Late Night’s Seth Meyers sandbags Ted Cruz on climate change
posted at 3:21 pm on March 18, 2015 by Noah Rothman
For the nation’s left-leaning entertainers, the most interesting thing about Texas Sen. Ted Cruz this week is his callous willingness to scare toddlers for fleeting political gain. In fact, beyond Cruz’s apparent intention to run for the White House in 2016, this latest craze was of singular interest to Late Night host Seth Meyers.
Meyers welcomed Cruz on to the show on Tuesday night, and the pair had a rather jovial exchange. Things got a little tense, though, when Meyers engaged in a tortured and contrived effort to put Cruz in a corner on the issue of global warming (starting at the 3:20 mark):
At a recent speech, Cruz had warned an audience which included a three-year-old girl that the world was “on fire.” The cliché to which Cruz appealed is universally applied to armed conflicts, and the increasing proliferation of interstate wars and insurgencies around the globe demonstrates that Cruz’s observation was self-evidently correct. Meyers tried to take Cruz’s comments literally when he averred that he, as a faithful member of the church of climate change, believes the world is, indeed, actually on fire. Because it’s extremely hot, you see.
“I think he world’s on fire literally,” Meyers said. “Hottest year on record. But, you’re not there, right?”
To this contention, Meyer’s audience whooped and hollered in a manner that would have made Jon Stewart feel right at home.
Cruz’s response was clever insofar as it undermined the canard to which the left’s climate alarmists cling: That they are wholly rational and data-driven, and their opponents refuse to accept consensus scientific opinion in the parochial service of their political values. Cruz noted that, for 17 years, satellite data has demonstrated that there has been no appreciable warming trend whereas climate models continue to predict catastrophic warming in the near-term. Cruz implied that it was safer to trust empiricism rather than the climate models that have yielded erroneous predictions for decades.
“So, you trust satellites more than computers?” Meyers asked, pivoting back to a joke. Cruz followed suit, and the conversation veered back toward a humorous direction.
This was a great moment for Cruz and for conservatism generally.
I’ve written on multiple occasions on the fact that public opinion data shows that the obsession over climate change is a fad primarily limited to the left. Moreover, it has become an article of faith so central to the progressive identity that the left would compel its candidates and elected leaders to declare that global warming is a more pressing threat to life and liberty than even irredentist foreign regimes or Islamist terrorist organizations. That is an opinion so wildly out of step with the public that Republicans are virtually guaranteed to benefit from their opponents’ myopia.
This clip showed that this left-leaning audience, which was fully primed and ready to cheer for yet another sermon on climate change, was disappointed when they discovered that there were cogent counterarguments that had the capacity to dispel their faith. Of course, no semi-religious conviction dies easy and moments like these are sure to be repeated in the coming months. For conservatives, that might be the best news they’ve heard since, well, last night.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Is an anti-Cruz, pro-Rubio alliance forming in Iowa among Huckabee and Santorum fans?

Oh my: Bill Cosby charged with felony indecent assault in Pennsylvania

NRA working on ‘total recognition’ legislation to fix Virginia’s concealed carry mess






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Debate the science to your heart’s content, but for anyone to claim that it is “settled” is an absolute moron, and that includes the entire ‘hopey-changey’ crew of moonbats.
Hey, maybe the Goracle can make a few more predictions (from the comfort of his Bunyanesque carbon-footprint producing mansion), seeing as how the last ones he made were so spot-on.
tanked59 on March 18, 2015 at 5:18 PM
I’ve been meaning to tell you how much I enjoy the emotional context you bring to your trolling. Very different!
lineholder on March 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM
What sort of “plastic soda pop ring” are you talking about here ?
The kind that used to hold six packs together but haven’t been used in decades ?
Thanks for that Brian Williams moment, Oliver. I’m sure you saw a commercial once that said a fish could choke on a plastic soda pop ring. The idea that YOU actually saw such a thing – last year ? Not buying it for a millisecond
deadrody on March 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM
Seth, you were out of your element on that interview, stick with the comedy pablum that avoids anchoring it on your ignorance of the subject.
jake49 on March 18, 2015 at 5:20 PM
I’m thinking that’s a yes. Which is pretty far out there on the fringe of Global Warming cultists to be sure.
deadrody on March 18, 2015 at 5:21 PM
That’s also my view. I used to be totally supportive of Walker, until I learned more about his support for citizenship for illegal aliens and his alliance with the Chamber of Commerce.
Cruz is not perfect, but he is damn near close. He is someone of rare talent, and it would be extremely foolish for us to pass over him in favor of an insincere, establishment-backed candidate.
We had insincere, establishment-backed candidates the last two times, and we shouldn’t make that mistake again.
bluegill on March 18, 2015 at 5:21 PM
You should carry one of those 1911’s that go bang every time you look at for protection.
RickB on March 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM
That seemed tense to you Noah? My goodness!?
Bmore on March 18, 2015 at 6:06 PM
Clean up your shit before you leave the beach next time. Only you can prevent fish deaths.
Bmore on March 18, 2015 at 6:20 PM
You have opened my own now moist eyes. I cry with you and that poor fish in the soda pop ring. It’s OK. We will stop the 1% and their soda pop rings. We…will…overcome.
BoxHead1 on March 18, 2015 at 9:29 PM
except that the two major analyses – one by RSS and the other UAH, show that Mr. Cruz’s contention is false on its face
Republicans are only shooting themselves in their feet by this type of blatant propagation of falsehood.
We have an opportunity to make sure that we have a conservative majority in the SCOTUS for a decade or more, to finally overturn Roe v. Wade, to dispense with the traitorous policies of allowing our border to be overrun by lawbreakers, to stop funding the destruction of human life within the womb, to stop the single-payer health care train, etc. But what stands in the way of a conservative getting elected is the pseudo-conservative stance that we humans are incapable of altering our planet’s climates via our emissions. Should a conservative Republican get elected, he/she would probably take a pragmatic Reagan-esque approach on this issue; but election isn’t going to happen with the sheer nonsense of the type that Cruz spouted in front of the cameras becoming the Republican mantra.
oakland on March 18, 2015 at 9:59 PM
What a crock.
This manufactured, always in the future crisis will be the unraveling of our economy if statists have their way. The administration is now trying to strike deals with the UN on carbon emissions. What happened to national sovereignty?
freedomfirst on March 18, 2015 at 10:15 PM
oakland shows before running away and hiding – as always.
No, oakland, the pause is real. Do you deny that? No warming since 1998.
That’s not the stance. The stance is that idiots like you haven’t provided sufficient evidence for your hypothesis. Spare me all the post-normal science.
except that the two major analyses – one by RSS and the other UAH, show that Mr. Cruz’s contention is false on its face
Republicans are only shooting themselves in their feet by this type of blatant propagation of falsehood.
It’s only considered nonsense to pause deniers like you.
blink on March 19, 2015 at 1:04 AM
6 years ago I watched my college Geology “professor” proclaim that “everyone knows humans contribute to global warming” AS HE SHOWED US A QUASI-SINE-WAVE GRAPH OF EARTH’S HISTORY OF WARMING AND COOLING OVER MILLIONS OF YEARS. THE ARROW INDICATING PRESENT DAY SHOWED US CRESTING A WARMING TREND!
There must have been unknown advanced human civilizations (that we have absolutely no fossilized evidence of) during the previous crests of warming.
Do you have brain damage oakland?
UnstChem on March 19, 2015 at 1:23 AM
Oakland and Verbie,
As stated earlier, CO2 makes up a miniscule part of the atmosphere. It is essential for plant life, hence animal life, since nearly all animal life depends on either plants to feed on, or they eat other animals that feed on plants.
A more significant “greenhouse gas” is water vapor, which is far more capable of trapping or holding heat and contributing to average temperatures.
A little quiz for you: what is the highest contributor to CO2 levels AND the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere?
Humans?……Nope
Automobiles, trucks, and motorcycles?……Wrong again
Coal fired power plants?……Sorry
Animal farts?…….Nope
THE OCEANS?…….BINGO, right answer. Oceans make up 71% of the Earth’s surface and contain over 97% of the water on the Earth. And how on God’s Little Green Earth are humans supposed to control the amount of CO2 and water vapor that the oceans release into the atmosphere? Don’t try to answer, because we cannot.
GAlpha10 on March 19, 2015 at 9:02 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2