CNN panel unloads on Hillary for trivializing something as ‘sensitive as rape’

posted at 7:21 pm on June 17, 2014 by Noah Rothman

Oh, man. The “R” word. That word that doomed so many Republican candidates. That word which spawned countless hours of cable news hand-wringing and resulted in the sequestering over a dozen Senate and 50 House candidates for a two-day sensitivity training session in January. Yes, that “R” word.

It has scuttled political candidacies in the past, and it has now ensnared Hillary Clinton.

On Monday, The Washington Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman posted the results of yet another investigation into details of Clinton’s past which had somehow been overlooked by the mainstream press. Goodman unearthed audio of Clinton from the early 1980s speaking about one of the most influential cases of her legal career: the defense of a man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl.

In the audio, Clinton brags about her acumen in handling that case and mocks the prosecution’s fumbling of key evidence, particularly a tainted pair of underwear worn by the accused. In the end, Clinton successfully negotiated a plea bargain for her client based on a legal technicality.

On Tuesday, in reaction to this discovery, a panel of CNN political reporters and analysts noted that Clinton was essentially doing what any good defense attorney would do. While Clinton’s decision to brag about her success in this instance may be in poor taste, it does not overstep any ethical boundary.

That said, most of the political panel conceded that this audio is a political problem for Clinton.

“I think it’s good lawyering, but I think it’s bad politics,” said CNN reporter Brianna Keilar. “And I think it’s really bad for a certain subset of voters, and that would be young people.”

She added that Clinton’s brand as a “champion of women and girls” is damaged by the revelation that she attacked the character of a child rape victim. “I think it really pokes a hole in that narrative,” Keilar submitted.

CNN’s Dana Bash agreed. “I think we should also look at it from the perspective of the fact she was a young woman in a man’s world in the South,” she qualified. “The question then becomes, did she have a choice to go beyond that and, in the affidavit, what many will view as blaming the victim.”

Bash added that this issue was particularly sensitive because it involved “something as incredibly sensitive and incredibly explosive as rape.”

Finally, CNN’s Chief Political Analyst Gloria Borger suggested that the audio indicates how tenacious Clinton is when she has a goal set for herself.

Okay, so two out of three members of CNN’s political panel noted that the audio of Clinton bragging about getting a rape accuser off is a political problem for her.

In related news, MSNBC’s Krystal Ball continues to wage her war against Clinton from the left.

After urging Clinton not to run for the White House and to cede the Democratic presidential nomination to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in February, Ball insisted that Clinton’s gaffetasmic book tour is evidence that she is both “tone-deaf” and “unrelatable.” Ball delivered the unkindest cut of all when she asked if Clinton is the Democratic version of Mitt Romney.

An all-around stellar week for the presumptive Democratic 2016 nominee.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Hillary – unlikeable in 2008 — and still today

jake-the-goose on June 17, 2014 at 7:25 PM

I wonder if she could ever defend Bill in a similar situation? Conflict of interest, I guess.

Moron Labe on June 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM

Hillary Clinton is not the brightest bulb. Sometimes I think we should lay off her for now in hopes that somehow she manages to get the Dem nomination, because once that happened she would be an easy take down.

anotherJoe on June 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

Was there a stain?

If so….

Killary approves…

Electrongod on June 17, 2014 at 7:30 PM

Clinton’s brand as a “champion of women and girls”

LOL-

Del Dolemonte on June 17, 2014 at 7:31 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

Alinsky?

Del Dolemonte on June 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM

The debates should be interesting. A lot will come down to who the GOP nominee is. Do the Reps have a woman to put up against her? That could undermine expected sexism charges and give her license to ask some tough questions of Hilary.

Moron Labe on June 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM

Jake-t-g: Unlikeable? Understatement of the year, IMHO . . .

RedPepper on June 17, 2014 at 7:33 PM

you may laugh at her now but she will be the one laughing when she is your ruler..

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

symphony

Electrongod on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

Someone who would defend him against rape charges.

Fallon on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

Could the Democrats please find someone to run for president who isn’t a sleazy lawyer? Clinton, Edwards, Obama and Clinton again, it’s sick.

HidetheDecline on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

On Monday, The Washington Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman posted the results of yet another investigation into details of Clinton’s past which had somehow been overlooked by the mainstream press.

On Sunday evening, mainstream media reporter Glenn Thrush revealed that a former editor of his at Newsday in 2008 delayed and buried his story on Hillary Clinton’s defense of a child rapist because “it might have an impact.”

When Thrush wrote the story on February 24, 2008, Clinton was battling Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

@amychozick my then-editor appended a meaningless intro to the story, delayed and buried it because, in his words, ‘it might have an impact’

— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) June 16, 2014

Here’s the only link I can find to my original 2008 Newsday story on Hillary’s 1975 defense of child rapist http://t.co/dU0WiXaRmw

— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) June 16, 2014

Thrush Tweeted in response to a Free Beacon report on Hillary Clinton’s recordings regarding the case.

Resist We Much on June 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

Calling rojerb.
LOLOL

pambi on June 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM

Was it rape rape?

davidk on June 17, 2014 at 7:40 PM

She added that Clinton’s brand as a “champion of women and girls” is damaged by the revelation that she attacked the character of a child rape victim.

What utter crap. The only “women’s rights” Hillary ever championed were Hillary’s right to live at the largess of the taxpayer. These MSM idiots live in a fantasy world.

Cicero43 on June 17, 2014 at 7:40 PM

you may laugh at her now but she will be the one laughing when she is your ruler..

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

Metric or Imperial?

JugEarsButtHurt on June 17, 2014 at 7:41 PM

Trolls..

Can you explain what is…

Hard Choices…?

Electrongod on June 17, 2014 at 7:42 PM

davidk on June 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM

*snicker*

M240H on June 17, 2014 at 7:42 PM

“What difference at this point does it make?” — Hillary Clinton to every victim she has ever found expendable to her ambitions

UnderstandingisPower on June 17, 2014 at 7:42 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

Someone who would defend him against rape charges.

Fallon on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

…or-a cigar holder.

JugEarsButtHurt on June 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM

you may laugh at her now but she will be the one laughing when she is your ruler..

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

Strange. When I left the UK, I was a ‘subject.’ When I moved to the US, I became a citizen.

Elected politicians are not my rulers. They are my public servants.

Resist We Much on June 17, 2014 at 7:44 PM

you may laugh at her now but she will be the one laughing when she is your ruler..

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

LOL!!!!

Is that ruler as in a measuring device or ruler as in Queen of America? Because I have rather nifty device to make measurements with so I don’t need Cankles for that and last I checked this was a republic so no need for Witchypoo to swoop to our rescue.

Either way you guys crack me up. :)

HotAirian on June 17, 2014 at 7:45 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

A vindictive pimp ?

burrata on June 17, 2014 at 7:47 PM

She added that Clinton’s brand as a “champion of women and girls” is damaged by the

…fact that she was happily in charge of bimbo eruptions during Bill’s campaigns, discrediting and attacking his victims and hose bags alike when it suited their purposes.

Akzed on June 17, 2014 at 7:49 PM

CNN’s Dana Bash agreed. “I think we should also look at it from the perspective of the fact she was a young woman in a man’s world in the South,” she qualified. “The question then becomes, did she have a choice to go beyond that and, in the affidavit, what many will view as blaming the victim.”

I’ve lived my entire life in the southern states, and have not found a societal tolerance for rapists, much less child molesters.

Yes, we recognize the right of an accused to legal representation, and understand that a lawyer has a duty to represent their client to the best of their ability.

But bragging about getting a child molester a lighter sentence due to a technicality, and mocking a 12 year-old rape victim? That seems a bit over the top, even for a Democrat lawyer. But maybe the victim was the child of a white Republican, so from a certain point of view she was justified in the bragging and mocking, since from that viewpoint a white Republican’s child deserves to be raped, because of ‘white privilege’ or something.

s1im on June 17, 2014 at 7:50 PM

Same old same old. Called Monica an unstable stalker. To think that this evil witch is revered by so many.

Lee Jan on June 17, 2014 at 7:50 PM

not just any rape, but the especially horrendous crime of child rape.
WHY DO DEMOCRATS SUPPORT CHILD RAPE?!?!?!

Everyone spam it everywhere!!!!

abobo on June 17, 2014 at 7:50 PM

Easier than Warren?

blink on June 17, 2014 at 7:39 PM

Warren may be easy too but I don’t know enough about that.
Hillary is a sure thing!

anotherJoe on June 17, 2014 at 7:52 PM

I’ve often wondered what Bill saw in her.

Knott Buyinit on June 17, 2014 at 7:29 PM

‘Twas a match made in Heaven hell. She’s a beard, he’s a beard, everybody’s a beard-beard.

Naturally Curly on June 17, 2014 at 7:52 PM

In an email this evening, a veteran publishing source calls the latest Hillary Clinton book, Hard Choices, a memoir of her State Department years, a “bomb.” The source is referring to the early but underwhelming sales figures.
clinton hillary

“Between us, they are nervous at S&S [Simon & Schuster],” says the source, who gave permission for his email to be published. “Sales were well below expectations and the media was a disaster.”

According to this source, a Simon & Schuster insider, “They sold 60,000 hard covers first week and 24,000 ebooks.” The publishing house was “hoping and praying for 150,000 print first week.”

“The 60k represents a less than 10% sell thru based on what they shipped,” says the source.

It’s been reported that one million copies of Clinton’s book were shipped weeks before the June 10 publication date. “They will be lucky to sell 150,000 total lifetime,” the source writes in the email.

Hillary reportedly received a near-$14 million advance, a sum the publishing house will unlikely make back.

“It’s a bomb but it will be interesting to see how they spin it.”

Ruby Cramer of BuzzFeed reported earlier today that Barnes & Noble sold 24,000 of Clinton’s book.

Akzed on June 17, 2014 at 7:53 PM

Why shouldn’t she defend a rapist?

She married one.

mjs28c on June 17, 2014 at 7:55 PM

An all-around stellar week for the presumptive Democratic 2016 nominee.

And I’m loving it. She’s looking less and less like the “presumptive’ nominee every single day.

cat_owner on June 17, 2014 at 7:56 PM

The Internal Revenue Service is about to get slapped with a harsh payback for messing around with conservative groups, blowing wads of tax dollars on employee conferences and helping implement Obamacare.

The House Appropriations Committee is set to OK an IRS budget of $10.9 billion, $1.5 billion under President Obama’s request for fiscal year 2015, reducing the agency’s budget to 2008 levels.

The goal is to keep the tax agency focused on its “core duties,” and eliminate efforts to judge the political activities of tax-exempt groups and brake its implementation of Obamacare.

The funding is part of a larger $21 billion bill for several agencies including the IRS, Treasury Department and Securities and Exchange Commission. Noting that it cuts $2.3 billion from the president’s overall request, Chairman Hal Rogers said, “the bill focuses cuts on lower-priority or poor-performing agencies, such as the scandal-plagued and inefficient Internal Revenue Service.”

http://washingtonexaminer.com/house-budget-punishes-irs-with-15-cut-halts-obamacare-enforcement/article/2549830

davidk on June 17, 2014 at 7:57 PM

But bragging about getting a child molester a lighter sentence due to a technicality, and mocking a 12 year-old rape victim? That seems a bit over the top, even for a Democrat lawyer. But maybe the victim was the child of a white Republican, so from a certain point of view she was justified in the bragging and mocking, since from that viewpoint a white Republican’s child deserves to be raped, because of ‘white privilege’ or something.

s1im on June 17, 2014 at 7:50 PM

As long as Hillary supports the ability of the 12-year old to have an abortion, her liberal cred will be intact.

HidetheDecline on June 17, 2014 at 7:58 PM

CNN’s Dana Bash agreed. “I think we should also look at it from the perspective of the fact she was a young woman in a man’s world in the South,” she qualified

Does the same defense also apply to Paula Deen ? or is this defense something exclusive to supporters and enablers of child rapists ?

burrata on June 17, 2014 at 7:58 PM

Hey, everyone, I need your help understanding something:

It seems to me the media is vetting Candidate Clinton BEFORE she even formally becomes a candidate. I know the book tour is probably causing this but I’m truly surprised. I mean, the NPR interview, Diane Sawyer asking questions about how much money Hillary receives for speaking and now this. This is way, way more than “The Chosen One” has ever had to endure as a candidate or as President.

My only question is: Why? Does the media feel she is not loyal to Obama? Is it they find her not liberal enough? Are they trying to get these issues off the table before she runs? I’m just interested in what you all think. Thanks!

AOTC

Agent of the Cross on June 17, 2014 at 7:59 PM

Gonna need a big ruler. Might go with a tape instead.

Bmore on June 17, 2014 at 8:04 PM

let me know when they talk about the NYT running a long article about stress and trauma (including rape) preventing pregnancy 10 days or so after Akin said bad stuff.

dmacleo on June 17, 2014 at 8:04 PM

Hillary reportedly received a near-$14 million advance, a sum the publishing house will unlikely make back.

“It’s a bomb but it will be interesting to see how they spin it.”

Ruby Cramer of BuzzFeed reported earlier today that Barnes & Noble sold 24,000 of Clinton’s book.

Akzed on June 17, 2014 at 7:53 PM

Lemme guess the future :
Somehow, all the losers who want Killery for POTUS will find a source , a very secret source, which will give them money so they can buy her book in the next 2 weeks , then the group will be reimbursed by huma’s wahabi bosses ?

burrata on June 17, 2014 at 8:07 PM

you may laugh at her now but she will be the one laughing when she is your ruler..

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

So you are down for some Monarchy…

William Eaton on June 17, 2014 at 8:07 PM

H.R. Clinton is unable to separate herself from her own actions, her own past. She acted in her own best interest, regardless of the interest of a 12 year old child, or the interest of Justice.

Are we surprised by that at this very late stage of her career?

thatsafactjack on June 17, 2014 at 8:08 PM

Agent of the Cross on June 17, 2014 at 7:59 PM

Paving the way for Biden/Johnson 2016 ticket. Don’t fight the Illuminati, son.

abobo on June 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM

This has to be one of the worst weeks for a political figure in I don’t know how long. Even Obama usually has scandals week after week, not several scandals blowing up simultaneously.

And hearing Levin playing clips of the Greta interview makes me wonder why Hillary even bothered to do an interview.

Aizen on June 17, 2014 at 8:12 PM

I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to mislead in my previous statement. It should have read:

“Are we surprised to find this to be so? Especially now, that we’ve endured the final dregs of her career.”

thatsafactjack on June 17, 2014 at 8:14 PM

On Tuesday, in reaction to this discovery, a panel of CNN political reporters and analysts noted that Clinton was essentially doing what any good defense attorney would do. While Clinton’s decision to brag about her success in this instance may be in poor taste, it does not overstep any ethical boundary.


Seriously????????????

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE: DEFINITION

The attorney-client privilege is the oldest privilege recognized by Anglo-American jurisprudence. In fact, the principles of the testimonial privilege may be traced all the way back to the Roman Republic, and its use was firmly established in English law as early as the reign of Elizabeth I in the 16th century. Grounded in the concept of honor, the privilege worked to bar any testimony by the attorney against the client.1

As the privilege has evolved, countless policy justifications have played a role in its development. At its most basic, the privilege ensures “that one who seeks advice or aid from a lawyer should be completely free of any fear that his secrets will be uncovered.”2 Thus, the underlying principle of the privilege is to provide for “sound legal advice [and] advocacy.”3 With the security of the privilege, the client may speak frankly and openly to legal counsel, disclosing all relevant information to the attorney and creating a “zone of privacy.”4 In other words, shielded by the privilege, the client may be more willing to communicate to counsel things that might otherwise be suppressed. In theory, such candor and honesty will assist the attorney in providing more accurate, well-reasoned professional advice, and the client can be secure in the knowledge that his statements to his lawyer will not be taken as an adverse admission or used against his interest.5 Indeed, armed with full knowledge, counselors at law are better equipped to “satisfy all of their professional responsibilities, uphold their duties of good faith and loyalty to the client, and [contribute] to the efficient administration of justice.”6

For all of its policy considerations and justifications, the attorney-client privilege has a very real practical consequence: the attorney may neither be compelled to nor may he or she voluntarily disclose matters conveyed in confidence to him or her by the client for the purpose of seeking legal counsel. Likewise, the client may not be compelled to testify regarding matters communicated to the lawyer for the purpose of seeking legal counsel.

Salem Communications must be pursuing a pretty bizarre agenda if they have Noah Rothman freely posting whatever nonsense pops into his head on this site.

The only one that comes to mind is they are intentionally seeking to discredit the site by driving its commentary down to the “CNN Prime Time Host” level.

Side Note: Clinton’s client was alive at the time the interview/audio was done. The POS died in 1992. Anyone think the POS authorized her disclosure of his privileged communications?

Hint: If he was still alive, he’d stand a fair shot at a settlement in the multi-million dollar range.

PolAgnostic on June 17, 2014 at 8:34 PM

Hillary vs Warren. One FAKE as opposed to another FAKE.

GarandFan on June 17, 2014 at 8:41 PM

CNN’s Dana Bash agreed. “I think we should also look at it from the perspective of the fact she was a young woman in a man’s world in the South,” she qualified. “The question then becomes, did she have a choice to go beyond that and, in the affidavit, what many will view as blaming the victim.”

I’ve lived my entire life in the southern states, and have not found a societal tolerance for rapists, much less child molesters.

Yes, we recognize the right of an accused to legal representation, and understand that a lawyer has a duty to represent their client to the best of their ability.

But bragging about getting a child molester a lighter sentence due to a technicality, and mocking a 12 year-old rape victim? That seems a bit over the top, even for a Democrat lawyer. But maybe the victim was the child of a white Republican, so from a certain point of view she was justified in the bragging and mocking, since from that viewpoint a white Republican’s child deserves to be raped, because of ‘white privilege’ or something.

s1im on June 17, 2014 at 7:50 PM

I imagine we should all be aware that Hilary is just as much a victim of the patriarchy now as all women, everywhere. It’s not her fault that the entirety of the left confine their championship of women to whatever meets their best political interests at the time.

Recon5 on June 17, 2014 at 8:52 PM

you may laugh at her now but she will be the one laughing when she is your ruler..

ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch on June 17, 2014 at 7:34 PM

Strange. When I left the UK, I was a ‘subject.’ When I moved to the US, I became a citizen.

Elected politicians are not my rulers. They are my public servants.

Resist We Much on June 17, 2014 at 7:44 PM

Looks like the troll’s Freudian slip is showing.

CurtZHP on June 17, 2014 at 9:08 PM

Ball delivered the unkindest cut of all when she asked if Clinton is the Democratic version of Mitt Romney.

More like the Democratics’ Bob Dole. “It’s my turn now!”

slickwillie2001 on June 17, 2014 at 9:16 PM

We are being force fed a Hillary candidacy by a bunch of liberal 50- and 60-something women who control most of what we see on television and read in the newspapers. Gloria Borger is one of them. Notice that the younger women on this panel aren’t buying what Borger is selling.

Women of Hillary’s generation want her to be President. Almost nobody else does.

rockmom on June 17, 2014 at 9:31 PM

Elizabeth Warren… There is nothing, in my mind, that is more of a definitive moment in proving someone’s real-world incompetence than a serious opinion that the half-witted fake indian that underperformed Obama in liberal Massachusetts by 15 points should be their party’s nominee in 2016.

That’s just flat out brain dead. I give you Krystal Ball.

deadrody on June 17, 2014 at 9:33 PM

Sometimes I think we should lay off her for now in hopes that somehow she manages to get the Dem nomination, because once that happened she would be an easy take down.

anotherJoe on June 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM

Easier than Warren?

blink on June 17, 2014 at 7:39 PM

Yeah, no. I can’t imagine someone that people actually think could win the Democratic nomination that would be easier to beat than Elizabeth Warren. The very definition of an empty suit with literally nothing of substance to say

deadrody on June 17, 2014 at 9:37 PM

Not to worry everyone, Amanda Marcotte has declared that this is no big deal

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/06/17/hillary_clinton_defended_an_accused_rapist_in_1975_good.html

yes the same one that immediately determined that the duke “rapists” were guilty and should be strung up…this case however was great lawyering…..I wonder if she, herself would have accepted the case knowing the scumbag was guilty…he being “pro” woman and all…..

lostinjrz on June 17, 2014 at 9:45 PM

Dana B has a weird hotness about her. Gloria B is just a garden-variety liberal hack. All three are media liberals who think they are cleverly passing themselves off as professional journalists.

Who’s going to tell them? Certainly not Jake the tapper.

Jaibones on June 17, 2014 at 9:49 PM

She added that Clinton’s brand as a “champion of women and girls” is damaged by the revelation that she attacked the character of a child rape victim. “I think it really pokes a hole in that narrative,” Keilar submitted.

I’m sorry. The Clinton’s have been attacking the character of rape victims since at least as far back as the Governor’s Mansion in Arkansas.

This isn’t news to anyone paying attention.

Washington Nearsider on June 17, 2014 at 9:50 PM

That’s just flat out brain dead. I give you Krystal Ball.

deadrody on June 17, 2014 at 9:33 PM

Heh. Yes, please bring on Fauxcahontas as the Dimmwit nominee.

Jaibones on June 17, 2014 at 9:51 PM

In related news, MSNBC’s Krystal Ball continues to wage her war against Clinton from the left.

Am I right to assume that Krystal Ball is a drag queen? With a name like that!

thuja on June 17, 2014 at 9:56 PM

Hillary Clinton is not, NOT the Democratic Mitt Romney!

Mitt has talent and achievements.
Also, he’s not ugly and lacks cankles.

orangemtl on June 17, 2014 at 10:31 PM

Let me add to the war on women; tell the fat chick to put on some clothes. Does she think she’s at happy hour trying to pick up some wall street dweeb?

peacenprosperity on June 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM

You can’t expect much from someone who calls themselves ThisIsYourBrainOnKoch.
Except maybe a lot of laughs. KochBrain is fun to laugh at.

Closet Optimist on June 17, 2014 at 10:55 PM

Would that we still had Hitchens alive with us today!

Tzetzes on June 17, 2014 at 11:21 PM

Hillary Clinton, the Left’s Todd Akin, and an even bigger jackass!

MWC_RS on June 18, 2014 at 1:00 AM

Hillary laughs after admitting she defended a child rapist ( knowing he was a child rapist)

it forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs *laughter*

MWC_RS on June 18, 2014 at 1:05 AM

Would that we still had Hitchens alive with us today!

Tzetzes on June 17, 2014 at 11:21 PM

Keep in mind that Hitchens was a Marxist at the time and was attacking the Clintons from the Left when he wrote that book. I mean I’m okay with that, I’m okay with hard core fringe lefties like Warren showing the world how awful human beings the Clintons really are ( the MSM might actually report it if the attacks are from a democrat)

But you should clarify, Hitchens wasn’t “with us” at that time, and arguably never ever was “with us” though the War on Terror seemed to turn him from a anti-imperialist Marxist, into a atleast robust national defense guy ( not sure if he ever changed on domestic ideology though)

MWC_RS on June 18, 2014 at 1:08 AM

thuja

Krystal Ball’s problem is clearly genetic and we should stop mocking her and MSNBC should stop taking advantage of her disabilities. Any parent who would name there child after a stripper is clearly intellectually deficient. It really ain’t her fault she’s brain dead. The DNC really owes her an apology for forcing her to run against Rob Wittman in 2010 and simultaneously wearing a Dildo hat.

MWC_RS on June 18, 2014 at 1:10 AM

there

This is where I wish HotAir had an edit function.
Should read *their* not there.

MWC_RS on June 18, 2014 at 1:11 AM

She’s not done anything here she didn’t do for her husband. After all, handling
“bimbo eruptions” for guilty men has long been her specialty.

unclesmrgol on June 20, 2014 at 3:38 PM