Video: Live Action launches Planned Parenthood Exposed

posted at 3:21 pm on May 28, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The pro-life organization Live Action has launched a new website platform for its continuing investigation and exposure of the nation’s largest abortion-mill chain, and issued a new report on its abuses. Planned Parenthood Exposed will soon feature videos from ongoing undercover probes, but starts off today with an introductory look at the effort:

“Now that you know,” the video asks, “what will you do?” The site also has a Spring 2014 analysis of its current and past investigations into Planned Parenthood, including heartbreaking stories like this:

In 2002, a 39-year-old man impregnated his 13-year-old stepdaughter. He took her to a Planned Parenthood facility in Santa Clara, California for a pregnancy test that summer, and again in December for an abortion. Planned Parenthood referred the girl to San Francisco University hospital, where her 22-week baby was killed.

After the abortion, the sexual abuse continued until the following summer, when the girl’s mother discovered the medical records from the abortion. Only then was the stepfather arrested.

Presented with two opportunities to intervene, Planned Parenthood asked no questions regarding
the suspicious circumstances and returned this young girl to her abuser.

The report also attacks PP’s “deceptive and manipulative counseling”:

Our investigators received an overwhelming breadth of medical misinformation from the Planned Parenthood facilities we audited in 2009. Even the most basic fetal development information was distorted in the Planned Parenthood counseling room – for example, in Appleton, Wisconsin, the Planned Parenthood nurse told our investigators that “heartbeat is when the fetus is active in the uterus – can survive – which is about 17 or 18 weeks.” In truth, the human fetus’s heart begins to beat by four weeks (8). Meanwhile, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, our investigators were told that a child in the womb at six to eight weeks’ gestation has “no legs, no arms, no head, no brain, no heart.” Tis could not be farther from the truth (9).

Coincidentally, Michael Brendan Dougherty writes at The Week about the same lack of scientific accuracy from the pro-abortion movement as a whole, in answer to critics who charged Marco Rubio with getting the science of conception wrong:

Is the beginning of a human life something we can know? Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) claimed recently that human life begins at conception, and that this is a scientific fact.

There are two stock responses to such a statement, both obscurantist. The first is the tack Philip Bump took in trying to create a gotcha blog post about Rubio’s statement. Bump promised to boldly look into the science of human life’s origins, and boldly came back saying that there isn’t any. After querying a medical definition of pregnancy and sending it to Rubio’s office for comment, Bump threw up his hands and retreated from the science altogether …

The science is pretty straightforward about when a human life begins. You can watch visualizations of it on YouTube. After the fusion of sperm and egg, the resulting zygote has a unique human DNA from which we can deduce the identity of its biological parents. It begins the process of cell division, and it has a metabolic action that will not end until it dies, whether that is in a few days because it never implants on the uterine wall, or years later in a gruesome fishing accident, or a century later in a hospital room filled with beloved grandchildren.

In the case of identical twins, the zygote divides and two separate metabolic processes begin using the same genetic code. This is an observed phenomena. Hand-waving about whether we categorize viruses as “life,” for example, doesn’t obtrude on these facts, since human zygotes cannot develop into viruses or non-human forms of life. Biology doesn’t really give us options for when an individual life begins, at least none that we could deny without also denying our ability to know whether any individual members of a species “really exist.”

Truth in this case is the most potent weapon. Keep your eyes on the new Planned Parenthood Exposed site for upcoming exposés about the leading providers of abortion — and the half-billion dollars they get from American taxpayers each year.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Hyde Amendment, Schmyde Amendment…

Newtie and the Beauty on May 28, 2014 at 3:26 PM

Oh, and Bishop!

Newtie and the Beauty on May 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM

Planned Hood of Ghouls.

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 3:28 PM

Every time I hear how much of our tax dollars go to PP I rage. They should not get a dime from us.

Conservative4Ever on May 28, 2014 at 3:28 PM

The three ps: Planned Parenthood Perversion

russedav on May 28, 2014 at 3:35 PM

But…. but, but… mammograms!

The Schaef on May 28, 2014 at 3:37 PM

There are two types of genocide: The first results in tanks from the world’s armies rolling through your capital city. The second gets you generous gifts from the treasury.

Occams Stubble on May 28, 2014 at 3:38 PM

Melissa Perry of MSNBC said that Planned Parenthood is making money off of the bodies of black babies, or something

faraway on May 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM

Yes, because many girls Mothers fail to notice their 13 year old suddenly has a 22 week old bun-in-the-oven.

HopeHeFails on May 28, 2014 at 3:48 PM

PP : Supporting statutory rape is cool.

CW on May 28, 2014 at 3:50 PM

Oh come on..isn’t this question answered already? I read where Sarah Silverman stated that it was just goo. And since she’s constantly being a spokeswoman for liberals then you know it’s true. It’s on the internet! Take a look for yourself: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-silverman-bravely-admits-shes-never-had-an-abortion-on-maher/

sweet mary…I almost made myself ill just typing this post.

Renee on May 28, 2014 at 3:56 PM

In truth, the human fetus’s heart begins to beat by four weeks.

Not to argue with the main point, but I would like to see the scientific proof of this statement. It contradicts both of my wife’s nursing manuals, American and Russian, so a politically biased distortion is unlikely.

Rix on May 28, 2014 at 3:56 PM

God bless em. I mean it they are speaking for the most innocent and defenseless.

Its going to take a great deal of praying for mercy and grace to crack thru that deflector shield of judicial blindness out there.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 3:58 PM

Oh, and Bishop!

Newtie and the Beauty on May 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM

Heh! Hi Newtie, it’s ok to say Bishop? Noob needs to know ;)

Bakokitty on May 28, 2014 at 4:06 PM

America’s war on her children was started in ernest when Roe vs Wade was passed.

Bakokitty on May 28, 2014 at 4:11 PM

Heh! Hi Newtie, it’s ok to say Bishop? Noob needs to know ;)

Bakokitty on May 28, 2014 at 4:06 PM

How-DEEEE, Kitty!

And yes, it is ;-)

Newtie and the Beauty on May 28, 2014 at 4:16 PM

Coincidentally, Michael Brendan Dougherty writes at The Week….. in answer to critics who charged Marco Rubio with getting the science of conception wrong

And with a somewhat similar lack of accuracy. The more important question on the abortion issue is not when life begins but, does the zygote or fetus possess the individual right to life. The pre-requisite for possessing the individual right to life is to first be an individual human being. An essential characteristic of which is to possess a particular type of consciousness. The fetus does not possess this.

None of this, in my view, validates PP. Seems to me they are quite corrupt. Gov’t doesn’t belong in any aspect of the medical industry.

beselfish on May 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM

Planned Parenthood Exposed
posted at 3:21 pm on May 28, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Ed –

The bogeyman angle is not only false, it’s also ineffective.
All that is accomplished is a courser and more crass rhetoric that shrinks the base to even fewer hardcore activists.
So cheer this if you want, but I’m confident you do so at the expense of reducing abortions.
PP is not populated by evil ghouls who support incestuous rape of young girls. That lie can be sold easily to a few (read the comments), but not at all to many.
You need to re-think what you’re embracing by supporting this stuff.

A little OT, have you seen this piece over at Politico?
Fascinating look at the how the abortion issue was cynically co-opted by the right for political reasons – not moral ones.

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

Renee on May 28, 2014 at 4:04 PM

Interesting and educational, thanks. What these sources refer to as “heart” and “heartbeat” are not exactly the terms one would apply to a grown human body, but the development process itself is fascinating. At least I’ll know better how to handle the “viability” line of argumentation.

Rix on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

Melissa Perry of MSNBC said that Planned Parenthood is making money off of the bodies of black babies, or something

faraway on May 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM

Oh! I’m sure that isn’t true. She mocks black babies.

Happy Nomad on May 28, 2014 at 4:35 PM

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

You’d be funny if you weren’t so stuck in the dark.

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 4:35 PM

PP is not populated by evil ghouls who support incestuous rape of young girls. That lie can be sold easily to a few (read the comments), but not at all to many.

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

You are full of BS. Killing babies is their cash cow. Anybody who works there is, indeed a soul-less ghoul, an evil human being not worthy of the life they have been given. They will all burn in hell.

Happy Nomad on May 28, 2014 at 4:37 PM

You’d be funny if you weren’t so stuck in the dark.

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 4:35 PM

P.S. Randall Balmer is a leftist idiot. Of course you would love his dumb@$$ery.

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 4:38 PM

hope they don’t plan to use youtube as the actual video host, crap can get taken down so easily there.
I thought I read last week o’keefe was going to do something with planned parenthood, is this it? I didn’t watch the vids or anything as I got too many things downloading now to do so.

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

a racist child killer says what??

dmacleo on May 28, 2014 at 4:45 PM

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

I’m sorry, I couldn’t hear the “coarser and more crass rhetoric” over the 50 million screams of lives snuffed out by abortion in this country alone.

And you’re f*&%ing kidding me if you think the kind if people that support Planned Parenthood aren’t a vulgar, nasty lot.

BKennedy on May 28, 2014 at 4:46 PM

I don’t think this is a very effective ad at all. Why do a video with no people in it? When a video ad is all just pastel-colored animations, I’m left uninterested.

Not that I don’t support their mission – it’s vital. But come on, in the present world of video and information that we inhabit, they are going to have to do a lot better work to get their message to penetrate anything.

Harbingeing on May 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM

An essential characteristic of which [life] is to possess a particular type of consciousness. The fetus does not possess this.

beselfish on May 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM

How do you know? Can you measure spiritual consciousness or tell us anything about a human being’s spiritual connection to the body, when that happens or how it happens? Can you not distinguish the difference between the body, the mind, and the spirit?

Harbingeing on May 28, 2014 at 4:57 PM

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

Final word and suggestion: you’re not well advised to comment on threads where your stupidity is so easily discerned.
Now run along, pajama boy. Try to get OFA to pay you but I think they’re outta Obamabucks.
Pffft!

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 4:58 PM

PP is not populated by evil ghouls who support incestuous rape of young girls.

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

Strawman. They’re not ghouls, they’re human beings cheerfully killing other human beings–i.e., performing evil acts. With public funding. And doing all kinds of other despicable stuff too.

spiritof61 on May 28, 2014 at 4:59 PM

Captain Obvious says, “People who kill babies for a living just might do other unethical things as well.”

eMatters on May 28, 2014 at 5:01 PM

Captain Obvious says, “People who kill babies for a living just might do other unethical things as well.”

eMatters on May 28, 2014 at 5:01 PM

There’s no connection between views on abortion and ethics on other matters that I’m aware of. The US is pretty evenly split between pro-life and pro-choice.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:18 PM

verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM
Bless yer heart.

PP is not populated by evil ghouls

There IS such a thang as having been DELUDED into acting in EVIL ways.
Many who escape PP and the abortion industry speak PRECISELY to that.
They were DELUDED into believing they we doing the right things.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 5:19 PM

does the zygote or fetus possess the individual right to life. The pre-requisite for possessing the individual right to life is to first be an individual human being. An essential characteristic of which is to possess a particular type of consciousness. The fetus does not possess this.

beselfish on May 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM

You will, of course, be happy to cite all your authoritative sources and court cases which prove that a right to life for a human being is preconditioned to “possess a particular type of consciousness”.

Please define “particular” as well, since even people who are in a vegetative state and presumed to have NO consciousness may not be killed by an act of violence.

In fact, you have made this whole line of reasoning up, and you will find nothing at all which states a human being loses that individual right to life if a “particular type of consciousness” is missing.

Of course, it makes YOU feel better to think that the person that is killed during an abortion is lacking something fundamental: I will admit that stating that the object of the murder is the Other and does not deserve life is really well-trodden ground, even if a bit blood-soaked.

Why not just admit that convenience in one’s sex life is more important to you than sniveling little babies who cannot benefit you in any way?

I’m waiting for you pro-aborts to just man up and say what you really believe, but you’re such cowards.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:21 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:18 PM

Do you think everyone who claims to support abortion is willing to actually wield the stainless steel instruments that cut the tiny little body into pieces?

Are they all willing to get the blood and amniotic fluid all over their hands, and flush the remains down the drain?

Are you ready to do it?

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:24 PM

Captain Obvious says, “People who oppose gay marriage and killing babies for a living just might do other unethical things as well.”

eMatters on May 28, 2014 at 5:01 PM

Fixed it for you in light of this:

The Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices found that the National Organization for Marriage violated campaign finance laws by failing to properly register as a ballot question committee and file financial reports in the 2009 referendum that struck down gay marriage. Same-sex unions were legalized by voters in 2012.

http://news.yahoo.com/maine-fines-national-anti-gay-marriage-group-172644164.html

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:18 PM

Do you think everyone who claims to support abortion is willing to actually wield the stainless steel instruments that cut the tiny little body into pieces?

Are they all willing to get the blood and amniotic fluid all over their hands, and flush the remains down the drain?

Are you ready to do it?

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:24 PM

I don’t know. It’s irrelevant to the claim of whether people who are pro-choice lie or are otherwise more unethical than people who are pro-life.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:27 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM

You’re guilty as charged so you make lame excuses.

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 5:28 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM

Oh! Oh! Look over there! Shiny object! Change the subject changethesubjectquickquick!

Pissant.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:29 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:18 PM

Aren’t we talking about ‘ends justify the means’ ??
Carry that onward ..oh, sorry .. EVOLVE that thinking, and ..
Whatcha get ??

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 5:31 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:27 PM

How clueless are you really?

The question was whether people who work at PP/kill babies for a living might do other unethical things, and you pirouette gracelessly to half the country supports abortion.

Are YOU willing to kill babies? You seem to believe “support” is the same thing as working at an abortion mill, so I guess the answer is yes.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:32 PM

I see the disciples of Molech have presented their drivel.

CurtZHP on May 28, 2014 at 5:33 PM

When asked if abortion supporters would actually be willing to perform abortions, jimbo replies:

I don’t know.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:27 PM

Why don’t you know, jimmy?

Are YOU willing? Is performing an abortion exactly the same as supporting abortion?

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:35 PM

Child sacrifice is chekist jimbo3′s aka jim56 favorite thing.

Nothing gets that cold black heart of his racing like forceps piercing a skull.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 5:37 PM

When asked if abortion supporters would actually be willing to perform abortions, jimbo replies:

I don’t know.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:27 PM

Why don’t you know, jimmy?

Are YOU willing? Is performing an abortion exactly the same as supporting abortion?

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:35 PM

I would be willing to pay for one, yes.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:38 PM

Hey jumbo would it be easier if you could just tell those fetuses what you told Emily M to do? I know it got your reprobate chucks banned last time, but maybe you could reprise your swan song, as it were.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 5:38 PM

Come on jim56: you’ve attempted to erect a badly constructed strawman about the equivalence of performing an abortion for profit and supporting abortion as a general idea, as well as bringing up some totally unrelated alleged wrong-doing by someone else, but you can’t hide.

Answer or flee.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM

Is jim56 Armin? I guess all ghouls have that same offensive aura and it doesn’t matter.

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM

Come on, pajama boy, answer the question asked of you.

No one asked about paying for it.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:40 PM

Just do a site search and look at the demonic drivel jimbo3 put forth all those cycles ago before he got banned for being brave for once and telling someone what he really thought. Never answer any of its questions.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM

Come on, pajama boy, answer the question asked of you.

No one asked about paying for it.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:40 PM

It would be illegal for me to do so, because I’m not a doctor.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM

RE: pambi on May 28, 2014 at 5:19 PM
(Sorry, got interrupted)

A delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary. [1] As a pathology, it is distinct from a belief based on false or incomplete information

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM

Is performing an abortion for profit exactly the same as supporting abortion in general?

jim56?

Why can’t you answer?

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:43 PM

It would be illegal for me to do so, because I’m not a doctor. I think I hear my mother calling me.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM

It would be illegal for me to do so, because I’m not a doctor.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM

With hospital admittance privileges, in case sumpin’ goes wrong, y’mean ??

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM

Recycled trolls smell funny.

CurtZHP on May 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM

Is performing an abortion for profit exactly the same as supporting abortion in general?

jim56?

Why can’t you answer?

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:43 PM

Probably not.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:49 PM

Child sacrifice is chekist jimbo3′s aka jim56 favorite thing.

Nothing gets that cold black heart of his racing like forceps piercing a skull.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 5:37 PM

Nothing gets your heart racing like lying about people you disagree with, like your claim yesterday I was a “sodomite”. Got any proof for anything you say about me, you worthless troll?

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:51 PM

50% of aborted fetuses have no Y chromosome. Planned Parenthood is the undoubted leader in the War on Women, as it kills over 100,000 future women every year. But feminists are strangely silent. Why?

The beloved founder of PP is Margaret Sanger, who pushed for abortion to limit the number of negro children (again, half of them female). The disproportionate number of abortions performed on black mothers screams racism. But we only hear crickets from the racial grievance mongers. Why?

spiritof61 on May 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM

Probably not.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:49 PM

Probably not. Man up, you little weasel.

It was YOUR contention that the people working at PP/killing babies are exactly the same ethically as anyone else who supports abortion.

So now you grudgingly sorta admit the two things are unrelated?

Your pathetic attempts at changing the subject from the bloody horror that is abortion don’t work in this venue.

Go back to your burrow.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM

Got any proof for anything you say about me, you worthless troll? jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:51 PM

Weasel standing up on its hind legs and baring its teeth.

Skewwy

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:58 PM

Probably not. Man up, you little weasel.

It was YOUR contention that the people working at PP/killing babies are exactly the same ethically as anyone else who supports abortion.

So now you grudgingly sorta admit the two things are unrelated?

Your pathetic attempts at changing the subject from the bloody horror that is abortion don’t work in this venue.

Go back to your burrow.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM

It was my contention that people who perform abortions or who support abortions have no different ethics on other matters than people who are pro-life. Do you have any proof that they are?

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:00 PM

Pro-aborts have Kermit Gosnell, Planned Parenthood protecting rapists and violating notification laws, infanticide, race-based murder of unborn, sex-based murder of unborn, “do I look pretty in this bikini” based murder of unborn.

And Jim comes back with “hey they didn’t file some piece of paper!” as an equivalency?

Waste receptacles for feminine hygiene products are better suited for public display than Jim’s antics.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:06 PM

It was my contention that people who perform abortions or who support abortions have no different ethics on other matters than people who are pro-life.
jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:00 PM

Kidding, right ?
Missed your sarc tag, I guess.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:06 PM

It was my contention that people who perform abortions or who support abortions have no different ethics on other matters than people who are pro-life.
jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:00 PM

Kidding, right ?
Missed your sarc tag, I guess.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:06 PM

No sarc tag. Do you have any “proof”?

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:08 PM

Captain Obvious says, “People who oppose gay marriage and killing babies for a living just might do other unethical things as well.”

eMatters on May 28, 2014 at 5:01 PM

Fixed it for you in light of this:

The Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices found that the National Organization for Marriage violated campaign finance laws by failing to properly register as a ballot question committee and file financial reports in the 2009 referendum that struck down gay marriage. Same-sex unions were legalized by voters in 2012.

http://news.yahoo.com/maine-fines-national-anti-gay-marriage-group-172644164.html

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM

Failed to properly register as the right kind of committe for horrendously complicated campaign finance laws? Well, you really proved what scumbags they are!

Wait, how did we go from abortion to “opposing gay marriage?” Are you that desperate?

Hmm. Maybe people who kill babies are desperate as well as unethical.

Or maybe that’s painting with too broad a brush, and maybe it’s just you.

There Goes the Neighborhood on May 28, 2014 at 6:12 PM

No, Jim. I don’t see any Pro-Lifers out there counseling rape victims on how to protect their rapists. But I do see Pro-Aborts doing that.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:12 PM

No, Jim. I don’t see any Pro-Lifers out there counseling rape victims on how to protect their rapists. But I do see Pro-Aborts doing that.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:12 PM

Some members of the Catholic church did that with respect to child abuse claims against priests.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:16 PM

No sarc tag. Do you have any “proof”?
jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:08 PM

Proof that pro-lifers are more ethical than pro-aborts ?
How about that they don’t NORMALLY side with ‘ends justify the means’ ??
Sure, you might find a few, but all told ?? Nahhhh.
If you’d only open YOUR eyes, you’d see plenty of proofs.
However, me thinks you wouldn’t accept ANYTHING provided, anyway, sooo …

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:17 PM

Coincidentally, Michael Brendan Dougherty writes at The Week….. in answer to critics who charged Marco Rubio with getting the science of conception wrong

And with a somewhat similar lack of accuracy. The more important question on the abortion issue is not when life begins but, does the zygote or fetus possess the individual right to life. The pre-requisite for possessing the individual right to life is to first be an individual human being. An essential characteristic of which is to possess a particular type of consciousness. The fetus does not possess this.

None of this, in my view, validates PP. Seems to me they are quite corrupt. Gov’t doesn’t belong in any aspect of the medical industry.

beselfish on May 28, 2014 at 4:21 PM

So now that we’ve established that life begins at conception, the REAL question changes to whether that life has the right kind of consciousness to be considered a human being.

Sounds a lot like you want some unanswerable question out there so you don’t have to feel bad about the simple fact that abortion kills babies.

If it’s not a human baby, what is it? Are we supposed to go back to pretending it’s just a lump of tissue?

There Goes the Neighborhood on May 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM

Slave owners were very ethical people too. They merely thought that certain humans were chattel property, exactly like you pro-aborts.

Dolce Far Niente on May 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:16 PM

The Art of Deflection

spiritof61 on May 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM

Jim, “some members of the Catholic Church” include reprobates like Pee-lousy, Chappaquidick Kennedy, etc. Not exactly following in Catholic doctrine there.

And I’m saying that as a Protestant.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:19 PM

Oh, and those members of the Catholic Church were not, in fact, counseling rape victims on how to protect their rapists.

As I’m sure you’ve been told before, learn2abc.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:22 PM

No sarc tag. Do you have any “proof”?
jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:08 PM

Proof that pro-lifers are more ethical than pro-aborts ?
How about that they don’t NORMALLY side with ‘ends justify the means’ ??
Sure, you might find a few, but all told ?? Nahhhh.
If you’d only open YOUR eyes, you’d see plenty of proofs.
However, me thinks you wouldn’t accept ANYTHING provided, anyway, sooo …

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:17 PM

Really? Then why were many pro-lifers last night supporting a Texas Attorney General candidate who was fined $1,000 for not registering when solicited clients for a Texas investment firm.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:22 PM

Oh, and those members of the Catholic Church were not, in fact, counseling rape victims on how to protect their rapists.

As I’m sure you’ve been told before, learn2abc.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:22 PM

Sure they were. In some cases, the higher ups talked the victims out of reporting the rapes or convinced the victims that it wouldn’t be a good thing to report the rapes. That was to protect the church and the priests involved.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:25 PM

There goes the douchebaggery again. False equivalency is all he has. Helping protect violent criminals is the same as failing to negotiate all the unnecessary red tape fill out all the right pieces of paper. What a douchebag thing to say, Mr Polanski.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:27 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 6:22 PM

Dayum, sure hope you’re not anywhere’s near a source of flame !
Straw catches quick, dude.

P’raps cuz we’d all heard his side of the story, (I suggest YOU investigate that, too) and decided, unlike YOU, that it was no big friggin’ deal, in perspective.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:29 PM

fined $1,000

I could get fined $500 for missing my customer and turning around in the wrong parking lot. That’s the same thing as running interference for a serial killer in the defense of abortion on demand, or something.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:35 PM

I am a worthless troll.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:51 PM

Edited for clarity. :)

22044 on May 28, 2014 at 6:41 PM

damn socons

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 6:41 PM

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 6:41 PM

*pambi hunts for screen cleaner*

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:45 PM

Me: Your side protects serial killers and rapists in your goals for legally slaughtering millions of unborn babies.

Jim: So? I saw one of you people stop in the crosswalk at a red light.

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:47 PM

Jim, blood dripping from his hands: Stop judging me! I saw you wear white shoes after Labor Day!

John Hitchcock on May 28, 2014 at 6:53 PM

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM

Good Lord !!
Aren’t Botox and mani-pedi parlors subject to more scrutiny/regulations ???

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 6:58 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/15/federal-judge-temporarily-blocks-miss-from-revoking-license-state-only-abortion/

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM

ARe you sure that’s not a repeat of a story from last year? The date above would suggest April 15th, 2013.

There Goes the Neighborhood on May 28, 2014 at 7:09 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/15/federal-judge-temporarily-blocks-miss-from-revoking-license-state-only-abortion/

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM

ARe you sure that’s not a repeat of a story from last year? The date above would suggest April 15th, 2013.

There Goes the Neighborhood on May 28, 2014 at 7:09 PM

Didn’t notice that. Hears the headline and byline:

Federal judge temporarily blocks Miss. from revoking license of state’s only abortion clinic
Published May 28, 2014
Associated Press

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 7:15 PM

A Bing search show several stories from May ’14 and some from from Apr. ’13.

davidk on May 28, 2014 at 7:20 PM

He sits, enthroned above, and laughs at man and how persistently they continually walk in these delusions…
Since He well knows how mankind works.

Jus sayin’.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 7:37 PM

We know who ends in the end, and it isn’t the chekist.

They go straight to hell.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 8:48 PM

I would be willing to pay for one, yes.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 5:38 PM

Why ? When ? Etc.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 8:51 PM

The Spirit of the Age

questionmark on May 28, 2014 at 9:32 PM

PP is not populated by evil ghouls who support incestuous rape of young girls. That lie can be sold easily to a few (read the comments), but not at all to many.
 
verbaluce on May 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

 
+1. The vast majority (99%+) of abortions have absolutely nothing to do with rape or incest.
 
Great point. Thanks for making it.

rogerb on May 28, 2014 at 9:40 PM

We know who ends in the end, and it isn’t the chekist.

They go straight to hell.

Murphy9 on May 28, 2014 at 8:48 PM

For you:

Revelation 21:8 ESV

But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.”

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 10:23 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 10:23 PM

Proof, please.
As per your standard/requirement, is all.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 10:26 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 10:23 PM

Proof, please.
As per your standard/requirement, is all.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 10:26 PM

For one, he called me a sodomite yesterday.

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 10:34 PM

jim56 on May 28, 2014 at 10:34 PM

Mmm, K.
But as I recall, he was referring to the SOCK he believed you were/might be.

pambi on May 28, 2014 at 10:37 PM

Comment pages: 1 2