31 House Democrats join GOP in vote to approve Keystone

posted at 7:21 pm on November 14, 2014 by Noah Rothman

On Friday, an overwhelming majority of House members passed legislation sponsored by Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) which approved construction of the long-delayed Keystone XL Pipeline. By 252 to 161, the House opted to send the measure to the U.S. Senate, where it will face a vote from the upper chamber next week which could, for the first time, force the president to determine whether to approve or veto the oil transit route.

31 Democratic representatives voted with every Republican member of Congress save Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), who voted present, to approve construction of the pipeline. It is an indication that the 114th Congress will feature a far rowdier Democratic caucus.

Only seven of the 31 Democrats are not going to be members of the next Congress. 24 House Democrats who voted in favor of the measure will be coming back for the new Congress on January 6.

Among the Democrats who voted in favor of building the pipeline is newly elected Rep. Donald Norcross (D-NJ), brother of New Jersey Democratic Party leader George Norcross, who filled a seat vacated by the resigning Rob Andrews just this week. The congressman representing the city of Camden cast one of his first votes on Friday in favor of constructing the pipeline in spite of the White House’s opposition.

President Barack Obama has threatened to veto the House bill even if it is approved by the Senate next week, a move which could have significant implications for the upcoming December 6 runoff election in Louisiana which will determine if Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) keeps her seat for a fourth term.

The president has placed a variety of obstacles in the way of the construction of Keystone:

His State Department — which must approve the pipeline, since it crosses international borders — is six years into a review of the project. Obama told reporters Friday in Myanmar that his “position hasn’t changed.”

He said the pipeline is still facing a challenge from Nebraska landowners and said he doesn’t think “we should circuit that process.”

“My government believes that we should judge this pipeline based on whether or not it accelerates climate change or whether it helps the American people with their energy costs or their gas prices,” he said.

The U.S. Senate is scheduled to hold a vote on the House bill next Tuesday, but it is not believed that it will receive the 60 votes required for passage. “If Landrieu and Hoeven can’t find a 60th supporter, Republicans plan to try to pass the bill again in January when they control both chambers of Congress,” The Washington Examiner reported.

Whatever happens in the upper chamber, Landrieu is unlikely to be the ultimate beneficiary.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Big deal… the GOPe will betray you…

oscarwilde on November 14, 2014 at 7:26 PM

That;s because they know they have nothing to loose and can pander to their stupid voters at home.

Walter L. Newton on November 14, 2014 at 7:26 PM

Why did Amash vote present?

swamp_yankee on November 14, 2014 at 7:26 PM

Bipartisanship!

President Barack Obama has threatened to veto the House bill even if it is approved by the Senate next week

Why is President Obstructionist thwarting the will of the American people?

rbj on November 14, 2014 at 7:26 PM

Obama: You have to understand, the Keystone Pipeline is meaningless to Americans. SO IT WAS ALL POLITICAL, RIGHT BARRY?

Rovin on November 14, 2014 at 7:27 PM

BS political cover for these slimy Dems……they knew the vote was going to pass anyways……
Slime balls with no integrity…….

FlaMurph on November 14, 2014 at 7:28 PM

Odd assortment of Dems. It looks like all the retiring and defeated Dems with a portion of the black caucus?

swamp_yankee on November 14, 2014 at 7:29 PM

If noting else, the vote does eliminate the Obama alibi that the president had no opinion on the pipeline until the State Department and EPA give him their final reports (which have been done over and over again in the past six years). If the Senate also approves and forces Obama to veto, even before the Republicans take over, it sets down a marker than Hillary and anyone else in the Democratic Party will either have to rebuke or campaign on in 2016.

jon1979 on November 14, 2014 at 7:32 PM

Keystone is only the first salvo. At the end of the day, the Obama administration and the Democratic Party are in complete disarray. From the elections (that changed the course of the liberal progressive ideology in terms of national policy), to Grubergate, (the ultimate deception that facilitated the passing of ObamaCare), to this disastrous foreign policy, Harry Reid and his cohorts, (the big Democratic Donors), are so torn apart on how to find a narrative their base can relate to, the marriage between the Tea Party and Beltway Republicans looks like a match made in Heaven compared to these folks.

Given their party has decided to keep the status quo, (both Pelosi and Reid in power), Hillary’s campaign folks must feel like they’re re-visiting a scene from the Exorcist—heads twisting in all directions.

This is going to be fun!

Rovin on November 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM

House opted to send the measure to the U.S. Senate, where it will face a vote from the upper chamber next week which could, for the first time, force the president to determine whether to approve or veto the oil transit route.

Harry Reid won’t even let this leave his desk. He’ll protect Obama’s political ass as long as he can.

GarandFan on November 14, 2014 at 7:41 PM

Ah yes, all of a sudden the Left is bi-partisan. I can’t imagine why

AureliusPundit on November 14, 2014 at 7:41 PM

Preezy Choom Insanity Fascist the Magnificent I will never ever forgive this impertinence….

He is likely to glare at all involved and banish them to the dreaded corn field.

workingclass artist on November 14, 2014 at 7:43 PM

Harry Reid and his cohorts, (the big Democratic Donors), are so torn apart on how to find a narrative their base can relate to, the marriage between the Tea Party and Beltway Republicans looks like a match made in Heaven compared to these folks.

This is going to be fun!

Rovin on November 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM

Well, there’s a bunch of wish-casting. Let me know how that works out for you.

yaedon on November 14, 2014 at 7:46 PM

House opted to send the measure to the U.S. Senate, where it will face a vote from the upper chamber next week which could, for the first time, force the president to determine whether to approve or veto the oil transit route.

Harry Reid won’t even let this leave his desk. He’ll protect Obama’s political ass as long as he can.

GarandFan on November 14, 2014 at 7:41 PM

Not so sure. Reid might allow a vote to try to protect Mary Quite Contrary, who is grasping at this last straw to save her seat. But if he allows a vote, we’ll see how many Democrats who DIDN’T lose elections this year vote for the Keystone Pipeline. If there are at least 6 of them, McConnell will know he has a filibuster-proof majority in the new Senate, when he’ll have 54 Republicans, and he can force Obama to either sign the bill or veto it. Even if Obama vetoes the bill, he will show everyone that Obama is the Obstructionist-in-Chief, not the Republicans.

Steve Z on November 14, 2014 at 7:49 PM

Has White House shill Brian Williams now called this an end to gridlock now that voters have handed his beloved DNC a thorough ass-kicking November 4th?

viking01 on November 14, 2014 at 7:49 PM

Why did Amash vote present?
swamp_yankee on November 14, 2014 at 7:26 PM

Because the GOP is a progressive party. Vote Republican or something

Brock Robamney on November 14, 2014 at 7:50 PM

New NRSC chair: I’d bet that Reid retires in 2016

Assuming Satan doesn’t claim him first…or the Vega$ mafia.

viking01 on November 14, 2014 at 7:55 PM

As far as I’m concerned Keystone is a national Security/energy Independence issue.

If Obama vetoes this he doesn’t care about national security and energy independence.

Crux Australis on November 14, 2014 at 7:55 PM

“My government believes that we should judge this pipeline based on whether or not it accelerates climate change or whether it helps the American people with their energy costs or their gas prices,” he said.

His government? I’m not surprised a guy who acts as if he’s king talks like he’s one too, but still…good lord.

And Justin Amash’s Present vote is silly. Tool.

changer1701 on November 14, 2014 at 7:58 PM

Why did Amash vote present?
swamp_yankee on November 14, 2014 at 7:26 PM

His spokesman, Will Adams, said in an email that despite his vote, Amash supports the pipeline’s construction, but there’s a caveat.

“He supports the construction of the pipeline but opposes the singling out of any one company or individual in a bill,” Adams wrote.

Dolce Far Niente on November 14, 2014 at 8:04 PM

Democrat yes votes:

John Barrow (GA-12)
Sanford Bishop Jr. (GA-2)
Bob Brady (PA-1)
Jim Clyburn (SC-6)
Jim Cooper (TN-5)
Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
Mike Doyle (PA-14)
Al Green (TX-9)
Gene Green (TX-29)
Ruben Hinojosa (TX-15)
Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18)
Dan Lipinski (IL-3)
Dave Loebsack (IA-2)
Sean Maloney (NY-18)
Jim Matheson (UT-4)
Carolyn McCarthy (NY-4)
Mike McIntyre (NC-7)
Patrick Murphy (FL-18)
Rick Nolan (MN-8)
Donald Norcross (NJ-1)
Bill Owens (NY-21)
Collin Peterson (MN-7)
Nick Rahall (WV-3)
Cedric Richmond (LA-2)
David Scott (GA-13)
Terri Sewell (AL-7)
Albio Sires (NJ-8)
Bennie Thompson (MS-2)
Marc Veasey (TX-33)
Filemon Vela Jr. (TX-34)
Tim Walz (MN-1)

topdawg on November 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM

31 House Democrats join GOP in vote to approve Keystone

Though I do support the Keystone Pipeline initiative, I fail to see how it will do this country much good in the long run. The profits go to the private concerns that built it, not us (unless “wealth redistribution” is enforced I suppose). I’ve heard about the tens of thousands of jobs that will be created in its construction, but then when it’s done?

Once I built a tower to the sun
Brick and rivet and lime
Once I built a tower
Now it’s done
Brother, can you spare a dime?

And, I also think that many if not most of those fantastic jobs will be filled by immigrants, legal and otherwise. We certainly don’t want unions in there demanding higher pay and such.

Then there’s the probability of a petroleum glut on the world market. Since all of the major economies are in decline, we’re simply using less energy-and the average consumer is cutting back because chances are he doesn’t have a decent paying (or any) job and is broke and no job to commute to M-F.

So if the prices fall enough, the thing may not be economically feasible.

The main reasons I support it are that since the Eco Nuts are against it, there must be something good about it, and it’s just silly not to build it if they plan on continuing to exploit the oil sands.

Dr. ZhivBlago on November 14, 2014 at 8:11 PM

I see Nolan, Walz and Peterson (MN) all voted yes. Each one of them was soiling their shorts into the wee hours on Election night, but each one squeaked by.

Bruno Strozek on November 14, 2014 at 8:22 PM

Why are they scared to impeach Chairman Dogeater?

Krupnikas on November 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM

Why are they scared to impeach Chairman Dogeater?

Krupnikas on November 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM

Because most of the electorate remembers the last time the GOP tried that, and they remember it didn’t work out so well for them…

JohnGalt23 on November 14, 2014 at 8:45 PM

I remember a few years back when gas prices were almost 5.00 alot of posters here were blaming it on Obama and his refusal to approve this pipeline amongst other things. Now with gas around 2 and change in a lot of places where is his credit? I remember I was laughed at for saying it isn’t much a president can do to influence gas prices and I still feel that way but it’s funny how obviously a large portion of conservatives opinions on that matter has changed.

Politricks on November 14, 2014 at 8:46 PM

Funny how Obama ifs all about following procedure with the pipeline. Illegal alien invaders not so much.

jukin3 on November 14, 2014 at 8:51 PM

Harry Reid and his cohorts, (the big Democratic Donors), are so torn apart on how to find a narrative their base can relate to, the marriage between the Tea Party and Beltway Republicans looks like a match made in Heaven compared to these folks.

This is going to be fun!

Rovin on November 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM

They can unite against Obama claiming they were lied to as well regarding Ocare. What have they got to lose over the next 2 years?

Would be interesting to see if the MSM would join them in their victimhood.

The entire country can unite, it’s citizens, the lefties, and the media, euphorically licking each other’s wounds. While the mean old Republicans can just go off as the party that keeps saying “I told you so”.

Oxymoron on November 14, 2014 at 9:02 PM

“We wanted to pass amnesty back in 2010, Obama wouldn’t let us! He tricked us into passing Ocare! He has Harry Reid’s kitten held hostage to keep bills from being voted on! He’s got NSA dirt on all of us, so we can’t keep his power in check! We’re the victims here, just like you America!”

– Unnamed high level source

Oxymoron on November 14, 2014 at 9:10 PM

LOCAL MEDIA REALLY PALYED DOWN THE DEMOCRAT PARTICIPATION. ACTUALLY REPORTED THAT ONLY 19 DEMS VOTED WITH THE RS.

AprilApple on November 14, 2014 at 9:17 PM

His State Department — which must approve the pipeline, since it crosses international borders — is six years into a review of the project. Obama told reporters Friday in Myanmar that his “position hasn’t changed.”

So pass a bill that runs the pipeline right up to the border. By the time they get that section built and the Canadians get their section built we might have a president who will sign it. Then all you need to do is put in the last 10 feet or so to complete.

Corsair on November 14, 2014 at 9:24 PM

I remember a few years back when gas prices were almost 5.00 alot of posters here were blaming it on Obama and his refusal to approve this pipeline amongst other things. Now with gas around 2 and change in a lot of places where is his credit? I remember I was laughed at for saying it isn’t much a president can do to influence gas prices and I still feel that way but it’s funny how obviously a large portion of conservatives opinions on that matter has changed.

Politricks on November 14, 2014 at 8:46 PM

Nothing has changed. Unprecedented high gas prices are still the direct product of Obama policies.

Prices are lowering now due to the Dakota fracking boom on private lands Obama can’t stop. His embargo on federal oil land development persists.

And you’re still being laughed at. Tool.

Younggod on November 14, 2014 at 9:54 PM

Why are they scared to impeach Chairman Dogeater?

Krupnikas on November 14, 2014 at 8:27 PM

Because most of the electorate remembers the last time the GOP tried that, and they remember it didn’t work out so well for them…

JohnGalt23 on November 14, 2014 at 8:45 PM

If only dogeater had a blue dress

workingclass artist on November 14, 2014 at 9:58 PM

I’m kinda slow, apparently. Can anyone explain how exactly oil moving through a pipe – an act that already occurs planetwide – would somehow impact the climate?
(Of course, one would also have to buy into the manmadeclimatechange boondoggle, but humor me).

Is the pipe superheated and flying around in Algore’s jet, spraying cfc-laden hairspray bottles as it goes?

WhaleBellied on November 14, 2014 at 10:11 PM

Impeachment is toothless.

It’s a tool for an Era where shame mattered.

Frankly, I’m sick of hearing people whine about. I don’t think they have a clue about what it really entails… nothing

It’s a show trial. It has no effect on Obama, his powers, his decisions.

You can do it to shame him, but he doesn’t care and the media will rush to his supportm
.

swamp_yankee on November 14, 2014 at 10:23 PM

WhaleBellied on November 14, 2014 at 10:11 PM

That’s what I’m wondering. How the hell does a pipeline accelerate so-called climate change? These people are so full of crap. It’s obvious that Obama is kowtowing to his big money donors like Tom Steyer and Warren Buffet.

TarheelBen on November 14, 2014 at 10:27 PM

or whether it helps the American people with their energy costs or their gas prices,” he said.

Um Solyndra called. Even they were laughing.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on November 14, 2014 at 10:35 PM

Democrat yes votes:

John Barrow (GA-12)
Sanford Bishop Jr. (GA-2)
Bob Brady (PA-1)
Jim Clyburn (SC-6)
Jim Cooper (TN-5)
Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
Mike Doyle (PA-14)
Al Green (TX-9)
Gene Green (TX-29)
Ruben Hinojosa (TX-15)
Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18)
Dan Lipinski (IL-3)
Dave Loebsack (IA-2)
Sean Maloney (NY-18)
Jim Matheson (UT-4)
Carolyn McCarthy (NY-4)
Mike McIntyre (NC-7)
Patrick Murphy (FL-18)
Rick Nolan (MN-8)
Donald Norcross (NJ-1)
Bill Owens (NY-21)
Collin Peterson (MN-7)
Nick Rahall (WV-3)
Cedric Richmond (LA-2)
David Scott (GA-13)
Terri Sewell (AL-7)
Albio Sires (NJ-8)
Bennie Thompson (MS-2)
Marc Veasey (TX-33)
Filemon Vela Jr. (TX-34)
Tim Walz (MN-1)

topdawg on November 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM

I think it’s time we returned the favor for all the Mobys and take to Kos, etc to demand that we purge the DINO’s.

The planet cant wait!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!
-CheesyMopedO6

V7_Sport on November 14, 2014 at 10:59 PM

Yeah run, DemonRats…run for your political lives!!

These slippery bastards always manage to save themselves for oooooooooone more term. Still, for the moment, it’s delicious to watch the scumbags run…so ruuuuuun, DemonRats, ruuuuuuuun!!

Mike from NC on November 14, 2014 at 11:20 PM

Notice Obama’s artless dismissal of the idea from his pivot/ defeat-distraction tour of Asia: he actually said it would benefit Canada, as if that was a bad thing. Maybe he meant it would hurt China, who will get the trade if the US passes on it.

If he did just one thing the US wanted, he would redeem himself a little. Now, he’s just being a jerk.

virgo on November 14, 2014 at 11:48 PM

Prices are lowering now due to the Dakota fracking boom on private lands Obama can’t stop. His embargo on federal oil land development persists.

And you’re still being laughed at. Tool.

Younggod on November 14, 2014 at 9:54 PM

Yes, but EagleFord is bigger. Permian is on fire again too. Texas has, IIIRC, doubled its oil production in just a couple of years. Your point stands; this is largely on private land.

juliesa on November 14, 2014 at 11:50 PM

Yes, but EagleFord is bigger. Permian is on fire again too. Texas has, IIIRC, doubled its oil production in just a couple of years. Your point stands; this is largely on private land.

juliesa on November 14, 2014 at 11:50 PM

Thanks for filling in my shorthand, Julie.

Obama’s oil embargo shows that his priority isn’t the interests of the United States, further evidence that he’s an anti-American psychopath.

He’s against higher oil production. That would mean lower gas prices.

Now, lower gas prices lowers living costs for all Americans, especially the poor, across the board. In fact, higher energy prices have been a major drag on the economy, one reason for the worst economic recovery in American history.

Lower gas prices increases our leverage in the Middle East — they not so rich now, and we not forced to kowtow. It also cripples Putin’s ability for foreign adventurism — reduced oil revenue for a shaky Russian economy.

A rational chief executive interested in fulfilling his oath of office would do everything in his power to lower prices. Of course, Obama does the opposite.

What should happen: Open up federal lands for exploration, allow all offshore drilling, do Anwar; frack everything in sight.

Flooding the world with cheap oil is in America’s domestic and foreign policy interests. We now have the wherewithal, so there is no excuse.

Younggod on November 15, 2014 at 2:50 AM

…whether or not it accelerates climate change…

Is there a human on the planet capable of calculating a difference in a change in that kind of outcome depending on that type of variable?

anuts on November 15, 2014 at 3:05 AM

Looking forward to the US Senate response next week!

Khun Joe on November 15, 2014 at 8:01 AM

Looking forward to the US Senate response next week!

Khun Joe on November 15, 2014 at 8:01 AM

There will be none. Reid won’t bring it to a vote.

albill on November 15, 2014 at 8:35 AM

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/11/14/Muslim-Brotherhood-Overruns-National-Cathedral-in-DC

davidk on November 14, 2014 at 7:43 PM

Obama and Valerie J. – Our Muslim Brotherhood in the White House.

albill on November 15, 2014 at 8:38 AM

topdawg on November 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM

That list of Dems look at first glance to be a lot in saver states, where they probably still survive.

Don L on November 15, 2014 at 8:54 AM

Looking forward to the US Senate response next week!

Khun Joe on November 15, 2014 at 8:01 AM

There will be none. Reid won’t bring it to a vote.

albill on November 15, 2014 at 8:35 AM

See, that is a response too.

Don L on November 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM

What will it take to override the veto? And how would an override vote be impacted by the change of House and Senate?

COgirl on November 15, 2014 at 8:57 AM

“He supports the construction of the pipeline but opposes the singling out of any one company or individual in a bill,” Adams wrote.

Cronyism is written into the bill, yo. It’s a badly written bill. Still glad Keystone passed. But corporate cronyism is a cancer.

casuist on November 15, 2014 at 9:15 AM

He’s against higher oil production. That would mean lower gas prices.

Aside: Oil prices already collapsing, yo. State Department, CIA, House of Saud, intend to starve out Russian bloc in advance of winter to stir unrest against Putin and placate a worried and soon to be very cold Europe:

Russia Is Preparing For A “Catastrophic” Oil Price Collapse

The burning question of the moment is how long can producers and producer states maintain artificially low prices at the expense of their own clients, peoples? The Russians have countered by signing deals with the Chinese even as they hoard physical gold in bullion by the pallet-load and other money-like easily traded-converted commodities like palladium.

Imagine both the Russians and the west holding their breath to see who can endure the longest without passing out. Given the brain power of his opposition, I would bet on Putin, yo.

casuist on November 15, 2014 at 9:23 AM

Is this Bipartisan vetoing or ship jumping?

Guess it could also be LIE, LIE AND MORE LIES. Just to look good for a few? Don’t think so.

Hopefully it is Bipartisan vetoing but most likely it is ship jumping.

jpcpt03 on November 15, 2014 at 10:52 AM

Why is the pipeline good?

1. Because that oil (and nat gas) is moving through the USA right now and it will continue to move in greater quantity as Canada continues to produce. How is it moving? Using Warren Buffet’s trucks and rail for the most part. The trucks tear up highways and take up traffic space. Did you know that trucks and rail spill oil at a rate about 20 times as high as a pipeline per unit transported? If you want less spills, use a pipe.

2. The product not going to LA is going to China. If you like clean air, why do you want China’s filthy refineries cracking that heavy tar oil rather than the cleanest in the world, USA refineries?

3. We have a pipeline shortage. Pipeline companies will rent open space in the pipeline to move American product as well as Canadian oil. A big collector is better than building more small pipelines. How expensive is it to build small pipelines? I’m in a partnership that owns a 13 acre piece of land. We were paid $600k just for the right of way for two 8 inch pipelines to run under that 13 acres.

4. Pipelines have to be built, and then they have to be maintained. There will be jobs as long as their are pipelines.

5. The nat gas produced during the oil drilling is keeping heating prices lower for consumers and is stabilizing the supply. It is also resulting in lowered carbon emissions from the USA for the first time since we started measuring emissions.

6. Canada has for a long time sold us oil at a discount for being a good neighbor. They have explained that the discount will have to go away if we force them to go the more expensive route of building a western pipeline to deal with China.

Stable supply at a lower price, good for national security, less use of Arab product, a happy important trading partner, lower prices for consumers, some jobs, and cleaner air. That’s why we need the pipeline.

Meremortal on November 15, 2014 at 11:09 AM

From the look of the names on this list, Pelosi must have allowed them to vote their conscience. I expected to see all names from states that would benefit from this so they could CYA next election, but there were some surprises.

If people don’t see Obama and the Democrats for who they are after Reid is allowing this vote, they never will. I can’t believe the blatant hypocrisy of Reid allowing the Senate to vote on this after refusing the allow the vote for years.

Now, the question is, could they possibly get 67 votes for it in the Senate? That would send a message to Obama, but I doubt the Democrats will be allowed to vote their conscience on this one.

bflat879 on November 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM

The Keystone pipeline will not be built in the foreseeable future. The reasons are not political, they are economic. The Saudis are driving down the price of oil in order to protect market share. Canada has the most expensive oil to extract, and thus the highest marginal cost per barrel. They will shut down production first.

Unless the Canadian government steps in and subsidizes the pipeline….

It is not going to happen.

The Republicans in Congress would be stupid to waste political capital on this issue.

.

percysunshine on November 15, 2014 at 12:08 PM

“My government…”

Really, your Highness? Not “My administration”?

So much for “of, by and for the people”.

jnelchef on November 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM

Will the Senate bill get 60 votes? I hope they get 80. Send a message to Barry.

dogsoldier on November 15, 2014 at 12:45 PM

topdawg on November 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM

Not one Democrat from California. If Cali was a separate country how would we know?

claudius on November 15, 2014 at 2:51 PM

The Republicans in Congress would be stupid to waste political capital on this issue.

.

percysunshine on November 15, 2014 at 12:08 PM

Bullshit. How long you think OPEC will sell oil for $70/barrel? Let them do it for a few years. By then Keystone and other sources will be on line.

Mimzey on November 15, 2014 at 9:32 PM

Imagine both the Russians and the west holding their breath to see who can endure the longest without passing out. Given the brain power of his opposition, I would bet on Putin, yo.

casuist on November 15, 2014 at 9:23 AM

Yeah, it turned out so well for them with that Berlin Wall thing.

Yo.

Younggod on November 16, 2014 at 2:02 AM

Folks, we are getting much closer to be able to override a president veto. After going around congress so many times and throwing them under the bus, it would justify putting him under the bus for once. We need to repeal Obamacare and pass the Keystone Project that he has dithered with now for 6 years. Just do it.

Amazingoly on November 16, 2014 at 9:55 AM