Breaking: House Republican arrested for obstruction, perjury

posted at 9:21 am on April 28, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The last we heard from Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY), he threatened to throw a reporter off of a balcony. He has bigger problems than anger-management issues today, though. Grimm turned himself in to the FBI today to answer charges of fraud related to a health-food restaurant he owned prior to his election to Congress:

New York Congressman Michael Grimm surrendered to federal authorities today after being indicted on campaign finance violations.

Grimm, a Republican from New York City’s borough of Staten Island, had gained notoriety when he was caught on tape after the State of the Union speech earlier this year threatening to throw a reporter off the Capitol’s balcony and said he would “break you in half, like a boy.”

Grimm, a former FBI agent, was indicted on charges of fraud, obstruction and perjury.

That ABC News report may be slightly inaccurate, at least on the nature of the charges. Grimm had been under investigation for campaign-finance violations, but these charges are not entirely related to that issue, according to the Washington Post:

Grimm spent much of the weekend hunkered down, bracing for the unveiling of the federal charges, which were due to be disclosed after his surrender. He turned himself in to the FBI at an undisclosed location Monday morning and was taken to Lower Manhattan for processing. The charges stem from his ownership of a Manhattan health-food restaurant that has ties to an Israeli fundraiser who served as a liaison between Grimm and a mystic, celebrity rabbi whose followers donated more than $500,000 to Grimm’s campaign in 2010.

While the investigation has focused on Grimm’s fundraising, U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch is expected to announce an indictment centered on his restaurant business, which Grimm launched after leaving the FBI in 2006, according to officials familiar with the investigation who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the pending charges.

The state fined the Upper East Side restaurant, Healthalicious, $88,000 for not providing workers compensation. In a lawsuit against the company, workers accused the owners of not paying proper wages and sometimes giving out cash payments to skirt tax and business laws.

It is unclear whether federal prosecutors will eventually expand the charges to encompass Grimm’s campaign activities, but investigators have been moving on that side of the case against several key players, some with ties to the restaurant.

Jazz wrote about Grimm’s dilemma on Saturday, and noted that the filing deadline for a primary challenge to Grimm had already passed:

The filing deadline for the race in the 11th has already passed. Should this develop into a situation where Grimm either had to step down or was so exposed and injured that he couldn’t possibly prevail, the GOP might still be forced to either run him anyway or allow the Democrats to run for the seat unopposed. It’s not unheard of that, upon appropriate petition, a court could step in and allow the Republican party leaders from the area to put up another candidate, but that’s not a sure thing.

New York television station WPIX reported that others are now questioning the timing of this indictment in relation to the election. They also report that a woman romantically linked to Grimm has been indicted for strawman donations:

The same day Grimm’s attorney announced criminal charges against the lawmaker were pending, a Texas woman who has been romantically involved with Grimm was indicted in New York on charges of making illegal campaign contributions.

Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn unsealed the indictment against Diana Durand on Friday.

The indictment said she caused more than $10,000 in donations to be made in the names of other people between November 2009 and October 2010. It says she lied in June 2012 when she told the FBI she didn’t reimburse straw donors for their contributions to Grimm’s campaign.

Durand’s attorney Stuart Kaplan said his client and Grimm became friends before he ran for office. He said she’ll plead not guilty.

When Robert Torricelli turned out to be toxically corrupt, New Jersey courts allowed Democrats to replace him on the ballot with the late Frank Lautenberg, even though the filing deadline for ballot changes had passed. New York Republicans may want to start that process now, but it’s no slam dunk that the court in New York will follow suit even under similar circumstances. Republicans might end up stuck with Grimm on the ticket.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

When does Holder send out the Cheka?

Murphy9 on April 28, 2014 at 9:24 AM

Considering -0- Dem arrests for Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS-Gate AND A DOZEN OTHER SCANDALS this HAS to be bias!

MaiDee on April 28, 2014 at 9:26 AM

I’m sure a number of IRS employees will be next.

jmtham156 on April 28, 2014 at 9:27 AM

Ain’t politics grand.

tdarrington on April 28, 2014 at 9:29 AM

I will be interested in something like this, when they do the same to Reid…

right2bright on April 28, 2014 at 9:30 AM

He’s a solid Peter King repub, in other words he’s a democrat. Remember when he tore into the Tea Party concept?

DanMan on April 28, 2014 at 9:30 AM

I’ll ask again-

Am I supposed to care because he has an “R” next to his name? I only ask because my days of allegiance to a party that is nothing more than the lesser of two evils are over.

M240H on April 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM

A Dem would get an award for campaign shenanigans.

faraway on April 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM

His politics and miscreanty aside, and he should be replaced…but he has more honor than any Democrat.

22044 on April 28, 2014 at 9:32 AM

to answer charges of fraud related to a health-food restaurant he owned prior to his election to Congress:
=======================================

I wonder if the NSA was involved,…at Nixons,..er,..Hopey’s
direction!
(snark)

canopfor on April 28, 2014 at 9:32 AM

New York television station WPIX reported that others are now questioning the timing of this indictment in relation to the election

The United States of America’s Federal Department of Justice timing an indictment to harm the Republican party for the benefit of the Fascist-Democrat party. I would be shocked, except that Eric Holder is in charge.

The corruption in the federal bureaucracy is wide and deep. The only answer is an early spring pruning that goes way deep.

rbj on April 28, 2014 at 9:33 AM

Arrested.

“Like a boy”

BobMbx on April 28, 2014 at 9:34 AM

Maybe he’s guilty, but if he were a Democrat this wouldn’t be happening.

forest on April 28, 2014 at 9:34 AM

When does the anger and frustration finally break through the din of pop culture and get people to really change the system?

tdarrington on April 28, 2014 at 9:36 AM

Page 1 above the fold yet Leland Yee crickets

neyney on April 28, 2014 at 9:37 AM

I’ll ask again-

Am I supposed to care because he has an “R” next to his name? I only ask because my days of allegiance to a party that is nothing more than the lesser of two evils are over.

M240H on April 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM

Same here. I couldn’t care less anymore. As long as the country continues to decline into the muck the whole system can go to h3ll as far as I’m concerned.

HiJack on April 28, 2014 at 9:38 AM

A lot of people seem willing to lower their standards because the other side is scum. That’s not a good thing.

ElectricPhase on April 28, 2014 at 9:38 AM

At least they finally managed to put a politician’s party affiliation in the first sentence of the story. /

Fenris on April 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM

Just another day in New York, a sleazeball caught doing something sleazy.

So when exactly does Rangel get the indictment for failing to report his rental income, they could put them both on trial simultaneously and save some money.

Bishop on April 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM

Why bother? It’s New York, let the Dems have it.

Cindy Munford on April 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM

Bishop on April 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM

Racist.

Cindy Munford on April 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM

Don’t trust anybody with a “D” or an “R” (and sometimes “I”) next to their name.

RayinVA on April 28, 2014 at 9:45 AM

Arrested.

“Like a boy”

BobMbx on April 28, 2014 at 9:34 AM

.
It’s kinda ‘grim’, but I would still call this “thread winner”.

listens2glenn on April 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM

So, when are all the Fiesta Bowl strawman donators going to be indicted?

corona79 on April 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM

Maybe he’s guilty, but if he were a Democrat this wouldn’t be happening.

forest on April 28, 2014 at 9:34 AM

If he were a democrat, this would be a resume enhancement. He’d be the 2016 frontrunner.

CurtZHP on April 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM

He is a global warming fear merchant peddling more government control, higher energy prices, and a lower standard of living. Funny that the people making the global warming documentary Years of Living Dangerously are having this guy front and center at this time:

You’ve probably heard about Years of Living Dangerously, the big-budget, nine-part documentary on the supposedly dire threat posed by global warming.

Part three airs this Sunday on Showtime, and it stars Republican Representative Michael Grimm (NY). The story arc follows Rep. Grimm’s conversion from global warming skeptic to believer. In a nutshell, here’s the plot: Grimm had been a denier, but then he talked to former South Carolina Representative Bob Inglis,* and now he’s really scared of climate change.

airupthere on April 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM

I wonder if the NSA was involved,…at Nixons,..er,..Hopey’s direction! (snark) canopfor on April 28, 2014 at 9:32 AM

We pretty much have to assume that nowadays.

Akzed on April 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM

So glad I went door to door for this guy in 2010. Had I known (then we all would have, right?)…

Sheesh.

Rixon on April 28, 2014 at 10:01 AM

Someone remind me.

Where is Charlie Rangel now;

Since the accusations were first raised two years ago, Mr. Rangel has acknowledged bookkeeping errors in his financial disclosure forms and has said that his failure to pay more than $60,000 in taxes on rental income from a Dominican beach house was an oversight, caused, in part, by his inability to speak Spanish.

Mel Reynolds;

Less than a year after disgraced former Rep. Mel Reynolds ran a failed bid for Congress under the slogan of “redemption,” the convicted sex offender is again facing allegations of sexual misconduct, this time in Zimbabwe, according to immigration officials and state media reports…

President Bill Clinton commuted Reynolds’ fraud sentence in 2001, with two years remaining to be served. After his release, Reynolds tried repeatedly to regain his congressional seat, including an attempt last year to succeed disgraced former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.

Jesse Jackson Jr .:

Former Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. plans to sell his home in Washington to help pay a $750,000 forfeiture judgment, a part of his sentence for illegally dipping into his campaign coffers and spending the money on rock ’n’ roll memorabilia, furs, capes, vacations and other personal items. His lawyers and federal prosecutors mentioned the plan in a filing Friday in Federal District Court in Washington. Mr. Jackson is expected to enter prison within several weeks for the 2 ½-year prison term that was imposed in August. His wife, Sandra, a former Chicago alderman, was given a yearlong sentence for filing false income tax returns related to the misspent funds. She will serve her time after her husband is released. The sale of the Jacksons’ town house in Washington could enable them to keep their Chicago home.

Should I go on?

If Grimm is guilty. Meaning he is correctly convicted by a court of law in full view of the evidence, then he should pay the price.

But this smells like a political witch hunt, where the government has put the full resources of law enforcement to work and suspiciously timed an indictment.

That’s not justice. It’s the Democrat Party Stasi at work.

Democrats and the DoJ are getting desperate to distract people from the absolute economic trainwreck and lawless government they have presided over. They realize a distraction from the real issues is needed.

Well here you go.

Marcus Traianus on April 28, 2014 at 10:01 AM

Why bother? It’s New York, let the Dems have it.

Cindy Munford on April 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM

That’s why we keep losing to them. We look at NY and say hopeless state – who cares? They look at Texas and see a challenge.

crrr6 on April 28, 2014 at 10:02 AM

Marcus Traianus on April 28, 2014 at 10:01 AM

While agree with you wholeheartedly, it doesn’t excuse Michael Grimm’s actions if, and when, he is indicted and convicted.

Democrat criminality (excuse the redundancy there) will 99.999% be ignore, excused or somehow mitigated. We have got to do a better job of vetting our candidates. Because the corollary to the last sentence is .0000001% of Republican criminality will be broadcast, trumpeted, examined and persecuted/prosecuted regardless of the facts and circumstances.

Rixon on April 28, 2014 at 10:05 AM

That’s why we keep losing to them. We look at NY and say hopeless state – who cares? They look at Texas and see a challenge.

crrr6 on April 28, 2014 at 10:02 AM

THIS.

Rixon on April 28, 2014 at 10:06 AM

The charges stem from his ownership of a Manhattan health-food restaurant that has ties to an Israeli fundraiser who served as a liaison between Grimm and a mystic, celebrity rabbi whose followers donated more than $500,000 to Grimm’s campaign in 2010.

American Hustle

WhatSlushfund on April 28, 2014 at 10:06 AM

Oh no, this isn’t a politically motivated indictment, at all! I’m suuuuure……..

GWB on April 28, 2014 at 10:07 AM

crrr6 on April 28, 2014 at 10:02 AM

This is beyond a challenge. You have this guy indicated and Rangel free as the breeze. And Peter King is the best they can come up with for a Republican. Before I die they will get rid of the Electoral College and New York and California will decide all the elections and the death spiral will accelerate for the good old USA.

Cindy Munford on April 28, 2014 at 10:08 AM

Don’t defend him, remind people of Democrats with cash in their freezer, move on.

Or… do something stupid. I’m be sure to read what this is tonight on cnn.com

PBH on April 28, 2014 at 10:08 AM

Oh wow… He was gun running?
No.

He let a woman drown in a car he wrecked?
No.

He slept with a minor?
No.

So he’s getting the perp walk because…
He paid people in cash to skirt the law.
Oh so he’s guilty of…
Right, the same thing Harry Reid did.

Skywise on April 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM

No mystery party storyline here!

FruitedPlain on April 28, 2014 at 10:16 AM

I wonder if the NSA was involved,…at Nixons,..er,..Hopey’s direction! (snark) canopfor on April 28, 2014 at 9:32 AM

We pretty much have to assume that nowadays.

Akzed on April 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM

Akzed: Agreed:)

canopfor on April 28, 2014 at 10:17 AM

Brings to mind the bogus charges, made against Tom DeLay, by a democrat DA in Houston. Whose only purpose, was to eliminate a powerful, effective Republican.

kjatexas on April 28, 2014 at 10:17 AM

Same here. I couldn’t care less anymore. As long as the country continues to decline into the muck the whole system can go to h3ll as far as I’m concerned.
HiJack on April 28, 2014 at 9:38 AM

I’ll agree the I’m more than ready to form a third party and force both the GOP and the DNC into their graves and even watch the country fall into economic despair because the people are to stupid to understand their rights but I will NOT let this country abandon the constitution.

Skywise on April 28, 2014 at 10:19 AM

Why bother? It’s New York, let the Dems have it.

Cindy Munford on April 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM

That’s why we keep losing to them. We look at NY and say hopeless state – who cares? They look at Texas and see a challenge.

crrr6 on April 28, 2014 at 10:02 AM

Who is this “we” that you speak of? I ask because the Republican party certainly does not look at me and think “we”. They look at Peter King and think “we”, they look at this Grimm fellow and think “we”, they look at Christie and think “we”; I look at those pieces of sh** and think … well, they frown mightily at expressing what I think about that around here.

And since Grimm is a Staten Island boy, and S.I. is on of the five boroughs, please tell me what “we’re” going to win in the financial capitol of the world that willing elected, by a freaking landslide, avowed Marxist DeBlasio?

Unless by “win” you’re implying military action.

M240H on April 28, 2014 at 10:24 AM

He will plead “MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL!!” at his arraignment, and the indictments will immediately be dismissed.

cdog0613 on April 28, 2014 at 10:34 AM

I knew something was up with this guy when he quickly disappeared post election.

I thought he was going to be part of the Scott Brown/Paul Ryan camp, but one of the last times I saw him, he was going against either the GOP or the base. At that point, I could see the expiration clock ticking.

Enough of the FBI agents as politicians. Enough with the lawyers. And if Petraeus saddles up with the Dems, enough with the career military.

budfox on April 28, 2014 at 10:35 AM

He’s a solid Peter King repub, in other words he’s a democrat. Remember when he tore into the Tea Party concept?

DanMan

More so than you think. He’s a big convert to believing in “climate change”, appearing as one of the big stars of the silly “The Year Of Living Dangerously”.

William Teach on April 28, 2014 at 10:47 AM

And what was it Harry Reid did with his election funds? He gets away with it and the (R) gets to go to jail. Ain’t life grand?

Pardonme on April 28, 2014 at 10:47 AM

…Harry Reid… is smiling!

KOOLAID2 on April 28, 2014 at 11:00 AM

Republicans might end up stuck with Grimm on the ticket.

Be funny as hell if he still got re-elected. It would be worth it just to see the Democrats complain and once again choke on their own hypocrisy!

GarandFan on April 28, 2014 at 11:06 AM

When Robert Torricelli turned out to be toxically corrupt, New Jersey courts allowed Democrats to replace him on the ballot with the late Frank Lautenberg, even though the filing deadline for ballot changes had passed. New York Republicans may want to start that process now, but it’s no slam dunk that the court in New York will follow suit even under similar circumstances. Republicans might end up stuck with Grimm on the ticket.

There’s still time for the Selection Committee on Vacancies to choose a substitute if Grimm steps down. All it takes is a quorum of the committee to designate a substitute. A quick breeze through election law (SS6-148) suggests the deadline for a Congressional Rep is 20 September, but I could be wrong.

Dusty on April 28, 2014 at 11:06 AM

The “timing” of these campaign fraud charges against Grimm just before a major election is a typical movement made by his opponents. I honestly do not understand why the Democrat party is so critical about the methods used by Grimm to get campaign-donations. He is using EXACTLY the same methods used by the abysmally corrupt Clinton administration ! Remember James Riady ? That man pumped millions of dollars of illegal foreign money directly into the Democrat party and the White House. Riady and 24 other people pleaded guilty on felony and misdemeanor charges. Meanwhile the people who initiated this scam, Bill Clinton and Al Gore walked away untouched. (The totally corrupt Janet Reno made sure that no criminal-charges were filed against anyone in the White House.)

Bugdust172 on April 28, 2014 at 11:17 AM

Oh wow… He was gun running?
No.

He let a woman drown in a car he wrecked?
No.

He slept with a minor?
No.

So he’s getting the perp walk because…
He paid people in cash to skirt the law.
Oh so he’s guilty of…
Right, the same thing Harry Reid did.

Skywise on April 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM

To be fair, he should have known that you have to be a Democrat to get away with this kind of thing.

I guess he thought being a former FBI agent was good enough to let you ignore the law and threaten reporters. Oops.

There Goes the Neighborhood on April 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM

The filing deadline for the race in the 11th has already passed. Should this develop into a situation where Grimm either had to step down or was so exposed and injured that he couldn’t possibly prevail, the GOP might still be forced to either run him anyway or allow the Democrats to run for the seat unopposed. It’s not unheard of that, upon appropriate petition, a court could step in and allow the Republican party leaders from the area to put up another candidate, but that’s not a sure thing.

That only happens in real, genuwine bona fide emergencies. Like a Democrat about to lose his seat.

There Goes the Neighborhood on April 28, 2014 at 11:27 AM

M240H on April 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM

I agree, only I’m not totally sure the GOP is the lesser of two evils. At least the Demwits are upfront about all of the evil ideas they embrace.

The GOP is only pretending to have convictions about conservative ideas, which they are presently seeking to redefine.

Kjeil on April 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM

Grimm lost we with his vocal criticism of the Shutdown last year. Whatever.

ParisParamus on April 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM

Another benevolent job creator, the greatest of american heroes!

everdiso on April 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM

I agree, only I’m not totally sure the GOP is the lesser of two evils. At least the Demwits are upfront about all of the evil ideas they embrace.

The GOP is only pretending to have convictions about conservative ideas, which they are presently seeking to redefine.

Kjeil on April 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM

More of you should listen to Kjeil.

This is the difference between the two parties – the dems actually try to accomplish what they say they want to accomplish (and sure, you may disagree with what they want to accomplish). The reps, on the other hand, blatantly lie to get elected, and don’t care a whit about actually implementing what they said they would.

everdiso on April 28, 2014 at 12:04 PM

Rep. Michael Grimm charged with criminal fraud
24s
Update: Rep. Michael Grimm, R-NY, indicted on 20 counts, including mail fraud and perjury, relating to his former ownership of a Manhattan restaurant – @thehill
read more on thehill.com
=========================

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/house-races/204538-grimm-indicted-on-20-counts#ixzz30CJSycyc

canopfor on April 28, 2014 at 12:06 PM

So the charges are announced… He paid “undocumented” immigrants under the table.

Id argue that makes him a Democrat hero because he was protecting illegal immigrants from being deported by the evil Obama administration.

Skywise on April 28, 2014 at 12:15 PM

Rep. Michael Grimm charged with criminal fraud
1m
Rep. Michael Grimm, R-NY, pleads not guilty to 20 count indictment charging him with concealing money and lying about his workers’ wages – @AaronKatersky

canopfor on April 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM

Another Tea Party backed congressman crashes and burns.

Bradky on April 28, 2014 at 12:38 PM

We’ll probably find out quite soon that Grimm also was seen talking to Donald Sterling.

Another Drew on April 28, 2014 at 12:44 PM

I’ll ask again-

Am I supposed to care because he has an “R” next to his name? I only ask because my days of allegiance to a party that is nothing more than the lesser of two evils are over.

M240H on April 28, 2014 at 9:31 AM

No, you do not have to care because he has an R next to his name. However, you might want to care because of the unfair treatment which is at play here, and that has nothing to do with your disaffection for Republicans. You can grind that ax over more relevant issues. The fact remains that Michael Grimm has been pilloried in the media without even having been tried, whereas Leland Yee (as someone else pointed out)has been charged with an even more egregious crime but has been granted the protective cloak of media silence. The media have gone after Grimm relentlessly (HotAir included), dredging up “dirty deeds” from his past in order to make sure his reputation remains well and truly shredded. Yet we find no sidebars referencing the admirable work he has done in support of veterans’ groups, for those would distract the attention from the larger agenda. Furthermore, no one here has mentioned the rumor that Schmuck Schumer may have masterminded the timing of this “investigative” activity in order to remove Grimm– literally or figuratively– from the congressional race. One does not have to be a Grimm apologist to rail against the malice behind the treatment of him. Whatever Michael Grimm may or may not have done, and even if he has taken “the wrong stand” on purist conservative issues, he remains a man who is being unfairly treated by too many who are overly quick to judge and condemn others. For that reason alone he should be worthy of defense.

ricoliv on April 28, 2014 at 1:03 PM

even if he has taken “the wrong stand” on purist conservative issues, he remains a man who is being unfairly treated by too many who are overly quick to judge and condemn others. For that reason alone he should be worthy of defense.

ricoliv

For that reason alone, you should be called a moron.

xblade on April 28, 2014 at 1:25 PM

Thought this guy was a piece or crap a long time ago. And of course this was blatently political in timing. You have to know the rules of the game, and then play by them. Our repub leaders ave no clue. Dems are the greatest criminal organization in the history of man. You expect fair play? You think you can work with them? And Boehner blubbers about amnesty. There is our brilliant strategist. He couldn’t fight his way out of an air pocket.

Cliff by the Ford on April 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM

High-profile warmist. Happy to lose him.

JEM on April 28, 2014 at 1:50 PM

You know what would be awesome? If this guy pulls a “Rangel”, stays on the ballot, and wins.

Lib heads explode, hilarity ensues.

EvilMonk on April 28, 2014 at 2:08 PM

A lot of people seem willing to lower their standards because the other side is scum. That’s not a good thing.

ElectricPhase on April 28, 2014 at 9:38 AM

Pointing out that there are double standards in operation is not the same as lowering your own standards.
Pointing out that the other side is scum is not the same as accepting scum-artists on your own side.

Both parties are full of corrupt miscreants.
However, as many commenters here have pointed out, the treatment of the corruptocrats by the media and the legal establishment differs according to the party affiliation.

You are right to sound a warning against drifting into accepting lower standards just because the other side does it. Reasonable people can disagree on where those standards should fall, and what constitutes the line that can’t be crossed without rejection.
But, it is painfully obvious that even a minor misstep by a Republican will be treated as a major felony, while actual felonies by Democrats are dismissed as inconsequential or outright ignored.

With all due recognition of the DOJ leadership deficiencies, the front-line LEO’s do seem to be doing their job – Yee, Rangel, Jackson, Franklin et al. were investigated, some were indicted and convicted. The choice of targets and timing is an upper-level call, thus political in nature, as are pardons and commutations.

But, as a general rule, Republicans are more likely to dump their crooks (once exposed), while the Democrats are more likely to embrace theirs.

AesopFan on April 28, 2014 at 3:07 PM

5 years of Constitutional violations and broken laws and the 1st (and only) one who will probably go to jail is a Republican…wow

easyt65 on April 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM

He is a tax cheat — he should be running with Bundy, the annointed one of the HA purists.

Grimm-Bundy 2016 “Cause…’Merika!!”

Bradky on April 29, 2014 at 4:49 AM