QI GDP revised sharply downward to -2.9%; Flashback: Remember when ObamaCare saved us from contraction?

posted at 9:11 am on June 25, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Remember when the Obama administration considered a GDP contraction of 1% in the first quarter just a hiccup, mainly caused by weather? Good times, good times. That itself was a rather sharp downward revision from the advance estimate of 0.1%, but that was just a mere stumble compared to the plunge in the final revision. The Commerce Department now states that GDP fell at an annualized rate of -2.9% in the first quarter, the worst in more than five years:

Real gross domestic product — the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States — decreased at an annual rate of 2.9 percent in the first quarter of 2014 according to the “third” estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the fourth quarter of 2013, real GDP increased 2.6 percent. …

Real GDP declined 2.9 percent in the first quarter, after increasing 2.6 percent in the fourth. This downturn in the percent change in real GDP primarily reflected a downturn in exports, a larger decrease in private inventory investment, a deceleration in PCE, and downturns in nonresidential fixed investment and in state and local government spending that were partly offset by an upturn in federal government spending.

This time the news is bad across the board. Exports dropped 8.9% in Q1, a huge drop from 2013, which wasn’t exactly spectacular either. Real final sales of domestic product dropped 1.3%, where in earlier estimates it had remained in positive territory. Business investment also fell:

Real nonresidential fixed investment decreased 1.2 percent in the first quarter, in contrast to an increase of 5.7 percent in the fourth. Nonresidential structures decreased 7.7 percent, compared with a decrease of 1.8 percent. Equipment decreased 2.8 percent, in contrast to an increase of 10.9 percent. Intellectual property products increased 6.3 percent, compared with an increase of 4.0 percent. Real residential fixed investment decreased 4.2 percent, compared with a decrease of 7.9 percent.

Reuters noted immediately that this is not just weather-related:

The Commerce Department said on Wednesday gross domestic product fell at a 2.9 percent annual rate, the economy’s worst performance in five years, instead of the 1.0 percent pace it had reported last month.

While the economy’s woes have been largely blamed on an unusually cold winter, the magnitude of the revisions suggest other factors at play beyond the weather. Growth has now been revised down by a total of 3.0 percentage points since the government’s first estimate was published in April, which had the economy expanding at a 0.1 percent rate.

The difference between the second and third estimates was the largest on records going back to 1976, the Commerce Department said.

Underscoring that is the May durable-goods report, which showed a contraction of 1.0% despite having a month of mild-to-good weather:

New orders for manufactured durable goods in May decreased $2.4 billion or 1.0 percent to $238.0 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. This decrease, down following three consecutive monthly increases, followed a 0.8 percent April increase. Excluding transportation, new orders decreased 0.1 percent. Excluding defense, new orders increased 0.6 percent. Transportation equipment, also down following three consecutive monthly increases, led the decrease, $2.3 billion or 3.0 percent to $74.4 billion.

Again, business investment signals even rougher times ahead:

Nondefense new orders for capital goods in May decreased $0.4 billion or 0.5 percent to $82.1 billion. Shipments decreased $0.5 billion or 0.7 percent to $75.9 billion. Unfilled orders increased $6.2 billion or 0.9 percent to $662.7 billion. Inventories increased $2.5 billion or 1.4 percent to $181.7 billion. Defense new orders for capital goods in May decreased $4.0 billion or 31.4 percent to $8.8 billion. Shipments decreased $0.2 billion or 2.3 percent to $9.4 billion. Unfilled orders decreased $0.6 billion or 0.4 percent to $158.9 billion. Inventories increased slightly or 0.1 percent to $23.6 billion.

This comes as Barack Obama planned yet another “pivot” to the economy, in the hopes of distracting from bad news in foreign policy and at the VA and IRS. The previously poor Q1 results already had the White House on the defensive, which they tried to brush off as weather-related and anomalous. Clearly, neither is the case. The economy has run aground on Obama’s own policies, and we’ll be lucky to hit positive growth at all this year with the bad Q1 number looming over everything. That calls into question all of Obama’s budget projections, which were based on irrationally sunny projections of economic growth this year and the next few years.

We’ve been complaining about stagnation ever since the June 2009 technical recovery. Now we may look at stagnation with some nostalgia in the months ahead. If Q2 GDP ends up in negative territory, that’s a recession no matter what the weather looks like.

Update: The advance estimate was a positive 0.1%, not -0.1%. I have corrected it above.

Update: Steve Eggleston sends an interesting analysis via e-mail:

- Tom Blumer identified the biggest contributor to this unexpectedly-bad report – a rather-radical overestimation of spending on health care (http://www.bizzyblog.com/2014/06/25/1q14-gross-domestic-product-3rd-reading-062514/). Its contribution to the change in real GDP went from +1.10 percentage points in the advance estimate to +1.01 points in the second estimate to -0.16 points in the final estimate.

- If you think the 17th-worst quarter on record (going back to 1947) for real GDP is bad, the -1.71% change in nominal (current-dollar) GDP, which is the first time since the 2nd quarter of 2009, is the 10th-worst on record.  Other than the heart of the Great Recession (4th quarter of 2008 and 1st quarter of 2009), the last time nominal GDP fell by at least this much was the 4th quarter of 1960.

Of course, the BEA will get another bite at this next month when they do their annual revision of the previous 5 years of data.

There are a lot of analysts trying the Chip Diller spin today, but this is meaningful and bad news.

Update: Regarding Blumer’s observation, remember when Jay Carney credited ObamaCare for saving us from a contraction?

Uh … sure.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

We are headed into very dangerous times…be prepared…

PatriotRider on June 25, 2014 at 1:16 PM

Where in the hell will we be at the end of Obama’s term???…

PatriotRider on June 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM

Somewhere in the Fifth Circle, if my geography is correct….

ElectricPhase on June 25, 2014 at 1:21 PM

Nobody liberates people from Job – lock like Obama.

Axeman on June 25, 2014 at 1:22 PM

Three percent drop in GDP is a good thing! (/media)

This has nothing to do with Obama democrat care and even less with Obama’s economic policies of big government/ fascism.

jukin3 on June 25, 2014 at 1:26 PM

Does anyone here know what the Canadian economy was doing during this past winter? I don’t remember any story that Canada is suffering with their economy but only hear that its doing well including last winter.

garydt on June 25, 2014 at 12:11 PM

+1.2% real GDP at an annualized rate for 1Q2014, +2.7% real GDP at an annualized rate for 4Q2013.

Steve Eggleston on June 25, 2014 at 1:31 PM

QI GDP revised sharply downward to -2.9%; Flashback: Remember when ObamaCare saved us from contraction?

“Thank you, President Obama!”

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 25, 2014 at 2:27 PM

Should we start the countdown?

How many days remain of this presidency?

timoric on June 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM

But the market is up! What a great country!

claudius on June 25, 2014 at 2:41 PM

Should we start the countdown?

How many days remain of this presidency?

timoric on June 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM

Depends on what the “remains” is.

Do you mean literally or gravitas? Cause the polls show he has no more gravitas with anyone. Which will make the rest of his literal Presidency a Despotism.

UnstChem on June 25, 2014 at 3:01 PM

Whatever your political stripes, anyone who is surprised by this should have their head examined. Politicians and their Wall Street shills screaming that the economy is great doesn’t make it so.

Faramir on June 25, 2014 at 3:20 PM

Doesn’t matter. This is still W’s fault. Had this been good news it would have been to Obama’s credit.

Isn’t that neat? It’s like when unusually cold it’s still the fault of global warming.

anuts on June 25, 2014 at 3:22 PM

Doesn’t matter. This is still W’s fault.

anuts on June 25, 2014 at 3:22 PM

Thank you for putting everything in proper perspective. Much appreciated!

UnstChem on June 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM

concerning the weather issues and the economic issues:

if all of the economists and meteorologists were to swap jobs, no one would be able to tell in the slightest, based on their prediction accuracy.

WaldoTJ on June 25, 2014 at 3:38 PM

WaldoTJ on June 25, 2014 at 3:38 PM

Heh…

I hear Detroit’s nice this time of year.

anuts on June 25, 2014 at 3:49 PM

if all of the economists and meteorologists were to swap jobs, no one would be able to tell in the slightest, based on their prediction accuracy.

WaldoTJ on June 25, 2014 at 3:38 PM

Doesn’t matter-it all comes down to Global Warming…and, racism.

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 25, 2014 at 3:51 PM

David Burge @iowahawkblog · 2h

Face it, how bad can the economy be if Ezra Klein and Matt Yglesias can still find employment? #Hawksplaining

Schadenfreude on June 25, 2014 at 3:57 PM

Oh look – an Obama recession. When was the last time we had two recessions this close together?

Of course, I never felt like we were ever out of the last recession. They should just lump the last six years together and call it the Great Obama Recession.

SupplyGuy on June 25, 2014 at 3:58 PM

Summer of recov…
Global warming is to bla…
It’s a one off blip on the rada…
What differences, at this point, does it ma…

Not quite sure what excuses they’ll use, but they’ll find some!

xNavigator on June 25, 2014 at 9:18 AM

Obama didn’t build that.

Oxymoron on June 25, 2014 at 4:09 PM

Is the adjustment from +0.1 to -2.9 the largest ever? Based on my memory of these things, it very well might be. What I think the Government, especially under Obama has learned is how to fudge the numbers. How to cheat and make them look better then they really are. Make the predictions[which are usually too high] just as important as the actual numbers. Its all a giant shell game of smoke and mirrors.

KMav on June 25, 2014 at 4:53 PM

Haven’t read all the comments yet.

Has libfree been on to scold us on yet another failure of the “free” market?

questionmark on June 25, 2014 at 5:02 PM

Enjoy, America.

CW on June 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM

Should we start the countdown?

How many days remain of this presidency?

timoric on June 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM

Depends on what the “remains” is.

Do you mean literally legally or gravitas probable reality? Cause the polls show he has no more gravitas with anyone. Which will make the rest of his literal Presidency a Despotism.

UnstChem on June 25, 2014 at 3:01 PM

ReWrite™ engaged for the probability we’ll have to literally drag him out of the Oval Office sometime after noon Eastern 1/20/2017.

Steve Eggleston on June 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM

I have a bad feeling about this.

Count to 10 on June 25, 2014 at 6:03 PM

Is the adjustment from +0.1 to -2.9 the largest ever? Based on my memory of these things, it very well might be. What I think the Government, especially under Obama has learned is how to fudge the numbers. How to cheat and make them look better then they really are. Make the predictions[which are usually too high] just as important as the actual numbers. Its all a giant shell game of smoke and mirrors.

KMav on June 25, 2014 at 4:53 PM

Yeah, it pretty much has to be.

slickwillie2001 on June 25, 2014 at 7:00 PM

Is the adjustment from +0.1 to -2.9 the largest ever? Based on my memory of these things, it very well might be. What I think the Government, especially under Obama has learned is how to fudge the numbers. How to cheat and make them look better then they really are. Make the predictions[which are usually too high] just as important as the actual numbers. Its all a giant shell game of smoke and mirrors.

KMav on June 25, 2014 at 4:53 PM

If not, the 3.1-point drop between the 1st and 3rd reads is pretty close to the biggest change in the normal adjustment cycle. We do know the 1.9-point drop from the 2nd estimate is the biggest 2nd-to-3rd-estimate drop ever.

I will note that the “final” +1.9% 1Q2011 GDP change went down to +0.4% one month later in the first annual revision, +0.1% in the 2012 annual revision, and -1.3% in the 2013 comprehensive revision, which is a 3.2-point drop. That is due for one more “regular” annual revision next month.

Steve Eggleston on June 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM

I’m blaming Republican do-nothing obstructionism. If only they had agreed to increasing the minimum wage…

5 million people making 30% more overnight = GDP goes wild!

/math-free Obamanite

Dolce Far Niente on June 25, 2014 at 9:19 PM

Okay, let’s pivot to the economy! Whoa! Hey look at this Global Warming!

virgo on June 26, 2014 at 1:47 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3