Romney capitalizes on 2012 clairvoyance about today’s global Hellscape with searing op-ed

posted at 8:41 pm on September 4, 2014 by Noah Rothman

It isn’t so much that former Massachusetts governor and 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney was a prophet. Just that he had read a book or two.

Throughout the course of the campaign, the turnaround artist and blue state Republican issued some dire but necessary warnings to the American public about how the geopolitical environment was changing for the worse.

In 2012, Romney called it “troubling” and “alarming” that Barack Obama had essentially appeased the Russian bear by offering concessions like the withdrawal of interceptor missile and radar installations in Eastern Europe without reciprocity from Moscow. He said that Russia’s actions have made that nation “without question, our number one geopolitical foe.”

This prompted a flood of scorn and mockery from a raft of self-assured critics. But by 2014, after Russia had frustrated America’s ambition to contain the Syrian civil war, invaded neighboring Ukraine, and unilaterally annexed a portion of that nation’s territory into Russia proper, nearly all of Romney’s self-respecting critics were forced to concede that he had a point.

In that campaign and earlier, Romney warned that the Islamist goal was the establishment of a pan-Islamic caliphate state which would counter the West and add a grave new military dimension to the ideological struggle against jihadism.

“It’s this century’s nightmare, jihadism – violent, radical Islamic fundamentalism,” Romney said in 2007. “Their goal is to unite the world under a single jihadist caliphate.”

“This is about Shia and Sunni. This is about Hezbollah and Hamas and Al Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood,” he reiterated in a 2008 presidential debate. “This is a worldwide jihadist effort to try and cause the collapse of all moderate Islamic governments and replace them with a caliphate.”

Bingo again.

These comments were dug up by Obama supporters in 2012 to suggest that Romney had a penchant for conflating “all Muslims” with fundamentalists and would, as president, send Americans to “fight [the] whole Muslim world.”

Undeterred, Romney warned America during a presidential debate in October that, while the U.S. could not approach every Islamic extremist threat militarily, the threat would have to be confronted.

But we can’t kill our way out of this mess. We’re going to have to put in place a very comprehensive and robust strategy to help the — the world of Islam and other parts of the world, reject this radical violent extremism, which is — it’s certainly not on the run… It’s certainly not hiding. This is a group that is now involved in 10 or 12 countries, and it presents an enormous threat to our friends, to the world, to America, long term, and we must have a comprehensive strategy to help reject this kind of extremism.

American voters preferred a more comforting fiction manufactured by Barack Obama and his backers which promised that the threat of Islamic fundamentalism had receded. They were wrong, and the establishment of the Islamic State brought with it a wealth of unimaginable new horrors.

Romney is having a bit of a moment. Some have speculated that all this attention may lead the former Bay State governor to suspect he should mount a third run at the White House. Well, judging from an op-ed Romney published in Thursday’s Washington Post, he may be thinking about it. Or, at the very least, he does not want to tamp down any speculation just yet.

“Several arguments are advanced to justify the decimation of our defense,” Romney wrote of the shrinking of the U.S. military occurring at the same time as national security threats proliferate. “All of them are wrong.”

It is said that the first rule of wing-walking is to not let go with one hand until the other hand has a firm grip. So, too, before we jettison our reliance on U.S. strength, there must be something effective in its place — if such a thing is even possible. Further, the appeal to “common humanity” as the foundation of this new world order ignores the reality that humanity is far from common in values and views. Humanity may commonly agree that there is evil, but what one people calls evil another calls good.

There are those who claim that a multipolar world is preferable to one led by a strong United States. Were these other poles nations such as Australia, Canada, France and Britain, I might concur. But with emerging poles being China, Russia and Iran, the world would not see peace; it would see bullying, invasion and regional wars. And ultimately, one would seek to conquer the others, unleashing world war.

Some argue that the United States should simply withdraw its military strength from the world — get out of the Middle East, accept nuclear weapons in Iran and elsewhere, let China and Russia have their way with their neighbors and watch from the sidelines as jihadists storm on two or three continents. Do this, they contend, and the United States would be left alone.

That reference to a “multipolar world” is evidence that Romney has perused a few books on international relations theory, too. And that may be his most terrifying prophecy yet. The post-Cold War conflicts in which the United States has engaged have been perfectly asymmetrical. The return of multipolarity would result in the rise of spheres of influence, increase the chances for miscalculation, and likely result in symmetrical great power warfare of a kind the world has not seen since 1945.

The usual cast of characters will emerge to scoff and mock, too. It’s all they have left.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

You have 2 links to the same CNN exit poll, which is a self reported opinion which means -exactly- nothing. Romney won independent voters. Those who are registered as independent.
V7_Sport on September 8, 2014 at 4:24 AM

So he captured 8% of the electorate and lost his base. Brilliant!

Brock Robamney on September 8, 2014 at 10:28 PM

So he captured 8% of the electorate and lost his base. Brilliant!

Brock Robamney on September 8, 2014 at 10:28 PM

The only upside of having you pepper this site with your DNC/OFA talking points to suppress the conservative vote is that you are too stupid to get the difference between “moderate” on a self reported exit poll which is a category that signifies nothing and “independent” which is a legitimate voter registration block.

V7_Sport on September 9, 2014 at 6:02 AM

ddrintn on September 8, 2014 at 7:15 PM

You are confusing “moderates” a term which means nothing with “independents” a voter registration like democrat or Republican which Romney won.

No, I said there is overlap. A lot of “independents” likewise self-described moderates.

There is overlap with “mammals” “mortals” and “bipeds” , it doesn’t mean the category is a useful measure of anything.

You have 2 links to the same CNN exit poll, which is a self reported opinion which means -exactly- nothing. Romney won independent voters. Those who are registered as independent.

V7_Sport on September 8, 2014 at 4:24 AM

Not entirely

Yes, entirely.

And he still lost even after winning the indie vote by 5 points

Thanks for all the help.

V7_Sport on September 9, 2014 at 6:07 AM

Romney is correct; anytime someone says “US stay home and we’ll be left alone” is whistling through a graveyard.

Remember, now matter what: sports, business, money, etc. – no matter who is at the top (and the USA has been for a long time – why, it was smart! it was (note “was”) rich, it had a great education system, it had a moral base, it had the Rule of Law, it checked people coming here, etc. – you are attacked by many outside your sphere and the left/dems/etc. try to lay a guilt trip on you b/c you work hard, save and take care of people.

OK, long sentence – but it’s true. Note, verbs are past tense.

MN J on September 9, 2014 at 10:54 AM

ddrintn on September 8, 2014 at 7:15 PM

There is overlap with “mammals” “mortals” and “bipeds” , it doesn’t mean the category is a useful measure of anything.

Of course it is, if you’re examining things like skeletal structure and body temperature. But a more apt comparison would be the overlap that occurs between, say “humanists” and “atheists”. SUrely you’re not too dense to understand the simple phrase “many independent voters are self-described moderates”.

And he still lost even after winning the indie vote by 5 points

Thanks for all the help.

V7_Sport on September 9, 2014 at 6:07 AM

You’re welcome. Someone had to vote for your squish. And I notice you still don’t put up one damn bit of data.

ddrintn on September 9, 2014 at 1:38 PM

The only upside of having you pepper this site with your DNC/OFA talking points to suppress the conservative vote…

V7_Sport on September 9, 2014 at 6:02 AM

LOL…who needs the DNC/OFA to “suppress the conservative vote” when we have Squishdom pimping feckless GOP moderate presidential candidates?

ddrintn on September 9, 2014 at 1:46 PM

The only upside of having you pepper this site with your DNC/OFA talking points to suppress the conservative vote…
V7_Sport on September 9, 2014 at 6:02 AM

LOL…who needs the DNC/OFA to “suppress the conservative vote” when we have Squishdom pimping feckless GOP moderate presidential candidates?
ddrintn on September 9, 2014 at 1:46 PM

Losers sure have a lot of excuses. Why would I need to poison the well when guys like Thad Cochran, Mutch McConnell and John Boner are doing such a bang up job. Like little old me can influence 10 million people to stay home in 2012. You are making me giggle v7 and everybody sees you as a Whig troll

Brock Robamney on September 9, 2014 at 4:08 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4