac on July 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM

Why did the NYT change the story at Hiilary’s direction…?

d1carter on July 24, 2015 at 11:41 AM

Access to every Democrat chick, cooperative wife, near-unlimited money, and not a chance to conceive a bastard. That’s what I call lucky.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 10:16 AM

Impotent. That’s one of the reasons these folks think chelsea isn’t his.

VegasRick on July 24, 2015 at 11:48 AM

I’ve heard an interesting theory that the Obama’s are going to slowly let Hillary blow in the wind (and add fuel where they can)on this to ultimately get her so damaged she can’t possibly be the nominee. They really want Biden to be their successor, but know they can’t be seen as taking sides this early.

Tater Salad on July 24, 2015 at 11:51 AM

meh

weedisgood on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

Could you explain why this is no big deal to you?

Throat Wobbler Mangrove on July 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM

Too baked to care…………..

VegasRick on July 24, 2015 at 11:51 AM

Let’s see if she gets the same treatment Patreaus got?

Sven on July 24, 2015 at 12:03 PM

I think you are correct. State knows what is being released and when, and they don’t like the optics of what is coming down the road.

Plus Obama doesn’t care about Hillary in any way so he won’t try and stop anything and her tanking in the polls so early doesn’t bother him one bit.

Johnnyreb on July 24, 2015 at 9:31 AM

She may know whats in his closet.

Sven on July 24, 2015 at 12:04 PM

Impotent. That’s one of the reasons these folks think chelsea isn’t his.

VegasRick on July 24, 2015 at 11:48 AM

No friggin’ way. I remember Gennifer Flowers gushing about how good ol’ BJ was in bed. And Chelsea wasn’t his because he had much better options than his hag.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 12:05 PM

No friggin’ way. I remember Gennifer Flowers gushing about how good ol’ BJ was in bed. And Chelsea wasn’t his because he had much better options than his hag.

Rix on July 24, 2015 at 12:05 PM

I should have said “shoots blanks”………

VegasRick on July 24, 2015 at 12:08 PM

Hillary just does not photograph well.

Redstone on July 24, 2015 at 12:10 PM

Is it possible to run for president while out on a work release program? (Need to be back in jail by 9:00 PM!)

If elected, can Cankles pardon herself?

pain train on July 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM

Hillary just does not photograph well.

Redstone on July 24, 2015 at 12:10 PM

Can’t make chicken salad out of chicken shit.

pain train on July 24, 2015 at 12:24 PM

She may know whats who’s in his closet.

Sven on July 24, 2015 at 12:04 PM

Reggie, Big Sven.

Although JugEars and the Hildebeast probably have plenty of dirt on each other.

pain train on July 24, 2015 at 12:26 PM

meh

weedisgood on July 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM

Fugtard of the Land

Schadenfreude on July 24, 2015 at 1:14 PM

Fisherman on trawler begins dumping cod from the net. Reaches into the pile and pulls out a server, tosses it back over the side.
Limerick on July 24, 2015 at 8:53 AM

Well, it stunk too much to keep on the boat… it was full of four mens’ blood.

Marcola on July 24, 2015 at 1:37 PM

Hillary to Obama: Remember our deal. You protect me, I protect you. You sell me out, I’ll sell you out for all the **** I know you’ve done.

Jarrett to Obama: I told you not to give that b**** a place in your Administration. She what happens when you don’t listen to me!

Obama to AG Lynch: Do nothing… for now.

Athos on July 24, 2015 at 1:50 PM