Feinstein: CIA snooped on secure Congressional network

posted at 10:01 am on March 11, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The question isn’t “who watches the watchmen” in the Beltway today. It’s “who’s watching the watchers who watch the watchmen.” The head of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence publicly accused the CIA of snooping a secure computer network set up as part of an investigation of the agency’s activities during the war on terror, following up on earlier hints of a war brewing between Langley and Capitol Hill:

The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee says the CIA improperly searched a stand-alone computer network established for Congress as part of its investigation into allegations of CIA abuse in a Bush-era detention and interrogation program. …

At issue is whether the CIA violated an agreement made with the committee about monitoring the panel’s use of CIA computers. The CIA provided the computers to congressional staffers in a secure room at its headquarters so that the committee could review millions of pages of top secret documents.

The Washington Post has more, including Feinstein’s blunt accusation that CIA attempted to intimidate the Senate into retreating on its oversight of the agency:

The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday publicly accused the CIA of secretly removing documents from computers used by her panel to investigate the agency’s controversial interrogation program and said that an internal agency investigation of the action has been referred to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said the activities of agency officials “may have undermined the constitutional framework” of congressional oversight.

The situation amounted to an attempted intimidation of congressional investigators, she said, adding: “I am not taking it lightly.”

Besides possible constitutional violations, Feinstein said the CIA may also have violated the Fourth Amendment, various federal laws and a presidential executive order that bars the agency from conducting domestic searches and surveillance. She said she has asked for an apology and recognition that the CIA search of the committee’s computers was inappropriate, but, “I have received neither.”

This, Jeff Zeleny notes, escalates a war that has been breaking out into the open over the last couple of weeks:

Needless to say, this comes at a bad time for the Obama administration. The original investigation had little to do with the Obama era; it was a probe into whether the CIA misled the Bush administration on interrogation and black-site operations in the early days of the war on terror. However, the agency has been under Obama administration control for over five years now, and its leaders are all Obama appointees. Even if the CIA was testing for leaks, it would have to work with Senate leadership to do so — and clearly that wasn’t the case if Feinstein’s going public this morning. And besides that, this would be the FBI’s jurisdiction, not the CIA’s, which is tasked with gathering foreign intelligence.

DNI James Clapper is already an unpopular figure for his misleading testimony to the Senate. John Brennan will sit in the hot seat this morning, with this storm in full rage. The upper chamber may be safely Democrat, but it’s likely to start asserting its constitutional powers — belatedly — over this intrusion on its authority, which would be stunning if it turns out to be true.

Update: Hmmmm.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

NOW you fuds give a crap when it’s your little world being pissed on, us beleaguered citizens out here were supposed to shut up and take it.

Bishop on March 11, 2014 at 10:03 AM

It’s just for their own good, shut up…

the_nile on March 11, 2014 at 10:04 AM

Your Boy King ordered this, you hag. Suck it up.

CurtZHP on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

Feinstein: CIA snooped on secure Congressional network

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

(gasp)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

dirtseller on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

Feinstein’s blunt accusation that CIA attempted to intimidate the Senate into retreating on its oversight of the agency:

Park rangers, IRS, CIA . . . all out of control, the entire federal bureaucracy. And now we’re supposed to hand our health care over to it?

rbj on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

…lovely couple …on the pic!

KOOLAID2 on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

…lovely couple …on the pic!

KOOLAID2 on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

Must be a serious problem because Turban and Feinstein have their serious faces on.

dirtseller on March 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM

I know that they were investigating Bush-era policy, but exactly under which administration did this occur? That was missing in both of the linked articles. Although, if I had to hazard a guess…

joekenha on March 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM

Great heavens to murgatroid, this old hagula fossil needs to be sent to pasture….

OmahaConservative on March 11, 2014 at 10:10 AM

If this is true the CIA must be brought to heel! The CIA works for the people and the Congress is their overseer for the people. Hit those Nazi bastards where it hurts…slash their budget to the point they can only do one function FOREIGN Intelligence!

Doomsday on March 11, 2014 at 10:10 AM

Suddenly the constitutionality of government action matters to her. Only when it is Congress’ fingers in the vice.

Like Bishop said, the rest of us do not matter to these crony loving corrupt Dems.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on March 11, 2014 at 10:10 AM

Aw. It’s precious how they want to be treated differently than they treat the Little People.

Good Lt on March 11, 2014 at 10:10 AM

I am not feeling you Di. Welcome to the unsupervised scrutiny everyone else is subject to.

FireBlogger on March 11, 2014 at 10:11 AM

Welcome to our world you tyrant. She supports the anti-4th Amendment actions against US citizens via the NSA but somehow this is wrong. The empire is falling

MoreLiberty on March 11, 2014 at 10:13 AM

Spy on thee but not on me. Right, Feinstein?

Wendya on March 11, 2014 at 10:15 AM

Welcome to the party, pal.

Bitter Clinger on March 11, 2014 at 10:15 AM

Hmm. Foo’stamps put more money back into the economy.
The CIA spied on me. Unexpectedly.

A coupla tactical nukes would put CA into the ocean.

Either that or Bugs Bunny could saw it off.

Lanceman on March 11, 2014 at 10:16 AM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

(gasp)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

dirtseller on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

You made me laugh dirt.

crankyoldlady on March 11, 2014 at 10:17 AM

Must be a serious problem because Turban and Feinstein have their serious faces on.

dirtseller on March 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM

Durbin is trying to figure out what the larger words mean, and Frankenstein’s face is permanently stuck that way because she’s a bitter old harpy.

Bishop on March 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM

You made me laugh dirt.

crankyoldlady on March 11, 2014 at 10:17 AM

Hold it. Commas mean everything.

You mean “You made me laugh, Dirt.” or did you mean he made you laugh dirt?

Lanceman on March 11, 2014 at 10:24 AM

The Democratic Senate will no longer be of any concern to us. I’ve just received word that Obama has dissolved it permanently. The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.

Long live Fascist America!

deadite on March 11, 2014 at 10:25 AM

Zack: In 2013, you pardoned a turkey. What do you have planned for 2014?

BO: We’ll probably pardon another turkey.

This is our PRES at his best – hawking OCare for kids (those under 26): Between Two Ferns

climbnjump on March 11, 2014 at 10:25 AM

Obama.

albill on March 11, 2014 at 10:28 AM

Hold it. Commas mean everything.

You mean “You made me laugh, Dirt.” or did you mean he made you laugh dirt?

Lanceman on March 11, 2014 at 10:24 AM

Either one will do. Don’t make fun of my sloppy punctuation, comma, Lance.

crankyoldlady on March 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM

No honor among Thieves….

This entire town is nothing but Lowlife Sh*tbags.

ToddPA on March 11, 2014 at 10:32 AM

Feinstein says CIA claimed it removed docs from the committee-only network at direction of the White House.

If that’s not an impeachable offense…

JohnGalt23 on March 11, 2014 at 10:33 AM

gee cry me a river. you have no problem raping us with the patriot act and call us names for opposing it and then cry when the repercussions hit you.

dmacleo on March 11, 2014 at 10:33 AM

DNI James Clapper is already an unpopular figure for his misleading testimony to the Senate.

Misleading? No! DNI Clapper and General Alexander lied their asses off. They specifically said that the NSA wasn’t spying on America. THAT WAS A LIE. I’m sick and tired of everybody pretending that they were just being a little too cute with words in open sessions by being the least distruthful as possible while answering the question. The proper response would have been to respectfully say that they’d be happy to discuss operational matters with the Intel committee in closed session. Instead they lied.

Happy Nomad on March 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM

Feinstein: CIA snooped on secure Congressional network

“You’re supposed to spy on the peasants, not us!!”

Cry me a f**king river, b1tch.

She’s probably afraid that her and her cronies’ backroom deals with the deep-pockets crowd on the left (and overseas) will come out. After all, if there’s one thing we know about the Company today, it’s that their own data security sucks.

I hope she has sleepless nights worrying about FNC or IBD getting their hands on the data about exactly who she’s (figuratively) in bed with.

I then hope it ends up in the hands of a Federal prosecutor Holder can’t control or intimidate.

clear ether

eon

eon on March 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM

She’s probably afraid that her and her cronies’ backroom deals with the deep-pockets crowd on the left (and overseas) will come out.

eon on March 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM

Yeah, that’s pretty much it.

climbnjump on March 11, 2014 at 10:37 AM

Well now, that ought to do it. It’s fine if they listen in and collect stuff on the peons out here, but don’t dare do it to them.

Besides that, evidently the NSA wasn’t listening too closely, if they were some of those idiots would’ve been brought up on charges.

De Oppresso Liber on March 11, 2014 at 10:38 AM

This is our PRES at his best – hawking OCare for kids (those under 26)

climbnjump on March 11, 2014 at 10:25 AM

Shameless rat-eared bastard. Did you catch the part where he got testy when asked what it felt like to be the last black president? Did he not understand the show he was appearing on?

Happy Nomad on March 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM

Whoa: Feinstein says CIA claimed it removed docs from the committee-only network at direction of the White House. WH denied.

Obama’s paranoia has now hit the point where he’s apparently spying on his own party. I didn’t know what to think when I saw Feinstein’s comments (especially after Holder started “investigating” the committee), but it’s clear now this is part of the executive branch’s war on the legislature.

Obama’s paranoia has blown way the heck past Nixonian levels. This guy is completely out of control, and dangerous to our country.

Doomberg on March 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said the activities of agency officials “may have undermined the constitutional framework” of congressional oversight.

So, I suppose this means the honorable Senator Feinstein sat on her hands while all the other Dems jumped to their feet in wild applause, when during the SOTU speech the boy king proudly proclaimed he would undermine the Constitution by going around Congress to get his way?

Yeah, I didn’t think so.

Flora Duh on March 11, 2014 at 10:40 AM

Whoa: Feinstein says CIA claimed it removed docs from the committee-only network at direction of the White House. WH denied.

— Shane Harris (@shaneharris) March 11, 2014

Then you better get your azz in gear and start an investigation, Diane, or are you accepting that the current preznit is above the law?

Bishop on March 11, 2014 at 10:40 AM

The question isn’t “who watches the watchmen” in the Beltway today. It’s “who’s watching the watchers who watch the watchmen.”

The problem is that Obama’s people don’t have a watchdog keeping an eye on the administration. They have a lap dog who will lick peanut butter off of anything put before it.

Happy Nomad on March 11, 2014 at 10:45 AM

So what, Senator ? … They’re on your side, so no biggie.

The important thing is that the IRS “took down” the Tea Party activists.

As long as that got accomplished, you can live with the rest of it … right ?

listens2glenn on March 11, 2014 at 10:48 AM

9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

“CIA abuse in a Bush-era detention and interrogation program”

A lie by omission is still a lie. I’m certain this also went on during Captain 0′s administration too…

I recall you stand ovating, Ms. Feinstein, on Captain 0′s declaration to use executive powers. None of you D’s or R’s have the ground to cite Constitutional oversight when you pass as a Senate generated bill O-Care that did not originate in the house under budget reconciliation…

Your house / senate approved “budget” for 2014 funds a lawless AG who will not protect or defend the constitution and who wants to reserve the right to drone kill Americans without right to a jury by his peers.

10Commandments on March 11, 2014 at 10:50 AM

This will all be swept under the rug and forgotten after Feinstein gets called a racist by Rev. Al and the rest of the whackos at MSDNC.

Flora Duh on March 11, 2014 at 10:52 AM

Me thinks this is all starting to unravel. Time to warm up the popcorn machine.

Deano1952 on March 11, 2014 at 10:54 AM

The question isn’t “who watches the watchmen” in the Beltway today. It’s “who’s watching the watchers who watch the watchmen.”

Ed Morrissey on March 11, 2014 at 10:01 AM

.
You watched Enemy Of The State, didn’t you ? . . . . . . . . . . . (me too)

listens2glenn on March 11, 2014 at 10:55 AM

Imagine that: Senator Feinstein doesn’t like the government spying on her. It’s about damn time.

Welcome to the club, Senator. How about if the administration were to turn the foul Justice Department or even the IRS loose on you, or the EPA or OSHA? Maybe all of them simultaneously. How about that idea, Senator?

Because not only do we have innocent citizens spied on all the time, while the Tsarnaev brothers and their ilk go unexamined until it’s too late, but those same innocent citizens also pursued by the agencies of government simultaneously merely for expressing political views different from the Progressive orthodoxy.

MTF on March 11, 2014 at 10:57 AM

That witch Feinstein was perfectly ok with the NSA spying on average American citizens, now she wants to object when the shoe is on her own foot…

oscarwilde on March 11, 2014 at 10:58 AM

At issue is whether the CIA violated an agreement made with the committee about monitoring the panel’s use of CIA computers.

Aha! This is slightly different from the first stories that came out. They simply complained about the CIA snooping on computers they had set up – which the CIA would be compelled to do under cybersecurity guidelines, regulations, and law. Now the claim is that they agreed they would leave the network alone, but didn’t. Hmmmmmmmm…….

GWB on March 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM

No honor among Thieves….

This entire town is nothing but Lowlife Sh*tbags.

ToddPA on March 11, 2014 at 10:32 AM

C’mon man, ease up. At least a bag of sh*t makes good fertilizer.

CurtZHP on March 11, 2014 at 11:05 AM

Then you better get your azz in gear and start an investigation, Diane, or are you accepting that the current preznit is above the law?

Bishop on March 11, 2014 at 10:40 AM

Oh, that horse left the barn a long time ago.

The question now is, do you accept that the Liar-in-Chief now reigns supreme, even over the entirety of Congress…?

JohnGalt23 on March 11, 2014 at 11:05 AM

This will all be swept under the rug and forgotten after Feinstein gets called a racist by Rev. Al and the rest of the whackos at MSDNC.

Flora Duh on March 11, 2014 at 10:52 AM

Yeah, that only works on Rethuglicans.

Lanceman on March 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM

I read the other side over the weekend (shouldn’t you be explaining the news to us, Ed?), and the CIA is claiming the files were accessed via intentional breach of the firewall between released documents and un-released documents, and the supposed document in question was a draft not subject to release. This happened years ago and they only found it due to software on every computer to trace file transfers on all CIA computers that they used when they were getting questions from specific Congressmen.

I’m not saying I believe them, but closing the loop. The article I read was specific to say it was DEMOCRAT aids that accessed unauthorized material. The CIA has no problem with the Republicans on the committee.

MC88 on March 11, 2014 at 11:09 AM

Hey, embrace the suck and shut up.

ouldbollix on March 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM

Has Obama issued his “I can assure you I knew nothing of this” statement yet?

gopsteve on March 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM

So the idiots at the CIA have been doing surveillance on both primary political parties. Perhaps this is something that can finally unite them to do something about the out-of-control CIA, NSA, etc?

slickwillie2001 on March 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM

…lovely couple …on the pic!

KOOLAID2 on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

Must be a serious problem because Turban and Feinstein have their serious faces on.

dirtseller on March 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM

Twins, separated at birth? Quick, get a DNA swab.

slickwillie2001 on March 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM

Oh this is too funny, she’s just now realizing that she’s no different than the rest of the people in the U.S. Welcome to the rest of America, b*tch.

onesheep on March 11, 2014 at 11:49 AM

“Not a smidgen of corruption…..”

Nothing to see here, move along….

ColBubba on March 11, 2014 at 11:53 AM

Funny how something you claim is “good for the country” looks not quite so good when it is your ox that is getting gored. This is just another example of the truth of the old statement that “a government that is big enough to provide things, is big enough to take things away, too.”

Frankly, If I could have known just what my boss(es) were saying and thinking I would have taken advantage of that in a heartbeat. That way I would know how to protect my job and also provide what they really wanted from me (or say “no” and just leave before getting fired). In this case, that Congress was stupid enough to give both CIA and NSA such broad power is just typical and proves how narcissisticly stupid politicians are…failing to see the obvious danger to giving anyone such power and authority. Sort of like giving a 15 year old a bottle of booze and keys to the car and saying, “be careful.”

TKPedersen42 on March 11, 2014 at 11:59 AM

Let’s stick with the ” Snowden is a traitor ” line and remember that all good R’s and D’s approve of any any and all govt snooping.

Exninja on March 11, 2014 at 12:01 PM

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) questioned whether a CIA search of congressional records might have undermined government oversight during a Senate floor speech Tuesday.

Her wonderment implies that there is some level of spying that is acceptable.

“I suppose that if the CIA were only looking at records of Republican members that would not undermine government oversight”

BobMbx on March 11, 2014 at 12:02 PM

She’s probably afraid that her and her cronies’ backroom deals with the deep-pockets crowd on the left (and overseas) will come out.

eon on March 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM

Yeah, that’s pretty much it.

climbnjump on March 11, 2014 at 10:37 AM

Snowden.

BobMbx on March 11, 2014 at 12:03 PM

Typical of our eleted officials, worried about themselves and their private use network, and the hell with the American people that elected them. We keep hearing, if you are doing nothing wrong you have nothing to worry about. Well what is Feinstein worried about? Self-serving politicans are the downfall of our country.

savage24 on March 11, 2014 at 12:18 PM

Feinstein: CIA snooped on secure Congressional network

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

(gasp)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

dirtseller on March 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM

My only reaction as well, LOL!

bluefox on March 11, 2014 at 12:28 PM

Spying on Feinstein is okay. In fact, it’s a good thing.

InterestedObserver on March 11, 2014 at 12:39 PM

And why shouldn’t congress be spied on if the rest of us are!?’!?!

This whole separate classes thing needs to stop!

KMC1 on March 11, 2014 at 12:55 PM

Let’s stick with the ” Snowden is a traitor ” line and remember that all good R’s and D’s approve of any any and all govt snooping.

Exninja on March 11, 2014 at 12:01 PM

What if the catastrophic damage yet to be unleashed by Snowden are transcripts or possible recordings of our esteemed reps and senators speaking power to the truth? The thought is too delicious to contemplate .. but would explain why these thugs have come on in unison agst Snowden. Most of what he’s disseminated has been of trivial nature about spying on our allies etc. and most of it has been of a DUH nature … of course we’re spying on everybody outside the US … and of course we’re spying on everybody inside the US .. but what has that spying revealed that’s so disasterous for our ruling elites? In their limited and self contained conclaves it might well could be their duplicitous deceit and backroom dealing .. kinda like how Juan McVain and Wymsy Grahamnesty get rated as ‘conservatives’ all the time.

GKChesterton99 on March 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM

Just for fun, I searched “Feinstein defends NSA”. Shoes on the other foot now, eh DiFi?

MikeinPRCA on March 11, 2014 at 2:03 PM

DiFi: Rules for me but not for…WHAT!?!???

MikeinPRCA on March 11, 2014 at 2:05 PM

Hey, maybe we should establish some kind of oversight for the intelligence community. Maybe we could form, like, a committee or something, made up of…I dunno, maybe Congress members or something. I mean, shouldn’t somebody keep an eye on the executive branch or something?

The word you’re looking for, ma’am, is schadenfreude, I believe. How’s it feel when your president is out of control?

DublOh7 on March 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM

That’s noth’in, have you heard about the IRS scandals???

They only care when it “them”…

right2bright on March 11, 2014 at 2:27 PM

So, the CIA did not just hack a Congressional network…THEY HACKED INTO A CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ENGAGING IN AN ON-GOING INVESTIGATION!

HOLY $H!’!TE! Can you say WATERGATE II?

Obama is in the center of no less than 4 On-Going scanadl investigations…His Attorney General has already been caught perpetrating 4 Felony Counts of Perjury and has admitted to ordering the illegal wire-tapping of AP editors, reporters, and their FAMILIES…Patreus – head of the CIA – is reportedly now in trouble for potentially committing Perjury…and now we have the President’s CIA (who had earlier been caught running weapons to Islamic Jihadists in Syria out of Benghazi) is now caught hacking into a Congressional Investigation! They obviously wanted to find out what the Committee had and potentially intended to plant information, make information/evidence dissappear, etc.

This whole situation smacks now of a dangerous rogue, criminal Obama administration that has proven it respects neither the Constitution or law (Holder Perjury, AP wire-tapping, NSA Spying) and that is now attempting to hack into and spy on the Committees that are investigating it!

TO H#LL WITH WATERGATE, THIS IS WAY WORSE THAN WATERGATE!

easyt65 on March 11, 2014 at 2:49 PM

Whoa: Feinstein says CIA claimed it removed docs from the committee-only network at direction of the White House. WH denied.

White sources speaking on condition of anonymity later explained that the CIA removed docs from the committee-only network at direction of the White House Snowden !!!!

PolAgnostic on March 11, 2014 at 2:53 PM

Under the patriot act this is allowed. I sure want blue sky on what Fienstein is doing or not doing.

jake49 on March 11, 2014 at 3:19 PM

OT/ Is this what an impartial SCOTUS judge should “believe”? Does any of it sound like boilerplate leftest catechism? (don’t want to derail the thread, but when I read this it pizzed me off. We’re stuck with this one for life. Kagan is another imo.)

On Monday, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that she believed that women and minorities had to crash the halls of power in order to “change the dialogue in this country.” She said that “money” was the obstacle to women and minorities having a say in government, adding, “we’re going to have to work the political system at the highest level.”

Mimzey on March 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM

Feinstein: CIA Spied on Senate Committee

Published on Mar 11, 2014

The head of the Senate Intelligence Committee is accusing the CIA of criminal activity in improperly searching a computer network set up for lawmakers investigating allegations that the agency used torture in terror investigations. (March 11)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqokbGtThiM

canopfor on March 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM

AP Politics ‏@AP_Politics 1h

AP VIDEO: CIA Director John Brennan denies allegation that his agency hacked into senate computers. http://apne.ws/1g5E2zL
====================================================

CIA Director Denies Senate Hacking Allegations

Published on Mar 11, 2014

During an interview Tuesday morning, CIA Director John Brennan denied allegations by Senator Dianne Feinstein that his agency hacked into senate computers. (March 11)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il7jV27l7pU

canopfor on March 11, 2014 at 3:44 PM

Wait, I was told you shouldn’t worry about this sort of thing, UNLESS you have something to hide.

She didn’t have anything to hide did she? I mean this makes her look guilty doesn’t it?

If you don’t have anything to hide you shouldn’t care who is looking at all your private data, right?

You can trust the government, right?

They’ll only go after data they NEED and it’s wrong to limit them, right?

Only a radical conspiracy lunatic wouldn’t trust the CIA with any data they want anytime they want it, right?

I can keep throwing liberal quotes at this all day long; but I’ll stop. Because I don’t believe any of them.

I’d just like clarification that the liberals never believed this crap either. Can I get that concession?

gekkobear on March 11, 2014 at 4:43 PM

“CIA improperly searched a stand-alone computer network established for Congress”

To me the question is, How many and what other ‘stand-alone computer network established for Congress”, are there that we do not know about?

jpcpt03 on March 11, 2014 at 6:30 PM

She’s afraid the CIA will get a hold of her intimate ‘Di and the Zucchini’ selfies. She sees how the NSA listening to Roberts phone sex made him Barry’s B!tch.

AppraisHer on March 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM

Now she cares about snooping into private matters. Pity the constitution doesn’t matter to us pigeons

jaywemm on March 11, 2014 at 11:16 PM

Sen Feinstein concerned about snooping? Let’s get out the Calipers and measure the noses of both the CIA and Sen to see who have the biggest honkers to snoop with.

MSGTAS on March 12, 2014 at 10:43 AM