Reid on McCutcheon decision: Darn those Koch-lovers on SCOTUS, or something

posted at 2:01 pm on April 2, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

How absurd is this response from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid? When it first appeared on Twitter, everyone assumed it was satire. Not so, reports Politico, as truth remains stranger than fiction, if just as predictable:

Responding to the decision, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) invoked his favorite boogeymen: the Koch brothers.

“The Supreme Court today just accentuated what they did on Citizens United, which is a decision that is one of the worst decisions in the history of that court,” Reid said during a press conference on raising the minimum wage. “All it does is take away people’s rights because, as you know, the Koch brothers are trying to buy America.”

Shocked? Er … no:

One must presume that if Reid stubbed his toe on the dais, he’d find a connection between the carpet manufacturer and Koch Industries. The McCutcheon case had nothing to do with the Kochs, as is true of most of Reid’s paranoid projections, but don’t bother to use logic when Reid is fulminating on billionaires who dare oppose Reid’s agenda while he conveniently forgets about his courting of George Soros, Tom Steyer, etc etc etc. I noted that hypocrisy in my column today at The Week:

This populist shriek is a nonsense argument even beyond Reid and Schumer’s oddly constipated response to the backlash. Democrats like Reid and Schumer, and their party and its affiliates, had little complaint when billionaires like George Soros organized grassroots into messaging attack dogs against Republicans. Reid and Schumer all but rented out the Senate last month on behalf of another billionaire, global warming activist Thomas Steyer, even though Senate Democrats had no legislation to offer.

But Schumer’s argument on the First Amendment is revealing in more than one way, and not just about Democrats. The Republican Party routinely demonized Soros during the 2006–08 election cycles in much the same way Democrats are doing with the Kochs in 2014. In both cases, the party in power had nothing more to offer the American electorate other than the demonization of peripheral characters. Neither had the courage to run on their own records and cheerfully withstand accountability on the basis of them.

Back to the rest of the Democratic reaction, which was a little more focused on the point. Most lamented the dismantling of campaign-finance law, which they pledged to reconstruct post-McCutcheon:

Over in the House, Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) said he plans to introduce legislation that will “fully reverse this latest Supreme Court blunder.” And House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called for passage of legislation sponsored by Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) that is meant to amplify small-dollars donations to congressional candidates.

“Our founders risked their lives, their liberty and their sacred honor to create a democracy — a government of the many, not a government of the money,” Pelosi said in a statement. “After misguided and destructive court decisions in McCutcheon and Citizens United, it is clear that Congress must act swiftly to restore fairness to our campaign finance system.”

Actually, they “risked their lives, their liberty and their sacred honor” to create a constitutional republic, in part to make sure that the government didn’t control who got to say what, and when and how much. That is what they meant when they wrote and ratified the 1st Amendment, which states that “Congress shall make no law” infringing on speech, especially political speech. Passing another law to limit that engagement is merely repeating what has already been struck down.

On the other hand, Senator Angus King (I-ME) offered a better suggestion:

Meanwhile, Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said he introduced legislation intended to make donations more transparent by requiring all contributions of $1,000 or more to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission within 48 hours. A campaign bill in the House will be introduced by Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas).

That’s actually a better idea than the Byzantine campaign-donation limitations that McCutcheon partly struck down. Full and immediate disclosure of all contributions for each candidate and party that exceeds $1000 in the aggregate makes sense, and doing that rather than imposing caps and forcing political contributions away from candidates and parties would do more for sunlight than the system erected since Watergate. That would put the cash in the hands of those who can be held responsible for the messaging created with it — and if nothing else, would at least reduce the demand for outside super-PACs and their lack of direct accountability.

If Congress really wants to reform the political process, that is the right path to take.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

They must not pay him well.

Bmore on April 2, 2014 at 2:05 PM

Not a good day for the senatorial mortician.

Schadenfreude on April 2, 2014 at 2:05 PM

“The Supreme Court today just accentuated what they did on Citizens United, which is a decision that is one of the worst decisions in the history of that court,” Reid said during a press conference on raising the minimum wage. “All it does is take away people’s rights because, as you know, the Koch brothers are trying to buy America.”

Good people of NV, this is exhibit #1 that you are mostly stupid to have voted him in.

Schadenfreude on April 2, 2014 at 2:07 PM

Like McCain, Reid is demented.

VorDaj on April 2, 2014 at 2:07 PM

…why isn’t he institutionalized?

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM

Schadenfreude, pure

Plus, Hagan is behind all opponents.

Schadenfreude on April 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM

…why isn’t he institutionalized?

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM

Because leftists are demented, and because the Rs are wussies, who enable them.

Schadenfreude on April 2, 2014 at 2:10 PM

I’ve been arguing for King’s bills for years – with the caveat that I haven’t read it, a GOP sponsor should be found immediately. And Boehner should copy it and put one in the House as well.

Dismantle the FEC. Let Soros and Kochs and all the other heavyweights put their names and faces behind the candidates they back. PACs who donate to a candidate must list their 10 largest donors with each donation.

Shine the light.

Zomcon JEM on April 2, 2014 at 2:10 PM

Too bad this happened after the SotU; obama can’t threaten the SC justices, until next year.

Schadenfreude on April 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM

Reid’s dementia is getting worse every day. Seriously.

Whitey Ford on April 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM

And then we need some conservatives to keep trying to gain control of the political organs that are the media and fire every columnist and news writer who is married to a non-elected member of the federal government.

Zomcon JEM on April 2, 2014 at 2:12 PM

when Reid is fulminating on billionaires who dare oppose Reid’s agenda while he conveniently forgets about his courting of George Soros

Is that the Nazi collaborator George Soros, who has never apologized for that collaboration?

rbj on April 2, 2014 at 2:12 PM

If the left cared about money in politics they’d try limiting what that money can buy in DC. Of course they are the swamp that needs to be drained so that’ll never happen.

jhffmn on April 2, 2014 at 2:12 PM

I’ve always thought Reid is despicable. That being said, his harping on this yet again makes it sound like he is feeling the effects of some medical issue.

Throat Wobbler Mangrove on April 2, 2014 at 2:13 PM

…why isn’t he institutionalized?

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM

You’d have to institutionalize every single Democrat.

Myron Falwell on April 2, 2014 at 2:13 PM

Reid’s dementia is getting worse every day. Seriously.

Whitey Ford on April 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM

I agree, Whitey Ford.

Throat Wobbler Mangrove on April 2, 2014 at 2:14 PM

Let’s go after the pimps and prostitutes not limit how much the johns can spend.

jhffmn on April 2, 2014 at 2:15 PM

No Maverick meltdown? Wake him up.

Marcus on April 2, 2014 at 2:15 PM

I’m gonna start voting Democrat if I don’t get my Koch check soon.

NotCoach on April 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM

Meanwhile, Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said he introduced legislation intended to make donations more transparent by requiring all contributions of $1,000 or more to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission within 48 hours. A campaign bill in the House will be introduced by Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas).

“Hey, let’s make 100 $999 donations to our favorite progressive!”

“But, won’t someone notice?”

“No, we’ll just make them in the names of 100 different people signed up for the ACA. They’re already registering them as Democrats in CA, so no one who matters is going to say anything, trust me.”

- /Next progressive “social justice advocacy group” gambit, you watch.

clear ether

eon

eon on April 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM

I wanted to come up with something pithy and clever re: Sen. Reid’s latest oration, but can’t get beyond, “WTF?”

werewife on April 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM

I’ve always thought Reid is despicable. That being said, his harping on this yet again makes it sound like he is feeling the effects of some medical issue.

Throat Wobbler Mangrove on April 2, 2014 at 2:13 PM

How can you or I tell the difference?

Myron Falwell on April 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM

I think that candidates should be put under strict campaign limits. A strictly regulated number of posterboard sheets but all the glitter and paint they need to get their message across. ;0

Seriously, this is one of those issues that can only get the political class riled up. Unlike gutting a sixth of the economy in the name of healthcare reform, McCutheon actually impacts the congresscritters. It’s inside baseball stuff that nobody outside of DC really cares about. And don’t think Dems mean it when they call for greater transparency…. that is the last thing they want.

Happy Nomad on April 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM

…why isn’t he institutionalized?

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM

You’d have to institutionalize every single Democrat.

Myron Falwell on April 2, 2014 at 2:13 PM

I see no downside to that.

cornbred on April 2, 2014 at 2:21 PM

The home is supposed to keep the doors locked, but he keeps getting out.

/sliver alert

mankai on April 2, 2014 at 2:22 PM

And why not let each candidate fill out a 1099 for each individual contribution?

cornbred on April 2, 2014 at 2:24 PM

How can you or I tell the difference?

Myron Falwell on April 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM

We can’t for sure, I suppose. His harping on the Koch brothers in this way doesn’t seem like the product of rational thought, though. He’s utterly fixated on them in a very strange way.

Throat Wobbler Mangrove on April 2, 2014 at 2:25 PM

He has been listening to too much Cowboy Poetry.

Sven on April 2, 2014 at 2:25 PM

Save us some time, Senator, just tell us what evil is not the direct result of Brawny paper towels and Angel Soft toilet paper money.

mankai on April 2, 2014 at 2:26 PM

“The Supreme Court today just accentuated what they did on Citizens United, which is a decision that is one of the worst decisions in the history of that court,”

Dred Scott was a bad decision. Korematsu v. United States was a bad decision. Upholding Obamacare as a tax was a bad decision.

McCutheon isn’t even close.

Happy Nomad on April 2, 2014 at 2:26 PM

Reid knows exactly what he’s doing. The Dems know they are looking at an uphill climb this November, so they’re once again going to return to the class warfare garbage that’s worked so well before. That’s why they’re pushing a minimum wage hike, and that’s why the Koch’s are suddenly on his mind a lot…there’s no better villain than a couple of wealthy billionaires when you’re trying to pit haves against have-nots.

changer1701 on April 2, 2014 at 2:27 PM

Just the other day Senator Reid stubbed his toe on a door step that was raised one inch on purpose by the Koch brothers. He also hit his shoulder onto another door frame because overnight the Kochs cut half an inch on purpose from it. It is the truth!

ojfltx on April 2, 2014 at 2:31 PM

That’s ridiculous, Reid.

How can the Koch brothers buy America?

You and Obama have already sold it to China.

Where’s the budget, Harry? How many years has it been?

thatsafactjack on April 2, 2014 at 2:32 PM

Reid knows exactly what he’s doing. The Dems know they are looking at an uphill climb this November, so they’re once again going to return to the class warfare garbage that’s worked so well before. That’s why they’re pushing a minimum wage hike, and that’s why the Koch’s are suddenly on his mind a lot…there’s no better villain than a couple of wealthy billionaires when you’re trying to pit haves against have-nots.

changer1701 on April 2, 2014 at 2:27 PM

What’s the over/under on OWS showing up this fall?

HumpBot Salvation on April 2, 2014 at 2:33 PM

…Harry and John McCain…on the same medication?

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:34 PM

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:34 PM

…and the same… hookah. ;)

thatsafactjack on April 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM

The democrats don’t understand that Harry Reid is making them look like senile idiots.
Well I think many democrats and some Republicans (McCain) are senile idiots……
Harry is suffering the onset of dementia.

redguy on April 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM

Meanwhile, Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said he introduced legislation intended to make donations more transparent by requiring all contributions of $1,000 or more to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission within 48 hours. A campaign bill in the House will be introduced by Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas).

No. The right to remain anonymous is itself protected by the First Amendment. See McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (“…an author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.”). Anonymity allows the speaker to say things without fear of reprisal OR fear of government retribution, both of which can chill important political speech. Would you give $1,000 to your favorite organization if you knew that your name would become public, and thus fair game for every protester of that cause in town?

LockeFox on April 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM

What’s the over/under on OWS showing up this fall?

HumpBot Salvation on April 2, 2014 at 2:33 PM

The Dems need them all for early voting.

Myron Falwell on April 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM

It’s surreal, isn’t it? Watching Reid lie, knowing he’s lying, him aware that he’s lying, knowing he knows we know he’s lying.

thatsafactjack on April 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM

What a Fu*king Sh*tbag

ToddPA on April 2, 2014 at 2:41 PM

in part to make sure that the government didn’t control who got to say what

But now the government is deciding who gets to say what because they’re taking money, which is free-speech according to the SCOTUS, and redistributing it to their oligarchical cronies, thus increasing the free-speech gap between the oligarchy and the people. This decision may make it easier for the oligarchy to buy the government, but at the same time it makes the redistribution of money by the government a 1st amendment violation.

FloatingRock on April 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM

What about the hourly $25 contributions from
Abc Def
123 Main
Anywhere, TX

who uses a prepaid cash card and overseas IP address?? Shouldn’t his contributions be tracked ??

KenInIL on April 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM

Seriously, now…If Harry Reid has any family or anyone at all that loves him, they would be well advised to have him checked into. the man is paranoid, schizophrenic, and demented. Oh…and he’s also a pederast.

bimmcorp on April 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM

Worried About Big Money Donors ‘Stealing The Election’? Guess Where The Top Ten Donate To…

The top ten donors so far for the 2014 cycle include the city of New York, the Democrat Governor’s Association, and the National Education Association, and a handful of unions – all of which gave overwhelmingly to Democrat candidates, and towards liberal outside spending groups.

VorDaj on April 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM

On the Open Secrets “Heavy Hitters” list, the top donors over the last 25 years includes the Kochs – at #59.

Much is made of Kochs’ donations to Americans to Prosperity, to which they gave $40,000 over several years. Not much is made of their giving to ACLU, which totaled over $1 million in the same period.

So Reid, Democrats, and media attacks on the Kochs are not just biased and exaggerated, they are outright lies.

Adjoran on April 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM

Quantitative Easing is the process by which the federal government prints free-speech out of thin air and distributes it to their cronies. QE needs to be stopped immediately on the grounds that it is a 1st amendment violation or else the corporations involved, the federal reserve, should be tried, convicted and sent to prison.

If corporations are people then it means that if a corporation commits murder, like Government Motors, it can be convicted and sentenced to life in prison if not the death penalty.

FloatingRock on April 2, 2014 at 2:48 PM

Please: it’s “Evil Koch Brothers.”

PersonFromPorlock on April 2, 2014 at 2:48 PM

George who? So-Rose? Never heard of ‘im.

Rusty Nail on April 2, 2014 at 2:51 PM

This is sad that these liberals representing tax payers have the nerve to attack citizens who are successful and employ tens of thousands of fellow Americans. If I was Koch industries I’d move any operation I had out of states that act this way.

tej on April 2, 2014 at 2:51 PM

Good thing Hairy Screed wasn’t one of our founding fathers!

Even though he’s old enough, I don’t believe ‘doing it’ with a goat or little boys would qualify as a ‘father’ of any sort. Unless you ask a liberal.

When will this filthy piece of dog feces kick the bucket?

When he does (hopefully today), can we mark that as a national holiday?

I still remember the day I danced around when then the “Lion of the Senate and Killer at Chappaquiddick” died.

Call me insensitive, but I love to see evil die.

ZeusGoose on April 2, 2014 at 2:55 PM

If money = speech then it is a 1st amendment violation for the government to redistribute money/free-speech.

The small-gov grass-roots can use this ruling to their advantage. This ruling invalidates much of what the federal government does, costing taxpayers hundreds of billions each year, and if we can use this decision to put a stop to all the ways that the oligarchy uses the government to redistribute our free-speech to themselves then it will probably cut so much spending that it will balance the budget.

So yes, a small group in the oligarchy has more free speech then all the rest of the people combined, but on the other hand all the various ways they’ve corrupted the government all this time is a gargantuan violation of our 1st amendment rights.

FloatingRock on April 2, 2014 at 2:56 PM

“The Supreme Court today just accentuated what they did on Citizens United, which is a decision that is one of the worst decisions in the history of that court,” Reid said during a press conference on raising the minimum wage. “All it does is take away people’s rights because, as you know, the Koch brothers are trying to buy America.”

The Koch brothers, or George Soros, or any other billionaire who gives lots of money to a campaign, cannot buy an election–they can only buy ads designed to convince people to vote for the candidates they want elected. But the voters who see these ads still have the right to ignore them and vote for another candidate.

In reality, labor unions have more power to corrupt an election than the Koch brothers, because labor unions can use coercive union dues for political campaigns, even if some of the union members don’t necessarily agree with the candidates supported by the union, they are FORCED to pay their union dues.

Steve Z on April 2, 2014 at 3:03 PM

Full and immediate disclosure of all contributions for each candidate and party that exceeds $1000 in the aggregate makes sense

how does this make sense, ed? all it does is allow democrats to create a hit list of those who they feel need to be silenced. have we already forgotten what is happening to brendan eich?

dbilly76 on April 2, 2014 at 3:05 PM

If the small-gove grass-roots plays their cards right then this decision means that the oligarchy can go ahead and buy Washington DC, but it simultaneously makes most of the corruption in Washington DC unconstitutional and must be stopped.

If money = speech then Obamacare and everything else that redistributes free-speech is a 1st amendment violation and must be stopped.

If money = speech then that means it’s a 1st amendment violation for the government to forcibly confiscate people free-speech, which means the IRS violates the 1st amendment every day.

Now maybe if we had a flat tax then it could be argued that it affects everyone’s free-speech equally and might pass muster, but that isn’t the case yet.

FloatingRock on April 2, 2014 at 3:05 PM

This jack wagon is going to get an innocent American or one of their family members hurt or killed.

Could you imagine what kind of headaches and extra expense you’d have to consider (e.g. security, stalkers, death threats, law suits, etc.) if the Senate Majority leader was calling you out on the Senate floor on a nearly daily basis?

Sure, the Koch’s are wealthy, but they’re private citizens and, from what I’ve read, haven’t done and aren’t doing anything illegal.

Ruckus_Tom on April 2, 2014 at 3:06 PM

But the voters who see these ads still have the right to ignore them and vote for another candidate.

Steve Z on April 2, 2014 at 3:03 PM

It’s nice in theory but in reality is doesn’t work out that way because the oligarchy controls the MSM, the political system and both political parties so no matter which party you vote for the oligarchy wins.

FloatingRock on April 2, 2014 at 3:10 PM

Reid is obsessed, is he not? After Reid and Obama get done with America, who would want to buy her or invest in her? That’s the problem.

TarheelBen on April 2, 2014 at 3:12 PM

Those who want to buy America have already bought out Reid and many members of congress. And it is not the Koch bro.s

jake49 on April 2, 2014 at 3:15 PM

…why isn’t he institutionalized?

KOOLAID2 on April 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM

He is.

The institution is the US Senate.

That is the problem.

ajacksonian on April 2, 2014 at 3:17 PM

How did you become a multimillionaire again, Harry … withour ever having a private sector job?

M240H on April 2, 2014 at 3:18 PM

After watching this lying moron the past year or so sink to new depths every day, I’ve reached the only possible conclusion: he’s truly ‘lost it’. I don’t think he’s acting, posturing, politicking or any of that. He’s just someone who’s got a bad case of the crazies.

If he were conservative, that would qualify him for wall-to-wall humiliation on the national news. But he’s a Democrat, so he just takes his place at the table with crazy Uncle Joe in the pantheon of socialist idiots.

forheremenaremen on April 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM

And if you don’t think the Republicans and Democrats are in it together against the people, ask yourself why no Republican Senator has ever stood up on the floor and asked Harry how he became a multimillionaire on a public servant’s salary?

And that is why evryone should be Conservative; they’re all crooks, so you limit what they can steal.

M240H on April 2, 2014 at 3:21 PM

Wasn’t Bernie Madoff a big-time Democratic doner/bundler?

Deafdog on April 2, 2014 at 3:24 PM

About the only thing besides corrupt deals on Reid’s brain is koch.

Murphy9 on April 2, 2014 at 3:26 PM

He must get paid every time he says the word Koch. By now hes made millions.

neyney on April 2, 2014 at 3:27 PM

Reid is nothing but a Koch Blocker.

billintex on April 2, 2014 at 3:32 PM

Harry Reid is a sweatheart protecting us from the evils of Koch brothers.

BatGuano on April 2, 2014 at 3:34 PM

Harry is a despicable little pipsqueak, but I don’t think he’s an idiot. By now he’s figured out that every time he mentions the Koch brothers it gets picked up by the media. That’s all he cares about, the more these dumbed down voters hear the name Koch, and the reference to GOP/Republicans and how evil those two rich power mongers are, they will remember it. That’s why he says their name at every opportunity he gets…for the publicity. For the tweets. For the buzz. Pelosi learned this trick a long time ago. People will remember the accusations, but not the rebuttals.

scalleywag on April 2, 2014 at 3:38 PM

Doesn’t Reid have the decency to leave Randolph and Mortimer Koch alone on their big day?

verbaluce on April 2, 2014 at 3:56 PM

I have a better idea for campaign finance reform. How about, you can donate as much as you want to any candidate you want, but every single donation must be recorded and tracked online. Donate $1? Your name goes online as donating $1. Donate a million? Same thing. But all donations must have a valid name; any donations made by fictitious people/anonymous/etc must be transferred to the Wounded Warrior Project or equivalent.

RblDiver on April 2, 2014 at 4:02 PM

That picture is way too pensive for Hairy “Slimeball” Reid. He’s not that thoughtful.

ExpressoBold on April 2, 2014 at 4:10 PM

It’s surreal, isn’t it? Watching Reid lie, knowing he’s lying, him aware that he’s lying, knowing he knows we know he’s lying.

thatsafactjack on April 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM

Yet, this azzhole wrote this book, not about Harry.

Schadenfreude on April 2, 2014 at 4:12 PM

How did you become a multimillionaire again, Harry … withour ever having a private sector job?

M240H on April 2, 2014 at 3:18 PM

Watch the movie “Casino” and look for the senator character. He’s based on Harry Reid, even right down to being from Searchlight.

gryphon202 on April 2, 2014 at 4:34 PM

Ok, at this point any psychologist or psychiatrist can look at Reid and say with certainty that his mental health is in the toilet and the old piece of fascist garbage needs to be put at the curb.

He missed trash day by 20 years now at least.

Diluculo on April 2, 2014 at 4:36 PM

Reid has Koch on the brain! Or in some other orifice.

MrX on April 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM

Doesn’t Reid have the decency to leave Randolph and Mortimer Koch alone on their big day?

verbaloon on April 2, 2014 at 3:56 PM

You do know that the Kochs as recently as several years ago had also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democrat organizations?

No, I didn’t think so.

You better go into conference again.

Del Dolemonte on April 2, 2014 at 5:34 PM

“CNN is saddened to report the passing today of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Police said he died of a drug overdose, after trying to inject Koch directly into his head using a hammer and chisel.”

Athanasius on April 2, 2014 at 6:09 PM

Hi boys and girls. Can you say DEMENTIA?

GarandFan on April 2, 2014 at 6:59 PM

This amoral waste of organic chemistry should be neutralized and sewered.

Murphy9 on April 2, 2014 at 10:17 PM

as you know, the Koch brothers are trying to buy America.

You mean the way he’s been bought? No, I don’t think so.

flataffect on April 3, 2014 at 12:24 AM

How is making donations public any different than making voting records public?

How far are we really away from people being targeted for who they support politically? Do we really want to go down that road?

jhffmn on April 3, 2014 at 12:31 AM