Planned Parenthood teen sex education: You could get tied to a tree …

posted at 12:41 pm on July 23, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Offering this kind of instruction once could get chalked up to an off-the-reservation employee. Three times and counting of having sex-education counselors delve deeply into instruction on sadomasochism complete with the explanation of the “safe word” is a pattern. Had this been a 25-year-old woman who specifically asked about whips-and-chains protocols, one could understand what follows. In this latest undercover video from Live Action’s Planned Parenthood Exposed series, the young girl identifies herself as 15 years old, and asks about “role playing,” after which comes a deluge of information — and yet another recommendation to watch pornography to extend her education:

I discussed this with Live Action’s Lila Rose on Thursday after their second video release, and pointed out the way that the sex education debate has shifted in a generation. I support sex education in schools when it’s an integrated part of health and biology education, and when it’s age appropriate, but for a long time the idea of sex education in schools was controversial. Many parents objected that sex education would end up promoting sexual activity, and especially sexual activity that could be harmful to children and teens. At that time, those concerns were dismissed as benighted and superstitious nonsense, and that no serious person could object to government-provided sex education.

And now, here we are. Planned Parenthood gets millions of dollars for sex education and other programs from the federal government, and the education they provide is exactly what those parents predicted. No 15-year-old needs instruction on how to let herself get handcuffed or tied to trees by her boyfriend as part of rational education about health and sex. If a 15-year-old even hinted that her boyfriend was pressing her to try these kinds of activities, that calls for an intervention, not a how-to for submission. The advice to watch pornos for further sex education threatens to distort the teen’s sexuality for a lifetime, from a healthy expression of love and pleasure in the context of marriage to decades of being someone else’s rag doll for exploitation.

This isn’t education. It’s indoctrination, and the cultivation of Planned Parenthood clients for the next 20 years. Planned Parenthood can continue to offer sex education, but it shouldn’t get tax dollars to do so.

Addendum: Former PP manager turned pro-life activist Abby Johnson reminds us that the organization makes plenty of profit off of its core business anyway — $313 per baby aborted.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Leftists are never liberal or progressive.

They are always thugs.

Schadenfreude on July 23, 2014 at 12:43 PM

Planned Parenthood teen sex education: You could get tied to a tree …
=======

Good lord, this must be a fetish of Tree Huggers!!
(sarc)

canopfor on July 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM

I’d like to tie Planned Parenthood to a tree.

Then leave it there to die.

portlandon on July 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM

Seems like a good thread for The Who 5:15:

Why should I care?
Why should I care?

Girls of fifteen
Sexually knowing
The ushers are sniffing
Eau-de-cologning

The seats are seductive
Celibate sitting
Pretty girls digging
Prettier women

dentarthurdent on July 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM

It’s all about driving the abortion business. More sex, more unintended pregnancies, more abortions, more money. Win!

Marcola on July 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM

Another thread designed to turn on Libfreeordead and friends. I bet they’re whipping out the joy-rags as we speak.

Walter L. Newton on July 23, 2014 at 12:47 PM

The advice to watch pornos for further sex education threatens to distort the teen’s sexuality for a lifetime, from a healthy expression of love and pleasure in the context of marriage to decades of being someone else’s rag doll for exploitation.

This ^^^^^^ times 1000!!!! It totally distorts the basis for actually building a loving relationship. The female in particular is subject to reducing herself to the status of becoming an object to serve the purpose where satisfaction of sexual needs and desires are concerned. And the means by which she exposes herself to act in the role can be dangerous to her very life!!!

Just heard a story from a male friend of mine…one of his male friends was found dead about three months ago…hanging to the back of the bathroom door…his wife couldn’t get him down in time.

BDSM is about thrill seeking! It doesn’t come close to expressing anything about loving someone.

lineholder on July 23, 2014 at 12:47 PM

Sounds like someone always wanted to be a lumberjack.

Flange on July 23, 2014 at 12:48 PM

Something something isolated incident something doesn’t reflect on PP something something.

rogerb on July 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM

repuglicans need to learn to stay out of other people’s bedrooms and sex dungeons.

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on July 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM

How is this not a child pornagraphy case? Anyone having such a discussion with minors should be up on charges for child pornography and endangerment.

Encouraging a minor to view pornography directly violates federal and state law given all such videos require a person to be 18 or older to view!

Skwor on July 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM

Pedophilia, incest, bestiality, polygamy. Soon to be forced down your throat by your local federal judge.

ConstantineXI on July 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM

Huh funny that…if I offered to show a 15 year old a porn I’d be hauled off to jail… ( as it should be)

Von Kleist on July 23, 2014 at 12:51 PM

Looks like someone else went to the Christian Grey School of Intimacy.

El_Terrible on July 23, 2014 at 12:51 PM

I support sex education in schools when it’s an integrated part of health and biology education, and when it’s age appropriate, but for a long time the idea of sex education in schools was controversial.

It should still be controversial. It’s the parents’ role to teach their kids this stuff. At best, if we’re absolutely going to have schools doing the teaching, abstinence-based should be the form.

I don’t think anyone’s really surprised by Planned Parenthood anymore. What little good they may accidentally do is overwhelmed by the mountains of evil.

Othniel on July 23, 2014 at 12:51 PM

My wife ties me up all the time…

with chores…:))

Boxtnt on July 23, 2014 at 12:51 PM

Encouraging a minor to view pornography directly violates federal and state law given all such videos require a person to be 18 or older to view!

Skwor on July 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM

Anyone in the abortion business is exempted from the law.

nobar on July 23, 2014 at 12:53 PM

repuglicans need to learn to stay out of other people’s bedrooms and sex dungeons.

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on July 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM

If Lib parents did there job , and did it well. the Cons wouldn’t need to worry about YOUR childs safety in or out of the bedroom.

or put simply … Just. Stop. Breathing.

Von Kleist on July 23, 2014 at 12:53 PM

“Where more babies to kill is good for business…”

——– Planned Auschwitzhood

viking01 on July 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM

Anyone in the abortion business is exempted from the law.

nobar on July 23, 2014 at 12:53 PM

Not entirely, not yet….but they’re trying to make that become a reality.

lineholder on July 23, 2014 at 12:57 PM

This isn’t education. It’s indoctrination, and the cultivation of Planned Parenthood clients for the next 20 years. Planned Parenthood can continue to offer sex education, but it shouldn’t get tax dollars to do so.

If those progressive-fascists want to support the indoctrination and eugenics advocacy of PP, then they should donate their own funds to the organization. There is absolutely no reason why one penny of taxpayer funds should go to this vile organization.

Addendum: Former PP manager turned pro-life activist Abby Johnson reminds us that the organization makes plenty of profit off of its core business anyway — $313 per baby aborted.

Proving the vile agenda of PP – their focus is on the profitability of the process, not in the taking of a life – or even respecting the law in the cases of underage girls and abortions. There’s no reason why any of this needs to be funded and sanctioned by government.

This is the face of the real war on women…

Athos on July 23, 2014 at 12:58 PM

Leftists are hell bent to turn this once exquisite country into a sewer.

tru2tx on July 23, 2014 at 12:58 PM

Wonder if the rat-eared SCOAMF would appreciate his own daughters receiving such instruction from this outlaw organization. I’m guessing maybe so, after all his own mother was a porn model.

TXUS on July 23, 2014 at 12:59 PM

Lolwut? Who ties people up to trees?

ezspirit on July 23, 2014 at 1:01 PM

Promoting women’s health.

///////

Ward Cleaver on July 23, 2014 at 1:02 PM

You could get tied to a tree …

Man, what a way to go green and I hope that is an Acorn I am stepping on.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM

THIS is the real War on Women.

The leftist hags who shout War on Wimmenses are nothing but projecting, lying, immoral whores who will stop at nothing to destroy the last shred of morality in our society.

NOMOBO on July 23, 2014 at 1:05 PM

Undercover which ruins you, the taxpayers. Work harder.

Schadenfreude on July 23, 2014 at 1:06 PM

Does anyone know how one becomes a PP “educator”? In other words, who are these cretins and what possible qualifications could they have to teach this subject to adolescents, much less adults?

I suspect they’re simply allowed to come up with whatever vague intertube crap they’ve individually vacuumed up or possibly some specific first hand perversion they may have experienced from underneath those rocks they crawl out from under, and just spew it irresponsibly like a sneeze from a plague victim.

This should entail an arrest for child porn and endangerment- there is NOTHING in the satanic hell that is porn that could help a young woman to a fulfilling sexual life, much less a normal one.

Although I realize loving monogamous marriages are to PP as holy water is to vampires; I suppose they are merely doing their best to make it impossible for girls to recognize a loving relationship and thereby remain loyal patrons of PP.

Can you atheists see this and NOT discern the hand of Satan here?

Dolce Far Niente on July 23, 2014 at 1:07 PM

I support sex education in schools when it’s an integrated part of health and biology education, and when it’s age appropriate, but for a long time the idea of sex education in schools was controversial. Many parents objected that sex education would end up promoting sexual activity, and especially sexual activity that could be harmful to children and teens. At that time, those concerns were dismissed as benighted and superstitious nonsense, and that no serious person could object to government-provided sex education.

I can only imagine how bad sex ed is now. When I was in highschool (mid 90s) the sex ed in school was taught in a way that made people who didn’t have sex feel like losers.

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:10 PM

PP is a cesspool of filth.

mankai on July 23, 2014 at 1:10 PM

Good thing we all get to pay for this bullshit …

Whitey Ford on July 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM

The advice to watch pornos for further sex education threatens to distort the teen’s sexuality for a lifetime, from a healthy expression of love and pleasure in the context of marriage to decades of being someone else’s rag doll for exploitation.

Parent: Mary, whad did you learn in school today?

Mary: I learned the proper way to be bukakeed.

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM

repuglicans need to learn to stay out of other people’s bedrooms and sex dungeons.

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on July 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM

People like you need to stop advocating for my tax money to go to repulsive organizations that instruct teens in S&M. If you want to play whips and chains, fine, but keep your filth off of other people’s children.

Athanasius on July 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM

Finally. An actual scandal.

libfreeordie on May 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM

Girl, bye.

slickwillie2001 on July 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM

Another thread designed to turn on Libfreeordead and friends. I bet they’re whipping out the joy-rags as we speak.

Walter L. Newton on July 23, 2014 at 12:47 PM

Or hoping that their dryers ate one of their socks…

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:14 PM

im sure the commentors on this site will find at least a dozen differant ways to deny obama any credit for this or spin it as a bad thing.

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on May 31, 2014 at 5:33 PM

Not this time precious, it’s all yours.

slickwillie2001 on July 23, 2014 at 1:15 PM

Where more babies to kill is good for business…”

——– Planned Auschwitzhood

viking01 on July 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM

Used to be “Killing is my business and business is good” had a very different meaning.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:15 PM

This ^^^^^^ times 1000!!!! It totally distorts the basis for actually building a loving relationship. The female in particular is subject to reducing herself to the status of becoming an object to serve the purpose where satisfaction of sexual needs and desires are concerned. And the means by which she exposes herself to act in the role can be dangerous to her very life!!!

Parent: Susie, what did you learn in class today?

Susie: I learned that a woman is capable of fitting two pen!ses in her anus.

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:17 PM

I can only imagine how bad sex ed is now. When I was in highschool (mid 90s) the sex ed in school was taught in a way that made people who didn’t have sex feel like losers.

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:10 PM

No formal sex ed for me. We had Home Economics and learned to type and bake cookies. Yea, I am that old and yes….I am a dood.

When I see your nic my mind’s eye reads Full Metal Jacket for some reason.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM

How is this not a child pornagraphy case? Anyone having such a discussion with minors should be up on charges for child pornography and endangerment.

Encouraging a minor to view pornography directly violates federal and state law given all such videos require a person to be 18 or older to view!

Skwor on July 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM

“Corruption of minors” comes to mind.

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM

Parent: Susie, what did you learn in class today?

Susie: I learned that a woman is capable of fitting two pen!ses in her anus.

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 1:17 PM

Silly you. That is the new type of chocolate chip cookie called “Double Chips”. No Home Economics for you.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:22 PM

So what’s worse, the bark or the bite?

Flange on July 23, 2014 at 1:28 PM

So what’s worse, the bark or the bite?

Flange on July 23, 2014 at 1:28 PM

FAIL!

I still have the trophy for the worst jokes on HA. Try again. Chuckle!

Time for me to stop being silly on such a serious topic.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:31 PM

Nay, I think it is EM et al who are excited by this.

First of all, if you need education in this realm you are kind of an idiot. Second, no way in heck would I talk to someone at my workplace about something like this.

That said, not everyone enjoys it how Santorum does: in the dark, under the sheets, while reading from the Bible, holding crucifixes, under the supervision of two priests and a nun, and for the sole purpose of bringing in another Believer into the world. Oh, oh, and certainly zero enjoyment.

If EM et al are soooo concerned with women, (who do consume LOTS of adult content), he could have started by talking to the Palin kid. You know, the one who danced with Satan and brought in an illegitimate child? Fact is, everyone loves it, but no one admits it. The bible belt has some of the highest incidence of out of wedlock birth in the US. Out of wedlock birth, or at least the frequency of women with children who do not have a husband currently, are also high in people who do not seek higher education.

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM

Although I realize loving monogamous marriages are to PP as holy water is to vampires; I suppose they are merely doing their best to make it impossible for girls to recognize a loving relationship and thereby remain loyal patrons of PP.

Can you atheists see this and NOT discern the hand of Satan here?

Dolce Far Niente on July 23, 2014 at 1:07 PM

I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not.

I do not think there was anything in the PP charter to make them help people recognize love. I am not sure how learning about carnal relations somehow precludes a woman from finding a loving relationship. Unless your opinion is that women should be as sheltered/ignorant as possible?

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM

ROFL.

Of course you would support thrill seeking behavior that can become as compulsive as a drug addiction, with women frequently taking the higher risk as being the object of the compulsive behavior rather than the propagator…and try to paint it as caring about women!

You have to be male.

lineholder on July 23, 2014 at 1:41 PM

Leftists are depraved.
They are not content to merely have the freedom to wallow in their cesspool of depravity. They are compelled to rob everyone of the freedom to choose not to plop into the excrement with them. They relentlessly force everyone, including your children, down into their cesspool. They force acceptance of their filth and societal chaos and force you to pay for it.

justltl on July 23, 2014 at 1:47 PM

ROFL.

Of course you would support thrill seeking behavior that can become as compulsive as a drug addiction, with women frequently taking the higher risk as being the object of the compulsive behavior rather than the propagator…and try to paint it as caring about women!

You have to be male.

lineholder on July 23, 2014 at 1:41 PM

If he can pull that off…..that is a whole lot of caring.

“You have to be male”……Great line and HT to you LH.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:48 PM

Leftism and its lesser cousin liberalism are every bit as much of a disease as rabies or Ebola.

justltl on July 23, 2014 at 1:51 PM

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM

We are speaking about using taxpayer money to indoctrinate 15 year old children in the ‘ins & outs’ of BD&SM as well as the ‘benefits’ of porn.

Maybe this is acceptable in your perverse and cynical swamp of a mind, pal, but to traditional, values driven Americans, of which there are still a significant number of, we find it appalling and extremely inappropriate.

For you to mock, denigrate and attempt to bludgeon your perverted views on the rest of us will not go unchallenged.

That said, why don’t you go tie your pecker to a bottle rocket and light a match? That ought to really get you off, amirite?

bimmcorp on July 23, 2014 at 1:57 PM

$313 per dead baby.

$313 per dead baby.

$313 per dead baby.

faraway on July 23, 2014 at 2:05 PM

$313 per dead baby.

$313 per dead baby.

$313 per dead baby.

faraway on July 23, 2014 at 2:05 PM

$313 per dead baby x 53 million dead babies = $16,589,000,000, or $414,725,000 per year in the 40 years since Roe v Wade.

Nice work, if you can get it…

bimmcorp on July 23, 2014 at 2:13 PM

When I see your nic my mind’s eye reads Full Metal Jacket for some reason.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM

LOL!

DethMetalCookieMonst on July 23, 2014 at 2:18 PM

I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not.

I do not think there was anything in the PP charter to make them help people recognize love. I am not sure how learning about carnal relations somehow precludes a woman from finding a loving relationship. Unless your opinion is that women should be as sheltered/ignorant as possible?

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM

Leftists are of course humor-challenged, but no, pinhead, there is nothing sarcastic in stating that teaching a young girl that being the mere object of sexual acts, the thing upon which sexual acts are performed to be enjoyed by the male will do absolutely nothing to teach her how to form solid and lasting relationships with men.

Weirdly, women have babies (which is part of sex- did you know?)- who require fathers- and those babies will struggle to thrive and become successful adults themselves unless she DOES learn how to create a relationship with that father, best done within the same home and lasting through the first 20 or more years of baby’s life.

Learning about “carnal relations” (and where did you resurrect that phrase from?) is strikingly different than being instructed in perversion by a tax-funded entity.

And where do you get the idea that instruction is necessary in the first place? Do you want to pretend there is some powerful Puritan system in place that makes it impossible for young girls to learn the mechanics of sex?

You also clearly demonstrate your own inability to discern the connection between sex and love. I feel perfectly confident in predicting that you have experienced nothing but the most fleeting of relationships, and probably pursue women with nothing other than selfish motives in mind, and no doubt secretly wonder why ANYONE would do otherwise.

Your nom is, of course, absolutely spot on.

Dolce Far Niente on July 23, 2014 at 2:45 PM

Now the female in that video is probably not a leftist. She is likely just a liberal dolt who is down with the idea that any and all sex acts are “equal”- just fine and dandy. She likely feels quite proud of herself for being “objective” and “nonjudgmental” and able to present herself as such. It likely doesn’t occur to her at all that she is talking to a 15 year old – a child. Did she give any thought to possibly encouraging that child to engage in acts that might expose her to disease, pregnancy or even physical injury, let alone psychological harm? I doubt it. Her prime directive is to appear to be a good little “nonjudgmental” and dispassionate liberal. She is actually the one who has been successfully indoctrinated by the Left and her fellow liberal sheep.

Liberals are ultimately just the tools and fools of leftists – useful idiots.

justltl on July 23, 2014 at 2:46 PM

When you talk to a liberal, you are impressed by their vacuousness, irrationality and complete lack of self insight.
When you talk to a true leftist, you are impressed by a modicum of intelligence surrounding a core of hatred, psychopathology, sociopathology and pure evil.

justltl on July 23, 2014 at 2:53 PM

Valeri Jarrett and Obama’s other puppet masters are true Leftists.
Obama himself is a poor oaf of moderate intelligence who was indoctrinated from birth to be a communist and racist. His laziness and capriciousness make him a common grifter- a post turtle – albeit a dangerous one by virtue of the post to which he was artificially elevated.

justltl on July 23, 2014 at 3:01 PM

Planned BDSM

Dr. ZhivBlago on July 23, 2014 at 3:13 PM

repuglicans need to learn to stay out of other people’s bedrooms and sex dungeons.

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on July 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM

…it’s ok!…just stay in the basement!

JugEarsButtHurt on July 23, 2014 at 3:21 PM

Murder Incorporated is not interested in educating, they are recruiting.

slickwillie2001 on July 23, 2014 at 3:21 PM

Pedophilia, incest, bestiality, polygamy. Soon to be forced down your throat by your local federal judge. ConstantineXI on July 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM

Pedophiliaphobe, incestophobe, beastialophonbe, polygamophobe…

Akzed on July 23, 2014 at 3:32 PM

There’s another word for a 15-year-old girl being tied to a tree before sex.

R.A.P.E.

But then that gives Planned Parenthood another excuse to sell an abortion to the 15-year-old victim.

Steve Z on July 23, 2014 at 3:33 PM

You could get tied to a tree …

.
Man, what a way to go green and I hope that is an Acorn I am stepping on.

HonestLib on July 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM

.
. . . : )

listens2glenn on July 23, 2014 at 3:41 PM

No 15-year-old needs instruction on how to let herself get handcuffed or tied to trees by her boyfriend as part of rational education about health and sex.

When my daughters were teenagers back in the late 90s/early oughts, we had family discussions about how to be safe as they began to drive and increasingly be out on their own. We had the discussion (in the context of what to do in the event of a personal attack, home invasion, etc.) about why it was important to resist if anyone tried to bind them. We explained that it was essential not to allow themselves to be rendered defenseless in any circumstances.

This advice — to a 15-year-old no less — is vile and disgusting. It makes me want to puke.

jix on July 23, 2014 at 3:41 PM

Why the shock? When you have a business whose business model includes killing babies in the womb, why would further immorality shock us. They will have these poor kids running in there aborting babies to boost their bottom line. They give awards to clinics for icreasing the amount of abortions done. And the democrat party supports this. If you are a Christian and think that you can vote for these people (democrats) because they are nice people. Think again, we might not know how you vote but God does and you will answer to Him. For the lefties in the HA crowd, repent. Get on your knees and repent because you are culpable and there will be hell to pay.

crosshugger on July 23, 2014 at 3:55 PM

“15 year olds should learn everything about BDSM sex, but nothing about market economics.” -leftist cretins

TarasBulbous on July 23, 2014 at 4:01 PM

I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not.

I do not think there was anything in the PP charter to make them help people recognize love. I am not sure how learning about carnal relations somehow precludes a woman from finding a loving relationship. Unless your opinion is that women should be as sheltered/ignorant as possible?

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM

You also clearly demonstrate your own inability to discern the connection between sex and love. I feel perfectly confident in predicting that you have experienced nothing but the most fleeting of relationships, and probably pursue women with nothing other than selfish motives in mind, and no doubt secretly wonder why ANYONE would do otherwise.

Your nom is, of course, absolutely spot on.

Dolce Far Niente on July 23, 2014 at 2:45 PM

I’ve been married 25 years and I agree with what antisense wrote above. Are you “perfectly confident that I have experienced nothing but the most fleeting of relationships”?

jim56 on July 23, 2014 at 5:44 PM

If a 15-year-old even hinted that her boyfriend was pressing her to try these kinds of activities

…that’s not family planning.

You know what’s stupid is that the libs will go off their cart making this about “hung up conservatives”, but they can’t really explain how this helps a responsible adult plan their family.

Are they Orgasms-R-Us or Planned Parenthood? What is their purpose?

Axeman on July 23, 2014 at 5:45 PM

If you are a Christian and think that you can vote for these people (democrats) because they are nice people. Think again, we might not know how you vote but God does and you will answer to Him. For the lefties in the HA crowd, repent. Get on your knees and repent because you are culpable and there will be hell to pay.

crosshugger on July 23, 2014 at 3:55 PM

You and I just disagree.

I think it’s people like you that need to get on your knees and repent for your culpability for distorting parts of the Bible to fit your own morality.

And for your vicious hatred of other (mainline) Christian groups because of their faith.

jim56 on July 23, 2014 at 5:47 PM

Unless your opinion is that women should be as sheltered/ignorant as possible?

Lib logic:

“sheltered/ignorant as possible” not tied to a tree for somebody’s kicks. Yes, anything less than submission and bondage is as ignorant as possible!!

Is it a guy? All men are rapists, remember your feminism?

We excuse rape-like behavior because it’s exciting and gets people off, but on the flip-side slur a whole sex, for their chromosome profile, because they’re more often the initiators and they tend to want it more.

Axeman on July 23, 2014 at 6:01 PM

jix on July 23, 2014 at 3:41 PM

Doh! Should have been: the late 90s/early aughts

jix on July 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM

I’m not sure. Are we recreating the Weimar Republic, or have we made it to Sodom and Gomorrah already?

Al in St. Lou on July 23, 2014 at 11:16 PM

Unless your opinion is that women should be as sheltered/ignorant as possible?

antisense on July 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM

No, they shoudln’t be “sheltered” they should be taught that porn is education and not at all unrealistic.

I mean this is the view of nearly everyone who … has never actually had sex.

So this is also your view?

Well I’m sorry to hear this is true; but perhaps pushing porn on children isn’t the best way to fix your problem.

gekkobear on July 24, 2014 at 12:46 PM