Obama admin is sure there’s no military solution in Iraq and everyone else is wrong

posted at 4:41 pm on August 7, 2014 by Noah Rothman

On Thursday, White House Press Sec. Josh Earnest insisted that, all evidence to the contrary, there is no military solution to the present crisis in Iraq.

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,” Earnest said. “The American people cannot solve this problem for the Iraqi people. The only solution that exists is an Iraqi political solution.”

Of course, it’s difficult to convene a reconciliation commission while fundamentalist extremists are crucifying people. To suggest otherwise is completely delusional.

And obviously ISIS, the Kurds, the Shiite militias, and Iran – all of whom are all engaged in vicious combat in Iraq — have a different take on the situation. Furthermore, because the Pentagon was ordered to produce military options to address the situation in Iraq as early as June, the White House does not really believe this either.

This administration continues to act as though the power of positive thinking will overcome adversity. Or, at the very least, that the press will determine that the administration is not culpable for thousands of deaths and a near ethno-religious genocide in Iraq if they pretend that they can’t do anything about it.

In closing, here is an inexplicable clip of CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer offering his thoughts on the current crisis in Iraq:

“The whole country of Iraq seemingly falling apart right now,” he said. “This is not the way it was supposed to be after when President Obama announced that all forces would be leaving.”

“He was hoping, obviously, that there would be some peaceful transition there,” the veteran CNN news anchor continued.

Perhaps he did not realize that “hoping” in the face of the warnings of countless informed advisors that a “peaceful transition” was unlikely is a stinging indictment of this administration.

Blitzer closed by noting that the current crisis is also not what George W. Bush envisioned when he appeared on the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared “mission impossible.”

Heave the heaviest sigh.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

There IS a military solution, we’re just not gonna use it.

myiq2xu on August 7, 2014 at 4:45 PM

Charles Blow

Josh Earnest

Schadenfreude on August 7, 2014 at 4:46 PM

‘Mission impossible’…that’s funny…

PatriotRider on August 7, 2014 at 4:47 PM

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,” Earnest said.

Of course there is! They had columns of troops and trucks marching around……. Shoot the columns of troops and trucks!!

What is the solution then? Huddle around and try to get them to join some half-a**ed “Unity Government?”

ThePrez on August 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM

Hmm. The military solution helped us out when fought those danged Germans and Japanese. It also helped when we wanted to break away from the British Crown and prevent the country from breaking up.

I’ve yet to see a diplomatic solution solve anything, however.

chrisbolts on August 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM

Heh

Schadenfreude on August 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM

Obama never saw a military solution he didn’t hate.

portlandon on August 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM

At least give them guns and training so they can fight back.

Oil Can on August 7, 2014 at 4:50 PM

Why can’t we use airstrikes, drones and jets, on ISIS?

dforston on August 7, 2014 at 4:50 PM

Hope isn’t a realistic strategy for anything. It denotes inaction and ineptitude. Hoping that something happens is 180 degrees from making things happen.

Wyznowski on August 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM

This puke makes me just as sick as the last puke.

crosshugger on August 7, 2014 at 4:52 PM

What he MEANS is, there is no military solution in Iraq…that doesn’t kill Obama’s ISIS brothers, and destroy the weapons and missiles he gave them in Libya.

Meople on August 7, 2014 at 4:52 PM

“He was hoping, obviously, that there would be some peaceful transition there,” the veteran CNN news anchor continued.

You keep using that word I do not think it means what you think it means.

Johnnyreb on August 7, 2014 at 4:53 PM

Blitzer closed by noting that the current crisis is also not what George W. Bush envisioned when he appeared on the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared “mission impossible.”

“mission impossible” That’s the banner that obama is flying over the USS White House.

“Mission Accomplished” is what the crew of the ship put up because their mission actually was ACCOMPLISHED.

HumpBot Salvation on August 7, 2014 at 4:53 PM

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,” Earnest said. “The American people cannot solve this problem for the Iraqi people. The only solution that exists is an Iraqi political solution.”

 
Similar to when Obama made the non-military solution that led to this problem for the Iraqi people?

rogerb on August 7, 2014 at 4:53 PM

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,” Earnest said.

FOR F@CK’S SAKE!

Yes there is. It’s just that Obozo doesn’t have the nuts to give that order. He is more concerned with optics and elections to care about people being slaughtered half-way around the world.

Several J-DAM’s would do the trick nicely. Or how about UAV’s with missiles overhead.

Patriot Vet on August 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM

Obama never saw a military solution he didn’t hate.

portlandon on August 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM

The military guys could tell him what to do but he has no repect for the few of them that are left. He never deals with anyone who makes him feel inferior.

crankyoldlady on August 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM

Heave the heaviest sigh.

But we have our distinguished Vice President who has anointed Iraq as ‘one of the great accomplishments of this Administration’…..

Unfortunately, history will repeat itself. Just as the political left in this country callously abandoned SE Asia in 1975 to murder and genocide, they are intent to do the same thing in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Lebanon for similarly morally bankrupt reasons.

Athos on August 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM

Hope & Change baby, Hope & Change!

D-fusit on August 7, 2014 at 4:55 PM

“This is not the way it was supposed to be after when President Obama announced that all forces would be leaving.”

“He was hoping, obviously, that there would be some peaceful transition there,” the veteran CNN news anchor continued.

Obama didn’t have a contingency plan. This proves even more that he is a 2 dimensional thinker, and not the “brilliant” person we were told by people who should know better.

The other possibility is the fall of Iraq was by design, as were all the other Muslim power gaining atrocities these past 6 years.

portlandon on August 7, 2014 at 4:55 PM

Why can’t we use airstrikes, drones and jets, on ISIS?
 
dforston on August 7, 2014 at 4:50 PM

 
Because it’s important to reinforce urinating/vomiting on themselves while claiming to be menstruating and well-timed strategic tackling by the victims while Al Qaeda ISIS is reloading first.

rogerb on August 7, 2014 at 4:57 PM

The military guys could tell him what to do but he has no repect for the few of them that are left. He never deals with anyone who makes him feel inferior.

crankyoldlady on August 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM

Absolutely. Obama has to be the most brilliant people in any setting. His poor fragile ego couldn’t handle anything else. There are cracks in the facade though. Let’s see if King Barry can take the pressure until ’16.

portlandon on August 7, 2014 at 4:57 PM

How did we get to the point this magnitude of manifest idiocy can be passed off as policy at a WH briefing?

When you enemy wages terrorism and war, destroying your country and taking it over, making slaves and serfs of anyone they don’t murder outright, there is a military solution in progress.

It’s just mind-boggling this idiot has the temerity to utter these words before the media. I can’t believe they didn’t hound him out of the room. Wait, it’s the WH press corps, so I guess I can.

As for Blitzer, the sanctimonious tool is oblivious.

novaculus on August 7, 2014 at 4:59 PM

There is only one answer to IS that it will understand and that is FORCE.

Having said that, it should not be up to the United States alone to destroy IS. The entire world has an interest in not only preventing the slaughter of upwards of millions of people, but also in stopping IS before their jihadists wind up on the doorsteps of countries around the world.

Resist We Much on August 7, 2014 at 5:01 PM

Hey bonehead, ISIS Ian’t in the mood for talking.

can_con on August 7, 2014 at 5:01 PM

Ain’t

can_con on August 7, 2014 at 5:02 PM

Like a coiled rattlesnake Neville Chamberlain awaits for the opportunity to strike.

antipc on August 7, 2014 at 5:02 PM

Why can’t we use airstrikes, drones and jets, on ISIS?

dforston on August 7, 2014 at 4:50 PM

That would hurt or kill Obama’s brotherhood in ISIS and destroy the arms and stinger missiles he gave them in Libya before Benghazi.

Meople on August 7, 2014 at 5:02 PM

“He was hoping, obviously, that there would be some peaceful transition there,”

Hope is not a foreign policy.

corkie on August 7, 2014 at 5:04 PM

Why can’t we use airstrikes, drones and jets, on ISIS?

dforston on August 7, 2014 at 4:50 PM

Obama doesn’t like using drones against his brothers of the Caliphate.

This Obama guy has got to go. Can any military commander override this POS smarmy wimpy coward d-bag bozo urkel looking stooge?

Key West Reader on August 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM

I am sure ISIS is very concerned about the political climate in Iraq!

Sven on August 7, 2014 at 5:06 PM

I’m sure the Yazidis dying of thirst on that mountain are reassured that all they need is a political solution.

Somewhere today some Montagnards are shaking their heads that another ethnic minority that fought with the Americans is getting hung out to dry. History repeats itself.

Slab Bulkhead on August 7, 2014 at 5:06 PM

“He was hoping, obviously, that there would be some peaceful transition there,”

Hope is not a foreign policy.

corkie on August 7, 2014 at 5:04 PM

You might have missed my post up thread, King Barky I foreign policy is:

Hope & Change baby, Hope & Change!

D-fusit on August 7, 2014 at 4:55 PM

D-fusit on August 7, 2014 at 5:09 PM

I would argue that there is a military solution in Iraq, but only one, and you just need to look at Hiroshima to know what it would look like.

The only thing that will ever deal with Muslim violence in the world is absolute, unwavering, overpowering force. It is the only thing they understand.

Shump on August 7, 2014 at 5:09 PM

We are being governed by an administration of fools. It’s going to get a hell of a lot worse before it gets better.

iceman1960 on August 7, 2014 at 5:10 PM

I HATE THIS PRESIDENT.

I hate him, his administration, and anyone that supports this anti American, anti Christian, anti Jewish, anti peace, anti freedom, anti democracy, anti capitalistic piece of living breathing fecal matter.

I’ve reached the line, I can’t say more than that without getting banned as well as having my rectum examined by a hellfire missile from one of obamacommie’s drones.

Diluculo on August 7, 2014 at 5:10 PM

Too bad about all that hating the military jargon there 0. You sir are worthless.

Bmore on August 7, 2014 at 5:12 PM

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,” Earnest said.

King Joffrey Obama.

MichaelGabriel on August 7, 2014 at 5:12 PM

ISIS sure seems to think there’s a military solution to the situation in Iraq …

… but of course, they’re acting irresponsibly.

PackerBronco on August 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM

I think Earnestly means that since “the world is at greater peace and tranquility” than it’s ever been before and because we left” Iraq stronger and safer” than ever before”, there is no need for bombardment of ISIL.

Besides, the President is allied with them, supplies weapons to them and generally is down with the whole thing. Eggs, omelet.

MTF on August 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM

“I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government,” said Biden.

Biden him smarterest but no more smarterest then Obama him reely smarterest.

jukin3 on August 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM

There’s the old line about “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” Of course, since many liberals don’t believe that line, it’s not surprising to see them take the same approach on a larger scale. Because appeasement worked so well leading up to World War 2.

Mohonri on August 7, 2014 at 5:13 PM

Blitzer closed by noting that the current crisis is also not what George W. Bush envisioned when he appeared on the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared “mission impossible.”

Wow..Really??

…Really???

BigWyo on August 7, 2014 at 5:15 PM

ISIS’s current killing fields can be traced directly back to Obama, Hillary Clinton, their faculty lounge foreign policy, Benghazi, and shipping arms to Syria ‘rebels’…

… Behold, ‘Smart Power Leading From Behind’.

When this is all over, Obama will be responsible for the deaths of millions…

Seven Percent Solution on August 7, 2014 at 5:15 PM

“Mission Accomplished” is what the crew of the ship put up because their mission actually was ACCOMPLISHED.

HumpBot Salvation on August 7, 2014 at 4:53 PM

You can never, ever explain that to a Low-IQ Democrat, because they hate the military and thus are totally unaware of traditions like that.

But my Dad was in the Coast Guard and served on a variety of ships, and they always displayed such a banner when they returned from a deployment-even if the mission of that deployment was as mundane as tending buoys in the Gulf of Maine!

Del Dolemonte on August 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM

The sorry old Ba$tard couldn’t even get the quote from his pathetic attempt at a slam right….

BigWyo on August 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM

Somebody’s bombing IS in Iraq.

Resist We Much on August 7, 2014 at 5:19 PM

FOX news just reported about 2 possible US air strikes in northern Iraq..

going2mars on August 7, 2014 at 5:20 PM

Pentagon is saying na na na na na, can’t hear ya Obama.

can_con on August 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM

All Obama has to do is drop his peace prize on Isis and they’ll drop their weapons, convert to something less Evil then ‘kill everyone not us” and the earth will start to heal.

Dino V on August 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM

Finally.

American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/middleeast/american-forces-said-to-bomb-isis-targets-in-iraq.html?smid=tw-bna&_r=0

Southernblogger on August 7, 2014 at 5:22 PM

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,”

How is it that the nation that defeated the Germans and Japanese in WWII and faced down the Soviet Empire in the cold war now has no military solution available to stop 20K lightly armed thugs with no air force or navy. If that is the state we are truly in, who is responsible for it? If it is not the case, why are we saying it to the dismay of our allies and derision of our foes.

KW64 on August 7, 2014 at 5:22 PM

Pentagon just denied carrying out bombing raids on Iraqi targets.

rottenrobbie on August 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM

FOX news just reported about 2 possible US air strikes in northern Iraq..

going2mars on August 7, 2014 at 5:20 PM

I would be more apt to believe they were French airstrikes.

France has more balls than Obama and his Regime and isn’t invested in protecting ISIS like Obama is.

Meople on August 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM

uggghhhhhh these f*ckin’ bums.

maybe the plus side to Jimmy Carter On Steroids is he’s followed by a wave of Yuppies and Ronald Reagan On Steroids. Maybe history will repeat itself for once.

TarasBulbous on August 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM

* for once in a good way, I meant.

TarasBulbous on August 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM

On Thursday, White House Press Sec. Josh Earnest insisted that, all evidence to the contrary, there is no military solution to the present crisis in Iraq.

Unleash the #hashtags!

Mr. Bingley on August 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM

I would be more apt to believe they were French airstrikes.

Or Russians.

MichaelGabriel on August 7, 2014 at 5:25 PM

I was just wondering. Now this may be a stretch, but it may help clear up a few little things.

I wonder if our president, deep down in his heart, sort of sides a bit with the radical Islamist?

Maybe if you were able to sit down with Obama, have a beer or smoke a joint with him, maybe he would open up a little and admit that he would like to see the terrorist get a upper hand in the world.

Maybe, just a little bit?

Walter L. Newton on August 7, 2014 at 5:28 PM

Jen Tsaki@statedeptspox

Ok, now let us all earnestly begin earnest singing…
“Someone’s crying lord, Kumbaya
Someone’s crying lord, Kumbaya
Someone’s crying lord, Kumbaya
Oh, Lord, Kumbaya”

Now, doesn’t that feel better?

Now, about that fundraiser for tonight…

MikeHu on August 7, 2014 at 5:29 PM

the “bear” is hibernating.

can_con on August 7, 2014 at 5:29 PM

Meople on August 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM

sometimes I use a coin flip to find out the truth from the government..
this time I want to use….. Golf Cart One..
is the Cart fully charged?
washed n waxed??
are the clubs clean?
is the caddy (RLove) ready??
is the CIC on the links…???

if he’s golfing today…
we just might be bombing someone… maybe

going2mars on August 7, 2014 at 5:29 PM

France has more balls than Obama and his Regime

Meople on August 7, 2014 at 5:23 PM

Ouch!

antipc on August 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM

Earnest is not earnest.

Schadenfreude on August 7, 2014 at 5:31 PM

“Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby: ‘Press reports that US has conducted airstrikes in Iraq completely false. No such action taken’”

https://twitter.com/PentagonPresSec

going2mars on August 7, 2014 at 5:34 PM

If Choomie is going to liken amnesty to emancipation, then he’d better start figuring out how the military wasn’t the solution to slavery.

formwiz on August 7, 2014 at 5:36 PM

It could be the US, France (they’ve already offered asylum), Russia (this is right in Putin’s wheelhouse a) Putin as Saviour; b) Russia wants to increase its influence in the region), Turkey (the Kurds have already asked for help), Israel (PR win on the heels of the Gaza war and Syria & Jordan would both likely agree to let them use their airspace because IS is an existential threat to both), Iran (they’ve already sent troops into Iraq and this would be a feather in their caps), or even Egypt (we’ve even supplied them with the aircraft and they loathe IS) with or without other states like Jordan, Syria, etc.

Resist We Much on August 7, 2014 at 5:39 PM

Military solutions are just politics raised several orders of magnitude. (Paraphrasing Clausewitz)
The right way to do this that has been ignored ever since the conclusion of hostilities in WWII, is the following (pay attention all LIVerals’ and a few conservatives):
First the politicians have to decide what they want to accomplish.
This will be the toughest issue because King Putt is, was, and remains A Complete and Utter Fraud. And TOTUS ain’t gonna come to his rescue any time soon.
Back to the DECISION what do you want to do? Stop some adversary, mess up a region, make a troublesome government ‘go away’, alter some attitudes, etc. WHAT exactly?
Answer the question; what do you what to do?
Once you have an ANSWER you go ask the Military what do they need to Solve-the-Problem and get to THE ANSWER.
You then ask the Military; what do you need to ‘Solve the Problem’?
You give the Military what they ask for and then (here is the easy part);
You wind them up and GET THE HELL OUT OF THEIR WAY … and LEAVE THEM ALONE!
Before you know it, Problem Solved.
It works EVERY TIME.
(Just ask the demolished Third Reich, and crushed remnants of Imperial Japan)

Missilengr on August 7, 2014 at 5:40 PM

Hurry up, rush over to this thread…

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/08/07/kurdish-tv-u-s-bombs-isis-targets-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-8354067

You may have to adjust your snark and rhetoric. Obama may have moved the target.

Walter L. Newton on August 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM

sometimes I use a coin flip to find out the truth from the government..
this time I want to use….. Golf Cart One..
is the Cart fully charged?
washed n waxed??
are the clubs clean?
is the caddy (RLove) ready??
is the CIC on the links…???

if he’s golfing today…
we just might be bombing someone… maybe

going2mars on August 7, 2014 at 5:29 PM

LOL, yep, gotta have your priorities straight!

Meople on August 7, 2014 at 5:52 PM

Considering the job requirements, I’m wondering why the WH doesn’t interview USED RV SALESMEN for this job – same requirements!

Tard on August 7, 2014 at 5:53 PM

Obama sees the problems will be solved with the Muslim Brotherhood taking on the community organizing of all those involved into one big happy Caliphate.

albill on August 7, 2014 at 6:02 PM

When I was a child I remember reading the story about a little boy and a bully. The little boy offered the bully his candy bar and suddenly the two were great friends. I laughed when I read it. Obama must have read it and thought “Yes, that’s how the world is supposed to work.”

Unfortunately the world DOESN’t work that way and so Obama doesn’t know what do do.

AtTheRubicon on August 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM

And on 9/11+1 Mecca should have been vaporized with a 100Kt nuke. Oh, there would have a hue & cry for some time from the Left about what was done. But still the fact would remain: to this day, peace would exist.

Until the Islamists experience total war as Nazi Germany & Imperial Japan has, their Jihad will never end.

RavingLunatic on August 7, 2014 at 7:30 PM

Someone explain to me how the PEFAP (Poor Excuse For A President) is perfectly comfortable with drones and target lists but can’t bring himself to take out caravans of enemies? This is by design.

Coltrane on August 7, 2014 at 7:58 PM

Translation: “If we can convince the media to stop covering this story, our low information voters might forget about it.”

TarheelBen on August 7, 2014 at 8:22 PM

“There are no military solutions to the very difficult problems that exist in Iraq now,” Earnest said. “The American people cannot solve this problem for the Iraqi people. The only solution that exists is an Iraqi political solution.”

Obvious question of the day.

If Earnest’s statement is correct then why is Obama trying to “solve” the current Israel-Palestinian war? Why not let Israel solve this problem for themselves?

Kingfisher on August 7, 2014 at 8:46 PM

Had King Barack been around at the time, all of Europe would now be speaking German.

GarandFan on August 7, 2014 at 10:19 PM

Barack Obama WILL win the war in Iraq by using diplomacy. He will offer free Obamacare medical policies to all of the ISIS terrorists. All they have to do is give up their weapons and surrender to the C.I.A. Dynamic-leadership like this does not show up in the White House very often ! Thanks to our President all of our troops will soon be home and America can live in “peaceful-harmony” with the Muslim-Brotherhood !

Bugdust172 on August 8, 2014 at 1:06 AM

Maxim 6: If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Earnest should have added “There is no military solution to the conflict in Iraq*”

*That this administration is willing to consider, primarily for political reasons, since it has never occurred to them that wars consisting of leading from behind while firing missiles from drones (at least until someone complains) and air-dropping token amounts of supplies constitutes pinprick injuries, and you never do an enemy a small injury.

War should be a rare choice, but when you do it, you should not do it by half measures.

Madcap_Magician on August 8, 2014 at 9:10 AM

“He was hoping, obviously, that there would be some peaceful transition there…”

“He that lives upon Hope, dies farting.” — Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanack, 1736

wagnert in atlanta on August 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM

The military guys could tell him what to do but he has no repect for the few of them that are left. He never deals with anyone who makes him feel inferior.

crankyoldlady on August 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM

“I think Barack knew that he had God-given talents that were extraordinary. He knows exactly how smart he is. . . . He knows how perceptive he is. He knows what a good reader of people he is. And he knows that he has the ability — the extraordinary, uncanny ability — to take a thousand different perspectives, digest them and make sense out of them, and I think that he has never really been challenged intellectually. . . . So what I sensed in him was not just a restless spirit but somebody with such extraordinary talents that had to be really taxed in order for him to be happy. . . . He’s been bored to death his whole life. He’s just too talented to do what ordinary people do.”

307wolverine on August 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM

“You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; and those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out.

- Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman

307wolverine on August 8, 2014 at 11:23 PM

I would argue that there is a military solution in Iraq, but only one, and you just need to look at Hiroshima to know what it would look like.

The only thing that will ever deal with Muslim violence in the world is absolute, unwavering, overpowering force. It is the only thing they understand.

Shump on August 7, 2014 at 5:09 PM

You’re underestimating the problem.

Think General Sherman. Julius Caesar. Genghis Khan. Salidin.

Tell our military, “This is not an enemy that observes the Geneva Conventions. Therefore, we shall not, either. You may kill all who show the least resistance. You may kill children who come up to you, because they might have bombs. They have claimed they want “martyrdom” – give them their wish.”

And then re-take Iraq. I’m not saying to implement the Coulter Plan, but it’s a good start. “We came as friends to help you, and you spit in our face. THIS TIME, we come not as friends, but as conquerors. We will not wait for you to spit in our face this time, we will just rip your face off first.”

Harsh? maybe.
But we want to discourage the next one.

ReggieA on August 9, 2014 at 2:18 AM