Senate GOP to Reid: Stop muzzling a vote on Iranian sanctions

posted at 6:01 pm on February 26, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

Since Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid played some serious defense for the White House at the start of the year and managed to ward off a vote on the largely bipartisan push coming from both Houses to impose the pending threat of tightened sanctions on Iran, the country has been relatively raking it in with the sanctions relief while Tehran’s leaders have been making familiarly rabble-rousing statements behind the scenes. You might think that it’s a pretty reasonable time to circle back to the issue, but according to Reid, you’d be wrong.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and other Republican senators this week have used Senate consideration of a measure dealing with veteran’s benefits to refocus attention on Iran and whether the U.S. should impose new sanctions on Tehran. …

“There’s no excuse for muzzling the Congress on an issue of this importance to our national security, to the security of Israel … and to international stability more broadly,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.), who for months has held off attempts to force a vote on the Iran issue, again criticized Republicans for trying to bring up Iran on ancillary legislation.

“They offered an amendment that has nothing to do with this bill, the veterans bill. It’s partisanship at its best, it’s obstruction at its best,” Mr. Reid said during a floor speech Wednesday morning.

Ugh. If you really want to talk about “partisanship” and “obstruction,” Reid has both of those bases covered with his incessant vote-blocking here. I like the way Sen. Ayotte put it in her response this morning: This proposed bill is just an insurance policy against Iran reneging on their end of the bargain, so what’s the problem? Unfortunately, as Sen. Corker admitted this afternoon, this latest push is probably ill-fated, too, via HuffPo:

The Obama administration has little to worry about, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) suggested Wednesday.

“It doesn’t look to me like we’re going to get a vote,” Corker told several reporters on Capitol Hill. …

“I think Congress weighing in strongly, in some form or fashion, on the biggest foreign policy issue we have underway right now kind of makes sense. It’s kind of what you do when you’re in the United States Senate,” Corker said. “Whether it’s exactly this piece of legislation or whether it’s something else, I think it makes sense for Congress to weigh in.” …

“I think there are very legitimate concerns about the sanctions dissipating, and you never end up with a deal and have a series of rolling agreements,” Corker said. “To us, the most important element is to define what the end has to be,” he added. “As their economy begins to recover, which it is … we’re going to lose the traction that we have on this issue.”

The WFB snagged some vids from this morning’s floor speeches on the topic:

Let me just repeat that a strong bipartisan majority in both houses of Congress agree with this approach. So, there’s simply no good reason for the majority leader to prevent a vote on this crucial legislation. He’s gridlocking the Senate, preventing the Senate from working its will, on a bill that enjoys broad bipartisan support and makes elementary good sense and it the best hope we have to prevent a nuclear armed Iran. There’s no excuse for muzzling the Congress on an issue of this importance to our national security, to the security of Israel, our closest ally in the Middle East, and to international stability more broadly. … This is a rare issue that should unite both parties in common purpose, and there’s no question it would if the majority leader would simply drop his reflexive deference to a president whose foreign policy is focusing on withdrawing from our overseas commitment.

And so all we’re asking for is let’s have a vote on this. This matters enough to the American people, this matters enough to the safety and the future of our children and future generations. This matters enough to the world. It deserves a full debate and it deserves a vote and if you’re against it, you can vote against it. If you’re against it, you can debate against it. We want to hear these arguments and your thoughts but why can’t we vote on it? It deserves a vote, it’s that important.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Arizona GOP state Sen. Steve Yarborough says he defended his anti-gay bill in a meeting with Gov. Jan Brewer – @abc15

davidk on February 26, 2014 at 6:10 PM

Now, how is it that one man can hold up bills in the Senate? I don’t have to say what the other side would be doing if it were Boooooooosh…

HiJack on February 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM

I believe that our Heavenly Father invented those like Harry Reid because he was disappointed in the monkey. I believe that whenever those like Harry Reid deliver any opinion on any matter it will always be an opinion so foolish and so valueless a sort that it can be depended upon to suggest to our Heavenly Father that those like Harry Reid are another disappointment and that they are no considerable improvement upon the monkey.

VorDaj on February 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM

Rubio is right!!!

And Persia will build the bomb!!

Democrats only want to tuck a feather in there caps, that they made Peace with Iran!

But,at what cost!!

canopfor on February 26, 2014 at 6:29 PM

Arizona GOP state Sen. Steve Yarborough says he defended his anti-gay bill in a meeting with Gov. Jan Brewer

davidk on February 26, 2014 at 6:10 PM

I know this is OT but let’s be clear here. There is not an anti-gay bill sitting on Brewer’s desk. This is a bill that defends the rights of those who sincerely and legitmately have problems with sodomite “marriage.” Brewer is about to veto a bill defending religous freedom because of gay bullies. If she thinks that she will be hailed a hero for doing so, she’ll be sorely disappointed. Sodomite bullies will hail the choice, but there will be hell to pay.

Happy Nomad on February 26, 2014 at 6:31 PM

I believe that our Heavenly Father invented Barack Obama because he was disappointed in Pinocchio. I believe that whenever Barack Obama delivers any opine on any matter it will almost always be so filled with half-truths and out right complete lies and so valueless a sort that it can be depended upon to suggest to our Heavenly Father that Barack Obama is an even bigger disappointment and a very large step backwards from even Pinocchio.

VorDaj on February 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM

I believe that our Heavenly Father invented those like Harry Reid because he was disappointed in the monkey.
VorDaj on February 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM

Okay, THAT is FUNNY! I don’t care who you are.

JusDreamin on February 26, 2014 at 6:44 PM

Reid peed and the Senate scuppers ran with the last of his brain cells…

vnvet on February 26, 2014 at 7:55 PM