Video: Beckel goes after White House silence on Christian persecution

posted at 2:41 pm on February 12, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

It’s not just Bob Beckel on The Five demanding more attention from Barack Obama and the White House on the acute issue of the global persecution of Christians, either. Members of Congress wondered aloud yesterday why the Obama administration has not leveraged its diplomacy or considerable American economic might to force players in the Middle East and Africa to stop the persecution. A rare appearance by a Vatican official in Congress attracted long-overdue attention in Washington to the issue:

In a rare appearance on Capitol Hill by a Vatican representative, Archbishop Francis Chullikatt testified Tuesday before a House subcommittee on the “flagrant and widespread persecution” of Christians in the Middle East.

“No Christian is exempt, whether or not he or she is Arab,” Chullikatt said.

Chullikatt was among seven speakers discussing the escalation of threats to Christians. Specifically, testimony focused on underreported assaults, the plight of impacted Christian communities and the need to protect religious freedoms and civil rights.

“Arab Christians, a small but significant community, find themselves the target of constant harassment for no reason other than their religious faith,” Chullikatt said.

This also led to the exchange on The Five, in which Beckel slams the White House for being “silent.” When one panelist notes that not many people know about the issue, Beckel says, “That includes the White House,” and follows up with this shot: “Why the White House and State Department stay silent on this, I do not know.”

Another panelist suggests that Christians have to speak out more about persecution of gays before people will speak out on persecution of Christians:

That’s an absurd formulation. First, the targeting of Christians worldwide is on a much larger scale thanks to the size of the Christian population. Second, Christians do speak out against persecutions of other minorities, including gays and lesbians. Fr. James Martin pointed out yesterday how the Catholic Church speaks out against such persecution, to use one small example among many.

Another suggestion from The Five was to pressure the UN into addressing it, but the UN is more interested in pursuing Christians than protecting them and covering up their own crimes, as Claudia Rosett wrote this weekend:

That’s rich coming from the U.N., which has still not solved its own festering problems of peacekeeper sex abuse, including the rape of minors. Exposing abusers and holding them to account is a great idea. The Vatican has spent years addressing the scandal of its own past handling of such cases. But the U.N. hardly engages in the transparency it is now promoting.

The U.N. releases only generic statistics on violations committed by personnel working under its flag. The U.N. doesn’t share with the public such basic information as the names of the accused or the details of what they did to people the U.N. dispatched them to protect. Blue berets accused of sex crimes are simply sent back to their home countries, where in the majority of cases they drop off the radar.

Though the U.N. has been recording a drop in sex-abuse cases since it began releasing numbers in 2007, the number of alleged instances of rape and exploitation each year still runs into the dozens. (This may understate the realities, given the hurdles to victims coming forward, often in societies in tumult or at war.) From 2007-13, the U.N. reported more than 600 allegations of rape or sexual exploitation, with 354 substantiated—many of them involving minors. The numbers do not convey how ugly some of these cases get. Details can occasionally be gleaned when an incident seeps past the U.N. wall of omerta and makes it into the news, as with the peacekeeper gang rape in 2011 of a Haitian teenager, whose agony was caught on video.

In such matters as sex abuse, it is reasonable to hold the Vatican, or any other organization, to standards higher than the low bar the U.N. sets for itself. But hypocrisy is just one of the problems with this 16-page report on the Holy See, which further assails the Vatican for not subordinating itself wholesale to a much broader U.N. agenda. For example, the report calls for the Vatican to drop its opposition to adolescent abortion and contraception, condone underage homosexuality, and use its “authority” and “influence” to disseminate world-wide a roster of U.N. views and policies that run counter to those of the Catholic Church.

The real issue here is that whatever changes the Vatican and the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics might consider, the U.N. is supremely ill-qualified to serve as a guide.

Indeed. And we’re apparently not interested in using our leverage to adjust that perspective, either. I wonder why.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Why would the Muslim dog eater stand up for Christians…

PatriotRider on February 12, 2014 at 2:44 PM

Let’s just admit we all see the elephant in the room. Why would a muslim president and anti christian cabinent do anything about christians being persecuted?

Skwor on February 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM

Dang. Obama’s prayer breakfast speech already went pffft.

22044 on February 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM

Which religions have lost and which have gained under the Obama Administration?

portlandon on February 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM

It’s clear to me that Obama resents Christians and is probably an atheist.

bluegill on February 12, 2014 at 2:51 PM

Beckel says, “That includes the White House,” and follows up with this shot: “Why the White House and State Department stay silent on this, I do not know.”

If I offered my opinion, I’d be a racist. Or even a raciest racist.

rbj on February 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM

Muslims persecuting Christians? Who knew? I’m sure President Cool will be mad as hell when he finds out.

HiJack on February 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM

WH in Afghanistan, and pretty much all over.

If bored, start at 2:40.

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 2:53 PM

“Somewhat terrorists are now welcome to the USA” — the WH

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

Meanwhile, in other news, Rand Paul just started a class action suit against the corrupt Obama regime, based on the violation of 4th amendment rights…This announced over two hours ago—crickets from HA. Just saying…

lovingmyUSA on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

If obama had a set, alas, the gay one at best, the eunuch at worst, would forbid Karzai to leave with the US billions, and let the Taliban make a football out of the stupid head.

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

There is (mostly) a false equivalency in “persecution”

Gays — being unable to marry (which is an ontological impossibility anyways) is held as a form of persecution

Women — not having access to free abortifacients (e.g. the Pill) is held as a form of persecution

Christian in Muslim lands — Persecution can frequently mean martyrdom, impoverishment by gangs, forcible conversion, etc.

And it’s not like the underground Catholics in China have an easy life either. My wife was classmates of a Chinese priest at Fordham; when he returned to China and was elevated to the episcopate, he was arrested.

But since Obama’s base is more concerned about the “persecution” of the first two groups, the true violence against Christians meets with a deaf ear. I really believe that Obama and his ilk have a Manichean view of the world; they are the servants of the Light, and those who oppose them are sunken into moral darkness and hence deserve to be under persecution…

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

It’s clear to me that Obama resents Christians and is probably an atheist.

bluegill on February 12, 2014 at 2:51 PM

He’s a liberal, right? ‘Nuff said.

HiJack on February 12, 2014 at 2:55 PM

He’s a liberal, right? ‘Nuff said.

HiJack on February 12, 2014 at 2:55 PM

He is NOT a liberal. We are the true liberals, for freedom/liberty for all.

He is a fascist leftist thug, like all the others in DC, here and everywhere.

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 2:55 PM

Beckel says, “That includes the White House,” and follows up with this shot: “Why the White House and State Department stay silent on this, I do not know.”

When you’ve lost Beckel…

HiJack on February 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM

Remember that Obama’s “spiritual mentor” was Jeremiah Wright:

http://youtu.be/JEMZHQsQJ6Y

Obama’s involvement with the church was political and to give himself some authentic black cred.

I still can’t get over how someone who attended sermons at that racist, anti-American church for decades was elected president.

bluegill on February 12, 2014 at 2:58 PM

Because if this administration admits that Christians are the most persecuted group in the world, then they would be conferring “victimhood” status on them, thus making them untouchable by liberal standards.

They have to be able to attack Christians, and be able to make Christians out as oppressors. Reality is screwing up their narrative. Again.

Iblis on February 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

B. Hussein Obama
“Dreams of My Father” and “Audacity of Hope”

Apparently Christians not being persecuted is a ugly political wind for Muslims, hence Obama’s silence.

Dugger on February 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM

I doubt the WH is silent on this. Truth be told they’re probably breaking out the party hats and cheering when no one is around.

Kataklysmic on February 12, 2014 at 3:02 PM

It’s clear to me that Obama resents Christians and is probably an atheist.

bluegill on February 12, 2014 at 2:51 PM

I think it’s pretty clear that he’s a Muslim in his heart – the question to me is whether or not he thinks he’s Allah himself…

Anti-Control on February 12, 2014 at 3:02 PM

OT – Why is azzhole obama visiting Rancho Mirage on Valentine’s day. Does he have a gay friend there?

How does Michelette feel about this?

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM

Violence against Christians is supported by liberals.

The Notorious G.O.P on February 12, 2014 at 3:04 PM

Because The One is not a Christian, but a Socialist. True Believer…

vnvet on February 12, 2014 at 3:04 PM

This also led to the exchange on The Five, in which Beckel slams the White House for being “silent.” When one panelist notes that not many people know about the issue, Beckel says, “That includes the White House,” and follows up with this shot: “Why the White House and State Department stay silent on this, I do not know.”

Because the occupant of the White House prefers to express his Muslim faith, the Wright way.

Steve Z on February 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM

Another panelist suggests that Christians have to speak out more about persecution of gays before people will speak out on persecution of Christians:

Why does everything have to be about gays 24/7? Rhetorical question, but it is getting tiresome.

Johnnyreb on February 12, 2014 at 3:11 PM

Beckel says, “That includes the White House,” and follows up with this shot: “Why the White House and State Department stay silent on this, I do not know.”

Dead christians can’t oppose the almighty state.

nobar on February 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM

Meanwhile, in other news, Rand Paul just started a class action suit against the corrupt Obama regime, based on the violation of 4th amendment rights…This announced over two hours ago—crickets from HA. Just saying…

lovingmyUSA on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

Er…is this what you’re referring to?
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/02/11/rand-paul-ken-cuccinelli-and-i-are-suing-obama-and-the-nsa-tomorrow-on-fourth-amendment-grounds/
‘Cause HA covered this yesterday.

With regards to Christian persecution, I don’t see Obama getting worked up about it. He’s just as likely to indulge in it. I don’t care how much of a Christian he poses himself to be–his actions speak louder than words, and his support for infanticide during his time as a senator screams volumes concerning his leftist beliefs.

Still, I’m glad this is getting coverage, and of all people–for Bob Beckel to be concerned! That surprises me.

theotherone on February 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM

Indeed. And we’re apparently not interested in using our leverage to adjust that perspective, either. I wonder why.

We tend to follow our leaders. Catholicism, my religion, is particularly about top down governmental structure, whether we’re talking church or national governance.

And our religious leaders have been more interested in promoting socialism and much less interested in championing life, marriage and liberty.

Terribly sad, but there it is.

My Catholic friends don’t like to talk about it, let alone take much action, not even willing to raise the issue with their priest or our bishop’s office.

The media doesn’t care, our government leaders don’t care, and our church leaders don’t care. For them it’s much more about redistribution, government coerced ‘charity’, etc.

shinty on February 12, 2014 at 3:15 PM

Meanwhile, in other news, Rand Paul just started a class action suit against the corrupt Obama regime, based on the violation of 4th amendment rights…This announced over two hours ago—crickets from HA. Just saying…

lovingmyUSA on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

HA covered it more than 2 hours ago: http://hotair.com/archives/2014/02/11/rand-paul-ken-cuccinelli-and-i-are-suing-obama-and-the-nsa-tomorrow-on-fourth-amendment-grounds/

Foxhound on February 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM

Dang. Obama’s prayer breakfast speech already went pffft.

22044 on February 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM

As do all of Dog Eater’s shameless lies. It’s the truth that would stick, but we have yet to hear any of that from him.

NOMOBO on February 12, 2014 at 3:19 PM

theotherone on February 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM

Thanks, my apologies to HA, I didn’t see this had been covered…I looked, but apparently I need new contacts–heh

lovingmyUSA on February 12, 2014 at 3:19 PM

Fascists cannot tolerate any other center of authority or influence outside of themselves. This puts them at odds with Christians, who should see their relationship with God through Jesus Christ as of paramount importance.

Therefore, it makes sense that these fascists would happily watch Christians be persecuted overseas in the hope that we in America will learn our place…which is to sit quietly in our churches and do as we are told.

What is happening is ugly and I fear it will become even uglier, both overseas and here. However it has been foretold…and it will fail. Sorry, fascists but Christ wins.

Micah68 on February 12, 2014 at 3:21 PM

I still can’t get over how someone who attended sermons at that racist, anti-American church for decades was elected president.

bluegill on February 12, 2014 at 2:58 PM

We were hoodwinked! Bamboozled! Well, not you and I, per se, but evidently by well over half the population…

yubley on February 12, 2014 at 3:21 PM

We all know the answer to Beckel’s question. Perhaps his asking it is an attempt to deflect from the obvious answer:
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=my+muslim+faith&FORM=VIRE2#view=detail&mid=D08DFBF5CABC69F3F229D08DFBF5CABC69F3F229

GaltBlvnAtty on February 12, 2014 at 3:24 PM

And it’s not like the underground Catholics in China have an easy life either. My wife was classmates of a Chinese priest at Fordham; when he returned to China and was elevated to the episcopate, he was arrested.

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM

Here’s one of many historical reasons the government of China is suspicious of religious groups

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 3:24 PM

When you’ve lost Beckel…

HiJack on February 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM

…you end up with more for yourself and your friends to drink.

CurtZHP on February 12, 2014 at 3:26 PM

“Why the White House and State Department stay silent on this, I do not know.”

The answer, Bob, is that the Obama administration generally and the President in particular DON’T GIVE A CRAP about the persecution of Christians anywhere in the world, because caring about such things pisses off the left wingers who write his campaign checks and, far more importantly, takes time and effort away from the fundamental transformation of the United States.

Sacramento on February 12, 2014 at 3:27 PM

OT – Why is azzhole obama visiting Rancho Mirage on Valentine’s day. Does he have a gay friend there?

How does Michelette feel about this?

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM

Golf?

crankyoldlady on February 12, 2014 at 3:29 PM

Why is anyone surprised that the party that booed God at their national convention turns a blind eye to the persecution of Christians?

Yankee Doodle on February 12, 2014 at 3:33 PM

Beckel will get back in line soon … very soon.

Carnac on February 12, 2014 at 3:33 PM

Another panelist suggests that Christians have to speak out more about persecution of gays before people will speak out on persecution of Christians

Does this mean if we start aggressively pursing gays and lopping of their heads we’ll start to get attention?

el hombre on February 12, 2014 at 3:36 PM

Here’s one of many historical reasons the government of China is suspicious of religious groups…

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 3:24 PM

Oh, cool! Then we should be REALLY suspicious of atheists who are in positions of power of government, given the history of the Reign of Terror, the various communist movements (including China…how many perished in the Laogai?), etc. Expressly atheistic governments have a pretty consistent track record of mass murder, so the suspicion that Christians have of atheists is well-justified.

/sarc (mostly)

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 3:37 PM

It isn’t just Christians. They are actively trying to wipe out Israel.

crankyoldlady on February 12, 2014 at 3:38 PM

…you end up with more for yourself and your friends to drink.

CurtZHP on February 12, 2014 at 3:26 PM

Also…..

I’m not the only soul who’s accused of hit and run
Tire tracks all across your back
I can see you had your fun

HonestLib on February 12, 2014 at 3:38 PM

Beckel goes on these little, fake mini-tantrums to brand himself as a humanist every so often. These fake rage episodes are comical. There isn’t a sincere bone in his body, other than his statist needs. It is all about marketing himself as the gentle giant who is roused to rage by *fill in the blank*

butch on February 12, 2014 at 3:41 PM

OT – Why is azzhole obama visiting Rancho Mirage on Valentine’s day. Does he have a gay friend there?

How does Michelette feel about this?

Schadenfreude on February 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM

She has to be fuming over the Beyonce stories: http://www.inquisitr.com/1129906/obama-and-beyonce-beyond-belief-that-they-are-having-an-affair/

slickwillie2001 on February 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM

The president of the USA is not concerned and has no empathy of Christians behind the Islamic or Communist Curtain. In no time before in our history has a president given so much support to Islamic Jihad including supplying billions of tax dollars, heavy armaments and stealthy military support by American forces. The president plays the greatest trick by making people believe that he does not know that these horrific, genocidal conditions exist.

Hening on February 12, 2014 at 3:48 PM

Why is Shannon Bream wearing a Starfleet uniform?

TX-eye on February 12, 2014 at 3:49 PM

However it has been foretold…and it will fail. Sorry, fascists but Christ wins.

Micah68 on February 12, 2014 at 3:21 PM

Amen. Old Christian saying: “I’ve read the end of the Book…and we win.”

theotherone on February 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM

Oh, cool! Then we should be REALLY suspicious of atheists who are in positions of power of government, given the history of the Reign of Terror, the various communist movements (including China…how many perished in the Laogai?), etc. Expressly atheistic governments have a pretty consistent track record of mass murder, so the suspicion that Christians have of atheists is well-justified.

/sarc (mostly)

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 3:37 PM

As I said, one of many examples. China has long recognized the Christian ‘missionaries’ as tools of imperialism. They’ve long been aware of the colonial history Africa, the Americas, etc.

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 4:02 PM

HUSSEIN only intervenes when his muslim brothers are in danger. He has no use for Christians because we won’t worship him.

ConstantineXI on February 12, 2014 at 4:17 PM

I’m still waiting for the defense of atheists…

And the scare quotes around missionaries are sadly misplaced. Why are they there? Are you implying, for example, the Jesuit martyrs Isaac Jogues, Jean de Brebeuf, etc., were merely “tools of imperialism”? Or the thousands of other martyrs who have died in spreading the Gospel? Please. Imperialists may have spread with the Gospel, and there are (too many) cases in which Christianity has been used in conjunction with this…but imperialism (i.e. the powerful taking advantage of the weaker) is far older than the Christian missionary movement. All forms of inculturation can be seek as imperialistic, including ones toward capitalism.

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 4:23 PM

Do I really have this right?

The solution to the problem of Islamists (who want to throw gays off the tops of buildings) persecuting Christians is for the Christians to speak out in FAVOR of gay rights.

Just checking.

Pythagoras on February 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM

Imperialists may have spread with the Gospel, and there are (too many) cases in which Christianity has been used in conjunction with this…

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 4:23 PM

Just coincidence? Or maybe you’ve got it backwards.

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 4:36 PM

Ah, I see…imperialism NEVER EXISTED prior to the Gospel! Genius!

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 4:40 PM

Of course it did. I’m not claiming that it didn’t.

I’m simply saying Christian missionaries have been a tool of imperialism and are recognized as such by China.

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM

Why would a muslim swine eater act to protect Christians?

jake49 on February 12, 2014 at 5:01 PM

A tool in the sense that any sort of inculturation can be a tool. By this reasoning, one might as well argue that capitalism has been a tool of imperialism. Or socialism. Or atheism. Or movements in favor of free speech. As long as we agree on this, I don’t think that we are disagreeing on much.

But I still haven’t heard the defense of atheists in our holy, God-given government that they are trying to subvert to an unholy amalgamation of Satanism, vegetarianism, eco-spiritualism, one-world-governmentism and technocratic Luddism! Darnit! (need to take meds now) :-)

(99% joking…but ONLY 99%!)

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 5:13 PM

Why would we expect the Obama administration to make any statement condemning the persecution of a group that they see has a hindrance to their agenda.

Zaire67 on February 12, 2014 at 5:37 PM

Second, Christians do speak out against persecutions of other minorities, including gays and lesbians.

What a joke. Christians are usually the people doing the persecuting.

triple on February 12, 2014 at 5:39 PM

Especially in the middle east right triple?

Murphy9 on February 12, 2014 at 5:44 PM

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 4:02 PM

Communist sympathizer and apologist. Not surprised.

What a joke. Christians are usually the people doing the persecuting.

triple on February 12, 2014 at 5:39 PM

You should have your head checked for brain activity.

WHere you been btw ? Taking an Obamacare hiatus? Hilarious. Diwmit. .

CWchangedhisNicagain on February 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM

Communist sympathizer and apologist. Not surprised.

CWchangedhisNicagain on February 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM

Akaname never capable of bringing an actual counter-argument. Not surprised.

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 6:27 PM

It’s easy, Bob. Obama hates Christians, too.

Laura Castellano on February 12, 2014 at 6:29 PM

And again, triple doesn’t get it. He (she?) cannot distinguish between “persecution” (not being able to “marry”! not getting free contraception!) and persecution (murder, forced conversion). For triple, when the first happens to groups he likes, it’s an outrage; when the latter happens to Christians, it’s no big deal.

The “war on women” doesn’t have a body count in the thousands, bub. The modern war on Christians does.

philosoph0123 on February 12, 2014 at 7:23 PM

But but Michael Sam is so courageous for coming out! Nah he’s not..real courage is being a Christian in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Somalia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea and other Muslim dominated countries..the common denominator in the vast majority of these countries? They are ruled by Islam

John 15:18 – If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before [it hated] you.

Matthew 5:44 – But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Jeremiah 20:11 But the LORD is with me as a mighty terrible one: therefore my persecutors shall stumble, and they shall not prevail: they shall be greatly ashamed; for they shall not prosper: their everlasting confusion shall never be forgotten.

Romans 8:35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?

sadsushi on February 12, 2014 at 7:55 PM

What a joke. Christians are usually the people doing the persecuting.

triple on February 12, 2014 at 5:39 PM

Any data to back that up or are you a typical fact-less fascist?

Micah68 on February 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM

I wonder why.

Matthew 7:16

dentalque on February 12, 2014 at 8:31 PM

What a joke. Christians are usually the people doing the persecuting.

triple on February 12, 2014 at 5:39 PM

Any data to back that up or are you a typical fact-less fascist?

Micah68 on February 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM

By “persecuting”, she means not providing them with free birth control options on their employee health care plans, so…

slickwillie2001 on February 12, 2014 at 8:34 PM

DarkCurrent on February 12, 2014 at 4:02 PM

Mr Anecdotal. You’re hilarious. Such strong arguments you bring. /

If you’re the standard I am well above average….but hey thanks for playing.

CWchangedhisNicagain on February 12, 2014 at 8:41 PM

Hey the other day he claimed Jesus as Lord. I really think he was talking about Jesus (haysoos) the Mexican illegal that he admired because it couldn’t be the Lord of all. Obama hates whites, Israel and babies in the womb and pretty much everything else that goes along with being a follower of Christ. If he doesn’t care about the most innocent in the womb, if he didn’t care about the Benghazi 4, if he doesn’t care about our military etc etc etc. Why would we think he would care about Christians in harms way. He is way too busy protecting the muslim brotherhood.

crosshugger on February 12, 2014 at 9:02 PM

The problem may be that the Obama administration doesn’t want to stir up the Christian persecution issue because the rebels in Syria — the ones we supposedly support — are Christian persecutors. The Russian Orthodox Church has been on Putin for a long time to support the Assad regime over these Christian persecutors.

MaxMBJ on February 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM